Heterophoxus, Shoemaker, 1925

Andrade, Luiz F. & Senna, André R., 2020, A novel species of Heterophoxus Shoemaker, 1925 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Phoxocephalidae) from southeast and southern Brazil, with an identification key to world species of the genus, European Journal of Taxonomy 592, pp. 1-16 : 14

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.592

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:31DF91C1-8CF2-4E84-AD18-F4899822690D

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3629794

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0382CF67-FFF9-103A-CFC7-D619D902FAF3

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Heterophoxus
status

 

Identification key to species of Heterophoxus View in CoL of the world

1. Epimeral plate 3, posteroventral corner with an acute projection .................................................... 3

– Epimeral plate 3, posteroventral corner without projection ............................................................. 2

2. Uropod 1, rami subequal ................................................................................ H. opus Griffiths, 1975 View in CoL

– Uropod 1, outer ramus much shorter than inner ............................... H. cephalodens Griffiths, 1975 View in CoL

3. Epimeral plate 3, acute projection medium to long .......................................................................... 4

– Epimeral plate 3, acute projection short ............................................. H. videns K.H. Barnard, 1930 View in CoL

4. Pereopod 7, basis reaching apex of merus ........................................................................................ 5

– Pereopod 7, basis not reaching apex of merus .................................................................................. 7

5. Uropod 1, rami subequal ................................................................................................................... 6

– Uropod 1, inner ramus about twice the length of outer .... H. pellusidus Ren in Ren & Huang, 1991 View in CoL

6. Uropod 2, peduncle longer than inner ramus ........................ H. ophthalmicus (Schellenberg, 1925) View in CoL

– Uropod 2, peduncle shorter than inner ramus ................................ H. ellisi Jarret & Bousfield, 1994 View in CoL

7. Antenna 2, article 4 without posteroproximal lobe .......................................................................... 8

– Antenna 2, article 4 with posteroproximal lobe .......................................... H. despard Alonso, 2012 View in CoL

8. Pereopod 4, coxa, posterodorsal margin with moderate to strong excavation ................................. 9

– Pereopod 4, coxa, posterodorsal margin with weak excavation ........ H. pennatus Shoemaker, 1925 View in CoL

9. Epimeral plates 1–3, posterior margin without setules ................................................................... 10

– Epimeral plates 1–3, posterior margin covered with setules ......................... H. shoemakeri View in CoL sp. nov.

10. Pereopod 7, merus stout, posterodistal lobe produced ................... H. trichosus K.H. Barnard, 1932 View in CoL

– Pereopod 7, merus slender, posterodistal lobe not produced ................. H. oculatus (Holmes, 1908) View in CoL

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF