Thrips bourbonensis Bournier
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.194532 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6206749 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AE87E4-E660-F60B-FF66-F8C85CC100DD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Thrips bourbonensis Bournier |
status |
|
Thrips bourbonensis Bournier View in CoL
Thrips bourbonensis Bournier, 2000: 94 In View in CoL describing this species from La Réunion, the author made no formal attempt to distinguish it from the species Thrips candidus View in CoL that he had described previously from that territory. The only distinction was given in a table of character states: in this the comb on tergite VIII of candidus View in CoL was stated to be “complete but irregular” in contrast to “complete and regular” in bourbonensis View in CoL . Paratype females of these two have been compared, and there is no significant difference between them in this comb ( Figs 7–8 View FIGURES 1 – 12 ), nor in any aspect of the chaetotaxy or sculpture, including the metanotum ( Figs 4–5 View FIGURES 1 – 12 ). The difference in body colour is possibly due to the specimens of candidus View in CoL having been kept in ethanol for a long time before slide mounting.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Thrips bourbonensis Bournier
Mound, Laurence A. 2010 |
Thrips bourbonensis Bournier, 2000 : 94 In
Bournier 2000: 94 |