Charaea sasajii ( Kimoto, 1969 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3861.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F906135C-0407-435E-95BF-F46F4F998F89 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6138328 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0380081D-FFC7-FFED-FF45-1C9080CBFA6B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Charaea sasajii ( Kimoto, 1969 ) |
status |
|
Charaea sasajii ( Kimoto, 1969)
( Figs 44 View FIGURES 40 – 51 , 64–69 View FIGURES 64 – 69 , 82 View FIGURES 82 – 87 , 90 View FIGURES 88 – 92 , 95–96 View FIGURES 93 – 100 )
Exosoma sasajii Kimoto, 1969: 46 (original description); Kimoto 1986: 57; Kimoto 1987: 189; Kimoto 1989b: 254; Kimoto 1991: 13; Takizawa et al 1995: 9; Kimoto & Chu 1996: 77 (catalogue); Kimoto & Takizawa 1997: 305 (key), 381. Taphinellina sasajii: Wilcox 1973: 451 (catalogue); Beenen 2010: 489 (catalogue).
Charaea sasajii: Beenen & Warchałowski 2010: 62 (catalogue).
Type locality. “Alishan, Chiayi Hsien”.
Type material examined. Paratypes: 2 ♂♂ ( KMNH), “( TAIWAN) / Alishan / Chiai Hsien / 27.VII.1966 / H. Kamiya leg. [w, p] // PARATOPOTYPE [b, p] // Exosoma / sasajii / Kimoto, n. sp. [w, h]”.
Additional material examined. 292 specimens — TAIWAN: Chiayi County: 9 ♂♂ 4 ♀♀, Alishan, 2400 m, 5.–9.viii.1981, L. Y. Chou & S. C. Lin leg. ( TARI); 1 ♂ 1 ♀, Alishan, 2400 m, 17.–20.viii.1982, K. C. Chou & C. C. Pan leg. ( TARI); 1 ♀, Alishan, 22.ix.2009, M.-H. Tsou leg. ( TARI). Hualien County: 10 ♂♂ 2 ♀♀, Tayuling, 6.–9.ix.1983, L. Y. Chou & K. C. Chou leg. ( TARI); 9 ♀♀, Tayuling, 12.–15.ix.1980, K. S. Lin & C. H. Wang leg. ( TARI); 4 ♀♀, Tayuling, Malaise trap, 10.–15.ix.1980, K. S. Lin & C. H. Wang leg. ( TARI). Kaoshiang County: 1 ♂, Chungchihkuan, 10.–13.x.2012, L.-P. Hsu leg. ( TARI); 1 ♀, Taoyuan, 1.vii.2009, M.-H. Tsao leg. ( TARI). Nantou County: 1 ♀, Kanko [= Kuankao], 17.iv.1924, T. Shiraki leg. ( TARI); 9 ♂♂ 6 ♀♀, Tsuifeng, 2300 m, 27.viii.1981, L. Y. Chou & S. C. Lin leg. ( TARI); 11 ♂♂ 11 ♀♀, Tsuifeng, 2300 m, 12.–14.ix.1984, K. S. Lin & S. C. Lin leg. ( TARI); 12 ♂♂ 14 ♀♀, Tsuifeng, 2300 m, 5.viii.1984, K. C. Chou leg. ( TARI); 10 ♂♂ 10 ♀♀, Tsuifeng, 2300 m, 15.–16.viii.1984, K. C. Chou leg. ( TARI, 1 ♂ 1 ♀ in NMPC); 1 ♂ 6 ♀♀, Sungkang, 2100 m, 15.–17.viii.1984, K. C. Chou leg. ( TARI); 37 ♂♂ 16 ♀♀, Tsuifeng, 2300 m, 1.–3.viii.1981, T. Lin & W. S. Tang leg. ( TARI); 4 ♂♂ 6 ♀♀, Yu-Shih, 1750 m, 4.viii.1981, T. Lin & W. S. Tang leg. ( TARI); 3 ♂♂ 1 ♀, Tatachia, 20.vii.2009, C.-F. Lee leg. ( TARI); 1 ♂ 3 ♀♀, Tatachia, 30.x.2009, C.-F. Lee leg. ( TARI); 2 ♂♂, Meifeng, 2130 m, 18.vii.1979, K. C. Chou leg. ( TARI); 4 ♂♂ 1 ♀, Meifeng, 2130 m, 18.vii.1979, K. S. Lin & C. H. Wang leg. ( TARI); 1 ♀, Meifeng, 2130 m, 22.–29.vii.1979, Malaise trap ( TARI); 1 ♂ 14 ♀♀, Meifeng, 2150 m, 26.viii.1980, K. S. Lin & C. H. Wang leg. ( TARI); 8 ♂♂ 31 ♀♀, Meifeng, 2150 m, 28.–29.viii.1981, L. Y. Chou & S. C. Lin leg. ( TARI); 1 ♂, Meifeng, 2150 m, 15.vii.1982, S. C. Lin & C. N. Lin leg. ( TARI);1 ♀, Meifeng, 14.ix.2009, S. F. Yu leg. ( TARI); 2 ♂♂, Meifeng, 2250 m, 31.viii.–2.ix.1982, L. Y. Chou & K. C. Chou leg. ( TARI); 1 ♂ 2 ♀♀, Huakang, 12.ix.2010, C.-F. Lee leg. ( TARI). Pingtung County: 2 ♂♂ 2 ♀♀, Peitawushan, 25.vi.2012, J.-C. Chen leg. ( TARI). Taichung County: 1 ♂ 1 ♀, Wuleng, 25.vii.2010, M.-H. Tsou leg. ( TARI). Taitung County: 1 ♂ 5 ♀♀, Motien, 5.x.2010, C.-F. Lee leg. ( TARI, 1 ♂ 1 ♀ in JBCB); 3 ♂♂, Hsiangyang, 2.vii.2009, M.-H. Tsou leg. ( TARI); 1 ♂ 2 ♀♀, Hsiangyang, 12.vii.2012, J.-C. Chen leg. ( TARI). Yilan County: 1 ♂, Taipinshan, 1950 m, 26.–28.vii.1983, L. Y. Chou leg. ( TARI).
Description. Measurements. Males: 2.7–3.3 mm, females: 3.1–3.7 mm. Dorsal side oval, moderately convex. Body, legs and antennae completely metallic greenish- or bluish-black, knees sometimes paler, abdomen yellow, sometimes ventrite I with infuscate base.
Male ( Fig. 82 View FIGURES 82 – 87 ). Anterior part of head impunctate, almost glabrous, fine setae visible at anterior margin of clypeus and laterally on nasal keel. Interantennal space 1.25 times as wide as transverse diameter of antennal socket. Interocular space 2.5 time as wide as transverse diameter of eye. Antennae filiform, 0.70 times as long as body, length ratio of antennomeres equals 8-4-5-6-7-7- 7-7-7-8-11.
Pronotum lustrous, 1.30 times as broad as long, widest in anterior third, covered with very fine punctures. Anterior margin straight, lateral margins almost straight and parallel in basal two third, anterior third convergent, posterior margin widely rounded. Border of anterior margin visible only in lateral parts, lateral and posterior margins with moderate border. Anterior angles swollen, rectangular, posterior angles obtusangulate, with pointed tip. All angles with setigerous pore bearing long pale seta, additional short setae visible on lateral margins of pronotum.
Elytra 1.65 times as long as wide and 0.70 times as long as body.
Protarsomere I and mesotarsomere I slightly wider. Length ratio of protarsomeres I, II, III and V equals 6-5-4- 7, of metatarsomeres I, II, III and V equals 9-6-4-9.
Last ventrite with widely trapezoidal emargination and with two very short incisions ( Fig. 67 View FIGURES 64 – 69 ).
Aedeagus symmetrical, short, apex straight or slightly concave ( Fig. 64 View FIGURES 64 – 69 ). Internal sac as in Fig. 90 View FIGURES 88 – 92 .
Female. Body more convex and more oval than in male. Interantennal space 1.85 times as wide as transverse diameter of antennal socket. Interocular space 2.15 time as wide as transverse diameter of eye. Antenna 0.65 times as long as body. Last ventrite transverse, widely rounded ( Fig. 69 View FIGURES 64 – 69 ). Pygidium subtriangular with rounded apex ( Fig. 68 View FIGURES 64 – 69 ). Protarsomere I and mesotarsomere I narrower than in males. Sternite VIII subtriangular with anterior margin widely rounded, tignum slender, twice longer than sternite VIII ( Fig. 66 View FIGURES 64 – 69 ). Spermatheca: nodulus gradually continuing to cornu, cornu widely C-shaped, proximal spermathecal duct wide basally, almost straight and than abruptly narrowed ( Fig. 65 View FIGURES 64 – 69 ).
Distribution. Taiwan.
Biology. Part of the specimens were collected on the flowers of Miscanthus floridulus (Labill.) Warb. ex K. Schum. & Lauterb (Poaceae) .
Differential diagnosis. This is the smallest Taiwanese species (2.7–3.7 mm). It is similar to Ch. houjayi sp. nov., which is larger (3.8–5.3 mm) and has a more oval body shape. Both species can be separated by the shape of the aedeagus ( Figs 64 View FIGURES 64 – 69 , 101 View FIGURES 101 – 112 ). Females of Ch. sasajii are almost indistinguishable from smaller females of Ch. houjayi sp. nov. based on external characters. Differencies can be found in the shapes of spermatheca and sternite VIII ( Figs 65, 66 View FIGURES 64 – 69 , 102, 103 View FIGURES 101 – 112 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Galerucinae |
Genus |
Charaea sasajii ( Kimoto, 1969 )
Bezděk, Jan & Lee, Chi-Feng 2014 |
Charaea sasajii: Beenen & Warchałowski 2010 : 62
Beenen 2010: 62 |
Exosoma sasajii
Kimoto 1997: 305 |
Kimoto 1996: 77 |
Takizawa 1995: 9 |
Kimoto 1991: 13 |
Kimoto 1989: 254 |
Kimoto 1987: 189 |
Kimoto 1986: 57 |
Wilcox 1973: 451 |
Kimoto 1969: 46 |