Rhipicephalus sulcatus Neumann, 1908b
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5251.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3326BF76-A2FB-4244-BA4C-D0AF81F55637 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7718459 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03966A56-0FEB-C7EA-BABF-8C49B6F9FD01 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhipicephalus sulcatus Neumann, 1908b |
status |
|
78. Rhipicephalus sulcatus Neumann, 1908b View in CoL View at ENA .
Afrotropical: 1) Angola, 2) Benin, 3) Botswana, 4) Burkina Faso, 5) Burundi, 6) Cameroon, 7) Central African Republic, 8) Chad (south), 9) Congo, 10) Democratic Republic of the Congo, 11) Eritrea, 12) Ethiopia, 13) Gabon, 14) Ghana, 15) Guinea, 16) Ivory Coast, 17) Kenya, 18) Malawi, 19) Mali (south), 20) Mozambique, 21) Namibia, 22) Nigeria, 23) Rwanda, 24) Senegal, 25) South Africa, 26) South Sudan, 27) Sudan, 28) Tanzania, 29) Togo, 30) Uganda, 31) Zambia, 32) Zimbabwe ( Morel & Vassiliades 1963, Pegram et al. 1987 b, Walker et al. 2000, Terenius et al. 2000, Morel 2003, Ntiamoa-Baidu et al. 2004, Horak et al. 2018, Sylla et al. 2021).
Guglielmone et al. (2020) regard as provisional the redescriptions of the male and female of Rhipicephalus sulcatus , as well as the descriptions of the larva and nymph in Theiler & Robinson (1953) and subsequently published redescriptions of the immature stages. Additionally, Guglielmone et al. (2020) believe that further studies, including those involving molecular methods, are needed to resolve the taxonomic problems associated with Rhipicephalus sulcatus and related ticks.
Morphological separation of Rhipicephalus sulcatus from Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato, Rhipicephalus afranicus , named as Rhipicephalus turanicus by Morel & Vassiliades (1963), Pegram et al. (1987b), Walker et al. (2000), Morel (2003) and Horak et al. (2018), and other species in the Rhipicephalus sanguineus group is difficult, and it is sometimes impossible to reach a specific diagnosis. Under these conditions, information concerning the geographic distribution of Rhipicephalus sulcatus should be treated as provisional, and our list of countries where alleged Rhipicephalus sulcatus has been found is chiefly drawn from Morel & Vassiliades (1963), Pegram et al. (1987b), Walker et al. (2000), Morel (2003) and Horak et al. (2018).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |