Scutacarus incisus, Khaustov & Minor, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4508.4.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F0369CC8-FF4B-4D96-BAE2-48A83418739E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5984622 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038E87C4-3C20-B82F-FF37-FF22FC0AFBAE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Scutacarus incisus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Scutacarus incisus sp. nov.
( Figs 17–22 View FIGURE 17 View FIGURE 18 View FIGURE 19 View FIGURE 20 View FIGURE 21 View FIGURE 22 )
Description. F EMALE ( Figs 17–22 View FIGURE 17 View FIGURE 18 View FIGURE 19 View FIGURE 20 View FIGURE 21 View FIGURE 22 ). Length of idiosoma 190 (190–195), width 180 (175–185).
Gnathosoma ( Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 ). Length of gnathosoma 21 (20–21), width 19 (18–20). Gnathosoma completely covered by tergite C. Dorsal median apodeme reduced. All gnathosomal setae smooth. Postpalpal setae needle-like, weakly blunt-ended, situated anterolaterally to setae cha. Other gnathosomal setae pointed. Setae cha 9 (9–10), chb 11 (10– 11). Setae dFe slightly shorter than dGe. Pits n not evident. Ass well-developed, palpal solenidion not evident. Setae m 10 (9–10). Pharyngeal pumps separated. Pharyngeal pump 1 oval, striated, situated inside gnathosomal capsule; pharyngeal pumps 2 and 3 indiscernible.
Idiosomal dorsum ( Figs 17A View FIGURE 17 , 21A View FIGURE 21 , 22A, B View FIGURE 22 ). Free margins of tergite C striated (not illustrated on Fig. 17A View FIGURE 17 ). All dorsal shields with numerous large round dimples ( Figs 22A, B View FIGURE 22 ). Prodorsum completely covered by tergite C. Lateral propodosomal spine present. Stigmata elongate, located dorsally. Posterior margins of tergites C, D and EF weakly undulate. Setae e and h 2 barbed, pointed and slightly thickened, other dorsal setae smooth and weakly blunt-ended. Trichobothria with long stem, clavate, sparsely barbed, with rounded apex. Posterolateral margins of tergite C with deep incisions. Cupules ia on tergite D and ih on tergite H small, round. Posterior margin of tergite H evenly rounded. Lengths of dorsal setae: v 2 7 (7–8), sc 2 6 (6–7), c 1 9 (9–10), c 2 7 (7–8), d 7 (7–8), e 13 (13–15), f 9 (8–9), h 1 10 (9–10), h 2 13 (13–15). Distances between setae: v 2 –v 2 39 (37–40), sc 2 –sc 2 35 (32–35), c 1 – c 1 47 (46–49), c 1 – c 2 44 (44–52), d–d 120 (115–120), e–f 16 (15–16), f–f 100 (100–105), h 1 – h 1 47 (47–52), h 1 – h 2 20 (20–22).
Idiosomal venter ( Figs 17B View FIGURE 17 , 21B View FIGURE 21 , 22C, D View FIGURE 22 ). Ventral plates with large dimples as on dorsal shields ( Figs 22C, D View FIGURE 22 ). Setae 2 b blunt-ended, thickened and flattened, other ventral setae pointed. Setae 2 b, 3 a, 3 b, 4 a, 4 b, and ps 3 smooth, other ventral setae barbed. Posterior margin of aggenital plate rounded. Secondary transverse apodeme absent. Ap1, ap2 and apsej well developed and joined with appr; ap2 forming w-like structure; ap3 indistinct, ap4 short; ap5 absent. Ags bell-like; pgs triangular. Well sclerotized chitinous curved ridges present posterolaterally to legs IV. Lengths of ventral setae: 1 a 18 (18–20), 1 b 18 (18–20), 2 a 15 (14–18), 2 b 19 (18–19), 3 a 10 (10–12), 3 b 12 (11–12), 3 c 32 (32–42), 4 a 10 (10–12), 4 b 13 (12–14), 4 c 41 (38–42), ps 1 12 (12–13), ps 2 7 (7–8), ps 3 7 (7–8).
Legs ( Figs 19 View FIGURE 19 , 20 View FIGURE 20 ). Leg I ( Fig. 19A View FIGURE 19 ). Leg setation: Tr 1, Fe 1, Ge 4, TiTa 16(4). Tibiotarsus without pretarsus and claw. Tibiotarsus cylindrical, with pinnaculum bearing seta tc”. Lengths of solenidia ω 1 11 (11–12), ω 2 8 (9– 11), φ 1 9 (8–9), φ 2 7 (7–9); φ 1 clavate, ω 1 finger-shaped, ω 2 and φ 2 uniformly thin. Setae d of femur and v’ of genu weakly blunt-ended; seta l” of genu distinctly blunt-ended; other leg setae (except eupathidia) pointed. Setae pl’, (pv) and s of tibiotarsus smooth; other leg setae (except eupathidia) barbed. Setae l’ and v” of femur absent. Leg II ( Fig. 19B View FIGURE 19 ). Leg setation: Tr 1, Fe 1, Ge 3, Ti 4(1), Ta 6(1). Tarsus with symmetrical hooked claws and flipper-like empodium. Solenidion ω 11 (11–12) finger-shaped, solenidion φ 4 (4) weakly clavate. Seta pl” spine-like, smooth, with subapical seta-like projection; seta l’ of tibia thick, comb-like, seta d of femur weakly blunt-ended, other leg setae pointed. Setae u’ and tc” of tarsus smooth, other leg setae barbed. Setae l’ and v” of femur absent. Leg III ( Fig.20A View FIGURE 20 ). Leg setation: Tr 1, Fe 1, Ge 2, Ti 4(1), Ta 6. Claws and empodium as on tarsus II. Solenidion φ 4 (4) weakly clavate. Seta pl” spine-like, with several barbs and subapical seta-like projection; seta d of femur weakly blunt-ended, other leg setae pointed. Setae u’ and tc” of tarsus smooth, other leg setae barbed. Leg IV ( Fig. 20B View FIGURE 20 ). Leg setation: Tr 1, Fe 2, Ge 1, TiTa 7. Tibiotarsus short, slightly longer than its width. All leg setae pointed. Seta tc’ of tarsus smooth, thickened, other leg setae barbed. Trochanter dorsally with short spine-like projection.
MALE and LARVA unknown.
Type material. Female holotype: New Zealand, Central Otago, Old Man’s Range , 45° 19' 7.60" S, 169° 12' 11.49" E, 1655 m a.s.l., in soil and debris under Raoulia sp. cushion plant, 17 February 2014 (M. Minor). Paratypes GoogleMaps : 10 females, New Zealand, Central Otago, Old Man’s Range , 45° 19' 7.60" S, 169° 12' 11.49" E, 1655 m a.s.l., in soil and debris under Raoulia sp. cushion plant, 17 February 2014 (M. Minor) GoogleMaps ; 1 female, New Zealand, Central Otago, Old Man’s Range , 45° 19' 7.60" S, 169° 12' 11.49" E, 1655 m a.s.l., in bare soil between cushion plants, 17 February 2014 (M. Minor) GoogleMaps ; 5 females, New Zealand, Central Otago, Old Man’s Range , 45° 18' 59.85"S, 169° 11' 45.19"E, 1639 m a.s.l., alpine herbaceous snowbank, in soil, 17 February 2014 (M. Minor) GoogleMaps ; 2 females, New Zealand, Central Otago, Old Man’s Range , 45° 20' 3.78"S, 169° 12' 25.26"E, 1649 m a.s.l., in bare soil between cushion plants, 17 February 2014 (M. Minor) GoogleMaps .
Type deposition. The holotype and 3 paratypes are deposited in the New Zealand National Arthropod Collection, Auckland, New Zealand ; 15 paratypes are deposited in the mite collection of the Tyumen State University Museum of Zoology , Tyumen, Russia .
Differential diagnosis. The new species is most similar to Scutacarus cactaeformis Mahunka, 1967 , described from Australia ( Mahunka 1967), by the absence of the claw on tibiotarsus I, slightly thickened setae e and h 2, short and smooth setae 3 a, 3 b, 4 a, 4 b, long and strongly barbed 3 c and 4 c, and thick and smooth seta tc’ on tibiotarsus IV. It can be distinguished from the latter by the much shorter dorsal setae c 1, c 2, d, f, and h 1, which are shorter than e and h 2 (vs. c 1, c 2, d, f, and h 1 distinctly longer than e and h 2 in S. cactaeformis ), and by smooth setae c 1 and c 2 (vs. barbed in S. cactaeformis ).
Etymology. The name of the new species is derived from the Latin incisus meaning having been cut, and refers to the presence of deep incisions on posterolateral margins of tergite C.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |