Pseudozena denticulata, Grzymala & Leschen, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4889.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0B8630F6-2EF0-44E6-9D3A-7386BF949FD0 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10513625 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A48794-FFC9-FFFB-6F85-48C8740BFE35 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pseudozena denticulata |
status |
sp. nov. |
Pseudozena denticulata sp. n.
Figs 2D View FIGURES 2 , 8 View FIGURES 8 A–8G, 9A–9G, 10C, 26C
Etymology. The specific epithet is in reference to the morphological character of the sclerotized ridges present on the metafemora. The name is formed from the Latin denticulatus (with small teeth).
Description. Length 1.60–1.67 mm. Body about 2.3× longer than wide. Dorsal surface piceous to brunneous with contrasting testaceous antennae, mouthparts, and legs. Dorsal vestiture biseriate, clothed with thin, decumbent pubescence arising anterad of each puncture, about 2× length of puncture, with 2–3 additional thin, slightly shorter, suberect setae between each puncture pair. Ventral vestiture with same type of biseriate pubescence as dorsum. Head, HW 0.44–0.45 mm, HL 0.18–0.21 mm; surface with numerous deep, elongate punctures, unevenly spaced on vertex, separated by an average of the length of two punctures, present from basal margin to antennal insertions, absent from integument between antennal insertions. Antennae ( Fig. 8B View FIGURES 8 ) with scape rounded, slightly longer than pedicel; pedicel subglobular, apex wider than base of antennomere 3; antennomeres 3–10 subserrate; antennomere 3 longer than pedicel, subequal in length and width to antennomere 4; antennomeres 4–7 subequal in length; antennomere 8 shorter than 7, antennomere 9 slightly shorter than 8, antennomeres 9 and 10 subequal; antennomere 11 2× longer than 10; antennomeres 3–11 covered in moderately dense, suberect pubescence, without additional pilosity. Pronotum, PW 0.36–0.38 mm, PL 0.32–0.33 mm. Elytral length 1.8–1.9× elytral width and 4.0–4.2× pronotal length.
Females. Length 1.67–1.69 mm, HW 0.42–0.45 mm, HL 0.17–0.21 mm, PW 0.36–0.38 mm, PL 0.32–0.33 mm, EW 0.74–0.78 mm, EL 1.35–1.36 mm. Antennae with scape rounded, slightly longer than pedicel; pedicel subglobular, apex wider than base of antennomere 3; antennomeres 3–5 subequal in length and width; antennomere 6 subequal in width and slightly shorter than antennomere 5; antennomere 7 subequal in width and slightly shorter than antennomere 6; antennomere 8 subequal in width and slightly shorter than antennomere 9; antennomeres 8–10 subequal in length and width; antennomere 11 subequal in width and about 2× length of antennomere 10.
Natural History. This is a relatively uncommon South Island species. Specimens have been collected in forests, mostly Nothofagus , and by sweeping, with one specimen collected at lights.
Distribution. South Island: Nelson (NN), Buller (BR), North Canterbury (NC), Dunedin (DN), Southland (SL), and Stewart Island (SI).
Type material examined. Holotype. Male ( LUNZ), labeled: “ NEW ZEALAND, SL / Catlins SF / Hunter Hills / 2.viii.1982 / C.A. Muir & R.E. Emberson ” . Paratypes (12).
South Island . NN: Abel Tasman NP, Harwood Trk , 720m, 02/03/1981, sweeping moss, ferns, on forest floor (1, LUNZ). BR: Nelson Lakes N.P ., Lake Rotoiti , 19/12/1983, L. Masner (2, CMNC); same, but Nothofagus & Griselinia forest , (2, CMNC); Mt Misery , Ecology Div. Station , 550m, 24/01/1977, to light, J.S. Dugdale (1, NZAC). NC: Arthurs Pass NP , Klondyke Cnr , 700m, 21/01/1981, sweeping Nothofagus seedlings on forest floor, J.W. Early (1, LUNZ). DN: Cloud Forest of Leith , 01/01/2003, 45 (2, NZAC). SL: Owaka, 13–20/01/1978, Malaise trap, Nothofagus, S. Peck & J. Peck (1, NZAC); Owaka, Table Hill Res. , 13–20/01/1978, Malaise trap, S. Peck & J. Peck (1, CMNC). SI: Christmas Village , 6–7.ii.1991, J.W. Early, swept in podocarp hardwood forest (1, LUNZ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |