Plasmodium infections
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2015.10.006 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A71B25-9D3C-E837-FCCE-FB77FE7D947D |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Plasmodium infections |
| status |
|
Thirteen of 36 individuals tested PCR-positive for Plasmodium spp. infection. Seven individuals were tested more than once, and repeated sampling at different times of the year almost always gave identical results for these animals. Only results for one animal (age 9) switched from negative to positive during the study period. Population prevalence is thus estimated at 36%. We did not observe any parasite stages in Diff-quick ® -stained blood smears.
Only two unique sequences were amplified in this study, which showed 95 ‾ 100% sequence identity to publicly available Plasmodium sequences. Most sequences could be unambiguously assigned to Plasmodium sp. LLD-2010 which has previously been found in Verreaux's sifakas ( Duval et al., 2010). Two animals carried a different parasite (EMBL accession no.: LN869522), which unambiguously nested within the clade of malaria parasites infecting lemurs (Bp 100; Fig.1 View Fig ). This parasite appeared as most closely related to Plasmodium sp. C-MAP-2012 (which has been found in Hapalemur griseus ( Pacheco et al., 2011)) , although the statistical support for this association was moderate (Bp 59; Fig.1 View Fig ). The patristic distance between these two sequences was 0.21 substitution per site (s.s —1), which is both higher than the 0.17 s s —1 observed between the two most closely related lemur parasite sequences known to date ( Plasmodium sp. B-MAP.2012 and E-MAP-2011) and higher than the maximum 0.14 s s —1 observed between P. reichenowii (clade C1, infecting chimpanzees) and P. praefalciparum sequences (clade G1, infecting gorillas; Rayner et al., 2011). Coinfections with both lemur malaria parasites were not observed.
A. Springer et al. / International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 4 (2015) 385 ‾ 395 389
Age seemed to affect Plasmodium spp. test outcome, with older animals being more likely to test positive ( Fig. 2 View Fig ). In fact, none of the animals up to the age of 5 years were infected (n = 18), 50% of animals between age 6 and 10 were infected (n = 10) and all animals over the age of 10 tested positive (n = 8). However, in the GLMM including age as well as sex, season and group size as fixed factors, age only tended to have a statistically significant effect ( Table 2). Sex, season and group size had no significant effect on Plasmodium spp. infection status.
3.2. Babesia infections and potential Plasmodium ‾ Babesia interaction
Prevalence of Babesia infections was 55.6%. Again, test results for only 1 individual (age 7) changed from negative to positive during the study period. The Babesia sequence amplified (EMBL accession no. LN869519) was the same in all samples and showed 94% identity to different Babesia canis isolates. We did not microscopically observe any Babesia parasite stages in Diff-quick ® -stained blood smears.
Only age significantly affected Babesia sp. test outcome, but contrary to the Plasmodium sp. infections, young animals were more likely to test positive ( Table 3, Fig. 2 View Fig ). Only 3 animals (6, 7 and 11 years old) were co-infected with Plasmodium sp. and Babesia sp. Based on this complementary age pattern, the low number of coinfections, and because neither age, sex, season nor group size influenced Plasmodium spp. infections, we tested Babesia infection status as a predictor of Plasmodium infection, and found a highly significant negative effect ( Table 4).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.