Lyssomanes florenciae, Bedoya-Roqueme, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7169230 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:617F4F03-2BFE-4287-BDB3-64D6A1ACB55B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7169465 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03843A28-FC4B-6D6A-0A48-F90380431EA2 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Lyssomanes florenciae |
status |
sp. nov. |
Lyssomanes florenciae , sp. n.
( Figures 1‒20 View Figures 1-10 View Figures 11-16 View Figures 17-20 )
Material examined. Holotype: 1♀ Brazil, Goias, Anapolis: Reserva Ecolo 6gica e Cientifica Trilha do Tatu [16°23'2.69"S, 48°56'39.36"W], [1075 m], October 15, 2019, dry forest, agitation of foliage, E. BedoyaRoqueme, R. F. Ribeiro col. ( LECA; A2 B2-3 , CE B1-3) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 2 ♀ Brazil, Goias, Anapolis : Reserva Ecolo 6gica e Cientifica Trilha do Tatu [16°23'2.79"S, 48°56'38.25"W], [1070m], October 29, 2019, dry forest, agitation of foliage, E GoogleMaps . Bedoya-Roqueme, R . F. Ribeiro col . ( LECA; A2 B2-3 , CE B1-3). All types are deposited in the arachnological collection of the Laboratory of Behavioral Ecology of Arachnids ( LECA), at the State University of Goias, Ana 6polis, Goias, Brazil .
Etymology. The species group name florenciae (gen.) is given to honor the arachnologist Lic. MarÍ6a Florencia Nadal who first taught me how to identify specimens of the family Salticidae .
Diagnosis. Lyssomanes florenciae is similar to L. similis Logunov 2014 , but can be easily distinguished from that species by the arrangement of the insemination ducts and the shape of the receptacles.
Description of female, based on the female holotype (LECA; A2 B2-3, CE B1-3). Color in alcohol: body pale yellow ( Figures 1‒3 View Figures 1-10 ), with scattered orange scales on ALE and PME, with few white hairs scattered throughout the carapace, becoming more visible near the PLE ( Figures 7‒8 View Figures 1-10 ), light-yellow endites and labium with slightly sclerotized edges ( Figures 9‒10 View Figures 1-10 ), pale yellow sternum, all legs uniformly light-yellow, metatarsus and tarsus a little darker, abdomen dorsum and sides with scattered dark hairs ( Figures 1‒3 View Figures 1-10 ), especially in the anterior part, clear ventral area, especially the region of the book lungs, where it is whitish, light-orange sclerotized epigynum ( Figures 1‒3 View Figures 1-10 ).
Cephalothorax wider than long ( Figure 4 View Figures 1-10 ), the ALE, PME, and PLE on dark-colored tubercules ( Figure 4 View Figures 1-10 ), surrounded by intense orange scales, and scattered white hairs ( Figure 7 View Figures 1-10 ), the AME surrounded by orange scales ( Figure 8 View Figures 1-10 ), with evident thoracic lines and a straight posterior margin ( Figure 9 View Figures 1-10 ); sternum octagonal in shape ( Figure 10 View Figures 1-10 ). Chelicerae are light-yellow and vertical, with two large teeth on the prolateral margin and a conspicuous small tooth on the medial prolateral margin ( Figures 11, 14 View Figures 11-16 ), five teeth on the retrolateral margin, which decrease in size, and a small conspicuous sixth tooth near the medial retrolateral margin ( Figures 12‒13, 15‒16 View Figures 11-16 ).
Abdomen elongated, with scattered dark hairs ( Figures 2‒3 View Figures 1-10 ), abundant on the anterior margin, with some evident depressions ( Figures 5‒6 View Figures 1-10 ). The epigynum is sclerotized, reddish-brown, oval, with a clear aperture, gonopores on both sides (Go, Figures 17, 19 View Figures 17-20 ); connected directly to a fossa (Fo, Figures 17, 19 View Figures 17-20 ), where the copulatory ducts begin. These ducts immediately curve, and then connect directly to the spermathecae (Sp, Figures 18, 20 View Figures 17-20 ), culminating in the fertilization ducts ( Figures 18, 20 View Figures 17-20 ).
Spination: Leg I: F= d 1*-2-2-2, r1-1-0; P= d 0-1r; T= d 0-0-2, v 2-2-2-2; M= v 2-2-2. Leg II: F= d 0-2-2, r1- 1-0; P= d 0-1; T= d 0-2, v 2-2-2; M= v 2-2-2. Leg III: F=d 0-2—2, r 1-1-1; P= d 0-1; T= d 0-1-1, r1-1, p1; M= v 0-2-2, d 0-0-1.
Measurements for three females: TL= 4.83–4.91; CL= 1.92-1.97; CW= 2.13–2.15; AL= 2.83–2.85; AERW= 1.14–1.16; PERW= 0.89–0.91; LOQ= 1.37–1.39; PMEP= 0.35–0.37; eyes of the second row separated from the ALE by 0.14–0.16 mm and from the PLE by 0.26–0.28 mm. Legs: F: I= 2.59‒2.60/0.46‒0.48, II= 2.35‒ 2.40/0.44‒0.46, III= 2.14‒2.16/0.41‒0.43, IV= 2.08‒2.12/0.30‒0.31; P: I= 0.89‒0.90/0.37‒0.39, II= 0.89‒ 0.90/0.32‒0.34, III= 0.78‒0.80/0.34‒0.36, IV= 0.66‒0.68/0.27‒0.29; Ti: I= 2.31-2.33, II= 2.08‒2.10, III= 2.23‒2.25, IV= 2.18‒2.20; M: I=2.25‒2.27, II= 2.11‒2.13, III= 2.28‒2.30, IV= 2.372.39; Ta: I= 0.63‒0.65, II= 0.63‒0.65, III= 0.65‒0.67, IV= 0.65‒0.67.
Male unknown.
Distribution. Only known from the type locality (Reserva Ecologica e Cientifica Trilha do Tatu, Ana6polis, Goias, Brazil) ( Table 1, Figures 21 View Figures 21-22 -23).
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |