Amasa brevipennis ( Schedl, 1971 )
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5194.2.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C6F3069F-6EC1-4FAC-8870-FC0B53BD45EF |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7147116 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B187C9-3251-FFBE-69D9-04FA6CA5F9C4 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Amasa brevipennis ( Schedl, 1971 ) |
| status |
|
Amasa brevipennis ( Schedl, 1971) stat. res.
Xyleborus brevipennis Schedl, 1971: 378 View in CoL .
Remarks. This species was previously considered a synonym of A. schlichii ( Stebbing, 1914) by Wood (1989). Amasa brevipennis is very similar in appearance to A. striatotruncata ( Schedl, 1971) which until recently was also considered a synonym of A. schlichii ( Smith et al. 2020b) . The holotype of X. brevipennis (NHMUK) and a paralectotype of X. striatotruncatus (NHMUK) were directly compared by SMS. Amasa brevipennis can be distinguished from A. striatotruncata by the following combination of characters ( A. brevipennis given first): declivital interstriae punctate and unarmed vs. interstriae impunctate and granulate on apical half of interstriae 1; all interstriae uniformly convex vs declivital interstriae 1 feebly inflated; circumdeclivital ring smooth and unarmed vs circumdeclivital ring with weakly serrate margin on apical third.
Distribution. East Malaysia.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Amasa brevipennis ( Schedl, 1971 )
| Smith, Sarah M., Beaver, Roger A. & Sittichaya, Wisut 2022 |
Xyleborus brevipennis
| Schedl, K. E. 1971: 378 |