Hadrodontina, Staesche, 1964

Leu, Marc, Bucher, Hugo, Vennemann, Torsten, Bagherpour, Borhan, Ji, Cheng, Brosse, Morgane & Goudemand, Nicolas, 2022, A Unitary Association-based conodont biozonation of the Smithian-Spathian boundary (Early Triassic) and associated biotic crisis from South China, Swiss Journal of Palaeontology (19) 141 (1), pp. 1-61 : 53

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13358-022-00259-x

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13128554

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038B1D1D-645D-FF85-FF1B-EB7BD4CAFAC7

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Hadrodontina
status

 

Genus HADRODONTINA Staesche, 1964

Type species. Hadrodontina anceps Staesche, 1964 .

Type stratum and locality. Campiller member, Skyth, South Tirol, Italy .

Remarks. Tere is still an ongoing debate about the phylogenetic relationships of Pachycladina , Parapachycladina and Hadrodontina . Sweet (1988) in his prioniodinid phylogeny considered Pachycladina and Hadrodontina as sister taxa. Some species of Pachycladina were assigned to a new genus Parapachycladina by Shunxin et al. (1997), but this view is not widely accepted. Orchard (2007) observed that Hadrodontina anceps , Ellisonia aff. triassica and Pachycladina peculiaris appear to constitute a natural group, although they are currently assigned to different genera. Based on their cladistics analysis, Donoghue et al. (2008) concluded that Pachycladina is either a sister taxon to Ellisonia or stays unresolved in a polytomy with Ellisonia , Hadrodontina and Furnishius . Based on his multi-element apparatus reconstructions, Koike (2016) included Hadrodontina and Pachycladina within the subfamily Hadrodontinae ( Koike, 2016) , supporting the original view of Sweet (1988). We follow here this suprageneric classification and include Hadrodontina and Pachycladina within the subfamily Hadrodontinae . More recently, Sun et al. (2020) published 3 natural assemblages of Hadrodontina aequabilis and confirmed the suprageneric classification of Koike (2016).

In P 1 elements, what most distinguishes Pachycladina from Hadrodontina is the basal configuration: the inverted basal ‘attachment’ surface of Pachycladina occupies the entire lower side plus one lateral side of the carina, whereas in Hadrodontina , a basal cavity with a deep basal groove is usually formed on the lower side and the attachment surface rarely extends over the mid-part of the keel, if at all. Te denticles of Pachycladina are also less numerous but much larger in relative size than those of Hadrodontina . Based on multi-element reconstructions however, Koike (2016) showed that Pachycladina peculiaris , as well as Ellisonia aff. triassica ( Koike et al., 2004) , should be synonymized with Hadrodontina aequabilis .

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Order

Ozarkodinida

SubOrder

Prioniodinina

Family

Ellisoniidae

SubFamily

Hadrodontinae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) CoL Data Package (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF