Tenagodus barbadensis, Bieler, 2004
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2003.00104.x |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8773D6CE-6F0B-4F28-AA6D-4CE788B4C6C3 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039F87F5-704C-231A-AEDA-FAF2CAB1FC92 |
treatment provided by |
Diego |
scientific name |
Tenagodus barbadensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
TENAGODUS BARBADENSIS View in CoL SP. NOV.
Type material: Holotype ( Fig. 6 View Figures 1–6 ): 35.8 mm overall shell length, 3.6 mm inner apertural diameter, about 7 teleoconch whorls, FMNH 301239 About FMNH . Paratypes (ranging in overall length 13.8–48.9 mm): 15 shells, 15 fragments (incl. SEM specimens, Figs 14 View Figures 7–14 , 23-25 View Figures 15–25 ), FMNH 301290 About FMNH ; 10 shells, HBOM 065 View Materials : 00000; 10 shells, AMNH 308079 About AMNH . Type locality: off Speightstown , Barbados (13∞14.82¢N, 59∞39.82¢W), 101 m; collected by suction device, submersible Johnson-Sea-Link II, dive 1732, with R/ V Seward Johnson; previously embedded in unidentified sponge (not Spongosorites ) .
Description
Shell (teleoconch) ( Figs 6 View Figures 1–6 , 14 View Figures 7–14 ). Very loosely coiled, with most known specimens between 20 and 45 mm in total length and with inner apertural diameter of 3– 4 mm (4.6 mm in largest fragment collected). Juvenile shells with little sculpture except growth marks, but developing numerous fine spiral striae of increasing strength on subsequent whorls; after 5–6 whorls only some of these striae developing into 4–6 rows of spines, the others continuing as finer riblets interspersed between them. Spines strongest on underside of coils, and nearly absent in what would be the umbilicus in a regularly coiled shell. Spines curved and fluted tube-like, with open side facing aperture. Earliest whorls often internally closed off by concave calcareous septa ( Fig. 14 View Figures 7–14 ). Early part of open shell slit (corresponding to region of posterior mantle cavity in the living animal) narrowed by lateral ingrowths, but not forming series of regular, complete holes ( Fig. 6 View Figures 1–6 ); the most recent (body whorl) slit barely restricted, with undulating to near-even margins ( Fig. 6 View Figures 1–6 ). Slit of earlier whorls (corresponding to region of digestive gland and gonad) filled-in with shell material. Fresh specimens with glossy shell surface. Shell light tan, often blotchily darker on earlier whorls.
Protoconch ( Figs 23–25 View Figures 15–25 ; n = 2 for measurements). Fragile and readily decollating (only 2 retrieved), 303– 337 Mm high and 298–320 Mm wide, most of its bulk represented by a large embryonic shell ( PC-I) 228– 235 Mm in diameter; larval shell ( PC-II) of only 1/3 whorl. Sculpture consisting of very small pustules on upper part of whorl, followed below by finely granulated spiral striae (which appear as rows of fused pustules); aperture strongly sinuous, deeply embayed on upper whorl surface at point of contact with teleoconch slit area. Embryonic shell whitish brown, larval shell light tan.
Operculum and anatomy: unknown.
Habits and habitat
Only known from single locality, as empty shells embedded in situ in unidentified sponge (not Spongosorites ), from 101 m depth.
Geographical distribution
Only known from off Barbados.
Comparison
The teleoconch morphology is very similar to that of T. squamatus , with rows of fluted shell spines. From the limited material at hand it appears that T. barbadensis has more and better-defined spiral striae between the spine-bearing ribs than T. squamatus . Its shell slit does not show the regular pattern of restriction to well-defined holes as present in comparatively smooth-shelled T. modestus . It remains to be seen whether the collected specimens of T. barbadensis are fully grown or whether this species also reaches much larger shell sizes. The key characters that set this new species apart are in the protoconch. Its sculpture is much finer, with less distinction of the area of pustules and the rows of striae than seen in the two other western Atlantic species (compare Figs 19, 22, 24 View Figures 15–25 ). As in the latter, the protoconch is roughly as wide as it is tall, but it shows different allometry. The embryonic shell is much larger (in fact, it is larger than the entire protoconch of T. modestus ), and there is a much shorter section of the larval shell ( PC-II): T. modestus grows an entire whorl following the embryonic shell, T. squamatus about one-and-a-quarter, but T. barbadensis develops only a third of a whorl (compare Figs 20, 22, 25 View Figures 15–25 ). Note that eroded teleoconch fragments of this species are hardly distinguishable from those of T. squamatus and collections might contain shells of both under the latter name.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.