Aeolothrips melaleucus (HALIDAY)

Minaei, K., 2014, New record of predatory thrips, Aeolothrips melaleucus (Thysanoptera, Aeolothripidae) from Iran, Linzer biologische Beiträge 46 (1), pp. 637-642 : 638-639

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5306359

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AE2C43-8A67-FFC1-FF25-5A9EF2DEFECC

treatment provided by

Marcus

scientific name

Aeolothrips melaleucus (HALIDAY)
status

 

Aeolothrips melaleucus (HALIDAY) View in CoL

Coleothrips melaleuca HALIDAY, 1852: 1117.

D i a g n o s i s Female macroptera. Body and legs brown, antennal segments III yellow, IV variable in color, yellow in basal quarter to half or almost entirely yellow ( Fig. 1A View Fig ); forewing posterior half dark after clavus to apex with two transverse dark bands ( Fig. 1D View Fig ). Antennal segment III with linear sensorium about 0.3 as long as segment, IV with linear sensorium 0.4 as long as segment and a little curved and wider at the apex. Tergite IX setae S1 about as long as length of tergite; sternite VII with 2 pairs of supernumerary setae arranged one in front of the other arising well in front of margin ( Fig. 1E View Fig ).

Male with colour and structure generally similar to female but paler and smaller. Tergites IV-V with paired tubercles ( Fig. 1F View Fig ); tergite IX with stout curved seta and non-bifurcate clasper ( Fig. 1G View Fig ).

D i s t r i b u t i o n Canada ( PUTMAN 1942), Britain ( MOUND et al. 1976); Europe ( ZUR STRASSEN 2003); USA (HODDLE et al. 2012); Turkey ( TUNC et al. 2012); Iran. M a t e r i a l s t u d i e d:1, IRAN, Fars Province, Khafr, from apple tree (Malus damestica),

15.iv.2008 ( KM 59 ) ; 4 1, Fars Province, Mohr, Heraj, from bean caper (Zygophyllum sp.),

3.iv.2013 (M. Abdolahi).

C o m m e n t s: In most Iranian Aeolothrips species , posterior margin of forewing is pale medially between two dark cross bands whereas in four species, A. eremicola PRIESNER , A. melaleucus and A. versicolor and A. wittmeri PRIESNER posterior margin of forewing is dark except at the base and apex ( Figs 1D View Fig , 2C View Fig ). However, A. eremicola and A. wittmeri are distinguished from melaleucus and versicolor by the narrow form of the band along the fore wing posterior margin between the two cross bands, in contrast to the other two species that have a wider band. A. melaleucus is readily distinguish from A. versicolor in both sexes. In the females, head is prolonged in A. versicolor (versus without prolongation in A. melaleucus ) ( Figs 1B View Fig , 2A View Fig ). Furthermore, all tibiae are brown in A. melaleucus in contrast to A. versicolor which is pale in the distal part of all tibiae ( Figs 1C View Fig , 2B View Fig ). In the male sex, tergites are without tubercles and tergite IX has no claspers and stout curved setae in A. versicolor whereas tergites IV-V have paired tubercles and tergite IX with stout curved seta and non-bifurcate clasper ( Figs 1F, 1G View Fig ).

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF