Pseudonereis brunnea, Conde-Vela, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4471.2.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:36312BD3-476F-476F-A953-8A6D4BE205D4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5978246 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A2FB52-FFAB-DC03-6B93-FC5FFDECFED6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pseudonereis brunnea |
status |
sp. nov. |
Pseudonereis brunnea View in CoL sp. n.
Figures 5A, D View FIGURE 5 ; 6 View FIGURE 6
Pseudonereis gallapagensis de León-González 1997: 236 View in CoL , Figs. 141a–e (non Kinberg, 1865).
Type material. Gulf of Mexico, Mexico. Holotype ECOSUR 0 191, La Mancha, Veracruz (19°36'0.30"N 96°22'19.61"W), 27 May 2004, 1– 2 m depth, Coll. MA Hernández-Álvarez. Paratypes ECOSUR 0 192 (6), La Mancha, Veracruz (19°35'10.16"N 96°22'38.88"W), 3 July 2003, 1– 2 m depth, Coll. MA Hernández-Álvarez. ECOSUR 0 193 (3), La Mancha, Veracruz, 23 July 2003, 1– 2 m depth, Coll. MA Hernández-Álvarez.
Additional material. Gulf of Mexico, Mexico. ECOSUR P2926 (12), La Mancha, Veracruz (19°35'7.49"N 96°22'38.74"W), 23 July 2003, 1– 2 m depth, Coll. MA Hernández-Álvarez. ECOSUR P2927 (10), La Mancha, Veracruz (19°35'13.64"N 96°22'39.24"W), 23 September 2004, 1– 2 m depth, Coll. MA Hernández-Álvarez. ECOSUR P2928 (10), La Mancha, Veracruz (19°35'10.16"N 96°22'38.88"W), 27 April 2004, 1– 2 m depth, Coll. MA Hernández-Álvarez. ECOSUR P2929 (1), La Mancha, Veracruz (19°35'7.49"N 96°22'38.74"W), 27 May 2004, 1– 2 m depth, Coll. MA Hernández-Álvarez. ECOSUR P2930 (1), La Mancha, Veracruz (19°36'4.91"N 96°22'18.09"W), 28 September 2003, 1– 2 m depth, Coll. MA Hernández-Álvarez. ECOSUR P2931 (6), Montepío, Veracruz (18°38'46.97"N 95°5'44.19" W), basaltic rocky shore, 1 April 2004, 1– 2 m depth, Coll. MA Hernández- Álvarez. USNM 174868 (68), Boca del Río, Veracruz, 10 September 1996, Coll. ML Jones.
Type locality. La Mancha Lagoon, Veracruz, Mexico (19°36'0.30"N 96°22'19.61"W), Gulf of Mexico.
Etymology. The specific name stems from the Latin adjective brunneus, - a, - um, meaning brown, referring to the even brown pigmentation present in this species.
Description. Holotype (ECOSUR 0191) complete, 24 mm long, 2.1 mm wide, 72 chaetigers; two paratypes (ECOSUR 0192) complete, larger one 23 mm long, 2 mm wide at chaetiger 10, 70 chaetigers, smaller one 22 mm long, 1.8 mm wide at chaetiger 10, 72 chaetigers, both used for showing pharynx and chaetae.
Body tapered, pigmented. Dark brown pigment in anterior end, more intense on prostomium and achaetous ring, discoloring posteriorly; pigment brown uniform in prostomium, with two narrow, pale lines behind each antenna, a central triangular spot arising from posterior margin of prostomium, becoming wider toward posterior end of prostomium, surrounding eyes and with a medial pale line between them; palps light brown, paler toward inner margins of palpophores, yellowish spots on palpostyles ( Fig. 6A, H View FIGURE 6 ).
Prostomium longer than wide; antennae digitiform, half as long as prostomium, slightly surpassing palps; eyes subequal, black, lenticulated, in trapezoidal arrangement, anterior pair semilunar, posterior pair rounded ( Fig. 6A, H View FIGURE 6 ). Achaetous ring twice as long as first chaetiger; four pairs of anterior cirri, cirrophores conspicuous, longest cirri reaching chaetiger 4 ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ).
Pharynx dissected in holotype, partially everted in paratypes; jaws brown, thick, 11 teeth, cutting edge completely dentate. Maxillary ring: I= 2 cones in vertical line; II= 3-3 comb-like rows in triangle; III= 4 comb-like rows in triangle; IV= 5-5 comb-like rows and additional cones, merged cones and P-bars, in sigmoid ( Fig. 6I View FIGURE 6 ). Oral ring: V= 1 cone; VI= 1-1 shield-shaped bars with pointed and blunt tips ( Fig. 5A View FIGURE 5 ); VII–VIII= one furrow row with 11 P-bars ( Fig. 5D View FIGURE 5 ) and one ridge row with 9 cones in a single band, rows vertically displaced; furrow and ridge regions with one paragnaths each ( Fig. 6J View FIGURE 6 ).
Parapodial cirri pattern. Dorsal cirri longer than notopodial dorsal ligules in anterior region, becoming shorter toward posterior end; basally inserted to notopodial dorsal ligules in most anterior segments, displaced medially in medial segments, subdistal in posterior segments, and distal in posterior-most ones. Ventral cirri subequal and basally inserted to neuropodial ventral ligules throughout body.
First two chaetigers with neuroaciculae only, remaining ones with both noto- and neuroaciculae. In first two chaetigers ( Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ), dorsal cirrus basal, 1.5 times longer than dorsal ligule. Dorsal ligule subconical, blunt, slightly longer than neuroacicular ligule. Neuroacicular ligule subconical, blunt, as long as neuropodial ventral ligule; postchaetal lobe rounded, as long as neuroacicular ligule; neuropodial ventral ligule digitiform. Ventral cirrus basal, as long as neuropodial ventral ligule.
In anterior and middle chaetigers ( Fig. 6D–E View FIGURE 6 ), dorsal cirrus medial, 1.5 times longer than notopodial dorsal ligule. Notopodial dorsal ligule subconical, blunt, as long as notopodial ventral ligule; notopodial ventral ligule rounded to digitiform, as long as neuroacicular ligule. Neuroacicular ligule subconical, twice as long as neuropodial ventral ligule, distally bilobed, superior lobe much smaller than inferior one; postchaetal lobe rounded, as long as neuroacicular ligule; neuropodial ventral ligule digitiform. Ventral cirrus basal, as long as neuropodial ventral ligules.
In posterior chaetigers ( Fig. 6F View FIGURE 6 ), dorsal cirrus subdistal, as long as notopodial dorsal ligule. Notopodial dorsal ligule pennant-like, twice as long as notopodial ventral ligule; notopodial ventral ligule digitiform, twice as long as neuroacicular ligule. Neuroacicular ligule subconical, slightly longer than neuropodial ventral ligule, distally bilobed, both superior and inferior lobes subequal, sometimes inconspicuous; postchaetal lobe rounded, as long as neuroacicular one; neuropodial ventral ligule digitiform. Ventral cirrus basal, as long as neuropodial ventral ligule.
In posterior-most chaetigers ( Fig. 6G View FIGURE 6 ), dorsal cirrus distal. Notopodial dorsal ligule foliose, pennant-like, 1.6 times longer than wide, 2.5 times longer than dorsal cirrus, 3–4 times longer than notopodial ventral ligule; notopodial ventral ligule digitiform, twice as long as neuroacicular ligule. Neuroacicular ligule subconical, blunt, slightly longer than neuropodial ventral ligule; postchaetal lobe rounded, as long as neuroacicular one; neuropodial ventral ligule digitiform. Ventral cirrus basal, slightly shorter than neuropodial ventral ligule.
Notochaetae homogomph spinigers. Neurochaetae homogomph spinigers and heterogomph falcigers in supraacicular fascicles, heterogomph spinigers and falcigers in sub-acicular fascicles.
Notopodial homogomph spinigers pectinate, teeth narrow, decreasing in size toward distal end ( Fig. 6N View FIGURE 6 ). Neuropodial homogomph spinigers as notopodial ones; neuropodial heterogomph spinigers pectinate, basal teeth coarse, decreasing in size toward distal end ( Fig. 6M, O View FIGURE 6 ). Neuropodial heterogomph falcigers falcate, pectinate, teeth narrow present basally, half to two thirds of inner edge edentate, distal tip stout, blades and articulation region of shaft dark brown ( Fig. 6K–L View FIGURE 6 ); supra-acicular falcigers stouter than sub-acicular ones ( Fig. 6K – L View FIGURE 6 ).
Pygidium crenulated; anal cirri cirriform, as long as last six segments ( Fig. 6B View FIGURE 6 ).
Variation. The results of the analysis of body variation and paragnaths number are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. W3 had the highest coefficient of correlation with TL, followed by W10, L3, and L10; notably, nCh had no correlation with TL. RTC had low correlation with TL. Variation in paragnath number was very low, varying in one or two paragnaths in the areas I, V and VII–VIII. The number of paragnaths in the areas V, VI and VII–VII is similar to found in other Pseudonereis species ( Bakken 2007, Table 1).
TABLE 1. Descriptive statistics of some body measures in three Pseudonereis species. Only complete specimens were considered for analysis. Abbreviations: TL= total length; L3 and L10= length at chaetiger 3 and 10, respectively; W3 and W10= width at chaetiger 3 and 10, respectively; nCh= number of chaetigers; RTC= reach of largest anterior cirrus).
Remarks. P. brunnea sp. n. resembles P. gallapagensis , but some differences can be noted. In P. brunnea sp. n., the anterior eyes are semilunar, whereas in P. gallapagensis they are rounded. Furthermore, in. P. brunnea sp. n., dorsal cirri are 1.5 times longer than notopodial dorsal ligules in anterior and middle chaetigers, whereas in P. gallapagensis they are 1.0–1.2 times longer. In P. brunnea sp. n., neuroacicular ligules are distally bilobate in anterior-most chaetigers only and sometimes inconspicuous, whereas in P. gallapagensis they are distally bilobate throughout body and lobes become inconspicuous in posterior-most chaetigers. Moreover, in P. brunnea sp. n., notopodial dorsal ligules are 3–4 times longer than notopodial ventral ones, whereas in P. gallapagensis they are 7– 8 times longer.
P. brunnea View in CoL sp. n. also resembles P. deleoni Villalobos-Guerrero & Tovar-Hernández, 2013 View in CoL , but they differ in some relevant features. In P. brunnea View in CoL sp. n., the anterior pair of eyes are semilunar, whereas in P. deleoni View in CoL they are rounded. Moreover, P. brunnea View in CoL sp. n. has even brown pigment in anterior body and fading out toward posterior end, whereas P. deleoni View in CoL has brown spots forming three rows in anterior segments, and only the central row remains in posterior chaetigers ( Villalobos-Guerrero & Tovar-Hernández 2013, Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ). Furthermore, in P. brunnea View in CoL sp. n., inferior and superior lobes of the neuroacicular lobes are conspicuous in anterior chaetigers only, whereas in P. deleoni View in CoL they are conspicuous throughout body.
Differences between P. brunnea View in CoL sp. n. and P. citrina View in CoL sp. n. are more obvious due to the absence of dark brown pigment, anterior pairs of eyes rounded, dorsal cirri 2–3 times longer than notopodial dorsal ligules, and translucent notopodial dorsal ligules in posterior chaetigers in the latter species. Specimens identified as P. gallapagensis View in CoL by de León-González (1997) from Veracruz and Tamaulipas, Gulf of Mexico, match with the current definition. The description of P. gallapagensis View in CoL by Dueñas-Ramírez & Quiros-Rodríguez (2012) from Córdoba, Colombian Caribbean, resembles P. brunnea View in CoL sp. n., but it requires further examination of specimens to determine if they are conspecific. Record of P. gallapagensis View in CoL by Rioja (1960: 297) from Veracruz likely belongs to P. brunnea View in CoL sp. n., but the greenish pigmentation described for the specimens and the short description lacking illustrations prevent its reliable inclusion into P. brunnea View in CoL sp. n. Record of P. gallapagensis View in CoL by Fauchald (1977a: 32–33) from Caribbean Panama likely belong to P. brunnea View in CoL sp. n., but re-examination of the specimens is needed to ensure the identification. Additional records of P. gallapagensis View in CoL ( Hartman 1944; Ibárzabal 1986; de León-González et al. 1999) lack descriptions to ensure its belonging to P. brunnea View in CoL sp. n. or another species.
Distribution. Gulf of Mexico.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pseudonereis brunnea
Conde-Vela, Víctor M. 2018 |
Pseudonereis gallapagensis de León-González 1997 : 236
León-González 1997 : 236 |