Scirtothrips Shull
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.157021 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6276622 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0391C840-FFEF-997F-8347-FBE1FBFECA09 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Scirtothrips Shull |
status |
|
Scirtothrips Shull View in CoL
Scirtothrips Shull, 1909: 222 View in CoL . Type species S. ruthveni Shull View in CoL , by monotypy.
Labiothrips Bhatti & Mound, 1994: 162 . Type species L. tenor Mound & Bhatti View in CoL , by monotypy. Syn. n.
In describing the genus Labiothrips , the authors emphasised the unusually elongate mouth cone of the only known species, also the head of females with the occipital ridge almost confluent with posterior margin of the compound eyes. Because of these character states, the species was not compared to any member of the genus Scirtothrips View in CoL . Moreover, at the time of that description the male of the species was not known. However, the males are now known to have the mouth cone rather shorter than that of females, and the postocular region distinctly longer. Moreover, the males have drepanae on the ninth tergite, as is common among Scirtothrips View in CoL species. Given the variation in mouth cone length among the species of Scirtothrips View in CoL recorded here, as well as the variation in other character states, there seems little point in segregating this one species to a separate genus. This is discussed further under S. tenor View in CoL below. Anascirtothrips View in CoL is another closely related genus (Mound & Wang, 2000), but the three known species all have a fringe of microtrichia on the sternites and the posterolateral setae on the mesonotum are close to the median setae. The second antennal segment lacks microtrichia (Mound & Wang, 2000), in contrast to Scirtothrips View in CoL species, but the pronotum of some of the new species described below has setae on the posterior half in contrast to most members of the genus worldwide.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Scirtothrips Shull
Hoddle, Mark S. & Mound, Laurence A. 2003 |
Labiothrips
Bhatti 1994: 162 |
Scirtothrips
Shull 1909: 222 |