Fuchibotulus, Haddad & Lyle, 2008
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5733/afin.049.0204 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7661497 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A18799-6561-FFA1-FE60-F3F79042F9DC |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Fuchibotulus |
status |
gen. nov. |
Genus Fuchibotulus View in CoL gen. n.
Etymology: The name is a combination of Fuchiba , a genus to which these spiders are related, and the Latin botulus (sausage), that refers to the sausage-shaped ST II of the female. Gender masculine.
Type species: Fuchibotulus bicornis View in CoL sp. n.
Diagnosis: The carapace shape is evenly high and flat dorsally, with a sharp decline in the last fifth, and has a strongly tuberculate surface texture ( Figs 50, 51, 53, 54 View Figs 50–55 ). The abdomen is notched anteriorly and has distinct dorsal sigillae with several pairs of tiny intermediate sclerites among them ( Figs 52, 55 View Figs 50–55 ). The legs lack spines and ventral cusps, and are weakly scopulate. Males have a needle-like embolus originating prolaterally and curving retrolaterally around the tegulum, accompanied by a narrow membranous conductor ( Fig. 56 View Figs 56–58 ); the palpal tibia has a larger single or bifid distal retrolateral apophysis and a small tooth-like proximal retrolateral dorsal apophysis ( Figs 57, 58 View Figs 56–58 ); females have a narrow median epigynal hood and strongly twisted entrance ducts leading to long, sausage-shaped ST II, with corresponding twisted ducts leading from ST II to the small posterior ST I.
Description: Small spiders, 2.80–3.55 mm long; carapace red, surface strongly granulate; abdomen pale grey with darker dorsal chevron marking; AER procurved, clypeus height equal to or slightly larger than AME diameter; AME slightly smaller than ALE, or eyes subequal; AME closer to ALE than to each other; PER strongly recurved; PME slightly larger than PLE, or eyes subequal; PME closer to each other than to PLE; chilum single, triangular, tapring distally; cheliceral promargin and retromargin with three teeth each, retromarginal teeth often on single base; labium trapezoidal, posterior width equal to length; endites straight laterally with distinct serrula; carapace broadly oval, widest at midpoint, eye region smoothly connected to thoracic region; carapace with slight depression anterior to fovea, posterior margin slightly concave; pleural bars isolated; sternum shield-shaped; precoxal triangles present; intercoxal sclerites present between coxae I and II, II and III, and III and IV; legs I slightly more strongly built than others in males; legs without spines or ventral cusps, metatarsi and tarsi weakly scopulate, metatarsi III and IV with terminal preening brush; leg formula 1423 ♂, 4123 ♀; abdomen oval, distinctly notched anteriorly, tapering posteriorly; dorsal scutum absent in both sexes; dorsal sigilla present, with several intermediate sclerites between them; venter with paired tiny sclerites running from epigastric fold to spinnerets; small inframamillary sclerite present; male palp with subtriangular RTA, sometimes split distally, and small tooth-like dorsal apophysis; tegulum oval, embolus needle-like, originating prolaterally, directed retrolaterally along distal margin of tegulum, accompanied by narrow membranous conductor; female epigyne with narrow median epigynal hood, copulatory openings medially, entrance ducts strongly twisted, ST II long and sausage-like, directed posteriorly; duct leading from ST II to ST I twisted around entrance ducts; ST I small and oval, posterolaterally situated.
Species included: F. bicornis and F. kigelia (both new).
Key to species of the genus Fuchibotulus View in CoL gen. n.
1 Males .................................................................................................................... 2
– Females ................................................................................................................. 3
2 Embolus tip at 2/3 of cymbium width ( Fig. 61 View Figs 59–66 ); distal retrolateral tibial apophysis distinctly bifid ( Fig. 62 View Figs 59–66 ) .............................................................. F. bicornis View in CoL sp. n.
– Embolus tip at retrolateral margin of cymbium ( Fig. 67 View Figs 67–70 ); distal retrolateral tibial apophysis triangular ( Fig. 68 View Figs 67–70 ) ........................................................ F. kigelia View in CoL sp. n.
3 ST II very elongate, extending posteriorly beyond anterior margin of copulatory openings ( Fig. 69 View Figs 67–70 ) .......................................................................... F. kigelia View in CoL sp. n.
– ST II oval-elongate, not extending to anterior margin of copulatory openings...... ( Fig. 65 View Figs 59–66 ) ...................................................................................... F. bicornis View in CoL sp. n.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.