Loneura orucapu, Obando & Gironza & Panche & Aldrete, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4802.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BA145877-12CB-4C97-A18F-9E4E6F0258CA |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039787F6-D143-261A-FF7A-FA594CDCF99C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Loneura orucapu |
status |
sp. nov. |
Loneura orucapu View in CoL n. sp.
(Figs 88–99)
Diagnosis. Related to L. misak , differing from it in having the posterior processes of the hypandrium more slender and more directed postero-laterally, and in having the mesal processes of the hypandrium stout and distally truncate (Fig. 91). Also, the endophallic sclerites are distinctly different in both species (Fig. 93).
Male. Color. Body pale brown. Head pattern (Fig. 90), vertex light brown; front with brown spots; an ochre transverse band between the inner border of each compound eye below the lower edge of the ocellar triangle to the epistomal sulcus; a cream diagonal band from the inner border of each compound eye to the epistomal sulcus at the level of the antennal fossae. Compound eyes black, ocelli hyaline with ochre centripetal crescents. Labrum, anteclypeus, postclypeus and mandibles dark brown. Genae dark brown. Postgenae light brown.Antennae: scape brown, pedicel and flagella pale brown, flagellomeres 1–6 with apices cream. Maxillary palps brown, Mx1 light brown. Tergal lobes of meso- and metathorax dark brown, with light brown edges. Thoracic pleura light brown with large dark brown areas. Legs: coxae with small ochre spots basally, fore- coxae, trochanters and femora brown; coxae,
FIGURES. 88–93. Loneura orucapu n. sp. Male. 88. Forewing. 89. Hindwing. 90. Front view of head. 91. Hypandrium. 92. Left paraproct and epiproct. 93. Phallosome. Scales in mm.
trochanters and femora of mid- and hindlegs light brown; femora with two brown spots; tibiae and tarsi brown. Wings hyaline (Figs 88–89). Forewing pterostigma hyaline, with proximal and distal brown bands; a pale brown submarginal band from R4+5 to areola postica, a slender brown band from Cu1 to distal end of 1A; veins with a brown spot at wing margin. Hindwings with brown spots distally on veins. Abdomen light brown, with subcuticular ochre bands on tergum; sternum with ochre subcuticular spots. Clunium pale brown. Hypandrium dark brown. Epiproct and paraprocts light brown.
Morphology. Head (Fig. 90): H/MxW: 1.45; H/d: 3.75; IO/MxW: 0.76. Vertex slightly above the level of the upper border of the compound eyes. Outer cusp of lacinial tips broad, with five–six short denticles. Mx4/Mx2: 1.22. Forewings (Fig. 88): L/W: 2.57. Pterostigma: lp/wp: 4.49, areola postica tall, wide, apically rounded: la/ha: 1.62, R4+5 sinuous, M five-branched, M3 and M5 forked. Hindwings (Fig. 89): l/w: 2.89; M three-branched. Hypandrium (Fig. 91), posterior processes distally slender, directed postero-laterally, meso- anterior processes stout, elongate, distally truncate; phallosome Y-shaped anteriorly, side struts slender; external parameres laminar, sclerotized laterally, apex rounded, bearing pores and short teeth on lateral margin (Fig. 93); two pairs of endophallic sclerites, anterior and lateral pair fused, laminar and strongly curved outwards; mesal pair proximally wide, with anterior processes laminar, mesal sclerite processes distally curved outward, with anteapical internal tooth. Paraprocts (Fig. 92) oval, with distal setal field and macrosetae as illustrated; sensory fields with 22–23 trichobothria on basal rosettes. Epiproct (Fig. 92) semioval, with short and long setae, two lateral macrosetae, a setal field on posterior border and a posterior field of microspicules.
Measurements. FW: 3662, HW: 2575, F: 950, T: 1625, t1: 725, t2: 90, t3: 120, ctt1: 26, f1: 650, f2: 562, f3: 500, f4: 475, f5: 330, f6: 275, f7: 250, Mx4: 250, IO: 470, D: 340, d: 240, IO/d: 1.96, PO: 0.71.
Female. Color. Body, head, legs (except fore-coxae which are cream), epiproct, paraprocts and wings as in the males. Subgenital plate with pigmented area U-shaped, sides dark brown, posteriorly pale brown ( Fig. 97 View FIGURES 94–99 ). Gonapophyses brown, ninth sternum brown to yellowish.
Morphology. Head ( Fig. 96 View FIGURES 94–99 ) H/MxW: 1.39; compound eyes large, H/d: 3.44; IO/MxW: 0.74. Vertex slightly above the level of the upper border of the compound eyes; outer cusp of lacinial tips broad, with 5–6 denticles. Mx4/Mx2: 1.28. Forewings ( Fig. 94 View FIGURES 94–99 ) L/W: 2.49; pterostigma: lp/wp: 3.82, elongate, wider in the middle; M five branched, M5 forked; areola postica: la/ha: 1.59, tall, wide, broadly triangular, apically rounded. Hindwings ( Fig. 95 View FIGURES 94–99 ) l/w: 2.96; M three-branched. Subgenital plate ( Fig. 97 View FIGURES 94–99 ) wide, setose, with posterior border rounded. Gonapophyses ( Fig. 99 View FIGURES 94–99 ): v1 elongate, slender and acuminate; v2+3 with a proximal slender heel, v2 with a row of nine setae; distal process long and acuminate, bearing microsetae on surface. Ninth sternum ( Fig. 99 View FIGURES 94–99 ) distinctly pigmented, rounded anteriorly, with U-shaped deep concavity. Paraprocts ( Fig. 98 View FIGURES 94–99 ) triangular, elongate, with long and short setae distally; sensory fields with 24–25 trichobothria on basal rosettes. Epiproct ( Fig. 98 View FIGURES 94–99 ) triangular, wide based, with long and short setae as illustrated.
Measurements. FW: 3542, HW: 2570, F: 917, T: 1500, t1: 612, t2: 75, t3: 118, ctt1: 22, f1: 550, f2: 467, f3: 455, Mx4: 248, IO: 460, D: 327, d: 250, IO/d: 1.84, PO: 0.76.
Material studied. Holotype male. COLOMBIA. Caquetá. San Vicente del Caguán, Belén de Los Andaquíes, Resguardo Indígena La Esperanza , 01°36’19.18’’N: 75°56’12.46’’W, 844 m. 3–4.III.2017. Led light trap in forest canopy. J. Panche. MUSENUV slide code 29322 GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 1 female, 1 male, same data as the holotype. MUSENUV slide code 29323 GoogleMaps .
Etymology. This species is dedicated to the “Organización Uitoto del Caquetá, Amazonas y Putumayo ” (ORU- CAPU).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |