Hamacantha (Vomerula) acerata Lévi, 1993
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5318.3.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6CFEC285-1E75-4061-997B-855E799A432A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8172117 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AE0A14-9C5F-B238-FF3B-6B79FCF59A76 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hamacantha (Vomerula) acerata Lévi, 1993 |
status |
|
Hamacantha (Vomerula) acerata Lévi, 1993 View in CoL
Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 , 2 View FIGURE 2 , Tables 1 View TABLE 1 , 2 View TABLE 2
Hamacantha acerata Lévi, 1993: 36–37 View in CoL , Fig. 13A
Material examined: Holotype MNHN DCL 3594
Description: The skeletal structure was as described by Lévi (1993) so the original description is translated in full here (from the French). “ Description. Sponge attached to various small calcareous debris, light gray-white in colour, measuring 20/15/ 2 mm. The surface is reticulated. The superficial film, very thin, contains sigmanistres and some diancistres. The main skeleton consists of bundles of styles in groups of three, associated in thick or crisscross bundles. Some packets arrange themselves radially around grains of sand.” The spicules of the holotype were, however, examined in this study and measurements of spicules are included in Table 1 View TABLE 1 and compared to the original description of Lévi as well as another closely related species H. (V.) umisachii Ise, Woo, Tan & Fujita, 2019 from Japan and a new species Hamacantha (Vomerula) novacula sp. nov. from Australia.
Remarks: Hamacantha (V.) acerata Lévi, 1993 is very similar to H. (V.) umisachii differing only in the shape of the diancistra and the cyrtancistra-like diancistra, which Lévi (1993) referred to as sigmancistras. Lévi’s species also has smaller sigmas and slightly larger but overlapping style lengths than H. (V.) umisachii ( Tables 1 View TABLE 1 & 2 View TABLE 2 ). Interestingly, when H. (V.) umisachii was initially described by Ise et al. (2019) it was not compared to H. (V.) acerata . The smaller category of diancistra of H. acerata was also overlooked in Table 2 View TABLE 2 by Castello-Branco & Hajdu (2018) The recovery of more specimens in the future and their molecular sequencing may confirm whether these two nominal species are conspecific. Hamacantha (V.) carteri Topsent, 1904 also has a similar spicule composition as H. (V.) umisachii but with more significantly different spicule sizes ( Table 2 View TABLE 2 ). As well as H. (V.) acerata , H. (V.) umisachii and H. (V.) mamoi Ise, Woo, Tan & Fujita, 2019 , cyrtancistra-like diancistra have also been reported from H. (V.) jeanvaceleti Castello-Branco & Hajdu, 2018 , H. (V.) klausruetzleri Castello-Branco & Hajdu, 2018 , H. (Zygherpe) desmacelloides Hajdu, Hooker & Willenz, 2015 .
MNHN |
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Vomerula |
Hamacantha (Vomerula) acerata Lévi, 1993
Ekins, Merrick, Baker, Soraya & Hooper, John N. A. 2023 |
Hamacantha acerata Lévi, 1993: 36–37
Levi, C. 1993: 37 |