Hyadina, Haliday in Curtis, 1837

Mathis, Wayne N. & Zatwarnicki, Tadeusz, 2019, Revision of the Shore-fly Genera Parahyadina Tonnoir and Malloch and New Zealand Hyadina Haliday (Diptera: Ephydridae), Zootaxa 4623 (3), pp. 401-440 : 409

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4623.3.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6C8F0D4B-1830-4B87-ACA4-824C356FDA91

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A08710-6826-FFFC-46EA-FD0FE6CB4CBC

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Hyadina
status

 

Key to Species of Hyadina View in CoL View at ENA and Parahyadina

1. Lateroclinate fronto-orbital seta weakly developed, basal diameter much reduced in comparison to basal diameters of vertical setae............................................................................................... 2

- Lateroclinate fronto-orbital seta well developed, basal diameter comparable or only slightly reduced in comparison to basal diameters of vertical setae.............................................................................. 3

2. Dorsocentral postsutural seta 1 with several dorsocentral setulae; male tergites 3–5 with ventrolateral margin shallowly and bluntly rounded.......................................................................... H. breva , sp. nov.

- Dorsocentral postsutural setae 2 with several dorsocentral setulae; male tergites 3–5 with anterior margin extended ventrolaterally as a pointed, well-sclerotized process.................................................. P. edmistoni , sp. nov.

3. Costal section II equal in length or longer than costal section III................................................ 4

- Costal section II shorter than costal section III.............................................................. 8

4. Wings amber......................................................................................... 5

- Wings hyaline........................................................................................ 6

5. Aedeagus in lateral view sickle shaped ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 13–16 ); hypandrial-gonal structure longer than wide in ventral view ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 13–16 ), apical extensions of gonites digitiform.............................................................. P. atra , sp. nov.

- Aedeagus in lateral view more or less rectangular ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 7–10 ); hypandrial-gonal structure wider than long in ventral view ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 7–10 ), apical extensions irregularly bifurcate...................................................... P. angusta , sp. nov.

6. Surstylar midheight bearing 5–6 setulae; aedeagus in lateral view shoe-like with tapered and narrow “toe”; gonite in lateral view ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 19–22 ) relatively narrow, straight throughout length.................................... P. bifurcata , sp. nov.

- Surstylar midheight bearing 2 setulae; aedeagus in lateral view more or less rectangular; gonite in lateral view L-shaped, apical portion more robust ( Fig. 52 View FIGURES 49–52 )............................................................................ 7

7. Shape of hypandrium-gonite in ventral view ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 49–52 ) more or less quadrate with corners extended as thumb-like process posteriorly and as shallowly bifurcate, broad process anterolaterally, anterior margin concave....................................................................................................... P. lacustris Tonnoir and Malloch View in CoL

- Shape of hypandrium-gonite in ventral view ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 23–26 ) tubular with lateral extension at 90° angle and with paired apical, digitiform extensions medially that bear 2 apical tubercles ( Chatham Islands).............................. P. bulla , sp. nov.

8. Male tergites 3–5 with anterior margin extended ventrolaterally as a pointed, well-sclerotized process; male tergite 5 tucked obliquely ventrad from plane of tergite 4................................................... P. edmistoni , sp. nov.

- Male tergites 3–5 with ventrolateral margin shallowly and bluntly rounded; male tergite 5 extended posteriorly in same plane as tergite 4........................................................................................... 9

9. Postsutural scutum without distinct, longitudinal vittae between acrostichal setae and dorsocentral setae; fronto-orbital setae and lateral vertical seta identical in length and basal width. Surstylus conspicuously tapered, apex narrowly rounded............................................................................................. P. irwini , sp. nov.

- Postsutural scutum with distinct, longitudinal vittae in rows between acrostichal setae and dorsocentral setae............ 10

10. Fronto-orbital seta subequal in length to lateral vertical seta. Surstylus in posterior view ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 39–42 ) tapered to narrowly rounded apex................................................................................. P. hennigi , sp. nov.

- Fronto-orbital setae shorter than lateral vertical seta. Surstylus in posterior view ( Figs. 29 View FIGURES 29–32 , 55 View FIGURES 55–58 ) somewhat rectangular with apex very shallowly bilobed................................................................................ 11

11. Medial and lateral lobes of surstylar apex about equal in length (best seen in posterior view); gonite in ventral view ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 55–58 ) with large, tapered, lateral process......................................................... P. latistylis , sp. nov.

- Lateral lobe of shallow surstylar bifurcation longer than medial lobe or angle; gonite in ventral view ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 19–22 ) with ventrally oriented, deeply bifurcate process.......................................................... P. debilis , sp. nov.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Ephydridae

Tribe

Hyadinini

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) CoL Data Package (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF