Monodelphis (Microdelphys) americana (Muller, 1776)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0090.455.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7161455 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A487D6-FFDD-FFCF-ADEA-383EFCBDFC38 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Monodelphis (Microdelphys) americana |
status |
|
Monodelphis (Microdelphys) americana View in CoL
(Müller, 1776)
TYPE MATERIAL AND TYPE LOCALITY: No type material is known to exist. Monodelphis americana is based on a 17th-century description of a species observed in Brazil by the Dutch naturalist Marcgraf (Pine and Handley, 2008), so the type locality is often assumed to be Recife, the main Dutch settlement in Brazil ( Cabrera, 1958). Although the application of this name is not currently disputed, future taxonomic contingencies might require the designation of a neotype.
SYNONYMS: brasiliensis Erxleben, 1777; brasiliensis Daudin (in Lacépède, 1802); rubida Thomas, 1899 ; trilineata Lund, 1840; tristriata Illiger, 1815 ; umbristriata Miranda-Ribeiro, 1936.
DISTRIBUTION: Monodelphis americana is known from the right bank of the Tocantins in eastern Pará southward along the rainforested (or formerly rainforested) Atlantic coast of Brazil to Santa Catarina ; the range of this species also extends inland along gallery-forested rivers into the Cerrado (Pine and Handley, 2008: map 37).
REMARKS: See Duda and Costa (2015) for a morphological description, measurement data, and comparisons with Monodelphis iheringi , a superficially similar and closely related sympatric congener. The names brasiliensis, trilineata, and tristriata are all based, directly or indirectly, on the same 17th-century description authored by Marcgraf (Pine and Handley, 2008), so they are objective synonyms of M. americana . However, the names rubida and umbristriata are subjective synonyms based on specimens that exhibit ontogenetic pelage-color variants ( Pavan et al., 2014; Duda and Costa, 2015). Northern and southern cytochrome b haplogroups of M. americana differ by an average uncorrected sequence distance of 8.2% ( Pavan et al., 2014) and merit close taxonomic scrutiny.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.