Astrogorgia cuddalorensis Fernando, 2011
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5236.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:796FF9F5-E71F-4C69-92CC-CF4D6752BD77 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7639439 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0388B641-7B3A-FF80-FF56-FC66FB39FA4D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Astrogorgia cuddalorensis Fernando, 2011 |
status |
|
Astrogorgia cuddalorensis Fernando, 2011 (species status uncertain)
Astrogorgia cuddalorensis Fernando, 2011: 72 , pl. 47, fig. 2–2d (Cuddalore); Fernando et al. 2017: 157, pl. 72, fig. 2–2d (Cuddalore).
Opinion: This species does occur in the region but its status is uncertain. It seems very similar to A. anastomosan .
Justification:
Literature analysis: The descriptions of the Indian material by Fernando (2011) and Fernando et al. (2017) are identical, but without detailed descriptions and more images of the sclerites, including the polyp armature, and close-up mages of the polyps and calyces it is not possible to distinguish this species from other nominal species. Even then, without a revision of the genus, it would probably be impossible to assess its validity as a new species. However, large irregular and branched coenenchymal sclerites are not expected in this genus and it would appear to be closely related to A. anastomosan and has similarities to A. krusadiensis and A. macrosclera .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Holaxonia |
Family |
|
Genus |
Astrogorgia cuddalorensis Fernando, 2011
Ramvilas, Ghosh, Alderslade, Philip & Ranjeet, Kutty 2023 |
Astrogorgia cuddalorensis
Fernando, S. & Venkataraman, K. & Raghunathan, C. 2017: 157 |
Fernando, S. A. 2011: 72 |