Hottentotta Birula, 1908

Kovařík, František & Lowe, Graeme, 2021, Scorpions of the Horn of Africa (Arachnida: Scorpiones). Part XXVI. Records of Hottentotta polystictus (Pocock, 1896), with descriptions of H. haudensis sp. n. and H. nigrimontanus sp. n. (Buthidae) from Somaliland, Euscorpius 330, pp. 1-28 : 1-3

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5741758

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8BF94E81-135A-46E9-90D5-96059074C787

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B08787-BF75-FFF7-F8E7-B420FD75C088

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Hottentotta Birula, 1908
status

 

Genus Hottentotta Birula, 1908 View in CoL

( Figures 1–150 View Figures 1–2 View Figures 3–6 View Figures 7–14 View Figures 15–22 View Figures 23–43 View Figures 44–45 View Figures 46–49 View Figures 50–59 View Figures 60–67 View Figures 68–88 View Figures 89–90 View Figures 91–94 View Figures 95–104 View Figures 105–112 View Figures 113–131 View Figures 132–133 View Figures 134–135 View Figures 136–137 View Figures 138–139 View Figures 140–146 View Figures 147–150 , Tables 1–2) http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:71BE5C50-

A22A-4F06-9B54-449B203AD78F

Hottentotta: Fet & Lowe, 2000: 133–144 (complete reference and synonymy list until 1998); KovařÍk & Ojanguren Affilastro, 2013: 159–180, figs. 942–1250 (complete reference and synonymy list until 2013); KovařÍk et al., 2018b: 1–14, figs. 1–76, tab. 1; KovařÍk et al., 2019c: 1–30, figs. 2, 5–178, tabs. 1–3.

TYPE SPECIES. Scorpio hottentotta Fabricius, 1787 .

DIAGNOSIS. Medium to large buthids, adults 27–130 mm. Carapace subrectangular, with distinct carinae, entire dorsal surface nearly planar, weakly emarginate anteriorly; ocular tubercle with well-developed median eyes; five pairs of lateral eyes in ‘ type 5’ pattern (Loria & Prendini, 2014). Sternum type 1 (Soleglad & Fet, 2003), triangular in shape. Pectines long, pectinal tooth counts ♂ 16–43, ♀ 13–38, fulcra present. Hemispermatophore flagelliform, capsule with 3-lobed sperm hemiduct and hook-like basal lobe, flagellum folded with pars recta and pars reflecta, pars recta arising from base of sperm hemiduct, trunk elongate. Tergites I–VI granular, with three carinae; tergite VII with 5 carinae. Sternite III with two granulated lateral stridulatory areas, which may be reduced in some species (e. g. in H. pachyurus and H. trilineatus ). Sternites III–IV with slit-like spiracles. Metasoma elongate, segment I with 10 carinae, segments II-IV with 8–10 carinae; ventrolateral carinae of metasoma V with granules more or less equal in size, never lobate; posterior margins of tergite VII and metasoma I–III with fine fringes of microsetae. Telson vesicle bulbous, coarsely and finely granulate, without subaculear denticle. Chelicerae with typical buthid pattern of dentition (Vachon, 1963), fixed finger armed with two denticles on ventral surface. Pedipalps orthobothriotaxic, type A-β (Vachon, 1974, 1975), femur petite d 2 dorsal, patella trichobothrium d 3 located between dorsomedian and dorsointernal carinae; chela db usually located between est and et, or level with est, rarely between est and esb; chela eb located clearly on pedipalp fixed finger. Dentate margin of pedipalp chela movable finger with distinct denticles forming 11–16 linear, non-imbricated rows, each flanked by a single external and internal accessory denticle; 4–6 terminal and one basal terminal denticles. Legs III and IV with well-developed tibial spurs, first and second tarsomeres of all legs with paired ventral macrosetae.

REMARKS ON HEMISPERMATOPHORES.We examined and compared 2 hemispermatophores from H. haudensis sp. n. (paratype 1198), 6 hemispermatophores from H. nigrimontanus s p. n. (paratypes 1337, 1399 and 1547), and 8 hemispermatophores from a third closely related species, H. polystictus ( Pocock, 1896) (4 individuals, 1296, 1302, 1329 and 1335). Hemispermatophores from these species were similar to each other in their structural features and proportions, and we did not detect interspecies differences that could serve as diagnostic characters. Vachon & Stockmann (1968: 85–87) also reported a lack of reliable differences between hemispermatophores from different species of Hottentotta in sub-Saharan Africa. They remarked that intraspecific variation in some cases could be as great as interspecific variation. Allowing for variation, the shapes of the sperm hemiduct lobes, and the short, hook-like form of the basal lobe of the three species studied here are generally consistent with previously described hemispermatophore capsule lobes in the genus Hottentotta (from H. buchariensis (Birula, 1897) , H. conspersus (Thorell, 1876) , H. gentili (Pallary, 1924) , H. hottentotta (Fabricius, 1787) , H. judaicus (Simon, 1872) , H. minax occidentalis (Vachon & Stockmann, 1968) , H. pellucidus Lowe, 2010 , H. polystictus ( Pocock, 1896) , H. saulcyi (Simon, 1880) , H. saxinatans Lowe, 2010 , H. tamulus (Fabricius, 1798) and H. trilineatus (Peters, 1861) ; Levy & Amitai, 1980; Lowe, 2010; Vachon, 1940a, 1940 b, 1952, 1958; Vachon & Stockmann, 1968). In particular, the capsule lobes in our samples of H. polystictus closely matched the lobe profiles for this species illustrated by Vachon (1940a: 256, fig. 57).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Scorpiones

Family

Buthidae

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF