Emertonius shelfordi (Peckham & Peckham, 1907), 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37828/em.2018.16.12 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6C3A5085-F624-4D0A-9F10-4EBB9AF19F01 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03807147-FF9B-FF93-FE40-FB83FC241CAD |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Emertonius shelfordi (Peckham & Peckham, 1907) |
status |
|
Emertonius shelfordi (Peckham & Peckham, 1907) View in CoL
Figure 19D View Figure 19 , 21 View Figure 21 G-J1, 25J, 26A
Myrmarachne shelfordii Peckham & Peckham, 1907: 603 (Dm).
Myrmarachne shelfordii Yamasaki, 2010: 64 , f. 8-12 (m).
Myrmarachne shelfordii Yamasaki & Ahmad, 2013: 549 View Cited Treatment , f. 39A-G, 40A-E (m, Df).
Emertonius shelfordi Prószynski, 2017b: 99 View in CoL , f. 45C3, 46G (f).
Material. 1) Lectotype male Borneo, Peckhams leg. 2) 2 males, 9 females Poring Hot Springs, Kinabalu Park , Sabah, Borneo. T. Yamasaki leg. Interpretation based on Yamasaki papers listed above.
Diagnosis. Key characters are shown on Figs 19D View Figure 19 , 21 View Figure 21 J-J1, comparative background on Fig. 21 View Figure 21 A-F, K-P.
Description. Classification based on shape of spermathecae ( Figs 19D View Figure 19 , 21 View Figure 21 J-J1), supported by color pattern in male and female, consisting of blackish brown and creamy whitish areas, documented heretofore only in Emertonius exasperans and E. koomeni , the shape of thorax, however, does not resemble these species and there are no "petal-like" spots on abdomen. Fragments of original descriptions – see Fig. 25J View Figure 25 . Male chelicerae, long and flat, conform to type species. Palps shape agree with remaining genera of MYRMARACHNINES.
African species not included to Emertonius . Due to differences in internal structure of spermathecae " Myrmarachne " kilifi Wanless, 1978 from Kenya ( Figs. 21 View Figure 21 W-Z) and " Myrmarachne" laurentina Bacelar, 1953 from Mozambique and South Africa ( Figs 21 View Figure 21 S-V) cannot be classified into Myrmarachne . Their shape of spermathecae resemble some "lesser genera", but they are not Emertonius . Chelicerae of males are different from both Emertonius and Myrmarachne by being short and bent, teeth are concentrated on prominent anterior extension of cheliceral edges. Body has weakly developed ant-likeness, with traces of compression on carapace and abdomen, but petiole is short. Shape of palp corresponds with generalized MYRMARACHNINES, but without developed additional thin loop of spermophor, tibial apophysis is small
7 Matching of males and females without any proof of real biological relationships, only because of fantasies of an authors, especially improbable when collected in distant localities, is a plague of taxonomic publications, similarly as identification of incidental specimens as conspecific. Conclusions in science require proofs and are subject of repeated checks. (See also case of " Neaetha" aegyptiaca " above - Fig. 10 View Figure 10 L-O).
and bent. They probably should be described as two separate new genera, but available documentation is insufficient for that.
Genera Padillothorus , Padillothorax and Stagetillus
Remark. Simon (1901-1903: 460) included poorly known genera Padillothorax Simon, 1901 and Stagetillus Simon, 1885 to a group of genera Bavieae, characterized by long, thin and pointed abdomen, somewhat broader carapace ( Fig. 28 View Figure 28 ) and multiple, small teeth on retrolateral margin of chelicerae. Prószyński (1984: 95, 1987: 103-105) revised genitalic characters of three species of these genera and discovered that epigyne of Padillothorus elegans Reimoser, 1927 is incompatible with type species of that genus - P. semiostrinus Simon, 1901 (compare Figs 28D View Figure 28 with 28K-L), so these species are not congeneric. At the same time he has interpreted palps of the latter, together with habitus appearance, as sufficiently similar to the monotypic genus Stagetillus (what ultimately appeared wrong) as to transfer P. semiostrinus to Stagetillus (compare Figs 28 View Figure 28 F-H with 28A-C). Since data of P. elegans were insufficient to reclassify it to other, or describe as a new genus, he left it temporarily in Padillothorax .
Separation of a species from its type species is unacceptable in the light of International Code of Zoological Nomenclature and Editor of the previous version of the Spider Catalog - Dr. N. I. Platnick - arbitrarily moved P. elegans also to Stagetillus , obliterating its specific properties. In this way, accordance with nomenclatorical rules was restituted, for the price of discordance with result of research, and a common sense (see also "imposed impractical nomenclatorical rules" - in Prószyński 2017b: 10). That created, however, a danger of overlooking by the future revident essential differences between " Stagetilus " species " elegans " and " opaciceps ". Usual all species of a genus are assumed to resemble their type species, in this case " opaciceps ", so why to check whether one "recently" revised species is not standing out? We have lost now illusions that classification of Salticidae could be stabilized within mere 60 years of research, present day research discontinuity may last decades, so we should bequest future Salticidologists with as neat knowledge as possible.
The problem is that no new data were added after 1987 revision of these spiders by Prószyński, to place " elegans " correctly then, and now. To convey sense of diversity of these genera we have no other choice left as to delimit new genus for " elegans " now, in spite of grossly incomplete data. Therefore it is proposed now to: a) reinstate genus Padillothorax from synonymy with Stagetillus , with two species P. semiostrinus Simon, 1901 and P. taprobanicus Simon, 1902 , b) to describe a new genus Padillothorus (note two letter difference from Padillothorax ) for Padillothorax elegans (Reimoser, 1927) , c) to leave genus Stagetillus as monotypic, with single species S. opaciceps Simon, 1885 . All in hope that future research will bring new species into each of these genera.
SOURCES: A-C, F-L - Proszynski 1987. Atlas ...: Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoly Rolniczo- Pedagogicznej, Siedlce, 103; 104-105, D-E - Proszynski 1984 c: Atlas ...: Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoly Rolniczo- Pedagogicznej, Siedlce, 95. By permission.
SOURCES: Simon, E. (1901a). Histoire naturelle des araignées. 2, 472, f. 538.
T |
Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Emertonius shelfordi (Peckham & Peckham, 1907)
Prószyński, Jerzy 2018 |
Emertonius shelfordi Prószynski, 2017b: 99
Proszynski, J. 2017: 99 |
Myrmarachne shelfordii
Yamasaki, T. 2010: 64 |