Mymaridae
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.172335 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3A92F5B0-E879-4D09-BBD9-2F7B9B1D6E53 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6263483 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B187FB-4C4B-A964-B553-FD73C279FB82 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Mymaridae |
status |
|
Key to genera and species of Mymaridae , egg parasitoids of Proconiini ( Cicadellidae ) in the Nearctic region
1 Tarsi 4 segmented ......................................................................................................... 2
Tarsi 5 segmented ( Gonatocerus Nees ) ....................................................................... 4
2 Metasoma distinctly petiolate; forewing blade with dark bands and modified setae ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1, 2. 1 ) ............................................................................. Acmopolynema sema Schauff
Metasoma sessile ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1, 2. 1 ); forewing blade without dark bands or modified setae ( Anagrus Haliday ) ........................................................................................................ 3
3 Forewing narrow ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1, 2. 1 ), 8.0– 9.5 x as long as wide; clava of female antenna with 5 longitudinal sensilla ...................................................................... Anagrus epos Girault
Forewing wide, 4.5–4.9 x as long as wide; clava of female antenna with 6 longitudinal sensilla .............................................................. Anagrus stethynioides S. Triapitsyn
4 Female (flagellum clavate, consisting of 8 segmented funicle and 1 segmented clava) ....................................................................................................................................... 5
Male (flagellum filiform, 11 segmented) ................................................................... 15
5 Propodeum distinctly rugose lateral to submedial carinae ( Figs 4 View FIGURES 3, 4 , 8 View FIGURES 5 – 8 , 11 View FIGURES 9 – 13 ) ( morrilli subgroup) ...................................................................................................................... 6
Propodeum smooth lateral to submedial carinae (as in Fig. 23 View FIGURES 21 – 24 ) (ater subgroup) ........ 8
6 Body mostly dark brown to black; F 5 brown basally and whitish or light brownish apically, F 6 whitishlight brownish ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 3, 4 ) ...................... G. morgani S. Triapitsyn, sp. n.
Body mostly yellowbrown; both F 5 and F 6 white (as in Fig. 10 View FIGURES 9 – 13 ) .............................. 7
7 Propodeum with submedial carinae parallel and closer to each other ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 5 – 8 ) .............. ........................................................................................................ G. morrilli (Howard)
Propodeum with submedial carinae curved and more apart from each other ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 9 – 13 ). ................................................................................ G. walkerjonesi S. Triapitsyn, sp. n.
8 Forewing with cubital row of microtrichia complete, extending to base of marginal vein ( Figs 16, 17 View FIGURES 15 – 17 , 24 View FIGURES 21 – 24 , 27 View FIGURES 26 – 28 ) ............................................................................................. 9
Forewing with cubital row of microtrichia incomplete, not extending to base of marginal vein (no microtrichia behind marginal vein, at most a few microtrichia just behind apex of venation) ( Figs 28 View FIGURES 26 – 28 , 30) ...................................................................... 13
9 F 5 –F 7 distinctly lighter than other funicle segments ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 15 – 17 ) ...... G. atriclavus Girault
F 5 –F 7 more or less concolorous with other funicle segments ................................... 10
10 Forewing blade with a narrow, distinct brown fascia extending from stigmal vein to hind margin ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 15 – 17 ) ....................................................................... G. fasciatus Girault
Forewing blade without such a fascia or slightly, more or less uniformly, infumated ... ..................................................................................................................................... 11
11 Head and mesosoma mostly yellow, with some brown ( Fig. 20 View FIGURE 20 ) .. G. triguttatus Girault
Head and mesosoma mostly dark brown (as in Fig. 25 View FIGURE 25 ) except mesosomal sternum with a distinct, welldefined yellow streak between each fore and middle coxae ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 21 – 24 ) ............................................................................................................................... 12
12 F 1 without longitudinal sensilla ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 21 – 24 ); forewing almost hyaline, at most with a faint, uniform brownish tinge ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 21 – 24 ) ........................................... G. ashmeadi Girault
F 1 usually with 2 longitudinal sensilla ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 26 – 28 ), rarely with 1 sensillum; forewing blade notably infuscated beyond venation, more conspicuously so behind tip of venation ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 26 – 28 ) .................................................................................... G. uat S. Triapitsyn
13 Forewing blade with a distinct infumate spot just beyond apex of venation ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 26 – 28 ) .. ................................................................................................... G. novifasciatus Girault
Forewing blade without infumate spot (as in Fig. 30) (the incomptus / impar complex) ..................................................................................................................................... 14
14 F 3 –F 8 each with 2 longitudinal sensilla (Fig. 29) ........................... G. incomptus Huber
At least one funicle segment among F 3 –F 6 without longitudinal sensilla or only with 1 sensillum, in different combinations (Figs 31–34) ......................................................... ............................................................. G. impar Huber, G. sp(p). near incomptus / impar
15 Propodeum distinctly rugose lateral to submedial carinae ( Figs 4 View FIGURES 3, 4 , 8 View FIGURES 5 – 8 , 11 View FIGURES 9 – 13 ) ( morrilli subgroup) .................................................................................................................... 16
Propodeum smooth lateral to submedial carinae (as in Fig. 23 View FIGURES 21 – 24 ) (ater subgroup) ...... 18
16 Mesosoma dark brown to black; forewing blade hyaline (as in Fig. 5 View FIGURES 5 – 8 ) ......................... ....................................................................................... G. morgani S. Triapitsyn, sp. n.
Mesosoma yellowishbrown; forewing blade with an infumate spot (sometimes inconspicuous) just beyond venation (as in Fig. 12 View FIGURES 9 – 13 ) ........................................................... 17
17 Propodeum with submedial carinae parallel and closer to each other (as in Fig. 8 View FIGURES 5 – 8 ); apodeme of genital sternite almost as long as aedeagal apodemes ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 9 – 13 ) ......................... ........................................................................................................ G. morrilli (Howard)
Propodeum with submedial carinae curved and more apart from each other (as in Fig. 11 View FIGURES 9 – 13 ); apodeme of genital sternite notably longer than aedeagal apodemes ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 ) ...... ................................................................................ G. walkerjonesi S. Triapitsyn, sp. n.
18 Forewing with cubital row of microtrichia complete, extending to base of marginal vein ( Figs 16, 17 View FIGURES 15 – 17 , 24 View FIGURES 21 – 24 , 27 View FIGURES 26 – 28 ) ........................................................................................... 19
Forewing with cubital row of microtrichia incomplete, not extending to base of marginal vein (no microtrichia behind marginal vein, at most a few microtrichia just behind apex of venation) (as in Figs 28 View FIGURES 26 – 28 , 30) .............................................................. 23
19 Forewing blade with a narrow, distinct brown fascia extending from stigmal vein to hind margin (as in Fig. 17 View FIGURES 15 – 17 ) ............................................................... G. fasciatus Girault
Forewing blade without such a fascia or slightly, more or less uniformly, infumated 20
20 Mesosoma dorsally yelloworange or light brown to brown ..................................... 21
Mesosoma completely dark brown ............................................................................ 22
21 Mesosoma dorsally yelloworange, with some brown ................... G. triguttatus Girault
Mesosoma dorsally light brown to brown, with some dark brown G. atriclavus Girault
22 Forewing almost hyaline, at most with a faint, uniform brownish tinge (as in Fig. 24 View FIGURES 21 – 24 ) (widespread in southeastern USA, southern and southcentral California, as well as in northeastern Mexico (Nuevo León and Tamaulipas North of [and including] Ciudad Victoria) .......................................................................................... G. ashmeadi Girault
Forewing blade notably infuscated beyond venation, more conspicuously so behind tip of venation (as in Fig. 27 View FIGURES 26 – 28 ) (in the Nearctic region, occurring only in the southernmost Nearctic part of Tamaulipas, Mexico, South of [but excluding] Ciudad Victoria) ........ .......................................................................................................... G. uat S. Triapitsyn
23 Forewing blade with a distinct infumate spot just beyond apex of venation, not reaching anterior margin (as in Fig. 28 View FIGURES 26 – 28 ) ............................................. G. novifasciatus Girault
Forewing blade hyaline, without infumate spot (as in Fig. 30) (the incomptus / impar complex) ........... G. incomptus Huber, G. i m p a r Huber, G. sp(p). near incomptus / impar
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.