Panaqolus nix, Cramer & Py-Daniel, 2015

Cramer, Christian Andreas & Py-Daniel, Lúcia Helena Rapp, 2015, A new species of Panaqolus (Siluriformes: Loricariidae) from the rio Madeira basin with remarkable intraspecific color variation, Neotropical Ichthyology (Neotrop. Ichthyol.) 13 (3), pp. 461-470: 462-468

publication ID

http://doi.org/ 10.1590/1982-0224-20140099

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:12677D4B-E956-4303-AAB0-47C50106A099

DOI

http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4776261

persistent identifier

http://treatment.plazi.org/id/42F632D8-A127-4092-B09B-708882C0C3B9

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:42F632D8-A127-4092-B09B-708882C0C3B9

treatment provided by

Carolina

scientific name

Panaqolus nix
status

new species

Panaqolus nix   , new species

u r n:l s i d:z o o b a n k.o r g:a c t: 42F632 D 8-A127- 4 0 9 2 -B0 9B - 708882C0C3B9

( Figs. 1-5 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig ) Panaque   sp. 1: photo - Zawadzki & Chamon, 2013: p. 312. Panaque   sp. 2: UFRO-I 6384, Zawadzki & Chamon, 2013: p. 313

(see remarks for further explanation).

Holotype. INPA 39606 View Materials , male, 110.1 mm SL, Brazil, Rondônia, rio Madeira, cofferdam at construction site of Santo Antônio hydroelectric power plant (former Santo Antônio rapids), 08°48’06”S 63°57’00”W, 14 Feb 2012, C. A. Cramer. GoogleMaps  

Paratypes. 48 specimens. Brazil: Rondônia State: INPA 39605 View Materials , 3 View Materials , 54.6-73.7 mm SL, Mamoré, near the São Lourenço community, trawl net fishing   , 11°43’24.10”S 65°11’31.70”W, 30 May 2010, L. H. Rapp Py-Daniel. INPA 41148 View Materials , 2 View Materials , 95.3 View Materials and 96.8 mm SL, rio Karipunas near mouth GoogleMaps   , 09°11’46.6”S 64°37’20.7”W, 4 Oct 2010, NaturaeEnvironmentalCompany technicians. INPA 41149 View Materials , 1 View Materials , 85.0 mm SL, rio Madeira, near mouth of rio Karipunas GoogleMaps   , 09°12’18.9”S 64°37’08.4”W, 30 Oct 2010, Naturae Environmental Company technicians. INPA 41150 View Materials , 28 View Materials , 32.8-112.2 mm SL, rio Madeira, cofferdam at the construction site of Jirau hydroelectric power plant (former Jirau rapids) GoogleMaps   , 09°15’15.7”S 64°38’50.4”W, 11-13 Nov 2011, Naturae Environmental Company technicians. MZUSP 114009 View Materials , 3 View Materials , 68.5-76.2 mm SL; UFRO-I 6384, 5, 50.8- 80.7 mm SL, same data as INPA GoogleMaps   39605. UFRO-I 7968, 1, 81.4 mm SL, rio Madeira, near Ilha do Búfalo , trawl net fishing   , 09°08’51.10”S 64°32’33.70”W, 23 Oct 2010, A. Ribeiro. UFRO-I 9974, 1, 53.6 mm SL, rio Madeira, below Santo Antônio rapids, trawl net fishing GoogleMaps   , 08°46’36.11”S 63°55’26.09”W, 23 Jul 2011, L. Nogueira. UFRO-I 10050, 1, 90.4 mm SL, same data as INPA GoogleMaps   39605. UFRO-I 13039, 1, 49.5 mm SL, same locality as holotype GoogleMaps   , 1 Dec 2011, C. A. Cramer. UFRO-I 13040, 1, 57.7 mm SL, same data as UFRO-I GoogleMaps   13039. UFRO-I 19646, 1, female, 97.3 mm SL, same data as holotype GoogleMaps   .

Non-types. 1 specimen. Peru: ROM 92440 View Materials , 1 View Materials , 117.0 mm SL, Río Tambopata , Madre de Dios drainage, approximately 12°48’S 69°17’W, 16 Aug 2010, K. Roach and A. Jackson GoogleMaps   .

Diagnosis. The presence of small white dots on the whole body and fins distinguish Panaqolus nix   from all congeners except P. albomaculatus   . These dots are frequently faded in preserved specimens (typically, at least the dorsal and caudal fins show some traces of dots). Panaqolus nix   can be distinguished from P. albomaculatus   by having more dots on the trunk (on nearly all plates having one dot each vs. one dot each on less than half of the plates), a longer head-eye length (35.1-41.5% HL [mean 37.8] vs. 31.9-37.2% HL [mean 34.4]), a smaller orbital diameter (12.5-16.8% HL [mean 14.3] vs. 16.0-19.9% HL [mean 17.7]), and longer rictal barbels (9.7-19.6% HL [mean 13.8] vs. 1.6-8.9% HL [mean 4.9]). Only two other Panaqolus   species ( P. dentex   and P. koko   ) lack alternating dark and light bands on fins. Panaqolus nix   can be distinguished from P. dentex   by lacking lighter colored saddles (vs. three lighter colored saddles between dorsal-fin origin and caudal fin), by having a shorter head-pectoral length (22.4-28.2% SL [mean 25.5] vs. 27.2-38.1% SL [mean 29.2]), a lower caudal peduncle depth (9.3-11.4% SL [mean 10.5] vs. 11.0-13.3% SL [mean 12.2]), a smaller orbital diameter (12.5-16.8% HL [mean 14.3] vs. 16.4-22.8% HL [mean 17.8]), and a larger adult body size (more than 100 mm SL vs. less than 80 mm SL). Panaqolus nix   differs from P. koko   in the shape of the main tooth cusp (round and without or with very small lateral cusp vs. quadrangular and with strong lateral cusp), a smaller orbital diameter (12.5-16.8% HL vs. 18.9-20.8% HL [n=7]), and a larger interorbital width (34.3-39.3% HL vs. 29.4- 33.2% HL). Panaqolus albivermis   typically has alternating light bands and rows of light dots or short lines on its body. Panaqolus nix   can be separated from this species by having a shorter dorsal spine (26.2-32.5% SL vs. 33.0-36.0% SL [n=4]), a shallower caudal peduncle (9.3-11.4% SL vs. 12.2- 14.9% SL [n=4]), and a higher adipose-anal depth (17.9- 22.2% SL vs. 15.8-17.9% SL [n=4]). Panaqolus changae   , P. gnomus   , P. maccus   , P. nocturnus   , and P. purusiensis   have alternating dark and light bands on the body (except P. nocturnus   and adult P. purusiensis   ) and fins (vs. never showing bands on body or fins in P. nix   ). Further, P. nix   can be distinguished from P. changae   by a narrower ventral cleithral width (29.0-33.8% SL [mean 31.0] vs. 33.4-37.4 [mean 34.8), a shorter head-pectoral length (22.4-28.2% SL [mean 25.5] vs. 28.0-31.1% SL [mean 29.9), a smaller orbital diameter (12.5-16.8% HL [mean 14.3] vs. 16.2-20.9% HL [mean 18.2]), and a larger adult body size (more than 100 mm SL vs. less than 90 mm SL). Panaqolus nix   differs from P. gnomus   by a lower dorsal-pectoral depth (26.9- 30.3% SL [mean 28.6] vs. 30.3-36.8% SL [mean 32.9]), a smaller interorbital width (34.4-39.3% HL vs. 39.7-44.7% HL), and a larger adult body size (more than 100 mm SL vs. less than 80 mm SL). Panaqolus nix   can be separated from P. maccus   by a shorter predorsal length (40.1-44.5% SL [mean 42.3] vs. 44.3-49.2% SL [mean 46.0), a shorter headpectoral length (22.4-28.2% SL [mean 25.5] vs. 27.2-44.1% SL [mean 30.8]), and a larger adult body size (more than 100 mm SL vs. less than 90 mm SL). Panaqolus nix   can be distinguished from P. nocturnus   by the angle of dentary tooth rows (less than 50° to nearly parallel vs. approximately 70°). Panaqolus nix   differs from P. purusiensis   by having a lower dorsal-pectoral depth (26.9-30.3% SL [mean 28.6] vs. 29.8-32.9% SL [mean 30.9;]), a lower caudal peduncle depth (9.3-11.4% SL [mean 10.6] vs. 10.9-14.0% SL [mean 12.1]), and a smaller mouth width (34.4-46.4% HL [mean 39.9] vs. 41.6-50.3% HL [mean 44.1]).

Description. Counts and proportional measurements in Table 1 View Table 1 . Medium-sized loricariid with standard length of measured specimens up to 112.2 mm SL. Dorsal profile of head and snout strongly convex from snout tip to posterior tip of supraoccipital, straight and posteroventrally slanted between dorsal-fin origin and adipose-fin origin, gently concave through caudal peduncle to posterior tip of procurrent caudal-fin ray. Dorsal orbit margin only slightly raised, forming gentle ridge, narrowing anteriorly, from anterior orbit margin to area lateral to nares. Dorsal surface of trunk transversely flattened from dorsal-fin origin to adipose-fin base. Ventral profile of head and body flat from oral disk to anal-fin origin. Caudal peduncle oval in crosssection. Greatest body depth at dorsal-fin origin. Pectoralfin origin just posterior to orbit; pelvic-fin origin at vertical through origin of second dorsal-fin ray; anal-fin origin slightly posterior to vertical through origin of last dorsal- fin ray. Adipose fin with well-ossified leading spine bearing odontodes.

Head and body covered by odontodes of uniform size and distribution. Enlarged odontodes on anterodorsal border of pectoral-fin spine. Cheek odontodes hypertrophied with anteriorly curved hooks on the tips; longest odontode extending to posterior cleithrum margin. Interorbital space flat or slightly convex. Eye dorsolaterally placed; orbit diameter 12.5-16.8% HL. Iris operculum present. Nares small and ovoid, slightly longer than wide.

= standard deviation, n = number of specimens, H = holotype. Interlandmarks (ILM) are the two points between which

measurements were taken (from Luj an et al., 2010).

Oral disk round, maxillary barbels of moderate length (10-20% HL). Lips papillate; small patch of elongate fleshy papillae behind each dentary tooth row ( Fig. 2 View Fig ). Border of lips smooth, without papillae. Teeth spoon-shaped and unicuspidate or with very small lateral cusp. Premaxillary teeth 3-7 per ramus (mode 4), mandibular teeth 4-7 per ramus (mode 5). Premaxillary tooth rows angled at approximately 90°, dentary tooth rows acutely angled at approximately 50° or nearly parallel ( Fig. 2 View Fig ). small plates. Body with pronounced lateral ridge extending from cleithrum to posterior margin of fifth or sixth plate of the inframedian plate row, decreasing in prominence posteriorly. Trunk without elevated ridges. 7-8 plates on dorsal-fin base (mode 7), 5-7 plates between dorsal and adipose fin (mode 6), usually 1 azygous preadipose plate, 6-8 plates between adipose and caudal fin (mode 7), 2 plates on anal-fin base, 11-12 scutes between anal and caudal fin (mode 11), and 24-25 lateral plates (mode 25).

Dorsal fin II,7-8 (holotype II,7), pectoral fin I,6, pelvic fin i,5, anal fin i,4, caudal fin i,13-14,i (holotype i,14,i). Spinelet triangular, dorsal-fin spine lock functional, posterior fin margin straight, margin of last two rays rounded. Dorsalfin origin closer to vertical line passing through pelvicfin origin than to vertical line passing through pectoralfin origin; not reaching adipose fin when adpressed. Last dorsal-fin ray without prolonged membrane. Adipose fin triangular; adipose-fin spine slanted posteroventrally, tip straight to curved ventrally, pointed; posterior margin of adipose-fin membrane concave to nearly vertical. Pectoralfin spine robust, membrane between spine and first ray without fleshy extension, distal fin margin straight. Pectoral fin, when depressed reaching 1/3 of pelvic fin. Pelvic-fin spine robust, distal margin slightly rounded, when adpressed reaching mid-length of anal fin. Caudal fin strongly forked; caudal-fin spines usually tipped with filaments of the length of the longest branched caudal-fin rays.

Color in alcohol. Coloration of head, body and fins without bands or saddles. Base coloration varying from uniformly yellowish-white over light brown to dark brown or nearly black in different specimens. Small white dots (about 1/3 of the eye diameter) present on whole body and all fins; approximately one dot per plate; dots smaller on head. Dots faded to absent in preserved specimens, especially on trunk, but usually visible on fins. Caudal fin showing distinct dots or diffuse lighter markings.

Head and body plated dorsally, except for small naked area around dorsal-fin base; some specimens with naked area at tip of snout. Supraoccipital bordered posteriorly by 2-3 (mode 3) plates on each side. Abdomen of adults ranging from incompletely plated (plates only in pectoral girdle, along sides, and posterior to pelvic fin) to nearly completely covered by small irregularly arranged platelets, with a small naked area around pelvic-fin origin and the urogenital orifice. Abdomen of juveniles of 70 mm SL or less naked or with only very few plates on the border with inframedian plates. Large naked area dorsally to pelvic-fin base, below ventral margin of inframedian plate row; sometimes showing 1-3 Color in life. Color of head, body and fins without bands or saddles. Base coloration varying from uniformly yellowishwhite over pale brown ( Fig. 3 View Fig ) to dark brown or nearly black in different specimens. In an aquarium, with clear water, light colored fish become dark in few days ( Fig. 4 View Fig ). Live specimens with small white dots (more or less 1/3 of the eye diameter) on whole body and all fins; approximately one dot per plate. Dots smaller on head. Caudal fin showing distinct dots or diffuse lighter markings.

Sexual dimorphism. Mature males have longer odontodes on the pectoral-fin spine and on the caudal peduncle ( Fig. 5 View Fig ). The illustrated specimen was dissected and its gender was confirmed based on gonads examination. A large female (UFRO-I 19646) that was kept in an aquarium did not develop any conspicuously elongated odontodes over time. Some eggs were released during the process of preservation shortly after she died in captivity.

Distribution and Habitat. The known distribution of this species is the Madeira basin, including the Madeira, Mamoré, and Tambopata (Madre de Dios drainage) rivers ( Fig. 6 View Fig ). Most of the specimens have been collected in cofferdams at the construction sites of the hydroelectric power plants of Santo Antônio and Jirau (former Santo Antônio and Jirau rapids), on the rio Madeira, by several technicians and ichthyologists hired by the two Consulting Environmental Companies responsible for the biological inventories in the area. Most of the remaining specimens have been caught in depths of 3.1 to 11 m (UFRO-I 6384, INPA 39605, MZUSP 114009) and 4.1 to 8.5 m (UFRO-I 6384) using trawl nets. This indicates that this species prefers deep-water habitats with strong current, which might help to explain its relative rarity in scientific collections.

Etymology. From the Latin nix   meaning snow, alluding to the color: in dark individuals the dots look like falling snowflakes, while pale individuals look like they have the whole body covered by snow; treated as a noun in apposition.

Remarks. ROM 92440 View Materials is not being considered in the type material as it is a dried specimen that disintegrated into several pieces. Zawadzki & Chamon (2013), in their list of Hypostominae   of the rio Madeira, illustrated Panaque   sp. 1 in page 312, and cited the lot UFRO-I 6384 as Panaque   sp. 2, in page 315. In fact, there was a mistake in assigning the lots to the images. The illustration of Panaque   sp. 1 shows in fact a specimen of Panaqolus nix   and the correct number of this lot is UFRO-I 6384. The second illustration, Panaque   sp. 2, is a different species and the correct numbers of the lots for this species are UFRO-I 6383 and UFRO-I 13109. So, Panaqolus nix   was already known, but not named, as part of the ichthyofauna of the rio Madeira.

Conservation status. The species seems to be widely distributed along rio Madeira, Mamoré and Tambopata as well. Despite the fact that part of its distribution includes two hydroelectric power dams, Jirau and Santo Antônio, the area of occurrence of Panaqolus nix   goes well beyond the dams. Thus, considering that important threats to the species were not detected yet, P. nix   should be classified as Least Concern (LC) according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) categories and criteria (IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee, 2014). In the last years parts of the known habitats have been severely altered by the construction of these hydroelectric power plants, destroying the former Santo Antônio and Jirau rapids and transforming more than 200 km of the rio Madeira, enlarging the riverbed and reducing the current. Additional collecting efforts should be conducted in that region in order to better understand the impacts of these constructions on the population of Panaqolus nix   and to be able to adjust (if necessary) the evaluation of the conservation status of the species.

ROM

Royal Ontario Museum