Platythelphusa polita Capart, 1952

Reed, Sadie K. & Cumberlidge, Neil, 2006, Brachyura: Potamoidea: Potamonautidae, Platythelphusidae, Deckeniidae (), Zootaxa 1262 (1), pp. 1-139: 1-139

publication ID

http://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1262.1.1

persistent identifier

http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039E87EB-FF93-0340-7A69-ED19371EFB6B

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Platythelphusa polita Capart, 1952
status

 

23. Platythelphusa polita Capart, 1952   (Fig. 195, plate XXIII)

Platythelphusa polita Capart, 1952: 455–57   , figs. 7d, e, g; Cumberlidge, 1999: 277; Cumberlidge et al., 1999: 1507–1509, fig. 5, 7h, i, 8e, o, p, 9e, 10p–s; Marijnissen et al., 2004: 528–530, Tables 1, 2.

Potamonautes (Platythelphusa) polita   — Coulter, 1991: 253–255, tables 9.XX, 9.XXI.

Type material examined: Lake Tanganyika , paratypes, adult female, ovigerous (cw 13 mm), adult male (cw 14 mm) ( BMNH 1952.10.23.34–35)   .

Additional material: TANZANIA: See Cumberlidge et al. (1999).

Diagnosis. Carapace sub­hexagonal, rounded, medium wide (cw/fw 2.4), slightly wider than long (cl/fw 2.1), high (ch/fw 1.1). Front deflexed slightly, edge smooth, each external corner marked by small, low tooth. Exorbital angle produced into broad low tooth, epibranchial tooth very small. Three teeth on anterolateral margin (small epibranchial tooth anteriormost, other two teeth large, subequal, directed forward). Sidewalls of carapace divided by epimeral sulcus into two parts, faint vertical sulcus can be detected under close examination. Suborbital margin lined by small granules, small tooth at medial end. Margins of inferior surface of merus of cheliped smooth; single large pointed distal tooth on medial inferior margin; superior margin of merus of p1 with short carinae. Inner margin of carpus of cheliped with two large subequal medial teeth, articular tooth (at point of articulation with propodus) low, blunt; outer margin of carpus smooth. Merus of p5 shorter than fw, distal tooth on superior margin of p2–p5 low. Propodus of p4 slim with smooth margins, propodus of p5 short, broad, margins of propodi of p5 flat, widened, smooth. Dactylus of p5 very short, only half as long as dactylus of p4. Dactyli of p2–p5 slim, curved, with rows of long spines. Terminal article of gonopod 1 directed sharply outward at 80° angle to the vertical, stout, cone­shaped, tapering to pointed tip.

Description. See Capart (1952) and Cumberlidge et al. (1999).

Size. The adult size range is from cw 12 to cw 18 mm.

Distribution. Lake Tanganyika: Burundi, Tanzania and D. R. Congo. Platythelphusa polita   occurs in waters from 5–60 m deep, where the lake bottom is either sandy or rocky and there are shell beds. This species is sometimes found inside empty Neothauma   shells.

Remarks. This species was redescribed by Cumberlidge et al. (1999), who provided details of its identification, distribution and ecology. The terminal article of gonopod 1 is directed outward at an 80° angle to the vertical, rather than at a 60° angle, as stated in Cumberlidge et al. (1999). Platythelphusa polita   is morphologically close to P. maculata   but differs in the form of the articular tooth of the carpus of p1 (which is a sharp spine in P. maculata   and a low, blunt tooth in P. polita   ), by the carapace height (which is medium high in P. polita   and flat in P. maculata   ) and by the size of the epibranchial tooth (which is extremely small in P. polita   and large and pointed in P. maculata   ). There are clear differences between P. polita   and P. armata   . These include the body size at maturity (cw 12 to cw 13 mm in P. polita   and cw 35 to cw 37 mm in P.armata   ), the articular tooth of the carpus of p1 (low and blunt in P. polita   and sharp and pointed in P. armata   ) and the terminal article of gonopod 1 (angled at 80° to the vertical in P. polita   and at 90° to the vertical in P. armata   ). Platythelphusa polita   is distinguished from juvenile P. armata   by the relatively high carapace, by the dimorphism of the male chelipeds, by fewer spines on the anterolateral margin of the carapace and by the distinctly smaller epibranchial tooth of P. polita   . Differences between P. polita   and P. echinata   include the carapace height (medium height in P. polita   and very flat in P. echinata   ), the inferior margins of p2–p5 (smooth in P. polita   , very spiny in P. echinata   ), the margin of the merus of p1 (smooth in P. polita   , very spiny in P. echinata   ), the frontal margin (smooth in P. polita   , very spiny in P. echinata   ) and the suborbital margin (smooth in P. polita   , very spiny in P. echinata   ).

Natural history and conservation status. The conservation status of P. polita   is categorized as least concern (LC) ( Table 4) because it has a range of occurrence and an area of occupancy in excess of the thresholds for vulnerable (VU) ( IUCN 2004). Its population is estimated to be stable based on indirect measures such as the fact that a material has been collected recently from more than one locality (R. Bills, pers comm.).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Malacostraca

Order

Decapoda

Family

Potamonautidae

Genus

Platythelphusa

Loc

Platythelphusa polita Capart, 1952

Reed, Sadie K. & Cumberlidge, Neil 2006
2006
Loc

Potamonautes (Platythelphusa) polita

Coulter, G. W. 1991: 253
1991
Loc

Platythelphusa polita

Marijnissen, S. & Schram, F. & Cumberlidge, N. & Michel, A. E. 2004: 528
Capart, A. 1952: 57
1952