Catoptria combinella
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5719.3.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BD7F316B-87F8-452F-9F97-0B466E6C7AD4 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038D87EB-FF9A-F944-D6CE-927FFF61FA52 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Catoptria combinella |
| status |
|
Catoptria combinella View in CoL ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775)
( Figs 1, 3, 4 View FIGURES 1–8 , 29, 29a View FIGURES 29–32 , 45 View FIGURES 45–48 )
Tinea combinella [ Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775: 319. Type locality: most likely Austria Wienergegend [ Vienna area]. Type material: lost. Neotype male, here designated: Austria, Niederöstereich, Göstlinger Alpen , Rothwald , Jagdhaus , 990 m, 12.vii.1999, F. Lichtenberger leg., TLMF Innsbruck C. Lichtenberger 2018-003, TLMF.
Catoptria petrificella ( Hübner, 1796) View in CoL , syn. nov.
Tinea petrificella Hübner, 1796: 28 , pl. 7, Fig. 47 View FIGURES 45–48 . Type locality: unknown [according to original description probably from Hungary]. Type material: lost. Neotype female, here designated: Austria: N. Tyrol, Innsbruck, Nordkette , 2000 m, 10.vii.1967, Hernegger., TLMF.
Material examined: Italy: 4 males, 1 female, Piemonte, Santuario di Oropa (BI), 1200 m, 20.vii.1958, U. Parenti legit, MZUF and RCGB ; 2 males, 1 female, Monte Baldo ( VR), dint. Rif. Novezzina , m. 1300, 14.vii.1987, U. Parenti legit, GS 3209, 3214 and 6954 GB, RCGB ; 1 male, Veneto ( VR), Ferrara di M. Baldo, 19.vii. 2013, 1750 m, G. Longo Turri legit, RCLT ; 1 male, Friuli, Chiusaforte ( UD), 29.vii. 2021, 1955 m, G. Longo Turri legit, RCLT ; Austria: 5 males, 5 females, Nordkette, Innsbruck , 2200 m, 26.vii.1971, Burmann, GS 1077 and 6926 GB, RCGB and MRSNTO ; 1 female, idem but 27.vii.1971, RCGB ; 2 males, 1 female, Nord Tirol, Howal , 750 m, 17.vii.1969, Kappellar Innsbruck, MHNG and RCGB ; 1 male, Steiermark, Prebichl , 1206 m, 9.vii.1953, O. Sterzl, SNSB ; 1 female, Styria, Frein , 800 m, 11.vii.1966, H. Reisser Coll., SNSB . Slovenia: 2 males, 1 female, Carniola, Velika Planina , 1600 m, 23.vii.1965, F. Hartig legit, GS 1061 and 1076 GB, MRSNTO ; 1 female, Goriska, Tolmin , Bovec, 2210m, 14.viii.2011, G. Longo Turri legit, RCLT .
Diagnosis. Catoptria combinella is similar in habitus ( Figs 1, 3, 4 View FIGURES 1–8 ) to C. coulonellus ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–8 ), but it can be distinguished by the uninterrupted medial white stripe, the darker medial area of the forewing, and the threefold end of the stripe, which is either lacking or only outlined in C. coulonellus . The male genitalia ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 29–32 ) are similar to those of C. coulonellus ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 29–32 ), C. orientellus ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 29–32 ) and C. spodiellus ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 29–32 ), however: versus C. coulonellus pars basalis is rounded, fan-shaped, vinculum is longer and spoon-shaped, shorter row of cornuti ( Fig. 29a View FIGURES 29–32 ) with about 15 longer cornuti; versus C. orientellus uncus and gnathos are longer, pars basalis is rounded, arched lamella of pars basalis is less developed, main row of cornuti longer and with on average smaller cornuti; versus C. spodiellus pars basalis is rounded, short row of cornuti longer with longer cornuti. The female genitalia ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 45–48 ): versus C. coulonellus ( Fig. 46 View FIGURES 45–48 ) ostium bursae more irregular, sterigma forming a complete sclerotized ring around ostium bursae, thicker above it; ductus bursae proximally curved inward and stouter; versus C. orientellus ( Fig. 47 View FIGURES 45–48 ) ostium bursae more irregular, sterigma forming a complete sclerotized ring around ostium bursae, thicker above it; ductus bursae proximally curved inward; versus C. spodiellus ( Fig. 48 View FIGURES 45–48 ) ostium bursae more regular, ductus bursae almost completely sclerotized.
Distribution: Found in the Alps with additional reports from Slovakia and Romania (Carpathians) ( Slamka 2008).
Remarks. Tinea combinella was described from an unspecified number of specimens, most likely collected in Lower Austria. The collection of Denis & Schiffermüller, formerly deposited in the “Hof-Naturalien-Kabinett” in Vienna, was destroyed by fire during the Vienna revolution of 1848 ( Hoffmann 1952).
Tinea petrificella was described from an unspecified number of specimens and a female figured ( Hübner 1796). Besides the detailed figure ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–8 ), which clearly depicts a longitudinal white stripe without medial interruption, Hübner ( op. cit.) also describes a threefold end of this stripe. Furthermore, the central part of the wings is described as darker. All these three characters are typical for the species currently named C. combinella . The type locality is not given in any detail but is suspected to be “probably from Hungary ”, where the species doesn´t occur (as C. coulonellus ). However, it should be considered that Hungary at the time of Hübner was much larger than at present, including parts of the Carpathians, where the species is currently known. To preserve the stability of nomenclature ( ICZN 1999), we therefore designate a neotype because after Hübner’s death his collection was dispersed and only few macrolepidoptera have been found in SNSB. Błeszyński that worked in Germany until his death, after extensive researches in German and British Museums considered (1965) all Crambinae of Hübner’s collection definitely lost.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Catoptria combinella
| Bassi, Graziano & Huemer, Peter 2025 |
Tinea petrificella Hübner, 1796: 28
| Hubner, J. 1796: 28 |
