Agyneta uta ( Chamberlin 1920 )

Dupérré, Nadine, 2013, Taxonomic revision of the spider genera Agyneta and Tennesseellum (Araneae, Linyphiidae) of North America north of Mexico with a study of the embolic division within Micronetinae sensu Saaristo & Tanasevitch 1996, Zootaxa 3674 (1), pp. 1-189 : 56-59

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3674.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:981F80ED-96D7-40C7-8A3C-677954416A2E

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6162325

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038D6700-FF8B-562C-118C-03F4ACF9B009

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Agyneta uta ( Chamberlin 1920 )
status

 

Agyneta uta ( Chamberlin 1920) View in CoL

Figs 165–171 View FIGURES 165 – 171 , map 9

Microneta uta Chamberlin 1920: 196 , f. 20.4. (Description 3).

Microneta anopla Chamberlin & Ivie 1933: 35 , pl. 9, f. 96–98. (Description Ƥ). (Holotype 3, allotype Ƥ from Utah: Raft R. Mts., Clear Cr., 9/4/32, Chamberlin & Ivie, AMNH). Examined.

Meioneta uta van Helsdingen 1973: 7, 10. (Transferred 3 from Microneta View in CoL , synonymized Ƥ).

Agyneta uta Buckle et al. 2001: 101 View in CoL . (Transferred from Meioneta ).

Type material: Microneta uta Chamberlin 1920 , 3 HOLOTYPE from Utah, Logan Canyon. R.V. Chamberlin Coll. (unique number 23420). MCZ, EXAMINED.

Diagnosis: Males are differentiated from all Agyneta species by their short, triangular, slightly dentate lamella characteristica ( Fig. 165 View FIGURES 165 – 171 ). From A. simplex by the absence of a cymbial tubercles ( Fig. 166 View FIGURES 165 – 171 ). Females are differentiated from all species by the proximal part of scape tinted with a grayish mark ( Fig. 169 View FIGURES 165 – 171 ). See A. simplex diagnosis to distinguish from the latter.

Description: Male: Total length 1.41; carapace length 0.64, width 0.49.

CEPHALOTHORAX: Carapace dark brown, shiny, finely reticulate; suffused with dark gray along margin, radiating lines; trident mark often present. Sternum dark brown strongly suffused with dark gray. Clypeus height 1. Chelicerae brown apical part lighter, with transverse dark gray band, not excavated; seta-tipped tubercles absent; promargin three denticles, retromargin three denticles; without projections near base of fang. Cheliceral stridulatory organ ~34 striae, well spaced getting closer together basally. ABDOMEN: Uniformly dark gray. LEGS: Yellow; leg I total length: 2.04; leg III total length: 1.60; Tm I: 0.32, Tm IV: absent. GENITALIA: Palpal retrolateral tibial apophysis short, rounded and smooth; dorsal tibial apophysis absent; two retrolateral trichobothria and a dorsal one ( Fig. 165 View FIGURES 165 – 171 ). Cymbium triangular; glabrous depression present ( Fig. 165 View FIGURES 165 – 171 ); cymbial tubercles absent; prolateral notch absent ( Fig. 166 View FIGURES 165 – 171 ). Paracymbium apical pocket small, anterior pocket curved and deep, not reaching the short and curved posterior pocket ( Fig. 165 View FIGURES 165 – 171 ). Embolus tip pointed, straight, with small retrolateral extension; Fickert’s gland absent; ventral lamella pointed, transparent; thumb short reaching below the embolus proper ( Fig. 167 View FIGURES 165 – 171 ). Embolus proper set apically, both part of equal size ( Fig. 167 View FIGURES 165 – 171 ). Anterior terminal apophysis narrow with no protrusions; posterior terminal apophysis striate; lamella characteristica large, ending in a wide curved tip with numerous spines ( Fig. 168 View FIGURES 165 – 171 ).

Female: Total length 2.01; carapace length 0.76, width 0.51.

MAP. 9. Localities of Agyneta uta ( Chamberlin1920) .

CEPHALOTHORAX: Same coloration as male. Chelicerae yellow; promargin four teeth, retromargin four denticles. Clypeus height 1. Cheliceral stridulatory organ ~29 striae, well spaced getting closer together basally. ABDOMEN: Same as male. LEGS: Same as male; palpal tarsal claw absent; leg I total length: 2.49; leg III total length: 1.84; Tm I: 0.24, Tm IV: absent. GENITALIA: Epigynum with proximal part of scape triangular tinted with grayish mark; epigynal slits oval; pit hook depression absent ( Fig. 169 View FIGURES 165 – 171 ); lateral lobes short and wide; stretcher seemingly absent; pit small ( Fig. 170 View FIGURES 165 – 171 ). Median part of scape short and wide; genital pores situated at base of lateral lobes pockets ( Fig. 171 View FIGURES 165 – 171 ). Internal genitalia with an elongated ventral receptacula and an oval dorsal one ( Figs 170, 171 View FIGURES 165 – 171 ).

Other material examined: USA: California: 8km North of Jonesville, 06.ix.1935, 335Ƥ, R. Chamberlin ( AMNH); Bray, 08.ix.1935, 435Ƥ, R. Chamberlin ( AMNH); Hay Creek, 07.ix.1935, 1Ƥ, R. Chamberlin ( AMNH); Silver Divide, N of Graveyard Lakes, 14.viii.1959, R. Chamberlin ( AMNH). Colorado: Florissant, Petrified Forest Area, 11.viii. 1973, 2430m, 13, P. Arnaud ( CAS). Idaho: Indian Valley, 6km SE town, 21.viii.1932, 232Ƥ, W. Ivie ( AMNH); Lost Lake, 27.vii.1939, 23 ( AMNH); NE McCall, 31.v.1944, 1Ƥ, W. Ivie ( AMNH); Mesa, 05.viii.1943, 13, W. Ivie ( AMNH); 3km NE Fruitland, 20.vi.1943, 13, W. Ivie ( AMNH); NE Fruitland, 20.vi.1943, 13, 10–25.ix.1943, 1033Ƥ, W. Ivie ( AMNH); Notus, 25.viii.1933, 131Ƥ, 18.ix.1933, 43, W. Ivie ( AMNH); Payette Lake (north side), 20.vi.1953, 13, W. Ivie ( AMNH); Snake River Bridge, NW Fruitland, 16.ix.1943, 23, W. Ivie ( AMNH); Thousand Springs, vii.1938, across river, 236Ƥ, W. Ivie ( AMNH). Nebraska: Ruby Valley, ix.1937, 331Ƥ, R. Chamberlin ( AMNH). New Mexico: 9-12km E Canjillon, 131Ƥ, C. Hoff ( AMNH); Glorieta Mesa near Rowe, 133Ƥ, C. Hoff ( AMNH); Los Alamos, 03.vi.1986, 13, D. Lowrie ( DBC); S- 96 W Emory Pass, 4Ƥ, C. Clayton ( AMNH). Oregon: Blue Mountains, v.1960, 1 Ƥ, J. Schuh ( AMNH); Lava River Caves State Park, 14.ix.1965, 333Ƥ, J., W. Ivie ( AMNH); Umatilla National Forest, Ruckela Junction Upper slope, 14.ix. 1965, 1341m, lower crown foliage, 1Ƥ, J. R. Mason ( USNM). Utah: 17km N Kamar, 04.xi.1939, 3Ƥ, D. Mulaik ( AMNH); Brighton, 20.xi. 1939, 2651m, 833Ƥ, D. Mulaik ( AMNH); Callas, 19.ix.1927, 131Ƥ, R. Chamberlin ( AMNH); Clear Creek, Raft River Mountains, 04.ix.1932, 837Ƥ, R. Chamberlin ( AMNH); Dove Creek, Raft River Mountains, 09.ix.1932, among fallen willow leaves 535Ƥ, R. Chamberlin ( AMNH); East Canyon, 14.vi.1942, 133Ƥ, W. Ivie ( AMNH); Fillmore Canyon, 22.ix.1935, 235Ƥ, R. Chamberlin ( AMNH); Grouse Creek, 08.ix.1932, 131Ƥ, W. Ivie ( AMNH); Henry Mountains, 09-12.ix.1929, 332Ƥ, R. Chamberlin ( AMNH); Joseph, 26.viii.1927, 2Ƥ, R. Chamberlin ( AMNH); North Fork of Provo River, Cobble Rest Camp, 24.viii. 1931,1Ƥ, W. Ivie ( AMNH); Park Valley, 09.ix.1932, 1Ƥ, R. Chamberlin ( AMNH); Payson Canyon, 15.iv.1934, 3Ƥ, W. Ivie ( AMNH); Richfield, 21.ix.1935, 2Ƥ, R. Chamberlin ( AMNH); Salt Lake City, 08.xi.1940, 231Ƥ, W. Ivie ( AMNH); Salt Lake City, Dry Canyon, 22.ii.1933, under grass on hillside, 131Ƥ, W. Ivie ( AMNH); Salt Lake City, Mill Creek Canyon, 05.xi. 1939, 2438m, 23, D. Mulaik ( AMNH); Smith and Morehouse Canyon, 06.vi.1934, 1Ƥ, W. Ivie ( AMNH); Willow Springs, 08.x.1927, 131Ƥ, R. Chamberlin ( AMNH); Zion National Park, 1927, 1Ƥ ( AMNH). Washington: Ingersoll Road [47.245N, 129.249W], 1146m, 11.viii.2004, Abies grandis foliage, 13, R. Crawford ( UWBM); Kamiak Butte [46.867N, 117.155W] 26.viii–26.xii.1994, pitfalls, forest, 926m, 23, J. Bergdahl ( UWBM); Manson, Morse Road, [47.917N, 120.125W] 21.ix.1982, riparian duff, 13, D. Caroll ( CAS); North Fork of Colockum [47.24N, 120.296W] 10.vii. 2004, 1499m, Larix / Pinus contorta foliage, 132Ƥ, R. Crawford ( UWBM); Richland, 17.ix.1935, 4Ƥ, R. Chamberlin ( AMNH); South of Spirit Lake [46.249N, 122.162W] 0 8–09.vi. 1984, 1103m, pitfalls, volcanic rocks, 13, R. Sugg ( UWBM).

Distribution: Western USA.

The fillmorana View in CoL group includes six species, A. fillmorana ( Chamberlin 1919) View in CoL , A. darrelli View in CoL n. sp., A. emertoni ( Roewer 1942) View in CoL , A. bucklei View in CoL n. sp., A. erinacea View in CoL n. sp. and A. crawfordi View in CoL n. sp., found in western North America.

All species within the group shared two unique characters; the male cymbium has a retrolateral fold ( Fig. 172 View FIGURES 172 – 180 ) and the dorsal part of the embolus proper is serrated, crest-like and connected to the tip of embolus ( Figs 27 View FIGURES 25 – 30. 25 , 174 View FIGURES 172 – 180 ). Within the group, A. fillmorana View in CoL , A. emertoni View in CoL , A. darrelli View in CoL are more closely related and share several characteristics; a reduced lamella characteristica, palpal tibia with two retrolateral trichobothria and the paracymbium with only an apical pocket and no posterior pockets ( Figs 172 View FIGURES 172 – 180 , 185 View FIGURES 185 – 194 , 195 View FIGURES 195 – 201. 195, 196 ). In addition, the male embolus has a long thumb, extending beyond the embolus proper and the ventral lamella of the embolus, is transparent and rugose ( Figs 174 View FIGURES 172 – 180 , 187 View FIGURES 185 – 194 ).

Only the holotype specimen of A. emertoni View in CoL was available for study, the color was faded, legs were missing or damaged. As such no detailed examination of the embolus and radical division was possible. Based on the presence of the retrolateral fold of the cymbium, the well serrated dorsal part of the embolus proper, easily visible in prolateral view ( Fig. 196 View FIGURES 195 – 201. 195, 196 ), I feel confident that A. emertoni View in CoL belongs in this group. Furthermore the presence of only an apical pocket on the paracymbium, and the absence of a basal enlarged plate of the embolus clearly shows its relation to A. fillmorana View in CoL and A. darrelli View in CoL .

In A. bucklei View in CoL , A. erinacea View in CoL and A. crawfordi View in CoL , the paracymbium has an apical pocket

and a posterior pocket, the palpal tibia with only one retrolateral trichobothria ( Figs 197 View FIGURES 195 – 201. 195, 196 , 202 View FIGURES 202 – 208 , 209 View FIGURES 209 – 212 ). Additionally, the thumb is short and at most reaching the base of the embolus proper, the ventral lamella is enlarged basally in a plate with small spines and the embolus has long spikes retro-ventrally ( Figs 199 View FIGURES 195 – 201. 195, 196 , 204 View FIGURES 202 – 208 , 211 View FIGURES 209 – 212 ), interestingly those spikes are also found in A. serrata View in CoL , A. semipallida View in CoL ( Figs 445 View FIGURES 443 – 449 , 531 View FIGURES 529 – 537 ).

A. fillmorana View in CoL is a fascinating species that displays an extraordinary range of morphs, in reference to the male overall size and cheliceral morphology. Chamberlin first described in 1919, Bathyphantes fillmoranus based on a female from Fillmore Canyon, Utah (later transferred to Meioneta by Ivie in 1969). Then in 1943, Chamberlin & Ivie described a new species based on a male from City Creek Canyon, Utah, as Gnathantes ferosa . The extreme size of the male chelicerae led them to believe that this was another genus and therfore they erected the genus Gnathantes . When studying the palpal configuration, it is clear that this is a member of the genus Agyneta View in CoL . The match of the two sexes together would have been difficult for Chamberlin & Ivie since the males and females were not collected at the same localities at that time. After studying many specimens, from different localities, it is apparent that Gnathantes ferosa is the male of A. fillmorana View in CoL , as many males and females have been collected together. Moreover, I also found small males of normal size, with normal chelicerae and with the same palpal configuration has G. f e ro s a excluding small variation that falls within the range of variation observed in other species of Agyneta View in CoL . One particular sample from California contained three different males morphs, one large male with greatly enlarged chelicerae ( Fig. 179 View FIGURES 172 – 180 ), one medium size male ( Fig. 180 View FIGURES 172 – 180 ) and a really small male. After detailed study of the male palp, embolus and radical division of those specimens I am convinced that this is a case of polymorphism. Some other cases of male size dimorphism and/or polymorphism (cheliceral and palp enlargement) have also been reported for spiders ( Vink et al. 2011).

MCZ

Museum of Comparative Zoology

AMNH

American Museum of Natural History

CAS

California Academy of Sciences

DBC

University College

USNM

Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History

UWBM

University of Washington, Burke Museum

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Linyphiidae

Genus

Agyneta

Loc

Agyneta uta ( Chamberlin 1920 )

Dupérré, Nadine 2013
2013
Loc

Agyneta uta Buckle et al. 2001 : 101

Buckle 2001: 101
2001
Loc

Meioneta uta

Helsdingen 1973: 7
1973
Loc

Microneta anopla

Chamberlin 1933: 35
1933
Loc

Microneta uta

Chamberlin 1920: 196
1920
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF