Metrocoris issaci, Jehamalar & Dash, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5082.4.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:65FCF485-9671-4F37-86D3-B1ED3D7F51D0 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5792723 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03926975-FFB2-0835-FF14-FE6EBC4AFEB8 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Metrocoris issaci |
status |
sp. nov. |
Metrocoris issaci sp. nov.
( Figs. 2A–O View FIGURES 2 )
Material examined: Holotype (apterous ♂): INDIA, MEGHALAYA, East Khasi Hills District, Sangmain, Umpaimmaw Nala , 1767 m a.s.l., 25.54208° N, 91.851° E, 8.iii.2016, Paratypes. 1 apt. ♂, 2 apt. ♀, 5 nymphs, same locality data as for holotype, Coll. E.E. Jehamalar.
Repository. The type specimens are deposited in the CEL, ZSI, New Alipore , Kolkata, West Bengal, India. Holotype Reg. No. 11559/H15 and paratypes Reg. No. 11560/H15.
Etymology. The new species is named after the first author’s second oldest brother Mr. E. Issac Vijaya Singh, for his constant support.
Diagnosis. The new species can easily be recognized by the presence of the long processes clothed with long setae on the coxa and the trochanter of the hind leg of the female; the hind coxal process of the female reaches half the length of the hind trochanter ( Figs. 2B, I View FIGURES 2 ); the dorsosubapical region of the male paramere with a small excavation and dorsally with a V-shaped groove, the apical region ventrally with a nail-like pale mark ( Fig. 2N View FIGURES 2 ).
Description. Apterous male (holotype): ( Figs. 2A, C–G, J–O View FIGURES 2 ). Body length 5.67 (5.67–7.19, n=2), body width at mesoacetabula 2.64 (2.64–3.23, n=2).
Colour. Dorsum of body black with yellowish-brown marks; broad black mark on head slightly narrow anteriorly and broad posteriorly, posterosublaterally connected with black mark near eyes ( Figs. 2A, D View FIGURES 2 ); median black mark on head slightly concaved posteriorly; antenna and legs dark-brown to black; antennal tubercle black; base of first antennal segment yellowish-brown ( Figs. 2A, D View FIGURES 2 ); rostrum dark-brown to black, except lateral region of first to third segments yellowish-brown; proacetabulum black ( Figs. 2C, D View FIGURES 2 ); pronotum with T-shaped black mark, sublateral mark broad curved downwards, extended laterally and connected to lateral mark of mesonotum ( Figs. 2A, D View FIGURES 2 ), sublateral mark slightly concaved posteriorly ( Fig. 2A View FIGURES 2 ); small area near anterolateral region of pronotum below eye yellowishbrown; fore femur dorsally and ventrally with broad black stripe connected to apical black ring, extensor region yellowish-brown ( Fig. 2A View FIGURES 2 ); mesonotal longitudinal medial and lateral dark marks connected to horizontal black marks anteriorly and posteriorly, mesonotal black marks narrower than adjacent yellowish-brown marks; sublateral black mark of mesonotum not connected posteriorly to black mark between meso- and metanota, sublateral black mark basal half narrow and abruptly broad posteriorly; mesopleural black mark anteriorly connected with transverse black mark between propleura and mesopleura, posteriorly not connected with black mark of mesoacetabulum ( Fig. 2D View FIGURES 2 ); mesopleural yellowish-brown mark broad and reaches up to sublateral region of mesosternum medially, apex extended anteriorly and posteriorly ( Fig. 2C View FIGURES 2 ); yellowish-brown mark on metacetabulum uninterrupted ( Figs. 2A, J View FIGURES 2 ); area above base of metacetabular region with small yellowish-brown mark; thoracic venter black, except mesosternal yellowish-brown mark on mediolateral region; coxa and trochanter of all legs yellowish-brown; mid femur dorsally with long thin brown stripe; dorsum of abdomen black, except connexival segments VI and VII, posteromedian region of terga V and VI and posterior half of tergum VII and lateral and posterior margins of tergum VIII yellowish-brown ( Fig. 2A View FIGURES 2 ); venter of abdomen black, except from apical half of sternum VI to apex yellowishbrown, except sternum VII basally and medially and lateral region of pygophore dark-brown to black ( Fig. 2C View FIGURES 2 ).
Structural characteristics. Body clothed with small black adpressed irregularly arranged setae; eyes covering anterior 1/3 of propleura ( Fig. 2D View FIGURES 2 ); posterior margin of mesosternum covered with short silvery-white setae ( Fig. 2C View FIGURES 2 ); sterna VI–VII clothed with long whitish-brown setae; antenna without any characteristic setae; head laterally with two to three long black setae in front of eyes; eye width greater than posterior eye width. Pleural region of prothorax posteriorly with few long black setae; anteromedian region of mesosternum with some long setae, prominent in lateral view; fore femur slender, basally with two long setae, almost medially with shallow notch; mid femur longer than hind femur; mesal region of meso- and metacetabula with thin stripe of short adpressed silvery-white setae to golden-yellow. Abdominal terga I–VII and connexivum clothed with short silvery-white to golden setae; sternum VII longer than combined length of sterna V and VI; posterior margin of sternum VII concave ( Fig. 2F View FIGURES 2 ). Terminalia: Tergum VIII large, slightly wider than long, slightly concaved posteromedially, posteriorly and laterally fringed with long brown setae ( Fig. 2E View FIGURES 2 ); basomedian region of sternum VIII smoothly raised and slightly depressed sublaterally ( Fig. 2F View FIGURES 2 ); lateral margin of sternum VIII parallel-sided; sternum VIII distinctly longer than sternum VII; proctiger subovate ( Fig. 2L View FIGURES 2 ), slightly visible from above ( Fig. 2E View FIGURES 2 ); pygophore posteriorly convex with fringe of medium-sized setae, posterolaterally fringed with long setae ( Fig. 2M View FIGURES 2 ); paramere falciform, dorsosubapical region with small excavation, nearly middle slightly raised with long and short setae, ventral region with nail-like pale mark at apex ( Fig. 2N View FIGURES 2 ), visible from outside of genital segments laterally. Endosoma in lateral aspect: proximal region of dorsal sclerite inwardly curved, with short reflex angled process; dorsal sclerite concaved medially; accessory apical sclerite absent; accessory dorsal sclerite broad posteriorly and reached up to level of anterior region of lateral sclerite; anterior region of basal sclerite reached near middle of dorsal sclerite; lateral sclerite proximally slightly bend upwards, with blunt tip; ventral sclerite very long surpassing well beyond level of lateral sclerite in lateral view ( Fig. 2O View FIGURES 2 ).
Measurements. Head length 0.94, width 1.54; eye length 0.64, width 0.39, posterior eye width 0.32; synthlipsis 0.67; lengths of antennomeres I–IV 2.35, 0.98, 1.01, 0.78. Pronotal length 0.60, width 1.62; combined length of meso- and metanota 1.92; mesosternal length 2.44; metasternal length 0.15. Lengths of leg segments: foreleg: femur 2.94, tibia 2.55, tarsomeres I–II 0.16, 0.86; mid leg: femur 7.86, tibia 5.61, tarsomeres I–II 2.87, 0.50; hind leg: femur 7.80, tibia 4.22, tarsomeres I–II 0.43, 0.53; widths of fore, mid, hind femora 0.46, 0.33, 0.22. Length of abdominal tergum 2.25; length of abdominal sternum 2.11; lengths of abdominal sterna II–VIII 0.12, 0.11, 0.10, 0.12, 0.13, 0.33, 0.55; proctiger length 0.03; pygophore length 0.59; combined length of abdominal sterna V–VI 0.24; length of abdominal tergum VIII 0.71, width 0.75.
Apterous female (paratypes): ( Figs. 2B, H, I View FIGURES 2 ). Body length 5.65 (5.65–5.69, n=2), body width at mesoacetabula 3.11 (3.11–3.23, n=2).
Colour. Similar to apterous male, except for the following characteristics: dorsum of abdomen black, except tergum VII posteromedially with small yellowish-brown mark; abdominal sterna VI–VII brown.
Structural characteristics. Similar to apterous male, except for the following characteristics: hind coxa and trochanter with long processes clothed with long setae, coxal process longer than process of trochanter ( Figs. 2B, I View FIGURES 2 ); flexor region of hind femur basally with setal fringe ( Fig. 2I View FIGURES 2 ); genital segments completely concealed under sternum VII; sternum VII almost triangular, lateral constriction not prominent ( Fig. 2H View FIGURES 2 ); abdomen short, not reaching apex of hind coxa ( Figs. 2B, I View FIGURES 2 ).
Measurements. Head length 0.91, width 1.77; eye length 0.73, width 0.41, posterior eye width 0.40; synthlipsis 0.79; lengths of antennomeres I–IV 1.62, 0.90, 1.11, 0.90. Pronotal length 0.52, width 1.79; combined length of meso- and metanota 2.58; mesosternal length 2.94; metasternal length 0.16. Lengths of leg segments: foreleg: femur 2.78, tibia 2.39, tarsomeres I–II 0.16, 0.92; mid leg: femur 7.36, tibia 5.18, tarsomeres I–II 2.70, 0.50; hind leg: femur 7.10, tibia 3.96, tarsomeres I–II 0.43, 0.53; widths of fore, mid, hind femora 0.38, 0.31, 0.23; lateral length of hind coxal process 0.47; lateral length of hind trochanter process 0.26. Length of abdominal tergum 1.53; length of abdominal sternum 1.16; lengths of abdominal sterna II–VII 0.14, 0.11, 0.10, 0.13, 0.17, 0.50; combined length of abdominal sterna II–VI 0.65; combined length of abdominal sterna V–VI 0.30; length of tergum VII 0.17.
Distribution. Presently known only from East Khasi Hills, Meghalaya, India.
Comparative notes. Metrocoris issaci sp. nov. shares the characteristics like the presence of the setal fringe on the base of the flexor region of the hind femur of the female ( Fig. 2I View FIGURES 2 ) and the falciform male paramere, having the convex area on the dorsal region near middle ( Fig. 2N View FIGURES 2 ) and the reflex angled process on the proximal region of the dorsal sclerite and the long ventral sclerite surpassing the proximal region of the dorsal sclerite ( Fig. 2O View FIGURES 2 ) with M. coxalis , M. nigriventris Tran & Polhemus, 2017 and M. josephi sp. nov. The new species differs from M. coxalis and M. nigriventris , by the presence of long processes on both the coxa and the trochanter of the hind leg of the female; in M. coxalis the process is present only on the hind coxa of the female and in M. nigriventris the hind coxal process is absent and the hind trochanter is slightly produced. Metrocoris issaci sp. nov. and M. josephi sp. nov. have processes on both the coxa and the trochanter of the hind leg of the female ( Figs. 2B, I View FIGURES 2 ; 3C, J View FIGURES 3 ); however, these processes are longer in M. issaci sp. nov. ( Fig. 2I View FIGURES 2 ) when compared to M. josephi sp. nov. ( Fig. 3J View FIGURES 3 ). Moreover, the area surrounding the omphalium is black in M. issaci sp. nov. ( Figs. 2C, H View FIGURES 2 ) but it is yellow in M. josephi sp. nov. ( Figs. 3B, I View FIGURES 3 ). The overall structure of the male paramere is almost similar in M. coxalis , M. issaci sp. nov., M. josephi sp. nov. and M. nigriventris ; however, there are distinct differences on the tip of the paramere in each species, in M. issaci sp. nov. it is subapically excavated both the dorsal and the ventral region ( Fig. 2N View FIGURES 2 ), in M. josephi sp. nov. the excavation is present subapically only on the ventral region ( Fig. 3N View FIGURES 3 ), in M. nigriventris it is subapically produced and in M. coxalis the paramere is apically bent outwards.
CEL |
University of Illinois |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |