Hymenophyllum digitatum (Sw.) Fosberg

Dubuisson, Jean-Yves, Pechon, Timothée Le, Bauret, Lucie, Rouhan, Germinal, Reeb, Catherine, Boucheron-Dubuisson, Elodie, Selosse, Marc-André, Chaussidon, Cécile, Dajoz, Isabelle, Pynee, Kersley, Grangaud, Edmond, Robert, Yannis, Tamon, Jean- Maurice & Hennequin, Sabine, 2018, Disentangling the diversity and taxonomy of Hymenophyllaceae (Hymenophyllales, Polypodiidae) in the Mascarene archipelago, with ecological implications, Phytotaxa 375 (1), pp. 1-58 : 32-33

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.375.1.1

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B0A579-7437-9675-25DE-FB2CFC716062

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Hymenophyllum digitatum (Sw.) Fosberg
status

 

20. Hymenophyllum digitatum (Sw.) Fosberg View in CoL ( Fosberg & Sachet 1980: 1), Fig. 15E–G View FIGURE 15

Trichomanes digitatum Sw. View in CoL ( Swartz 1806: 370). ≡ Gonocormus digitatus (Sw.) Prantl View in CoL ( Prantl 1875: 51). ≡ Microtrichomanes digitatum (Sw.) Copel. View in CoL ( Copeland 1938: 36). ≡ Crepidomanes digitatum (Sw.) K.Iwats. View in CoL ( Iwatsuki 1984: 175). Type:—‘Habitat in Ins. Franciae et Borboniae’, without date, without collector s.n. (holotype S?, not located). Note: a potential type is kept at P, L.-M.A. du Petit-Thouars s.n. (P00064999!).

= Trichomames digitatum Poir. ( Poiret 1808: 70), nom. illeg. Type:— MADAGASCAR. ‘Ile de Madagascar’, without date, L.-M.A. du Petit-Thouars s.n. (lectotype P, P00612304!, here designated)

= Trichomanes lanceum Willd. (Willdenow 1810: 500). ≡ Trichomanes loreum Bory (Bory 1833: 79), nom. illeg. Type:— LA REUNION. ‘Ile de Bourbon’, without date, J.B.G.M. Bory de St.-Vincent s.n. (lectotype B, BW 20 208010!, here designated; isolectotype P, P 04022563!). Note: Bory (1833: 78) proposed to rename T. lanceum as T. loreum because he considered that the concerned species does not exhibit significant lanceolate fronds and that his name was the first he has chosen before the Willdenow’s publication. However such proposition is not valid, and the Willdenow’s name, based on the same type specimen, keeps the priority and validity.

= Trichomanes piliferum Alderw. (van Alderwerelt van Rosenburgh 1922: 225). Type:—JAVA. Buitenzorg, Mt. Salak, November 1920, van den Brink 4116 (not located).

= Trichomanes taeniatum Copel. View in CoL ( Copeland 1932: 6, pl. 2). ≡ Microtrichomanes taeniatum (Copel.) Copel. View in CoL ( Copeland 1938: 37). Type:— TAHITI. Pare, Fautaua, 13 May 1930, M.L. Grant 3561 (holotype US, US 00134628!).

= Trichomanes digitatum Sw. var. uluguruense Reimers View in CoL ( Reimers 1933: 912). Type :— TANZANIA. ‘ Uluguru-Gebirge : NW., Bondua’, 25 November 1932, H.J. Schlieben 3028 (holotype B, BW 20 0104376!; isotype B, BW 20 0104375!, BR, BR0000013204945 !, BR0000013204952 !).

= Hymenophyllum alternatum Fosberg View in CoL ( Fosberg 1950: 135), based on Trichomanes dichotomum Kunze View in CoL ( Kunze 1847: 302, nom. nud.; 1848: 285), nom. illeg. ≡ Gonocormus dichotomus (Kunze) Prantl View in CoL ( Prantl 1875: 51). ≡ Microtrichomanes dichotomum (Kunze) Copel. View in CoL ( Copeland 1938: 36). Type:—JAVA. Salak, November 1843, H. Zöllinger 1707 (type P, P00624455!).

Note: Tardieu-Blot (1951) also cites Trichomanes blumei Hassk. View in CoL as a synonym, but despite information provided by Tropicos and IPNI, we did not succeed in finding any publication from Hasskarl including the description of the species. The only study we found on ferns by Hasskarl (published in 1856-1857) concerns Gleicheniaceae View in CoL and tree-ferns from Java ( Hasskarl 1856).

Short description—Epiphytic; long-creeping filiform rhizomes, bearing sparsely distributed roots and long reddish-brown trichomes, and widely separated pending fronds; fronds with filiform wingless stipes, up to 5 cm long, palmate to mostly digitate, bearing marginal isolated minute black hairs ( Fig. 15F View FIGURE 15 ), quite rare to absent on old leaves / specimens; sori few, terminal on most-apical segments, with a well-developed campanulate part, two lateral veinlets and a dilated bilabiate mouth; receptacle included to exerted at full maturity ( Fig. 15G View FIGURE 15 ).

Global distribution—East tropical Africa to Pacific Islands.

Current distribution in Mascarenes— La Réunion, Mauritius (quite rare on the island).

Ecology—Usually epiphytic on the Mascarenes (reported as mostly lithophytic in Asia) on tree-trunks in lowland to montane rainforests (400–1,700 m).

Representative specimens examined— MAURITIUS. Without locality, without date, F. W. Sieber s.n. ( P04022565 ) ; Brise Fer, December 2012, K. Pynee et al. s.n. ( MAU 0009345 About MAU ) ; Rivière du Poste, March 2012, K. Pynee et al. s.n. ( MAU 0011494 About MAU ) ; Mt Cocotte , October 2012, K. Pynee et al. s.n. ( MAU 0011914 About MAU ) ; Plaine Paul, January 2013, K. Pynee et al. s.n. ( MAU 0012600 About MAU ) ; Pétrin, February 2016, K. Pynee et al. s.n. ( MAU 0017695 About MAU ) .

LA RÉUNION. Without locality, 1831, C. Bélanger s.n. ( P0422564 ) ; Plaine des Palmistes , July 1875, M. G. de L’Isle 354 ( P00065000 ) ; Roche écrite, April 2005, T. Janssen et al. 2750 ( P00590831 ) .

Note— Hymenophyllum digitatum is the only Hymenophyllum species on the Mascarenes and in the western Indian Ocean that has sori with a developed campanulate part ( Fig. 15G View FIGURE 15 ), a feature that usually characterizes trichomanoids. This explains that most of the described related species were first placed in Trichomanes and that the Mascarenan species is named T. digitatum in Tardieu-Blot (1951, 2008). The taxonomic position of this species and relatives has actually been questionable and discussed for a long time. Copeland (1938) included these species in his genus Microtrichomanes (Mett.) Copel. , based on Microtrichomanes Mett. ( Mettenius 1864: 413, 414), considering such a genus as intermediate between Hymenophyllum and traditional Trichomanes (currently trichomanoids). The species actually combines Trichomanes -like sori and Hymenophyllum -like gross habit. Ebihara et al. (2004) nevertheless clearly demonstrated that most Microtrichomanes species, including traditional T. digitatum , belong to Hymenophyllum and more specifically to subgenus Sphaerocionium . Except for the sorus shape, Microtrichomanes taxa share with the other species of Sphaerocionium a laminar marginal indumentum, even if reduced.

F

Field Museum of Natural History, Botany Department

W

Naturhistorisches Museum Wien

K

Royal Botanic Gardens

C

University of Copenhagen

M

Botanische Staatssammlung München

G

Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève

T

Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics

Kingdom

Plantae

Phylum

Tracheophyta

Class

Polypodiopsida

Order

Hymenophyllales

Family

Hymenophyllaceae

Genus

Hymenophyllum

Loc

Hymenophyllum digitatum (Sw.) Fosberg

Dubuisson, Jean-Yves, Pechon, Timothée Le, Bauret, Lucie, Rouhan, Germinal, Reeb, Catherine, Boucheron-Dubuisson, Elodie, Selosse, Marc-André, Chaussidon, Cécile, Dajoz, Isabelle, Pynee, Kersley, Grangaud, Edmond, Robert, Yannis, Tamon, Jean- Maurice & Hennequin, Sabine 2018
2018
Loc

Hymenophyllum alternatum

Fosberg, F. R. 1950: 135
Copeland, E. B. 1938: 36
Prantl, K. A. E. 1875: 51
Kunze, G. 1847: 302
1950
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF