Bothropolys Wood, 1862
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5100.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8E2CCF7B-11BE-43EF-BA29-FB8AD63E8C54 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6313100 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03ABA95B-FFBE-E736-72F5-FAB7FBA37265 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2022-02-18 08:01:59, last updated 2024-11-29 15:02:39) |
scientific name |
Bothropolys Wood, 1862 |
status |
|
Genus Bothropolys Wood, 1862 View in CoL View at ENA
Type species: Bothropolys nobilis Wood, 1862 (by subsequent designation) ( Bonato et al. 2016).
Remark. The subgenus Bothropolys (Probothropolys) Verhoeff, 1907 , to which two of the three species here discussed have been quoted in literature, is disregarded by most authors ( Eason 1997).
Bonato, L., Chagas, J. A., Edgecombe, G. D., Lewis, J. G. E., Minelli, A., Pereira, L. A., Shelley, R. M., Stoev, P. & Zapparoli, M. (2016) ChiloBase 2.0 - A World Catalogue of Centipedes (Chilopoda). Available from: http: // chilobase. biologia. unipd. it (accessed 28 January 2022)
Eason, E. H. (1997) On some Lithobiomorpha from the mountains of Kirghizia and Kazakhstan (Chilopoda). Arthropoda Selecta, 6 (1 / 2), 117 - 121.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
1 (by plazi, 2022-02-18 08:01:59)
2 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-02-18 14:10:29)
3 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-02-18 15:38:35)
4 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-02-18 18:28:36)
5 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-02-28 22:04:16)
6 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-10-08 18:46:15)
7 (by plazi, 2023-11-06 19:14:33)