Scrapter avontuurensis
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.647 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:35836E71-F258-41CC-A4F6-37EAE851A016 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3852059 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A287AD-FFF2-FF97-FF4C-237BFADFFC26 |
|
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
|
scientific name |
Scrapter avontuurensis |
| status |
|
The males of S. avontuurensis Kuhlmann sp. nov., S. bokkeveldensis Kuhlmann sp. nov., S. fynbosensis Kuhlmann sp. nov., S. gessorum , S. inexpectatus , S. keiskiensis Kuhlmann sp. nov., S. minutuloides ,
S. minutus , S. nigerrimus , S. nitens Kuhlmann sp. nov., S. oubergensis Kuhlmann sp. nov. and S. pygmaeus are unknown.
1. Antennal flagellum medially broadened, entirely orange ( Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 12b); stigma bright yellow ( Kuhlmann 2014: Fig. 12a); S7 and S8 as in Kuhlmann (2014: fig. 12d, f)………………… ……………………………………………………………………… S. luteistigma Kuhlmann, 2014
– Antennal flagellum not broadened, only partly yellowish; stigma darker……………………………2
2. Third hind tarsus triangular broadened ( Fig. 10E View Fig )………… S. willemstrydomi Kuhlmann sp. nov.
– Third hind tarsus unmodified………………………………………………………………………3
3. Antenna long, last flagellar segment about twice as long as wide ( Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 24e); S7 and S8 as in Kuhlmann (2014: fig. 24d, f)………………………… S. punctulatus Kuhlmann nom. nov.
– Antenna shorter, last flagellar segment at most 1.5 times as long as wide……………………4
4. Hind tibia inside apically broadened, pointed ( Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 22e) or forming either a spine ( Fig. 7E View Fig ; Kuhlmann 2014: figs 2e, 31e) or a ± right angle ( Fig. 4G View Fig ; Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 27g)……5
– Hind tibia unmodified, if apically broadened then without spine or ± sharp edge……………10
5. Hind tibia inside apically forming a ± right angle ( Fig. 4G View Fig ; Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 27g)……………6
– Hind tibia inside apically pointed ( Kuhlmann 2014: Fig. 22e) or forming a spine ( Fig. 7E View Fig ; Kuhlmann 2014: figs 2e, 31e)………………………………………………………………………7
6. Body about 5 mm long; hind tibia forming a distinct right angle ( Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 27g); S7 and S8 as in Kuhlmann (2014: fig. 27d, f)………………………… S. roggeveldi Kuhlmann, 2014
– Body longer; hind tibia forming a shallow right angle ( Fig. 4G View Fig ); S7 and S8 as in Fig. 4F, H View Fig …… ………………………………………………………………………… S. hergi Kuhlmann sp. nov.
7. Hind tibia inside apically pointed ( Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 22e); scutum and metasomal terga finely punctate ( Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 22c); S7 and S8 as in Kuhlmann (2014: fig. 22d, f)……………………………………………………………………… S. papkuilsi Kuhlmann, 2014
– Hind tibia inside apically with spine ( Fig. 7E View Fig ; Kuhlmann 2014: figs 2e, 31e)………………8
8. Scutum and metasomal terga coarsely punctate ( Kuhlmann 2014: figs 2c, 31c)……………9
– Scutum coarsely and metasomal terga finely punctate ( Fig. 7C View Fig )… S. mellonholgeri Kuhlmann sp. nov.
9. Hind tibia apically with longer spine ( Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 31e); metasomal terga densely punctate ( Kuhlmann2014:Fig.31c);S7and S8as in Kuhlmann(2014:fig.31d,f) … S. spinipes Kuhlmann, 2014
– Hind tibia apically with shorter spine ( Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 2e); metasomal terga sparsely punctate ( Kuhlmann2014:fig.2c);S7and S8 as in Kuhlmann(2014:fig.2d,f)… S.acanthophorus Davies, 2005 View in CoL
10. Hind basitarsus brown to blackish………………………………………………………………11
– Hind basitarsus yellowish…………………………………………………………………………14
11. Hind tibia apically slightly swollen and curved ( Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 29e); scutum between punctures smooth and shiny; S7 and S8 as in Kuhlmann (2014: fig. 29d, f)… S. sittybon Davies, 2005 View in CoL
– Hind tibia unmodified; scutum between punctures sculptured and matt………………………12
12. Basal half of T2–T4 densely covered with short, silverish hair ( Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 33c); S7 and S8 as in Kuhlmann (2014: fig. 33d–e)…………………… S. ulrikae Kuhlmann, 2014
– Basal half of T2–T4 almost hairless ( Kuhlmann 2014: figs 17c, e, 20c)…………………………13 13. Discs of metasomal terga impunctate, very finely and regularly sculptured ( Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 20c); S7 and S8 as in Kuhlmann (2014: fig. 20d–e)………………………… S. nigritarsis Kuhlmann, 2014
– Discs of metasomal terga partly punctate, strongly to heavily and irregularly sculptured ( Kuhlmann 2014:fig.17c,e);S7 and S8as in Kuhlmann(2014:fig.17d,f)……………… S. nanus Kuhlmann, 2014
14. Hind tibia yellow with a brown spot on the back side ( Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 9a, c); S7 and S8 as in Kuhlmann (2014: fig. 9d–e)…………………………………………… S. glareus Davies, 2005
– Hind tibia mostly black ( Kuhlmann 2014: figs 5a, 7a, 13a)………………………………………15
The males of the following three species are very similar and can be best separated by S7 and S8.
15. S7 without membraneous apicolateral lobes ( Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 13d); S8 as in Kuhlmann (2014: fig. 13e)…………………………………………………………… S. minutissimus Kuhlmann, 2014
– S7 with membraneous apicolateral lobes ( Kuhlmann 2014: figs 5d, 7d)……………………………16
16. S7 apically with emargination slightly broader and shallower ( Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 5d)………… …………………………………………………………………………… S. albitarsis ( Friese, 1909)
– S7 apically with emargination slightly narrower and deeper ( Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 7d)……………… ………………………………………………………………………… S. exiguus Kuhlmann, 2014
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.