Parahyadina bulla, Mathis & Zatwarnicki, 2019

Mathis, Wayne N. & Zatwarnicki, Tadeusz, 2019, Revision of the Shore-fly Genera Parahyadina Tonnoir and Malloch and New Zealand Hyadina Haliday (Diptera: Ephydridae), Zootaxa 4623 (3), pp. 401-440 : 418-420

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4623.3.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6C8F0D4B-1830-4B87-ACA4-824C356FDA91

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10448078

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E084B480-3944-412A-B734-A44DE3676CB1

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:E084B480-3944-412A-B734-A44DE3676CB1

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Parahyadina bulla
status

sp. nov.

Parahyadina bulla , sp. nov.

( Figs. 18 View FIGURES 17–18 , 23–26 View FIGURES 23–26 , Map 5 View MAP 5 )

Diagnosis. This species is distinguished from congeners by the following combination of characters: Adults. Small to moderately small shore flies, body length 1.75–2.40 mm.

Head ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 17–18 ): Lateroclinate fronto-orbital seta well developed, basal diameter comparable or only slightly reduced in comparison to basal diameters of vertical setae.

Thorax ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 17–18 ): 2 pairs of posterior dorsocentral setae. Wing hyaline; costal section II greater in length than costal section III; costal vein ratio 0.83–0.85; M vein ratio 0.30–0.32.

Abdomen: Tergites 3–5 with ventrolateral margin shallowly round; male tergite 5 extended posteriorly in same plane as tergite 4. Male terminalia ( Figs. 23–26 View FIGURES 23–26 ): Epandrium in posterior view ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 23–26 ) as inverted, regular U, surstylar arms oriented ventrally, widest a ventral level of cerci, in lateral view ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 23–26 ) with dorsal, epandrium linear, narrow, more or less parallel sided, widest at level of fusion with surstyli; surstylar length (from fusion bulge ventrad) subequal to height of cercus, oriented in same plane as epandrial portion, in lateral view ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 23–26 ) with slight basal swelling (at fusion with epandrium), thereafter ventrally tapered to narrowly rounded, shallowly recurved apex, posterior margin very shallowly obtusely angled, apex bearing a single, short, curved setula, also bearing 2 larger setulae along anterior margin at midheight, length of setulae twice that of apical setula; cercus in posterior view ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 23–26 ) irregularly obovate, generally covered with small setulae, in lateral view ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 23–26 ) height greater than twice width with anterior margin somewhat straight, posterior margin almost regularly arched; aedeagus in lateral view ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 23–26 ) slipper-like with toe toward base, base shallowly bifurcate with slightly asymmetric, short arms, in ventral view ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 23–26 ) with basal margin deeply arched, wide, apical margin with short, wide medial projection, apex truncate; phallapodeme in lateral view ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 23–26 ) irregularly triangular, with moderately broad, elongate keel with a broadly rounded apical margin, extension toward aedeagal base digitiform, elongate, hypandrial extension broader and shorter than extension toward aedeagal base, in ventral view ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 23–26 ) very as a cross, with base shallowly bifurcate, cross piece at midlength, thereafter toward apex tapered to narrowly rounded apex; gonite and hypandrium broadly fused, in lateral view ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 23–26 ) with hypandrial portion longer than gonal portion, with shallow step at midlength, gonal portion short, tapered to point apically, in ventral view ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 23–26 ) tubular with lateral extension at 90° angle and with paired apical, digitiform extensions medially that bear 2 apical tubercles.

Type Specimen. The holotype male of Parahyadina bulla is labeled “ NEW ZEALAND. Tennants Lake (43°49.4’S, 176°34’W), 14 Oct 2002, D. and W. N. Mathis/ USNM ENT 00184462 [plastic bar code label]/HO- LOTYPE ♂ Parahyadina bulla Mathis & Zatwarnicki NZAC [red].” The holotype is double mounted (minuten in a plastic block), is in excellent condition, and is deposited in the NZAC. Thirty-two paratypes bear the same label data as the holotype (18♂, 14♀; USNM). Other paratypes are as follows: Chatham Islands. Chatham Island: Cape Young (43°41.7’S, 176°37.5’W; on Cotula coronopifolia L.), 16 Jan 1976, R. P. MacFarlane (1♂; NZAC) GoogleMaps ; Kiringe Creek (44°02.8’S, 176°38.3’W), 13 Oct 2002, D. and W. N. Mathis (1♀; USNM) GoogleMaps ; Lake Te Roto (43°49.2’S, 176°34.8’W), 12 Feb 1967, J. S. Dugdale (2♂, 2♀; NZAC) GoogleMaps ; Mangahu Forest (43°58.6’S, 176°30.2’W), 10 Feb 1967, J. S. Dugdale (1♂; NZAC) GoogleMaps ; Ocean Mail Point (2.5 km W; beach on lagoon; 43°45’S, 176°27.6’W), 12 Oct 2002, D. and W. N. Mathis (2♀; USNM) GoogleMaps ; Port Hutt (1 km NW; peat and bracken fern; 43°48.1’S, 176°43.3’W), 14 Oct 2002, D. and W. N. Mathis (13♂, 14♀; USNM) GoogleMaps ; Rotoparaoa Lake (43°48.7’S, 176°35.3’W), 14 Oct 2002, D. and W. N. Mathis (2♂, 1♀; USNM) GoogleMaps ; Tuku River (mouth; 44°03.9’S, 176°39.2’W), 13 Oct 2002, D. and W. N. Mathis (3♂, 3♀; USNM) GoogleMaps ; Waitangi Creek (43°47.1’S, 176°48.3’W), 14 Oct 2002, D. and W. N. Mathis (1♂, 1♀; USNM) GoogleMaps ; Waterfall Creek (44°03.5’S, 176°38.2’W), 13 Oct 2002, D. and W. N. Mathis (1♂; USNM) GoogleMaps ; Wharekuri (field and beach; 43°42.4’S, 176°34.7’W), 12 Oct 2002, D. and W. N. Mathis (6♂, 5♀; USNM) GoogleMaps . Pitt Island : Glory Bay (44°19’S, 176°12.1’W), 14 Jan 1990, J. W. Early (1♂, 2♀; LUNZ) GoogleMaps .

Type locality. New Zealand. Chatham Islands. Chatham Island. Tennants Lake (43°49.4’S, 176°34’W) GoogleMaps .

Distribution ( Map 5 View MAP 5 ). Australasian/Oceanian: New Zealand. Chatham Islands (Chatham Island, Pitt Island).

Etymology. The species epithet, bulla , is of Latin derivation and means knob, referring to the swollen, knoblike apex of the shallowly recurved gonite of this species.

Remarks. This species is apparently endemic to the Chatham Islands, occurring on both Chatham Island and Pitt Island. The dozen or so islets of the Chatham Islands were not sampled.

This species is very similar to P. lacustris , including many structures of the male terminalia, such as the surstylus. The gonites of this species, however, differ markedly, as seen by comparing Figs. 26 View FIGURES 23–26 of this species with those of P. lacustris ( Fig. 52 View FIGURES 49–52 ). The anterior projections of the gonite are approximate, not widely separated, and the posterior structure is as a very broad and short U-shaped structure. The phallapodeme is T-shaped ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 23–26 ) with the comparatively large cross piece located near the midlength and not toward the base. In addition, the surstylus in posterior view ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 23–26 ) is sinuous with a slightly expanded, semispatulate apex.

NEW

University of Newcastle

USNM

Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History

NZAC

New Zealand Arthropod Collection

LUNZ

Lincoln University Entomology Research Museum

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Ephydridae

Tribe

Hyadinini

Genus

Parahyadina

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF