Rhynchospora rubra (Lour.) Makino
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.15553/c2012v671a6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5762266 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A3879E-E307-FFEE-626D-FCB1F34BFABD |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Rhynchospora rubra (Lour.) Makino |
status |
|
3. Rhynchospora rubra (Lour.) Makino View in CoL in Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 17: 180. 1903.
Ξ Schoenus ruber Lour., Fl. Cochinch. View in CoL 1: 41. 1790.
Neotypus (designated here): INDIA: Cherrapunji , Khasia, Meghalaya, VIII.2006, Sangita Dey 9923 ( CAL [ 00000 22241 ]! ; iso-: ASSAM)( Fig. 3 View Fig ).
Loureiro did not cite any specific type specimen for this taxon, writing only “Habitat in Cochinchina”. According to STAFLEU & COWAN (1979-1988), Loureiro’s specimens are only partly preserved, the main collection is at BM, a small set is at P and some specimens are at LINN. A thorough search of these three herbaria for any Loureiro’s specimen which could be selected as type of R. rubra proved to be futile, and therefore, a specimen with mature fruits collected from Cherrapunji, Khasia, Meghalaya, India in August 2006 is here selected as neotype of R. rubra according to ICBN (Art. 9.11, MCNEILL & al., 2006).
CAL |
Botanical Survey of India |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Rhynchospora rubra (Lour.) Makino
Dey, Sangita & Prasanna, Parigi Venkateswara 2012 |
Schoenus ruber
Schoenus ruber Lour., Fl. Cochinch. 1: 41. 1790. |