Hebella sp.

Calder, Dale R. & Faucci, Anuschka, 2021, Shallow water hydroids (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) from the 2002 NOWRAMP cruise to the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands, Zootaxa 5085 (1), pp. 1-73 : 13-15

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5085.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:12FC3342-F2A0-4EE1-9853-9C5855076A10

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10685615

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B7-0D28-E06F-7DA0-23CF6606FE78

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Hebella sp.
status

 

Hebella sp.

Fig. 4b View FIGURE 4

Voucher material. Midway Atoll, on a hydroid stem, 23 ix.2002, one colony, with two hydrothecae, 1.3 mm high, without gonothecae, ROMIZ B5493 .

Remarks. This hydroid could not confidently be assigned to any known species of the family Hebellidae Fraser, 1912 . Its characters are closest to those of the hebellid genera Hebella Allman, 1888 (type species: Hebella striata Allman, 1888 ) and Anthohebella Boero, Bouillon & Kubota, 1997 (type species: Lafoea parasitica Ciamician, 1880 ), purportedly distinguished by the morphology of their liberated gonophores. Although gonophores of H. striata are certainly medusoids or medusae ( Hartlaub 1905), their anatomy after liberation has yet to be described. Thus, the molecular phylogenetic relationship of H. striata and H. parasitica needs study to determine whether the two nominal genera they nomenclaturally typify are indeed distinct. The species examined here has therefore been provisionally assigned to Hebella . Given the absence of gonosomes, our specimen is best not dealt with as an undescribed species. It is different from a hydroid reported earlier by Calder (2020) from Oahu as Hebella sp. , identified above as Hebella furax Millard, 1957 , and the species it represents is new to Hawaii.

In having a distinct, annulated pedicel, a deeply campanulate to almost cylindrical hydrotheca, hydrothecal walls with modest transverse annulations, a strongly flaring hydrothecal rim, and a ring of thickened perisarc at the hydrothecal base, this species most closely resembles Hebella venusta ( Allman, 1877) . However, it differs in having fewer and less distinct annulations on the hydrothecal wall. Moreover, its hydrothecae are larger (ca. 1000 µm long × 400 µm wide) than those of H. venusta as measured by Calder (1991a: to 650 µm long × 300 µm wide) and Galea (2010: 470–545 µm long × 265–315 µm wide). In terms of biogeography, H. venusta may be endemic to the Atlantic Ocean; records of it from the Indian Ocean ( Ritchie 1910, as Lafoea venusta ) and the Red Sea ( Mergner & Wedler 1977) are regarded here as questionable.

In the molecular barcoding studies of Moura et al. (2012) and Maronna et al. (2016), H. venusta and A. parasitica have been shown to be very close. Gonothecae of the two also appear to be morphologically similar (Boero et al. 1997; Galea 2010), although the medusoid or medusa stage of H. venusta is unfortunately still unknown.

Reported Distribution. Hawaiian archipelago. First record.

Genus Hebellopsis Hadži, 1913

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Cnidaria

Class

Hydrozoa

SubClass

Hydroidolina

Order

Leptothecata

Family

Hebellidae

Genus

Hebella

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF