Miscophus globiceps Mokrousov & Proshchalykin, 2025
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5728.3.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AF8E193C-2EB2-4E7F-8818-37228F654095 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17895371 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038487D0-FFD6-FFE4-FF66-FE2FFD06D5C4 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Miscophus globiceps Mokrousov & Proshchalykin |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Miscophus globiceps Mokrousov & Proshchalykin , sp. nov.
http://zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:
( Figs 31–42 View FIGURES 31–36 View FIGURES 37–42 )
Type material ( 4 ♀, 5 ♂). Holotype — ♀, Russia. Astrakhan Reg., / near Dosang village, 46.911°N, / 47.928°E, 03.VIII 2020 / Mokrousov M., Kapralov S. // Holotype ♀ Miscophus / globiceps Mokrousov / et Proshchalykin [ ZISP]. Paratypes: 1 ♀ with same label as holotype [ CMMN]; Astrakhan Province, 11 km N of Malyj Aral village, 46.762°N 48.491°E, 26.V.2019, 2 ♂, M. Mokrousov [ CMMN, ZISP]; ibid., 27.V.2019, 1 ♀, 2 ♂, V. Loktionov, K. Fadeev [ CMMN]; near Volzhskiy village, 46.965°N, 47.53°E, 29.VI.2019, M. Mokrousov [ CMMN]; Lapas village, 46.976°N 47.846°E, 7.VI.2016, 1 ♂, Mokrousov M. [ CMMN].
Diagnosis. Miscophus globiceps belongs to the M. mimeticus species group, characterized by: female clypeal anterior margin continuous, without indentations; male S 8 in most species with fused medial teeth, split only at the apex. From all related species, M. globiceps clearly differs by a conspicuously convex frons and small size ( 3.1–3.6 mm).
Description. Head ( Figs 34–35 View FIGURES 31–36 , 41–42 View FIGURES 37–42 ) distinctly transverse. Frons shagreened (shinier in male), conspicuously convex, median sulcus indistinct.
Mesosoma. Pronotal collar wide, slightly depressed posterolaterally. Mesonotum sparsely punctate, shiny. Mesopleuron with indistinct sparse punctures, shiny; episcrobal area nearly impunctate. Propodeal enclosure with median keel and oblique rugae, without shiny interspases. Propodeal lateral surface obliquely striate. Setation sparse, not concealing sculpture.
Metasoma. Sparsely micropunctate, shiny.
Coloration. Black with following yellowish or straw-colored areas: clypeus anteriorly, mandible (except amber apex), scape and pedicel (darkened dorsally), pronotal lobe, tegula, femoral apex, tibiae, tarsi and S 6 in females. Mid- and hindtibial spurs dark brown. Apical parts of metasomal segments discoloured.
Female ( Figs 31–36 View FIGURES 31–36 ). Body length 3.2–3.6 mm ( holotype 3.6 mm).
Head ( Figs 34–35 View FIGURES 31–36 ) ratio H:W = 0.85, ratio POL:OOL = 1.78. Ratio head height to maximal frons width = 1.42. Clypeal anterior margin continuous.
Legs. Forebasitarsus with three spines, apical spine shorter than second tarsal article ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 31–36 ).
Male ( Figs 37–42 View FIGURES 37–42 ). Body length 3.1–3.2 mm.
Head ( Figs 41–42 View FIGURES 37–42 ) ratio H:W = 0.55, ratio POL:OOL = 2.07. Ratio head height to maximal frons width = 0.97.
Legs. Forebasitarsus with two small spines.
Metasoma. S 8— Fig. 38 View FIGURES 37–42 .
Genitalia. Paramera— Fig. 39 View FIGURES 37–42 ; penial valvula— Fig. 40 View FIGURES 37–42 .
Etymology. The species name derives from two Latin words: “globulus”—sphere and the suffix “ceps”, from “caput” and “cephalus”, meaning head, characterizing the shape of the head.
Distribution. Russia ( Astrakhan Province).
| ZISP |
Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
