Aneuclis, Forster, 1869
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5733/afin.050.0105 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7671649 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038A87D4-AE41-142A-0D9A-FC59630AFDBF |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Aneuclis |
| status |
|
Key to Afrotropical species of Aneuclis View in CoL View at ENA
1 Second recurrent vein interstitial ( Figs 10 View Figs 10–14 , 16 View Figs 15–18 ) .................................................... 2
– Second recurrent vein postfurcal ( Figs 2 View Figs 1–5 , 12 View Figs 10–14 ) ....................................................... 3
2 Vein 2 rs–m very short ( Fig. 16 View Figs 15–18 ). Clypeus yellow, darkened in upper part. Metacarp almost reaching apex of fore wing ( Fig. 16 View Figs 15–18 ). First tergite without glymma, with petiole finely striate laterally. Ovipositor sheath 1.3 times as long as first tergite ( Fig. 18 View Figs 15–18 ) ....................................................................................... lasciva sp. n., ♀
– Vein 2 rs–m longer ( Fig. 10 View Figs 10–14 ). Clypeus entirely yellow ( Fig. 5 View Figs 1–5 ). Metacarp shorter, ending far short of apex of fore wing. First tergite with small but distinct glymma ( Fig. 7 View Figs 6–9 ), entirely smooth. Ovipositor sheath almost 3.0 times as long as first tergite ( Fig. 6 View Figs 6–9 ) ................................................................................. lanternaria sp. n., ♀
3 Legs mostly brown to fuscous ( Fig. 19 View Figs 19–24 ). Antenna black. Metasoma behind first segment dark brown, sometimes black. Ovipositor sheath about twice as long as first tergite ............................................................................... lugubris sp. n., ♀♂
– Legs yellowish, with hind leg sometimes slightly infuscate ( Fig. 8 View Figs 6–9 ). Antenna more or less yellowish or brownish yellow basally ( Figs 9 View Figs 6–9 , 22 View Figs 19–24 ). Metasoma behind first segment sometimes extensively yellow-brown ( Fig. 8 View Figs 6–9 ). Ovipositor sheath length various .................................................................................................................. 4
4 Females ................................................................................................................. 5
– Males (unknown for A. laminosa sp. n.) ............................................................... 7
5 Ovipositor sheath as long as first tergite or shorter ( Fig. 14 View Figs 10–14 ) .............. larga sp. n.
– Ovipositor sheath at least 1.8 times as long as first tergite ................................... 6
6 Ovipositor sheath about 1.9 times as long as first tergite. Head, in dorsal view, strongly narrowed and moderately rounded behind eyes. Propodeum with basal keel very short and apical area strongly acute anteriorly ( Fig. 23 View Figs 19–24 ) ........................ ...................................................................................................... vannoorti sp. n.
– Ovipositor sheath about 2.4 (rarely 2.1) times as long as first tergite. Head, in dorsal view, more weakly and roundly narrowed behind eyes. Propodeum with basal keel longer and apical area less acute or rounded anteriorly ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–5 ) ............ ....................................................................................................... laminosa sp. n.
7 Apical area of propodeum rounded or slightly acute (producing angle of about 85°) anteriorly ( Fig. 13 View Figs 10–14 ). Basal keel about 0.4 times as long as apical area ( Fig. 13 View Figs 10–14 ) .... ............................................................................................................. larga sp. n.
– Apical area of propodeum strongly acute anteriorly ( Fig. 23 View Figs 19–24 ). Basal keel at the most 0.3 times as long as apical area ( Fig. 23 View Figs 19–24 ) ............................. vannoorti sp. n.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.