Adenocerca minima Kolasa, 1981

Houben, Albrecht M., Monnens, Marlies, Proesmans, Willem & Artois, Tom J., 2022, Limnoterrestrial ‘ Typhloplanidae’ (Rhabdocoela, Platyhelminthes), with the description of four new species and a new genus, European Journal of Taxonomy 798, pp. 70-102 : 79-80

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.798.1671

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F136E044-62C8-4FB3-8160-7DAE663D9600

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6328782

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038A87DA-A770-FF90-0468-FB20FBD70D30

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Adenocerca minima Kolasa, 1981
status

 

Adenocerca minima Kolasa, 1981 View in CoL

Fig. 4 View Fig

Material examined

AUSTRIA • 3 specs, studied alive, one of which whole mounted and a second one horizontally sectioned; south of Graz, between Glashütten and Trahütten; 46°49′46″ N, 15°06′09″ E; 23 Aug. 2011; A.M. Houben and W. Proesmans leg.; humid moss from a small stream in a pine forest; XIV.2.38 and XIV.3.18; HU. GoogleMaps

Description and discussion

Specimens are about 0.6 mm long. Habitus and internal organisation correspond to the description of Kolasa (1981b). However, the original description, based on one specimen, mentions a much smaller animal (0.3 mm) (see Kolasa 1981b). Small dermal rhabdites are present all over the body. Protonephridiopores ( Fig. 4A View Fig : pp) are situated lateral to the pharynx ( Fig. 4A–B View Fig : ph). The two small testes ( Fig. 4A–B View Fig : t) are situated caudally from the pharynx, at 65–70% of the body.

Adenocerca minima clearly differs from all other representatives of Adenocerca by the orientation of the spines of its copulatory organ (see Fig. 4C–F View Fig ). Small spines are present in the distal half of the cirrus and at the distal end, where 6 µm long, distally pointing, crescent-shaped spines form a crown ( Fig. 4C View Fig : cs). Other species only possess small spines (A. clinopharynx Reisinger, 1924 and A. teshirogii) or have a different orientation of these spines, with the proximal spines being the biggest (A. bresslaui Reisinger, 1924).

Remarks

Kolasa (1981b) mentioned seven crown spines while we only counted six. Both Kolasa’s and our counts were made on a single specimen. Therefore, for the time being, we prefer to designate our specimens to the same species as Kolasa’s (1981b).

Previously known distribution

In wet mosses on the banks of the stream Fosso Contesora, Italy ( Kolasa 1981b).

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF