Physiphora alceae ( Preyssler, 1791: 129 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5506.3.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:47A8FFCF-12EC-43AE-974D-0F06DFB0606A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13759955 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039A8784-FFEB-4A3D-FF58-FD41E2386CA8 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Physiphora alceae ( Preyssler, 1791: 129 ) |
status |
|
Physiphora alceae ( Preyssler, 1791: 129) View in CoL
( Fig. 17 View FIGURE 17 )
Musca alceae Preyssler, 1791: 129 . Type destroyed ( Evenhuis & Pape, 2024). Czech Republic, Bohemia.
= Musca demandata Fabricius, 1798: 564 . Unspecified type (ZMUC). Germany, Kiel. Refs.: Hendel, 1910: 21–22 (cat., as Chrysomyza sic!); Evenhuis, 2012: no page (distr.).
= Chrysomyza splendida Fallén, 1817: 4 View in CoL . Unspecified type. Sweden, Scania (Esperod).
= Ulidia bicolor Macquart, 1835: 504 View in CoL . Syntypes male and female (MNHN). France and Germany. Refs.: Loew, 1845: 28 (syn. as U. demandata ); Séguy, 1934: 84; Zaitzev, 1984: 60; attributed to Macquart, 1835: 504 (Macquart’s “ U. bicolore View in CoL ” was used clearly as a vernacular French name of Ulidia demandata ; consequently mentioned “ U. bicolor Macquart View in CoL ”, always as a synonym of demandata, is unavailable) ( Chen & Kameneva, 2007: 17; Kameneva & Korneyev, 2016: 13).
= Ulidia smaragdi Walker, 1849: 1059 View in CoL . Type unknown (maybe in NHMUK).
Type material. destroyed ( Rozkošný et al., 1982; Thompson & Pont, 1993; El-Hawagry, 2017). Bohemia, Czech Republic.
Distribution. Worldwide (see comments), in the American continent: Argentina, Mexico, and USA. Chile. Región de Coquimbo: Limarí Province (Limarí); Región Metropolitana: Chacabuco Province (Lampa, Montenegro); Región de O’Higgins: Cardenal Caro Province (Marchigüe), Fig. 17 View FIGURE 17 .
References. Steyskal, 1968: 21 (cat.); Rozkošný et al. 1982: 353 (syn.); Evenhuis, 1989: 481 (cat.); Chen & Kameneva, 2007: 17–19 (distr., reds., syn.); Evenhuis, 2012: no page (cat., distr.); Kameneva & Korneyev, 2016: 13–17 (com., distr., reds., syn.).
Comments. For complete synonymy, generic combinations used, and geographic distribution of this species see Chen & Kameneva (2007: 17), Kameneva & Korneyev (2016: 13), and El-Hawagry (2017: 180).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Physiphora alceae ( Preyssler, 1791: 129 )
Mello, Ramon Luciano, González, Christian R., Elgueta, Mario, Camargo, Alexssandro & Barahona-Segovia, Rodrigo M. 2024 |
Ulidia smaragdi
Walker, F. 1849: 1059 |
Chrysomyza splendida Fallén, 1817: 4
Fallen, C. F. 1817: 4 |
Musca demandata
Hendel, F. 1910: 21 |
Fabricius, J. C. 1798: 564 |
Physiphora alceae ( Preyssler, 1791: 129 )
Preyssler, J. D. E. 1791: 129 |
Musca alceae
Preyssler, J. D. E. 1791: 129 |