Dasyatis rugosa (Probst, 1877)

Cicimurri, David J. & Knight, James L., 2009, Late Oligocene sharks and rays from the Chandler Bridge Formation, Dorchester County, South Carolina, USA, Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 54 (4), pp. 627-647 : 638-639

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.4202/app.2008.0077

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3D85D369-7A74-44B6-9766-7C4B8B26705B

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A6C023-FF8D-4E11-1E7D-F85BFA24FF20

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Dasyatis rugosa (Probst, 1877)
status

 

Dasyatis rugosa (Probst, 1877)

Fig. 8C View Fig .

Referred specimens.—BCGM 9098 and 9099, SC 2009.18.18.

Comments.—Although crown ornamentation is somewhat similar to Dasyatis cavernosa , D. rugosa is slightly larger (2.5 mm in width) and has a more convex labial face, wide but indistinct transverse crest, often sinuous labial crown margin (in basal view), and more robust root lobes (see also Cappetta 1970; Reinecke et al. 2005; Haye et al. 2008).

Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Oligocene (Chattian), USA (South Carolina); Miocene, France, Germany, Portugal, Poland.

Dasyatidae gen. et sp. indet.

Fig. 8D View Fig .

Referred specimens.—BCGM 9100 and 9101, SC 2009.18.19.

Comments.—These teeth are very easily distinguished from Dasyatis in our sample, not just by their larger size (3.5 mm in width), but by the nearly complete absence of crown ornamentation. There is a sharp transverse crest that divides the crown into a small, weakly concave labial face and a much more lingually expanded lingual face, and the labial crown margin (in basal view) is virtually straight.

Although this morphology was not discussed by Purdy et al. (2001), we have personally observed identical teeth from North Carolina (Lee Creek). These teeth are comparable to Dasyatis serralheiroi Cappetta, 1970 from the French Miocene, as well as to smooth or weakly ornamented teeth from the German and Swiss Miocene thought to be female D. cavernosa (Probst, 1877) (i.e., Leriche 1927; Bracher 2005; Wienrich and Reinecke 2009). Additionaly, the morphology is akin to teeth of extant Himantura Müller and Henle, 1837 (see Compagno and Roberts 1982; Monkolprasit and Roberts 1990), a taxon known primarily from the Pacific realm in freshwater and marine environments ( Bonfil and Abdallah 2004).

CICIMURRI AND KNIGHT—OLIGOCENE SHARKS FROM SOUTH CAROLINA 639

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF