Rutilus spp
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5779569 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5776942 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039187D5-9B5B-BB22-FFE6-74F574548AE0 |
treatment provided by |
Donat |
scientific name |
Rutilus spp |
status |
|
Rutilus spp View in CoL View at ENA (roach and related species)
Three species of Rutilus were recorded by Projet Lac in the perialpine lakes: common roach ( Rutilus rutilus ) is native to the Rhine and Rhone catchments and most of Europe (excluding Italian and Iberian peninsulas and Mediterranean drainages of the Balkan peninsula), while triotto (R. aula) and pigo ( R. pigus ) are native and endemic to the northern Adriatic basin, mainly the Po catchment ( Figure 34 View Figure 34 ). Rutilus rutilus was one of the most common species in Projet Lac, recorded in all northern perialpine lakes.This species was also recorded in a large number of fishing actions within each lake. Usually restricted to the littoral zone, R. rutilus also dominated the open water, pelagic zone of some smaller lakes: Remoray, Hallwil, Morat and Brenet. R. rutilus populations in the two most pristine oligotrophic lakes, Lake Brienz and Lake Walen, are genetically and – in the case of Lake Brienz – also phenotypically distinct from Rutilus in the other northern pre-alpine lakes [145]. Additionally, within Lake Brienz, fish from rocky boulder and cobble habitats are phenotypically distinct from those living over any other substrate type (; Figure 35 View Figure 35 ). We consider these to be different roach populations of high conservation priority. That Rutilus from more heavily impacted lakes geographically as distant as Lakes Geneva, Neuchatel and Hallwill are genetically more similar to each other than to those from Lakes Brienz and Walen may imply that Rutilus populations have lost parts of their distinctiveness in the course of ecosystem perturbation and stock transfer. In several Rhine lakes we also recorded intergeneric hybrids between Rutilus rutilus and Abramis brama ( Figure 34 View Figure 34 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |