Cocconeis diaphana W.Sm. ( Smith 1853 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2016.204 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3853038 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/003BB414-F623-3E6C-5761-0914FE69C29B |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Cocconeis diaphana W.Sm. ( Smith 1853 ) |
status |
|
Cocconeis diaphana W.Sm. ( Smith 1853)
Figs 2–3 View Figs 1–8 , 21–34 View Figs 21–26 View Figs 27–34 , Table 1 View Table 1
Cocconeis molesta var. amygdalina Grunow ex Cleve (1895: 174) .
Cocconeis amygdalina Bréb. ex Grunow in Van Heurck (1880 –1885: pl. 30, figs 22–23), nom. inval.
Original description
Smith (1853): 22, pl. 30, fig. 254, reproduced in Figs 2–3 View Figs 1–8 .
“ Cocconeis diaphana , n. sp. V. elliptical, scarcely siliceous, diaphanous; striae obscure. Length.0012” to.0018” (30.48 to 45.72 µm). v.v. β Nodule dilated into a Stauros. Marine. Sidmouth, Miss Cutler, communicated by Dr. Greville. Pontac, Jersey, Aug. 8, 1852, W. Sm. Supp. Plate XXX. 254”.
Type material
“Marine. Sidmouth, Miss Cutler…” “Pontac, Jersey… W. Sm.”, syntypes; “Pontac, Jersey… W. Sm.”, BM 23161 , here designated as lectotype; BM 23162 , isolectotype ; The other syntype, BM 19589, from Sidmouth, belongs to C. dirupta Gregory.
Notes
When W. Smith introduced C. diaphana , he also proposed an unnamed variety β characterized by “the nodule dilated into a stauros”. This variety, mostly represented in the Sidmouth gathering, though originally a syntype must be excluded from this species. It will be here treated as belonging to C. dirupta W.Greg. (see further comments under this species). The original drawings of C. diaphana ( Smith 1853, fig. 254) show relatively oblong valves, one without any stauros, the other, marked β, with a distinct stauros on the RV.
Van Heurck (1896: pl. 29, fig. 823bis) reports Cocconeis molesta var. amygdalina as a “synonym of C. diaphana W.Sm. partim, S. B.D., i., p. 22, pl. 30, fig. 254; H. V. H. Atl., pl. 30, figs 5 and 35”, and comments that it is: “much larger in size, 3.5 to 4.5 c.d.m. (35 to 45 µm). Central nodule rounded, surrounded by small hyaline area. Marine [...] Jersey ( W.Sm.)”.
Description of specimens from “ Jersey, Pontac”, after LM examination of the type material
BM 23161 ( Figs 21–26 View Figs 21–26 ) contains oblong-elliptical, thinly silicified and diaphanous valves, 33–42 µm (38 µm ± 2.5 σ) long, 21–26 (23 µm ± 2.2) wide, l/L 1.65 ± 0.2, with 26 ± 2.2 SV striae in 10 µm, 25 ± 0.7 RV striae in 10 µm, and ca. 23 axial SV rows in a zig-zag pattern ( Fig. 26 View Figs 21–26 ). The SV sternum is straight and narrow, the central area very reduced ( Figs 23–24 View Figs 21–26 ). The RV has clearly identifiable striae, with 25 areolae in 10 µm. The RV fascia is short and quite high, with the aspect of an elliptic central area more than a real fascia. The helictoglossae are straight and off the margin ( Fig. 24 View Figs 21–26 ). As this slide (BM 23161) contains the specimen best matching the original description, we here designate it as the lectotype of C. diaphana W.Sm.
Remark
Thanks to the kindness of Bart Van de Vijver we have received several SEM photographs of the isolectotype of Cocconeis diaphana deposited in the Van Heurck collection in Meise (BR). This material is epiphytic on marine Rhodophyceae, and is present on a mica labelled “ Cocconeis diaphana n.sp., Jersey, Aug. 14. 1852 ”, preserved in the W. Smith collection, vol. I, p. 33. These SEM photographs ( Figs 39–44 View Figs 39–44 ) are a perfect match for the LM figures in this paper and support our emended description.
Description of specimens from “Sidmouth”, after LM examination of the type material
The Van Heurck collection (VI-45-B10, Figs 27–32 View Figs 27–34 ) has specimens that are 15–24 µm (20.5 ± 3.2 σ) long, 14–18.3 (16 ± 2.4) wide, l/L 1.28 ± 0.1, with 18.7 ± 1.1 SV striae in 10 µm, and 22.7 ± 2.2 RV striae in 10 µm. Slide VI-45-B10 only shows the var. β.
The W. Smith collection (BM 19589, Figs 33–34 View Figs 27–34 ) has specimens that are 19–26 µm (22 ± 2.9 σ) long, 16-20 (18.6 ± 2) wide, l/L 1.19 ± 0.05, with 20 ± 1.4 SV striae in 10 µm, and 22 ± 0.5 RV striae in 10 µm.
Valves round-elliptical, relatively small. The SV is coarsely striated and punctuated, usually with no axial rows of areolae. The SV sternum is large and composed of two lanceolate parts ( Figs 27–29, 33 View Figs 27–34 ), one median SV stria lacking on one side ( Fig. 27 View Figs 27–34 , arrow) or both ( Fig. 33 View Figs 27–34 ). The RV has coarsely punctuated striae, strongly radiate. The RV fascia is narrow and wide (often more than half a valve in length). The raphe is often slightly sigmoid with helictoglossae deflected towards opposite sides ( Fig. 34 View Figs 27–34 ). Slide BM 19589 only shows the variety β.
The two examined slides of “ C. diaphana Sidmouth ” (VI-45-B10/BR and BM 19589) show valves with similar characteristics ( Figs 27–34, 33–34 View Figs 27–34 ), close to those of Cocconeis dirupta W. Gregory ( Figs 35–38 View Figs 35–38 , see below). Therefore, var. β is here excluded from C. diaphana and considered as a synonym of C. dirupta .
BM |
Bristol Museum |
W |
Naturhistorisches Museum Wien |
RV |
Collection of Leptospira Strains |
S |
Department of Botany, Swedish Museum of Natural History |
B |
Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem, Zentraleinrichtung der Freien Universitaet |
H |
University of Helsinki |
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Bacillariophycidae |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cocconeis diaphana W.Sm. ( Smith 1853 )
Riaux-Gobin, Catherine, Compère, Pierre, Jordan, Richard W., Coste, Michel & Yesilyurt, Jovita C. 2016 |
Cocconeis molesta var. amygdalina Grunow ex Cleve (1895: 174)
Cleve P. T. 1895: ) |
Cocconeis amygdalina Bréb. ex Grunow in Van Heurck (1880
Cocconeis amygdalina Bréb. ex Grunow in Van Heurck (1880 –1885: pl. 30 |