Eperua froesii, Fortes & Dos & Steege & Aymard & Secco & Martins-Da-Silva & Mansano, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.617.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8427601 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A487B6-2F16-FFFE-FF6C-F897FAFCFC2F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Eperua froesii |
status |
sp. nov. |
6. Eperua froesii E.A. Fortes, Aymard, H. ter Steege, & Mansano, sp. nov. (
Figures 8 View FIGURE 8 , 23–25 View FIGURE 23 View FIGURE 24 View FIGURE 25 )
Type:— BRAZIL. Pará: Rios Pacajá and Muirapiranga, Km 3,5–6,5, line SW of Ilha de Breu , 23 September 1965, Prance G. T. et al. 1458 (holotype IAN [117052]!, isotypes K [000807973] image!, MO [1780623] image!, NY [01171288]!, U [0083421] image!, US [00243011]!) .
Diagnosis: — Eperua froesii has short and erect inflorescences, non-tubular corollas, and exserted stamens. It differs from species with the same type of inflorescence, corolla, and stamen by the combination (see Table 3 View TABLE 3 ): stipules entirely joined, epunctate to inconspicuous pellucid punctate leaflets, flat to slightly revolute margins, depressed main vein on the adaxial surface, inconspicuous tertiary venation, brownish-yellow to reddish-brown inflorescence indumentum, white to light-red petals, stamens joined basally in a tube, glabrous stamens, ovary, and fruit.
Tree 20.0–25.0 m tall. Trunk and bark not seen. Stipules entirely joined, caducous, 5.6–44.5 × 10.1–44.0 mm, foliaceous, or 4.0–5.2 × 3.0– 4.7 mm, non-foliaceous, persistent to caducous. Leaves 4–5-jugate; petioles 1.0– 2.5 cm long; rachis 11.0–23.0 cm long; petiolules 4.2–7.6 mm long; blades 5.3–13.4 × 2.5–5.8 cm, coriaceous, glabrous, epunctate to inconspicuous pellucid-punctate, not discolorous to slightly discolorous, equilateral, lower pair elliptic to ovate, middle pairs elliptic, narrowly elliptic to ovate, upper pair elliptic, apex attenuate to acuminate, base symmetrical to asymmetrical, lower pair base obtuse to rounded, middle pair base obtuse to rounded, upper pair base obtuse to cuneate, margin flat to slightly revolute, secondary venation with one or two intramarginal veins (sometimes inconspicuous in developed leaves), vein closer to the margin continuous or not continuous, main vein straight, depressed on the adaxial surface, tertiary veins inconspicuous, areoles smaller concave. Inflorescences terminal or axillary, panicle, erect, puberulous, pubescent to tomentose (strigulose in infructescence), brownish-yellow to reddish-brown, 3.2–6.1(– 7.2 in infructescence) cm long, lateral racemes 1.0–2.7(–6.0 in infructescence) cm long, alternate and distichous; bracts 3.6–4.1 × 2.6–4.4 mm, ovate, concave, apex gland absent, strigose to tomentose, brownish-yellow to reddish-brown; bracteoles 4.5–9.0 × 2.9–6.1 mm, ovate to oblate, cucullate, apex gland absent, pubescent to tomentose, brownish-yellow to reddish-brown, persistent to caducous, attached to the lower middle portion of the pedicels; pedicel 4.0– 6.6 mm long, 1.6–3.4 mm in diameter, not twisted, tomentose, brownish-yellow to reddish-brown; buds 0.7–1.9 cm long, 0.5–1.0 cm in diameter, tomentose, brownish-yellow to reddish-brown. Flowers: hypanthium 4.3–4.9 mm long, 4.8– 6.4 mm in diameter, cup-shaped, equilateral, tomentose, brownish-yellow to reddish-brown; sepal 1.0–1.5 × 0.5–0.8 cm, elliptic to oblong, unequal, the dorsal one larger, cucullate, apex gland absent, green, tomentose, tomentulose to puberulous externally, brownish-yellow to reddish-brown, inner sepals scarious marginally; adaxial petal 0.9–1.4 × 1.2–1.8 cm, oblate, non-tubular, apex rounded, base truncate, white to light-red, glabrous; petalodia 0.6–0.8 × 0.4–0.5 mm; stamens exserted, joined basally in a tube, filaments 1.9–2.5 cm long, tube equilateral, 1.0– 1.6 mm long, glabrous, anthers 4.6–5.4 × 1.0– 1.3 mm, rectangular; ovary 5.0–8.6 × 2.6–3.1 mm, oblong to obovate, glabrous, stipe 5.9–9.5 mm long, glabrous, style 1.2(pre-anthesis)–2.0, stigma capitate, papillose. Legumes 13.2–23.5 × 3.8–9.8 cm, stipe 2.0– 2.5 cm long, oblanceolate, apex obtuse, apiculate, margin slightly thickened, dark-brown, veins absent, glabrous. Seeds not seen.
Phenology:— Flowering in September and October; fruiting in October and November.
Distribution:— Occurring in Pará ( Brazil) along the Acaraí River, a tributary of the Xingu River, and Pacajá, Anapu, and Muirapiranga (connected with Alto Anapu River) rivers, which are tributaries of the Tocantins River.
Habitat:— Floodplain forests, likely occurring in both igapó and várzea forests. The floodplain forests of the Xingu and Tocantins rivers are considered Igapó due to their clear-water rivers ( Junk 2011), while the floodplains near Portel in the Anapu river region are classified as várzea forests ( Junk 2011) due to Amazon River influence.
Conservation status:— Categorized as Near Threatened (NT) according to the IUCN criteria ( IUCN 2012, IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee 2022). The estimated extent of occurrence for the species is 21,015.730 km 2 and the estimated area of occupancy is 16.000 km 2.
Occurrence in protected areas: —Unknown.
Etymology:— The specific epithet is a tribute to Ricardo de Lemos Fróes, a Brazilian botanist (1891–1960) who collected the first two specimens of E. froesii in 1955–56, along with many other species of Eperua .
Vernacular names:— Ipê do Bento (Prance G.T. et al. 1458).
Uses:— Unknown.
Taxonomic notes:— Eperua froesii , E. cerradoensis , E. duckeana , E. reddeniae , and E. schomburgkiana are part of the group with short and erect inflorescences, non-tubular corolla, exserted stamens, falcate fruit with a length/width ration of 3:1 (vs. tubular corolla, included stamens, non-falcate fruit with a length/width ratio of 1:1 to 2: 1 in other species with short and erect inflorescence). They also share multijugate leaves with straight leaflets and inflorescence with dense indumentum. E. froesii shares characteristics such as stamens joined in a glabrous tube with E. cerradoensis , and glabrous ovary with E. schomburgkiana . Please refer to Table 3 View TABLE 3 for a summary of the similarities and differences among these species. Eperua froesii is this group`s only species with entirely glabrous stamens, ovary, and fruits. It was previously identified as E. schomburgkiana mainly by the glabrous ovary and fruit. However, besides the allopatric distribution ( E. froesii is restricted to the Eastern Amazonia, and E. schomburgkiana occurs in the Guyana Shield, see Figure 8 View FIGURE 8 ), E. froesii is a different species by the entirely joined stipules (vs. free in E. schomburgkiana ), stamens joined in a tube (vs. in a diadelphous sheath 9+ 1 in E. schomburgkiana ), and glabrous stamens (vs. irregularly tomentose sheath in E. schomburgkiana ). The separation of the species is also supported by phylogenetic studies using nuclear and ribosomal data ( ter Steege et al. 2023 in press, Fortes et al. in prep).
We chose the collection Prance G.T. et al. 1458 as the holotype over Fróes R. de L. 32452 because the former collection has more preserved flowers. Both collections could potentially be the type of E. froesii because they have glabrous stamens joined basally in a tube and glabrous ovary, which are the key characteristics to differentiate E. froesii from E. schomburgkiana and other species of the group.
Eperua froesii shows some contrasting morphological characteristics within the species with short and erect inflorescence and non-tubular corollas. While most species have clearly white petals ( E. cerradoensis , E. duckeana , and E. schomburgkiana ) and E. reddeniae has non-white petals (pink to purple), E. froesii shows a range of petal colors from white (Prance G.T. et al. 1458) to light-red (Fróes R. de L. 32418). Another variation is the stipule type, which is entirely joined in E. froesii , ranging from foliaceous ( Figure 23d–f View FIGURE 23 , 25b, c View FIGURE 25 ) to non-foliaceous ( Figure 25d View FIGURE 25 ). Foliaceous stipules are found in flowering branches (Fróes R. de L. 32418, Prance G.T. et al. 1458), and the non-foliaceous stipules are found in flowering, fruiting and sterile branches (Fróes R. de L. 32418, 32452, Prance G.T. et al. 1458, 1652). Further collections are needed to fully understand the petal color and the stipule patterns in E. froesii .
Specimens examined (Paratypes):— BRAZIL. Pará , Portel , regi„o do Anapú, rio Pracajaí, à beira do rio, 10 October 1956, Fróes R. de L. 33051 ( IAN [097476]!, K [000807978]image!). Rio Acaraí, afl. do Xingú, regi„o onde foi feito um levantamento estatístico florestal pelo IAN, SPVEA e FAO, 29 November 1955, Fróes R. de L. 32418 ( INPA [0005049]!, NY [1171155] image!, R [collection number 106671]!); Fróes R. de L. 32452 ( IAN [090190]!); rios Pacajá and Muirapiranga , west bank of rio Pacajá., 15 October 1965, Prance G. T. et al. 1652 ( F [ V0111469 F]!, IAN [117165]!, K [000807974, 000807976] image!, NY [01171289]!, U [0181543] image!, US [00243010]!).
G |
Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève |
T |
Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics |
IAN |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental |
K |
Royal Botanic Gardens |
MO |
Missouri Botanical Garden |
NY |
William and Lynda Steere Herbarium of the New York Botanical Garden |
U |
Nationaal Herbarium Nederland |
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
L |
Nationaal Herbarium Nederland, Leiden University branch |
F |
Field Museum of Natural History, Botany Department |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |