taxonID	type	description	language	source
03EC87E40A167F2B172358E78E29FDA9.taxon	materials_examined	Examined material: Chile, Prov. Elqui, Cuesta de Pajonales, Atacama Desert, 1400 m a. s. l., 30 September 1980: 3 males and 3 females, leg.: L. E. PEÑA G.	en	Sziráki, Gy. (2007): Studies On Brucheiserinae (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae), With Description Of The Second Genus Of The Subfamily. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 53: 231-254, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3237158
03EC87E40A167F2B172358E78E29FDA9.taxon	description	Complementary to the description of the species: Length of the body 3.6 – 4.0 mm in males, 4.2 – 6.6 mm in females. Fore wing 3.6 mm in males, 4.5 – 4.8 mm in females. Hind wing 3.4 – 3.9 mm in males, 4.0 – 4 – 5 mm in females. Length of the antennae seems to be similar in both genders: 3.9 – 4.3 mm. Well-developed midfrontal-coronal suture present. Number of antennal segments 50 – 54 in males, 55 – 56 in females. Scape 1.3 times, pedicel about 2 times, median flagellar segments 3.3 times as long as broad. The base of scape about 3 times as broad as pedicel, while pedicel somewhat wider than flagellar segments. The first two abdominal segments are very short. Spiracles present on the segments 1 – 8. Plicatures (Figs 1 – 2, 9) are in two lateral rows and in a median row on the abdominal segments 3 – 6 and 2 – 6 respectively in females, while on 3 – 7 (lateral) and 2 – 7 (median) in males. Below the opening of the first median plicature (Figs 1 – 2) seems to be a glandular structure, which is larger in females than in males. Male terminalia (Figs 3 – 7): The eighth segment is sclerotized somewhat more than the previous ones, and has a small ventral knob, covered by rather strong hairs. Ninth sternite rounded, swollen and very short. Ectoproct well sclerotized, with two dorsally converging, ventrally branching apodemes, with strong caudal, and small dorsal projections, and with two pairs of clasper-like, ventrally situated appendages. The anterior ventral appendage slightly forked, while the posterior one is rather blunt. Paramere moderately long, and curved inwards and forwards caudally. Penis consists of a well sclerotized, horseshoe-shaped ventral part and a slightly sclerotized dorsal arch. Ventral part of penis armed ventrally with teeth and hairs. Female terminalia (Figs 8 – 9): The eighth and ninth sternites are fused, supported by an apodeme anteriorly, and has a rounded projection caudally. Ectoproct has rounded caudal and a small dorsal projections, and bordered anteriorly by a strong apodeme. Large part of the caudal projection of ectoproct strongly sclerotized. Gonapophysis lateralis weakly sclerotized, and elongated in dorso-ventral direction. There is a folded glandular structure laterally at the anterior apodeme of the ectoproct. Female internal genitalia (Fig. 10): Bursa copulatrix rather large, and moderately sclerotized. Its dorsal and lateral surface covered by slashed projections, perhaps with glandular function. Receptaculum seminis weakly sclerotized, bladder like, with an unidentified darker structure inside. Duct of receptaculum semininis short. Ductus seminalis long. Its proximal end connected to the duct of receptaculum seminis, otherwise, its rather wide proximal part is attached to the bursa copulatrix between its vento-lateral lobes. Distal part of ductus seminalis extremely long, thin and looped many times. Median oviduct wide, and relatively well sclerotized. A separate postbursal accessory gland absent.	en	Sziráki, Gy. (2007): Studies On Brucheiserinae (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae), With Description Of The Second Genus Of The Subfamily. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 53: 231-254, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3237158
03EC87E40A167F2B172358E78E29FDA9.taxon	discussion	Remarks: The most remarkable distinctive feature of Brucheiser penai may be found in the male terminalia, in which the ninth sternite is short and widely rounded, while it is elongate and – in caudal view – consists of a wider anterior and a narrower posterior part in B. argentinus (RIEK 1975: figs 15 – 16).	en	Sziráki, Gy. (2007): Studies On Brucheiserinae (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae), With Description Of The Second Genus Of The Subfamily. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 53: 231-254, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3237158
03EC87E40A137F2417E459EC8ED9FD6B.taxon	type_taxon	Type species by present designation: Flintoconis gozmanyi sp. n.	en	Sziráki, Gy. (2007): Studies On Brucheiserinae (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae), With Description Of The Second Genus Of The Subfamily. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 53: 231-254, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3237158
03EC87E40A137F2417E459EC8ED9FD6B.taxon	description	Relatively large bodied and long winged (Fig. 11) coniopterygids. Head rather small, and bent backwards tightly to the prothorax in usual position. (In this case it is hidden below the pronotum.) Postclypeus, upper part of labrum and the antennal sockets weakly chitinized, other parts of the head capsule well sclerotized, with a well developed, straight midfrontal-coronal apodeme (Fig. 12). Structure of labial and maxillary palpi as it is usual in Coniopterygidae. Frons and vertex are not separated from each other. Antennae are more than fifty segmented, and about as long as the body. Pronotum large, wide, with well sclerotized edges, and with a median and two transverse apodemes (Fig. 13). The anterior and posterior edges of pronotum are tucked up. Wings are very long and rather narrow; the fore wings are about (or almost) two times as long as the body. The wing colour is grayish-brown with light stripes and spots (Figs 14 – 15). There are two costal cross veins. Longitudinal vein Rs forked, M unforked in both wings. In hind wing Rs branching from the R very near to the base. Two Rs-M cross veins in both wings. Cua, Cup and Aa veins are very long ones, and the two last longitudinal veins may be regarded as Ja and Jp with high probability (Fig. 16). It is worth mentioning that the number of the cross veins are somewhat larger than in other coniopterygids. Legs are long and slender. Fourth tarsal segment with lateral lobes, as it is typical in the subfamily Brucheiserinae. First tarsal segment almost as long as the others together. The structure and situation of the plicatures are also the same as in the genus Brucheiser detailed above, i. e., those are in two lateral rows and in a median row on the abdominal segments 3 – 6 and 2 – 6 respectively in females, and on 3 – 7 (lateral) and 2 – 7 (median) in males, with a glandular structure in the first median plicature. In male terminalia (Figs 17 – 19, 26 – 29) both anterior and posterior appendages of the ectoproct are well separated, and the tenth gonocoxal complex, with or without a ventro-caudal projection is situated above the caudal end of the slender parameres. Anterior appendage forked. Appendages and caudal projection of ectoproct wel sclerotized. (For homologization of the different part of the male terminalia, see later.) In female terminalia (Figs 20 – 23) the fused eighth and ninth sternites form a large, strong sclerite. At the base of this sclerite there is a folded glandular structure laterally. Caudal projection of ectoproct well sclerotized. The two gonapophyses laterales fused into a transverse ridge. In the female internal genitalia (Figs 24 – 25) the bursa copulatrix large, with two ventro-lateral lobes. Its dorsal and lateral surface covered by slashed projections. Receptaculum seminis weakly sclerotized, sack like. Duct of receptaculum semininis short. Ductus seminalis long, its proximal end connected to the duct of receptaculum seminis, otherwise, its rather wide proximal part is attached to the bursa copulatrix between its lobes. Distal part of ductus seminalis extremely long, thin, looped and coiled. A separate postbursal accessory gland absent.	en	Sziráki, Gy. (2007): Studies On Brucheiserinae (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae), With Description Of The Second Genus Of The Subfamily. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 53: 231-254, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3237158
03EC87E40A137F2417E459EC8ED9FD6B.taxon	discussion	Remarks: Apart from the striking difference between the wings, the new genus is very close to Brucheiser, the other known genus of the subfamily. The main distinctive features of Flintoconis gen. n. are: – elongated wings, with very long Cua, Cup and Aa, and with existing J veins; – presence of the tenth gonocoxal complex instead of penis with U, or horseshoe-shaped sclerotization; – fused gonapophyses laterales in female terminalia.	en	Sziráki, Gy. (2007): Studies On Brucheiserinae (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae), With Description Of The Second Genus Of The Subfamily. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 53: 231-254, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3237158
03EC87E40A137F2417E459EC8ED9FD6B.taxon	etymology	Etymology – I dedicate this new genus to Dr. OLIVER FLINT, the excellent American entomologist, who recognized that these unusual insects collected partly by him are coniopterygids.	en	Sziráki, Gy. (2007): Studies On Brucheiserinae (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae), With Description Of The Second Genus Of The Subfamily. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 53: 231-254, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3237158
03EC87E40A1E7F20173C5AD18E26FD5F.taxon	description	(Figs 11 – 25)	en	Sziráki, Gy. (2007): Studies On Brucheiserinae (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae), With Description Of The Second Genus Of The Subfamily. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 53: 231-254, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3237158
03EC87E40A1E7F20173C5AD18E26FD5F.taxon	materials_examined	Holotype: male, “ Chile: (Prov.) Elqui, Los Pajaritos, E Tres Cruces (= Chingoles), 19 – 20 Oct 1992, L. E. Pena G. ” – deposited in the Smithsonian Institution, Washington D. C. Paratypes: 1 male and 3 females, same data as holotype; 2 males and 2 females, Chile, Atacama (now Prov. Copiapo), 35 km S of Copiapo, 15 – 16 October 1992, at light, leg.: L. E. PEÑA G.; 1 male, Chile, Coquimbo (now Prov. Elqui), 15 km E of Choros Bajos at Rio Los Choros, 300 m. a. s. l., 10 – 11 November 1981, leg.: D. and M. DAVIS – deposited in the Smithsonian Institution, Washington D. C. and in the Hungarian Natural History Museum.	en	Sziráki, Gy. (2007): Studies On Brucheiserinae (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae), With Description Of The Second Genus Of The Subfamily. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 53: 231-254, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3237158
03EC87E40A1E7F20173C5AD18E26FD5F.taxon	description	Description: Length of the body 4.1 – 5.5 mm. The shape, structure and position of the head (Fig. 11) as is detailed in the description of the genus. Head capsule dark brown, eyes moderately large, black. Apart from their light brown basal part, palpi are pale ochreous. Antennae dark brown, 4.2 – 5.2 mm, 55 – 63 segmented in females, 5.1 – 7.0 mm, 63 – 67 segmented in males. Scape in lateral view about 1.5 times as long as broad, and 1.5 times as broad as the median flagellar segments. Pedicel almost two times as long as broad, flagellar segments 1.5 – 2 times as long as broad. The ordinary hairs bent forwards and situated irregularly. The short, stright setae are situated on the apical part of the flagellar segments. Thorax pale ochreous, with dark brown apodemes and shoulder spots. Shape and structure of pronotum (Fig. 13) as detailed in the description of the genus. Coxa, trochanter, the first tibia and the basal part of the second and third tibiae dark brown, other parts of the legs more or less lighter. Length of fore wing 8.5 – 9.2 mm, of hind wing 8.0 – 8.7 mm. The hind wing distinctly wider than the fore wing. Ground colour of the wings dark greyish-brown, with light stripes and spots. Light spots are on both wings before the distal part of Sc, at the end of Sc, R 1, R 2, and around some cross veins (Figs 14 – 15). In addition to these, in fore wing there are small light spots almost everyvhere, and narrow light strips between and along longitudinal veins R 1 - Aa, while in hind wing there are distally widening stripes between the longitudinal veins R 1 - Ja. Longitudinal veins and the stronger cross veins are brown. Structure of the venation as Fig. 16, and as given in description of the genus. There are only a few short fringes on both wings. Outstanding setae of M are absent, but there is a somewhat stronger bristle at about the basal third of M, and at the very basal part of Cua. Abdominal segments are moderately sclerotized, with plicatures as in the description of the genus. Male terminalia as in Figs 17 – 19. On the caudal edge of the eighth sternite a small hairy knob is situated, with two larger setae. Ninth sternite is a strongly sclerotized, in lateral view curved, in ventral and in caudal view blunt, V-shaped plate. The ectoproct well sclerotized, and has a strong apodeme ending in a short transverse section near to the base of the anterior appendage. Dorsal projection of ectoproct is a moderately large knob, with long setae. Caudal projection of ectoproct in lateral view prominent. Anterior appendage of ectoproct long, with pointed arms. At the base of this organ there is the rather small ninth gonapophysis. Posterior appendage of ectoproct with an acute tip, and with a slightly Y-shaped basal apodeme. Paramere moderately long and slender, with a stem straight in ventral view, and with a caudal part curved inwards and forwards. The tenth gonocoxal complex is represented by a sclerotized sheet of irregular H-shape, ending ventrally in a pair of slightly bent horns. Female terminalia as in Figs 20 – 23. The fused eighth + ninth sternite strongly sclerotized. Its dorsal edge – probable depending on the function – may be in twisted (Figs 20, 23), or in expanded (Fig. 21) position. The ridge formed by the fused gonapophyses laterales is thick and broad. The ectoproct moderately sclerotized. Its dorsal projection rather broad, while the caudal projection small, but well sclerotized. Female internal genitalia as in Figs 24 – 25. Vagina large, laterally expanded, well sclerotized. Bursa copulatrix and ductus seminalis strongly, receptaculum seminis and median oviduct moderately sclerotized. Median oviduct broad, receptaculum seminis forms a horizontally curved sac. Otherwise, as it is detailed in the description of the genus.	en	Sziráki, Gy. (2007): Studies On Brucheiserinae (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae), With Description Of The Second Genus Of The Subfamily. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 53: 231-254, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3237158
03EC87E40A1E7F20173C5AD18E26FD5F.taxon	etymology	Etymology – I dedicate this new species to the memory of Dr. LÁSZLÓ GOZMÁNY. He was an outstanding lepidopterologist, a wise man, and colleague always ready to help.	en	Sziráki, Gy. (2007): Studies On Brucheiserinae (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae), With Description Of The Second Genus Of The Subfamily. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 53: 231-254, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3237158
03EC87E40A187F3C1722587B8EBDFC46.taxon	description	(Figs 26 – 29)	en	Sziráki, Gy. (2007): Studies On Brucheiserinae (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae), With Description Of The Second Genus Of The Subfamily. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 53: 231-254, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3237158
03EC87E40A187F3C1722587B8EBDFC46.taxon	materials_examined	Holotype: male, “ Chile: (Prov.) Petorca, Finca Talanquén, S La Lígua, Oct 1984 (?), L. E. Pena G. ” – deposited in the Smithsonian Institution, Washington D. C.	en	Sziráki, Gy. (2007): Studies On Brucheiserinae (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae), With Description Of The Second Genus Of The Subfamily. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 53: 231-254, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3237158
03EC87E40A187F3C1722587B8EBDFC46.taxon	description	Description: Length of the body 6.4 mm. The shape, structure and position of the head as it is detailed in the description of the genus. Eyes moderately large, black. Head capsule, palpi, antennae, abdomen and large part of the thorax brown. Pronotum – apart from the dark apodemes – light brown. Shoulder spots dark brown. Tip of the antennae broken; remaining parts 65 (right) and 70 (left) segmented. Scape in lateral view about 1.5 times as long as broad, and 1.5 times as broad as the median flagellar segments. Pedicel almost two times as long as broad, flagellar segments 1.5 times as long as broad. The ordinary hairs bent forwards and situated irregularly. Short, straight setae are on the apical part of the flagellar segments. Shape and structure of pronotum as detailed in the description of the genus. Legs dark brown. Length of fore wing 9.2 mm, of hind wing 8.6 mm. Hind wing distinctly wider than fore wing. The wing colour and pattern are similar to those of F. gozmanyi; ground colour is dark greyish-brown, however, the fore wing with broad pale stripes and many spots of different size and irregular shape, thus larger part of the wing surface pale. Longitudinal veins and the stronger cross veins are brown. On both wings there are only a few short fringes. Outstanding setae of M are absent, but there is a somewhat stronger bristle at about the basal third of M and at the very basal part of Cua. The structure of the venation is similar to that of F. gozmanyi, but in fore wing of F. petorcana there is a Cua-Cup crossvein near to the middle of the wing, and there are distal M-Cua and Cua-Cup crossveins too. Longitudinal vein Aa forked near to the distal Cup-Aa crossvein. In the hind wing the fork of Rs is before the distal crossvein series, which contains a member between the branches of Rs. There is also a basal Cup-Aa crossvein. Because only the holotype only is available of F. petorcana, there is impossible to judge the taxonomic value of the above mentioned eidonomical differences between the two Flintoconis species. Abdominal segments are moderately sclerotized with plicatures as in the description of the genus. Male terminalia as in Figs 26 – 29. On the caudal edge of the eighth sternite a small hairy knob is situated, with two longer setae. Ninth sternite is a strongly sclerotized plate, with a large, setose and curved projection. The ectoproct well sclerotized, with a moderately strong apodeme ending near to a short transverse apodeme at the base of the anterior appendage. Dorsal projection of ectoproct is a moderately large knob, with long setae. Caudal projection of ectoproct rounded distally. Anterior appendage of ectoproct moderately long, curved strongly invards, with short, hooked arms. At the base of this organ there is the prominent ninth gonapophysis, with distinct apodeme. Posterior appendage of ectoproct large, with a stout apical tooth, and with a branching basal apodeme. Paramere moderately long, with a bent stem, and with a short caudal part curved inwards. The tenth gonocoxal complex is a subtriangular sclerite, with irregularly situated hairs, with a strong, forked projection, and ending ventrally in a pair of slightly bent spurs.	en	Sziráki, Gy. (2007): Studies On Brucheiserinae (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae), With Description Of The Second Genus Of The Subfamily. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 53: 231-254, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3237158
03EC87E40A187F3C1722587B8EBDFC46.taxon	discussion	Remarks: The new species is rather close to the above described type species of the genus Flintoconis. The main distinctive features of F. petorcana sp. n. are: – moderately long anterior appendage of ectoproct; – large posterior appendage of ectoproct, with stout apical tooth; – subtriangular tenth gonocoxal complex, with strong, forked projection.	en	Sziráki, Gy. (2007): Studies On Brucheiserinae (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae), With Description Of The Second Genus Of The Subfamily. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 53: 231-254, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3237158
03EC87E40A057F3D178F5ADE895AFC99.taxon	materials_examined	Examined material – Chile, Acgua (Aconcagua, now Prov. Los Andes), Rio Blanco, 10 March 1968: 1 female, leg.: O. FLINT and L. E. PEÑA G.; Chile, (Prov.) Antofagosta, Poposo, October 1983: 1 female, leg.: L. E. PEÑA G.; Chile, (Prov.) Curico, El Coigo, E of Potrero Grande, 6 – 7 January 1998: 1 specimen without abdomen, leg.: L. E. PEÑA G.; Chile, Santiago (now Prov. Cordillera), El Alfalfal, 29 February 1968: 1 female, leg.: O. FLINT and L. E. PEÑA G.	en	Sziráki, Gy. (2007): Studies On Brucheiserinae (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae), With Description Of The Second Genus Of The Subfamily. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 53: 231-254, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3237158
03EC87E40A057F3D178F5ADE895AFC99.taxon	discussion	Remarks: As the intraspecific variability of eidonomical features and of female internal genitalia in this genus is not known enough, specific identification of the above listeded specimens is impossible.	en	Sziráki, Gy. (2007): Studies On Brucheiserinae (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae), With Description Of The Second Genus Of The Subfamily. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 53: 231-254, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3237158
