taxonID	type	description	language	source
0382817F11128A72018960E2BE48F852.taxon	type_taxon	Type species. Poeocera misella Stål, 1863, by monotypy, first specified by Van Duzee (1916: 78).	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11128A72018960E2BE48F852.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Relatively small taxa (~ 10 – 16 mm including wings), nearly black. Body broad and parallel-sided. Head strongly transverse (lacking a projection), just wider than pronotum. Vertex strongly transverse, much wider than long, carinate on all sides. Frons quadrate, approximately twice as wide as tall. Forewings entirely opaque with pale (often bluish) maculations. Hindwings broad, anal lobe well-developed, smoky, mostly translucent, proximally deep grey, often with 1 – 2 large pale (pale blue or white) markings. Fore and middle legs with femora and tibiae flattened. Dorsum of abdomen broadly orange or red.	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11128A72018960E2BE48F852.taxon	description	Description. Color. Overall coloration is nearly black (dry specimens often paler). Head with anterior margin distinctly paler; body usually with minute pale dots. Forewings opaque, differing slightly in color and texture past nodal line, bearing pale (blue or white) maculations; forewings with pale irregular reticulate lines in cells from base to nodal line; distad of nodal line forewings bearing white dashes. Hindwings mostly smoky-transparent, apex darker gray, proximal portion near black, often with two pale large irregular spots (often blue or transparent). Legs black with irregular white spots, front and middle tibiae with 1 – 2 white bands (may be incomplete). Abdomen ventrally near black, dorsally bright red or orange. Structure. Body length (including wings) usually 16 mm or less. Body in dorsal view broad and parallel-sided, in lateral view, head and thorax in similar plane (not appearing hump-backed). Head in dorsal view broad (including eyes just wider than pronotum) and strongly transverse (head projection lacking), anteriorly weakly convex, and posteriorly concave. Vertex much wider than long, carinate on all margins (carina appearing thicker anteriorly), disc depressed, surface roughened; anterior margin of head (dorsal view) appearing to have second anterior carina (i. e., with “ double carina between forehead and crown ”, viz. Metcalf 1938). Head in lateral view with face receding ventrally, inflection between vertex and frons sharp. Frons (frontal view) broad, roughly quadrate, much broader than high, lateral margins sinuate, laterally foliate; face surface rugulose bearing faint transverse grooves, with median carina and diagonally oriented lateral carinae (approximated at base, giving a V-shaped appearance). Frontoclypeal suture arched (weakly in P. misella), clypeus, median third longitudinally carinate. Antennae short, scape smooth, about as tall as wide (hidden behind lateral foliations of frons from frontal view), pedicel somewhat bulbous, longer than wide, bearing numerous conspicuous sensory plaques, flagellum bristle-like with bulbous base. Eyes bulbous, laterally projecting, subcircular (in lateral view), with callus behind ventrocaudal margin (not an expanded flange), lacking a vertical carina or spine in front of eye. Lateral ocelli conspicuous at anterior ventral margin of eye. Rostrum reaching or exceeding hind coxae. In lateral view, mesonotum and pronotum flat and on same plane. In dorsal view, pronotum broad, about 1.5 – 2 × broader than vertex along midline, anterior margin arched and carinate, posterior margin nearly truncate (or weakly concave), surface irregularly rugulose bearing distinct median carina and a transverse carina (sometimes obscure) just anterior to pronotum midlength. Mesonotum triangular, a little exceeding length of pronotum + head at midline, bearing a distinct median carina, with lateral carinae obscure. Tegulae conspicuous. Front and middle legs with femora and tibiae expanded and flattened, hind tibiae with 4 – 6 lateral teeth, apical ornamentation 7 (2 + 5) - (8 – 9) - (6 – 9) (with conspicuous setae interspersed), with teeth at the apex of tibia large and those on the basitarsus and 2 nd tarsomere in uniform row with lateral teeth largest. Forewings broad, opaque and relatively short, costal and trailing margin subparallel, apex (at apical branches of RP and MP) broadly rounding, claval apex distad of midlength. Hindwings broad, maximum breadth near base, anal lobe well-developed. Male terminalia. Pygofer in lateral view narrowly trapezoidal (narrower posteriorly), anterior margin concave, caudal margin convex, ventral margin diagonally linear, dorsal margin sinuate; in ventral view posterior pygofer margin concave (medioventral lobe absent). Gonostyli broadly spatulate, bearing a conspicuous laterally projected hook around proximal third. Phallus stout, bilaterally symmetrical, in lateral view horizontally bisected into a dorsal and ventral lobe, each subtended by a sclerotized element; dorsal region membranous and subtended by a slender pair of rods; ventral sclerotized rods broader and cupped, enclosing a ventral pair of inflatable elements (variably everted by the macerating process) with weakly sclerotized apices. Anal tube (lateral view) broad, apex rounded; in dorsal view broad, apex exceeded by bluntly conical paraproct (epiproct hidden).	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11128A72018960E2BE48F852.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The fulgorid genera in the United States are few (i. e., eight, with five in the Poiocerini) and Poblicia is distinctive and easily recognized among them. The generally dark coloration, the relatively short and blunt forewings (bearing irregularly placed pale blue to white spots often combined with fine pale reticulations or dashes), with the hindwings fuscous proximally (with 1 – 2 irregular pale spots), and the dorsum of abdomen red or orange, help separate Poblicia from other similar genera. Providing definitive diagnostic features that separate genera of American Poiocerini is complicated by the fact that most included genera are incompletely defined and may be heterogeneous with the included species poorly known. Also, the quantitative phylogenetic study of Urban & Cryan (2009) did not recover the Poiocerini as a monophyletic taxon, suggesting that the main tribal feature (the lack of a projected head) may be a convergent feature found in distantly related lineages. The most similar genera found in Central America may be the genera Acraephia Stål, 1866, and Alaruasa Distant, 1906. Members of Acraephia tend to be much larger (the type species, A. perspicillata (Fabricius, 1781) is approximately 45 mm [n = 2]), with entirely dark forewings (lacking the fine pale reticulations or dashes) or with a bold pattern, and the hindwings are broadly fuscous, often with a large subapical transparent spot (e. g., Porion 1994, figs 20, 23). The color of the abdominal terga varies, but may be dark, yellow or pink (sometimes including the sternum). Alaruasa is varied in its appearance with some species with boldly marked wings (often including a transverse bar near the nodal line), and sometimes with copious flocculent wax on the abdomen (e. g., Porion 1994, figs 6, 9). The hindwings of Alaruasa vary from uniformly fuscous (e. g., A. anceps (Stål, 1869), Porion 1994, fig. 5), to largely transparent with a dark distal border (e. g., A. aerata (Distant, 1887), Porion 1994, fig. 6). The species of Alaruasa that appears to be most similar to Poblicia is A. pallidoconspersa (Distant, 1905) (see Porion 1994 fig. 8; Distant 1905, Tab. 14, fig. 26) which has the forewings minutely spotted (“ apical area immaculate ” Distant 1905: 145), with the dorsum of the abdomen mostly dark (“ lateral margins sanguineous ” Distant 1905: 145); the hindwings are described and illustrated as a uniform color by Distant (1905), but shown as dark proximally, clear distally by Porion (1994, fig. 8). We have not seen any definitive records (specimens or iNaturalist) of Poblicia from south of Mexico (but see comments under P. cribrata). On iNaturalist there are several records similar to Poblicia, although the individual appears relatively large with more elongate forewings (e. g., observation 38856037) that resemble Poblicia but are possibly Alaruasa pallidoconspersa. It is not clear whether the US species are distributed widely in Mexico or if there is one or more undescribed species (e. g., Figs 18 C, D) of Poblicia in the Mexican fauna.	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11128A72018960E2BE48F852.taxon	etymology	Etymology. Named after ‘ gens Publicia’, a plebeian family in ancient Rome, and is feminine in gender (Dmitriev 2022).	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11128A72018960E2BE48F852.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Southern USA and Mexico.	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11108A79018961C2BE7CFD84.taxon	description	(Figures 2 – 4 A – C, 5 – 7, 12 A – B, 18 A)	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11108A79018961C2BE7CFD84.taxon	description	1980 c: 15 [listed]. — Porion 1994: 21 [cataloged, illustrated]. — Moran et al. 2005: 8803 [endosymbionts]. — Urban & Cryan 2009 [phylogenetics]. — Bartlett et al. 2011 [listed, key, illustrated]. — Urban & Cryan 2012 [endosymbionts]. — Bartlett et al. 2014: 31 – 32, 169 [illustrated, notes]. — Broadley et al. 2023 [parasites].	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11108A79018961C2BE7CFD84.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Body length between about 11.0 – 15.5 mm, nearly black with minute pale spotting on the body, and larger bluish to white maculations on the forewing, area past nodal line bearing many pale dashes between longitudinal veins. Vertex very narrow (vs. P. misella), in frontal view dorsum of head truncate. Fore- and middle tibiae with 2 pale bands. Hindwings smoky-transparent washed with fuscous in proximal half (enclosing two large irregular clear windows) and along wing apex. Rostrum reaching hind coxa. Abdominal dorsum red. Amended description. Color. Overall coloration is nearly black (Fig. 2, darker in vivo, Fig. 18 A, dry specimens notably browner in appearance) with faint brown to bluish wash; head with anterior margin distinctly paler; body with fine pale speckles everywhere, except forewings (Fig. 3 A) with larger pale maculations especially following costa (forewing spots pale blue proximally, whitish past nodal line), forewings uniformly darkened (differing in hue past nodal line, before nodal line bearing many fine, irregular contrasting pale reticulate lines in cells, mostly connecting veins; beyond nodal line more distinct white dashes between veins) usually with short whitish transverse bar at apex of clavus (often obscure in vivo, more evident in dry specimens, especially if washed with alcohol), and a matching marking from costa; hindwings (Fig. 3 B) mostly smoky-transparent, apex fuscous-gray, proximal portion near black with two large irregular pale spots (may fade to whitish or translucent in preserved specimens), veins dark except proximal portion of MA pale. Legs black with irregular white spots, front and middle tibiae (Fig. 4 C) with two white bands (proximal one close to tibial femoral joint, distal band before tibial apex). Abdomen ventrally near black, dorsally bright red (evident on lateral portion of abdomen in repose). Structure. Body size (including wings) males x ̄ = 12.8 mm (11.0 – 13.5, n = 5), females x ̄ = 15.0 mm (14.0 – 15.5, n = 5). Body in dorsal view (Fig. 2 A) broad and parallel-sided, in lateral view (Fig. 2 B), head and thorax in similar plane (not appearing hump-backed). Head (dorsal view, Fig. 2 A) broad and strongly transverse, just narrower than prothorax, anteriorly weakly convex and posteriorly concave. Vertex much wider than long (about 4.5 × wider than midlength), carinate on all margins (carina appearing thicker anteriorly), disc depressed, bearing weak median longitudinal carina, surface roughened; anterior margin of head (dorsal view) appearing to have second anterior carina. Head (lateral view, Fig. 2 B) with face receding ventrally, inflection between vertex and frons sharp. Frons (frontal view, Fig. 2 C) broad, roughly quadrate, much broader than high (midlength about 0.56 × width at dorsal margin), dorsal margin truncate, lateral margins sinuate, laterally foliate, somewhat narrowing ventrad; face surface rugulose bearing faint transverse grooves, with median carina (not reaching fastigium) and diagonally oriented lateral (approximated at base, giving a V-shaped appearance, becoming obsolete ventrad). Frontoclypeal suture arched, clypeus triangular with rounding dorsal margin, median third longitudinally carinate. Antennae short, scape smooth, barely as tall as wide (hidden behind lateral foliations of frons from frontal view), pedicel somewhat bulbous, longer than wide bearing numerous sensory plaques, flagellum bristle-like with bulbous base. Eyes bulbous, laterally projecting, subcircular (in lateral view), with small callus behind ventrocaudal margin, lacking a vertical carina or spine in front of eye. Lateral ocelli conspicuous at anterior ventral margin of eye. Rostrum reaching hind coxae. In dorsal view, pronotum broad, about 2 × broader than vertex along midline (length at midline about 1 / 3 width), anterior margin arched and carinate, posterior margin nearly (roundly) truncate, surface irregularly rugulose bearing distinct median carina and obscure irregular tracings on disc. Mesonotum triangular, a little longer than pronotum + head at midline, bearing a distinct median carina, with lateral carinae obscure. Tegulae conspicuous. Front and middle legs (Fig. 4 C) with femora and tibiae expanded and flattened, hind tibia (Fig. 4 A) with 5 – 6 lateral teeth, apical ornamentation (Fig. 11 B) 7 (2 + 5) - (8 – 9) - (6 – 9), with teeth at the apex of tibia large and those on the tarsi much smaller in uniform row (lateral teeth largest), interspersed with conspicuous setae. Forewings broad (Fig. 3 A, length about 2.3 × width), opaque and relatively short, costal and trailing margins subparallel (costal margin weakly convex, trailing margin inflected slightly at costal apex), apex (at apical branches of RP and MP) broadly rounding, claval apex just distad of midlength; venation dense with numerous secondary veinlets, veinlets in form of pale dashed in apical third, densely reticulate in proximal 2 / 3; apex of clavus near nodal line (at apical 1 / 3 of wing); ScP + R forked from MP at basal cell; PCu and A 1 fused at about ¾ of clavus length. Hindwings (Fig. 3 B) broad, maximum breadth near base, apex broadly rounded, trailing margin indentated at claval fold; anal lobe well-developed. Male terminalia. Pygofer in lateral view (Fig. 5 A) narrowly trapezoidal (narrower posteriorly), anterior margin concave, caudal margin convex, ventral margin diagonally linear, dorsal margin sinuate; in ventral view, posterior pygofer margin concave (medioventral lobe absent). Gonostyli spatulate (Fig. 12 B), proximal portion bearing a conspicuous laterally projected hook around basal third; distal portion roughly quadrate; dorsal surface bearing a large dentate process a little distad of midlength, distal dorsal margin truncate then angled to a second truncate portion before reaching rounded dorsoventral margin. Anal tube (lateral view) broad and elongately triangular, dorsal and ventral margins weakly sinuate, distally expanded in proximal ¾, then strongly narrowed into blunt median lobe (apex of anal tube below midpoint); in dorsal view (Fig. 6 E), apex deeply concave with lateral margins expanded to blunt lobes; epiproct hidden, paraproct elongated, exceeding caudal margin of anal tube. Plant associations. Rhus copallinum L. (Anacardiaceae, winged sumac). Also reported (specimen records) Ambrosia trifida L. (Asteraceae), and Acer rubrum L. (Sapindaceae).	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11108A79018961C2BE7CFD84.taxon	biology_ecology	Biology. Poblicia fuliginosa is a univoltine species found on Rhus copallinum. They have five nymphal instars with adults starting to appear in July (in North Carolina). Females lay eggs in rows and cover them with a waxy covering (Fig. 7 A). Egg masses range in number of eggs (6 to 38) with an average of 25 eggs per mass (n = 40 egg masses; Hagerty 2024). Nymphs (Fig. 7 B) and adults are messy feeders and often leave seeping wounds on trees, which turn into nodules in subsequent years. Favored tree behavior has been observed with this species, where certain trees will have several individuals while none will be on other nearby trees. Nymphs appear to prefer hiding in foliage in the lower portions of the host plant. This species has been reared has been reared in association with spotted lanternfly biocontrol non-target host suitability studies and we intend to describe details of its biology in a separate publication.	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11108A79018961C2BE7CFD84.taxon	distribution	Distribution. USA: AL, AR, GA, IL, KS, LA, MD, MO, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX (except upper Rio Grande region), VA; Mexico: Coahuila (Fig. 24).	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11108A79018961C2BE7CFD84.taxon	discussion	Remarks. We have found that the eastern and western populations of Poblicia differ morphologically, biologically, and molecularly and therefore deserve status as separate species. Poblicia thanatophana was described from Nogales, Arizona (Kirkaldy 1907, Fig. 8) and is an available name for the western species, so we restore P. thanatophana out of synonymy with P. fuliginosa. The diagnostic differences between P. fuliginosa and P. thanatophana are that the former species is slightly larger, with the abdominal terga red (orange in P. thanatophana, at least laterally) and that P. fuliginosa usually bears two white bands on the front and middle legs (Fig. 4 C, one band in P. thanatophana, Fig. 4 F). The proximal forewing reticulations are more strongly contrasting in P. fuliginosa (Fig. 3 A) than in P. thanatophana (Fig. 9 A). The terminalia of the two species are quite similar, but can be distinguished by several subtle differences in the shape of the gonostyli (Fig. 12), and that the anal tube in P. fuliginosa (Fig. 6 E) appears more deeply bilobed apically than P. thanatophana (Fig. 11 E). Poblicia fuliginosa primarily utilizes winged sumac (Rhus copallinum L.) as a host species, whereas P. thanatophana is mainly on Asteraceae, in particular desertbroom (Baccharis sarothroides A. Gray). Nast (1951: 270), in his remarks concerning the genus Poiocera De Laporte, 1832, synonymized Poiocera venosa Walker, 1851 under Crepusia fuliginosa (Olivier, 1791) (which was a new combination for fuliginosa). This combination was missed in Bartlett et al. (2014) and is currently followed by Bourgoin (2025) because the issue had not been formally addressed in prior work. Nast (1951) described his reasons for excluding a series of taxa from Poiocera, but not his basis for placing fuliginosa under the South American genus Crepusia Stål, 1866 (type species Lystra miniacea Germar, 1830 from Brazil; Costa Lima 1935, Metcalf 1947). While early authors seemed uncertain about the diagnosis of Crepusia (e. g., Metcalf 1923, 1938; Ball 1933), the genus (Fig. 23) appears to be robust forms with the apex of the forewing transparent and the base of the hindwings usually colored red or orange (e. g., Porion 1994, figs 36, 42). An underlying issue is that the limits of many of the genera in the Poiocerini deserve reassessment, and many species are doubtfully placed to genus. We feel the placement of fuliginosa in the South American genus Crepusia by Nast (1951) was likely a result of a misunderstanding of the latter genus, and we here reaffirm the traditional placement of fuliginosa under Poblicia as it has been considered by all authorities since Nast (1951). The type specimen of Poblicia fuliginosa could not be located. The collection of G. A. Olivier is reported to be primarily in Paris, with a portion in Scotland (Horn & Kahle 1937, Osborn 1952). The location of the type specimen of this species was not reported in Porion (1994). Records on iNaturalist from Mexico (e. g., observation 16700436 from Coahuila State) appear quite similar to P. fuliginosa and may represent valid records of this species, but P. fuliginosa and P. thanatophana can not always be definitively diagnosed based on the views presented.	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11108A79018961C2BE7CFD84.taxon	materials_examined	Material examined. LOUISIANA: Natchitoches parish, Kisatchie National Forest, 22 – 23 Sep 1995, M. J. Travitz (1 male, UDCC); same, Sep 2002, R. M. Krause (1 female, UDCC); same, 14 Sep 2002, W. Burnside (1 male, UDCC); Kisatchie Ranger District, 09 Oct 2002, M Kleinhenz (1 female, UDCC); Tangipahoa parish, Arcola, Sandy Hollow Wildlife Management Area, 7 Sep 2002, S. T. Dash & M. Seymour, Rhus copallina (1 male, 1 female, UDCC); Same, 7 Sep 2002, P. L. Vasseur (1 male, UDCC). MARYLAND: Dorchester Co.: Linkwood Wildlife Management Area, 31 Aug 1994, M. J. Rothschild, Ambrosia trifida L. (1 male, UDCC). N ORTH CAROLINA: Bladen Co., 2.5 km N of Jones Lake Co. Rd. 1509, 17 Sep 1994, G. V. Fodor (1 male, NCSU); Bladen Lakes St Forest Co. Rd 1509, 6 km NE Hwy 242, 7 Sep 1990, H. Zhong (1 male, 1 female, NCSU); same, 07 Sep 1990, M. A. Wolff (1 male, NCSU); same, 7 Sep 1990, RJ Kopanic Jr. (1 male, 2 female, NCSU); Bladen Lakes State Forest, 22 – 27 Aug 2020, T. J. Hagerty, Rhus copallinum (5 males, UDCC; 3 male, 2 female, RBINS); Bladen Lakes State Forest, 5.5 km S of Ammon, SR- 1508 [Lulu Long Rd] at Turnbull Creek, 8 Sep 2001, M. A. Bertone (1 male, NCSU); near Bladen Lakes State Forest, 17 Sep 1994, C. R. Bartlett, Acer rubrum L. (2 female, NCSU); same, 18 Sep 1994, C. R. Bartlett, Rhus copallina (1 male, 1 female, NCSU, 1 female UDCC); Cumberland Co., Fayetteville, 6 Sep 1945, D. L. Wray (1 female, NCSU); Durham Co., 20 Km N. of Durham, on Hill Forest, 3 Sep 1999, J. R. Carlson (1 female, NCSU); same, 3 Sep 1999, C. M. Newman (1 female, (NCSU); Durham, 21 Sep 1995, H. A. King, Rhus copallinum (1 male, UDCC); Moore Co., Southern Pines, 6 Oct 1908 (2 female, NCSU); same, 7 Oct 1908, A. H. Manee (1 female, NCSU); same, 26 Jun 1919 (4 male, NCSU); Southern Pines, Sep 1906, R. Woglum (2 sex undetermined, UCRC); same, 27 Sep 1906, R. Woglum (2 sex undetermined, UCRC); same, 7 Sep 1908, A. H. Manee (1 sex undetermined, UCRC); Pasquotank Co.: Elizabeth City, Late Aug 1919, F. Sherman (1 female, NCSU); Richmond Co., Hoffman, 26 Sep 1981, R. Webster (1 sex undetermined, UCRC), Wake Co., (13 specimens, NCSU). OKLAHOMA: Payne Co., Stillwater, 7 Oct 1993, M. Gates (2 sex undetermined, UCRC). SOUTH CAROLINA: Oconee Co., Seneca, 3 Sep 1989, Debbie Oliver (1 male, UDCC). TEXAS: Tyler Co.: Tyler County, 7 Oct 1989, C. Bordelon (1 female, UDCC). VIRGINIA: Northampton Co.: Kiptopeke State Park, 3.7 km SW Towsend, 4 Oct 2014, S. T. Dash, Rhus copallina (1 male, UDCC). iNaturalist State Records: ALABAMA: Chilton Co. (137657115), Colbert Co. (97167950). ARKANSAS: Pulaski Co. (59383343), Faulkner Co. (125299876); Cleburne Co. (136038966).	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F111A8A6401896434B851F86D.taxon	description	(Figures 4 D – F, 8 – 11, 12 C, D, 18 B) Kirkaldy 1907: 61 [described]. — Metcalf 1947: 63 [cataloged as synonym of Poblicia fuliginosa]. — Gómez-Marco et al. 2023 [parasites as Poblicia fuliginosa].	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F111A8A6401896434B851F86D.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Body length between about 10.5 – 13.5 mm, nearly black usually with minute pale spotting on body, and larger bluish to white maculations on forewing, area past nodal line with many pale dashes between longitudinal veins, proximal to nodal line with reticulate veinlets (less dense than P. fuliginosa). Vertex very narrow (vs. P. misella), in frontal view dorsum of head truncate. Abdominal dorsum orange, fore- and middle tibiae with one pale band. Rostrum reaching hind coxae. Amended description. Color. Overall coloration (Fig. 8) deep blackish-brown to nearly black (darker in vivo) with faint bluish wash; head anterior margin paler; body usually with fine minute spots (may be obscure or absent), except forewings (Fig. 9 A) with larger pale bluish maculations especially along costa and apically, forewings uniformly darkened and opaque (differing in hue past nodal line, before nodal line bearing many fine, irregular reticulate lines in cells, mostly connecting veins; beyond nodal line more distinct white dashes between veins); hindwings (Fig. 9 B) mostly smoky-transparent, apex darker gray, proximal portion near black with two large irregular spots (may fade to whitish or translucent in preserved specimens) and pale portion of clavus; veins dark except pale in proximal irregular pale spots. Legs black with irregular white markings, front and middle tibiae (Fig. 4 F) with one white band in distal third. Abdomen ventrally near black, dorsally bright orange (evident on lateral portion of abdomen in repose). Structure. Body size (including wings) males x ̄ = 10.9 mm (10.5 – 11.5, n = 5), females x ̄ = 13.1 mm (12.5 – 13.5, n = 5). Body in dorsal view (Fig. 8 A) broad and parallel-sided, in lateral view (Fig. 8 C), head and thorax in similar plane (not appearing hump-backed). Head in dorsal view broad and strongly transverse, just narrower than prothorax, anteriorly weakly convex and posteriorly concave. Vertex much wider than long (about 5 × wider than midlength), carinate on all margins (carina appearing thicker anteriorly), disc depressed bearing weak median longitudinal carina (sometimes obscure), surface roughened; anterior margin of head (dorsal view) appearing to have second anterior carina. Head in lateral view with face receding ventrad, inflection between vertex and frons abrupt. Frons (frontal view, Fig. 8 D) broad, roughly quadrate, much broader than high (midlength about 0.62 × width at dorsal margin), dorsal margin truncate, lateral margins sinuate, laterally foliate, somewhat narrowing ventrad; face surface rugulose bearing faint transverse grooves, with weak median carina (not reaching fastigium) and obscure diagonally oriented lateral carinae (approximated at base, giving a V-shaped appearance, becoming obsolete ventrad). Frontoclypeal suture arched, clypeus triangular with rounding dorsal margin, median portion longitudinally carinate. Antennae short, scape smooth, as tall as wide (hidden behind lateral foliations of frons from frontal view), pedicel bulbous, about as long as wide bearing numerous sensory plaques, flagellum bristle-like with bulbous base. Eyes bulbous, laterally projecting, subcircular (in lateral view), lacking a vertical carina or spine in front of eye. Lateral ocelli conspicuous at anterior ventral margin of eye. Rostrum reaching hind coxae (Fig. 8 B). In dorsal view, pronotum broad, about 2 × broader than vertex along midline (length at midline about 1 / 4 width), anterior margin arched and carinate, posterior margin nearly truncate, surface rugulose bearing median carina and obscure disc bearing two pits on each side of median line (median pit distinct, more laterad somewhat obscure); transverse carina of pronotum absent. Mesonotum triangular, a little longer than pronotum + head at midline, bearing a distinct median carina (becoming obsolete at scutellum), with lateral carinae obscure. Tegulae conspicuous. Front and middle legs (Fig. 4 F) with femora and tibiae expanded and flattened, hind tibiae (Fig. 4 D) with 4 lateral spines, apical spinulation (Fig. 4 E) 7 (2 + 5) - (9 – 10) - (6 – 7), with spinules at the apex of tibia large and those on the basitarsus and 2 nd tarsomere in uniform row with lateral spinules largest, bearing conspicuous setae intersperse among apical teeth. Forewings (Fig. 9 A) broad, opaque, and relatively short (length ~ 2.3 × width at widest point), costal and trailing margin subparallel (costal margin weakly convex, trailing margin inflected at costal apex), apex (at apical branches of RP and MP) broadly rounding, claval apex just distad of midlength; venation dense with numerous secondary veinlets, veinlets in form of pale dashed in apical third, dull reticulate in proximal 2 / 3; apex of clavus near nodal line (in apical 1 / 3 of wing); ScP + R forked from MP at basal cell; PCu and A 1 fused near claval apex. Hindwings (Fig. 9 B) broad, maximum breadth near base, apex broadly rounded, trailing margin indentate at claval fold; anal lobe well-developed. Male terminalia. Pygofer in lateral view (Fig. 10 A) narrowly trapezoidal (narrower posteriorly), anterior margin concave, caudal margin convex, ventral margin diagonally linear, dorsal margin sinuate; in ventral view deeply concave (medioventral lobe absent). Gonostyli (Figs 12 C, D) spatulate, proximal lateral portion bearing a conspicuous laterally projected hook before midlength; distal portion spatulate; dorsal surface bearing a large dentate process a little distad of midlength, posterior margin smoothly rounded. Anal tube (lateral view, Fig. 10 A) broad and elongate, dorsal and ventral margins weakly sinuate, distally expanded to midline, then narrowed into blunt median lobe (apex of anal tube near midpoint); in dorsal view (Fig. 11 E) apex shallowly concave, lateral margins expanded to blunt lobes; epiproct hidden, paraproct stout, exceeding caudal margin of anal tube. Plant associations. Baccharis sarothroides A. Gray (desertbroom), Baccharis salicina Torr. & A. Gray (willow baccharis), Baccharis sp., Brickellia sp. (brickellbush), Helianthus sp. (sunflower) (all Asteraceae). The California record of this species at the flowers of Opuntia basilaris Engelm. & J. M. Bigelow (Cactaceae) is likely a dispersing individual.	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F111A8A6401896434B851F86D.taxon	biology_ecology	Biology. Poblicia thanatophana adults were always collected on Baccharis sarothroides from 2020 to 2022 (July – August). After collection, adults were able to feed on B. sarothroides potted plants (~ 60 cm high) for around 20 days inside a walk-in chamber (25 ± 1 ° C; 50 % R. H.; 8: 16 D: L) at the Insectary and Quarantine building at the University of California, Riverside. Seven Poblicia thanatophana egg masses were found on potted B. sarothroides with an average number of eggs of 29.86 ± 2.69 (SE) (Gómez-Marco et al. 2023).	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F111A8A6401896434B851F86D.taxon	distribution	Distribution. USA: CA, AZ, CO (Pueblo Co.), NM, TX (upper Rio Grande region); Mexico: Sonora (Fig. 25).	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F111A8A6401896434B851F86D.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The diagnostic features that separate this species from P. fuliginosa are described in the remarks under the latter species. It is possible that the easternmost populations of this species may be peripatric with P. fuliginosa.	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F111A8A6401896434B851F86D.taxon	materials_examined	Material examined. Type material (BPBM, holotype, male) “ Nogales // Arizona / A. Koebele // 2519 [?] // Type [red paper] // Poblicia / thanatophana / 577 ♂ Kirk [handwritten] / Holotype [red paper, stuck perpendicular on label right side // P. thanatophana / Kirk Type [handwritten]. Other material examined. ARIZONA: Cochise Co. (46 specimens, UCRC, 1 specimen TAMU); Gila Co., 22 mi. NE of Globe, 12 Sep 1957, Timberlake, Baccharis sp., (5 sex undetermined, UCRC); Miami, 29 Aug 1958, M. W. Nielson, Baccharis sp. (1 sex undetermined, UCRC); Graham Co., Graham Mountain, 15 Sep 1940, Bryant (1 sex undetermined, UCRC); Santa Cruz Co.: 5 mi S of Patagonia, 15 Sep 1985, W. F. Barr (1 male, UDCC); AZ 82 at road to Patagonia Lake, 3.5 mi S of Patagonia, 26 Sep 1997, C. L. and S. L. Staines (1 female, UDCC); Florida Canyon, 25 Sep 1997, C. L. and S. L. Staines (1 female, UDCC); Santa Rita Mountains, 19 Sep 1964, W. F. Barr (1 female, UDCC); Yavapai Co., S Hillside, 1 Oct 1980, Art Strong (1 sex undetermined, UCRC). CALIFORNIA: Inyo Co., 2 Miles East of Darwin, P. H. & M. Arnaud, 4700 ft. alt., 12 Jun 1971, at flowers Opuntia basilaris (CASENT 8139059) (1 sex undetermined, CASC). NEW MEXICO: Dona Ana Co.: 12 Sep 1976, J. Calderon (1 female, UDCC); Organ Mountains, Long Canyon, 30 Sep 2007, P. A. Lenhart (2 males, 4 females, UDCC); Vado, 16 Sep 1976, A. Stephens (1 male 1 female, UDCC); Eddy Co.: 4 mi. E Loving, 7 Nov 1989, T. O. Robbins, Baccharis salicina (1 male, USNM). TEXAS: Donley Co.: 4 mi. N. Clarendon, Greenbelt Resevoir, 06 Oct 1988, P. E. Boldt & T. O. Robbins, Baccharis salicina (1 male, USNM); El Paso Co.: McKelligon Canyon, El Paso, 08 Sep 2007, M. J. Lara (1 female, UDCC); Red sand dunes along Highway 62, 09 Sep 2007, M. Dominguez (2 female, UDCC); same, 13 Oct 2007, O. G. Uranga (1 male, UDCC); Socorro, 25 Oct 1973, G. Strong (1 female, UDCC); West El Paso, 16 Apr 2007, J. Bautista (1 male, 3 females, UDCC); same 6 May 2007, J. Bautista (1 female, UDCC); same, 21 May 2007, J. Bautista (1 female, UDCC).	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11068A67018961C2B99DFDAE.taxon	description	(Figures 14, 15)	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11068A67018961C2B99DFDAE.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Vertex distinctly elongate (relative to P. fuliginosa and P. thanatophana), each lateral compartment with a distinct pit; in frontal view, frons nearly square (just wider than tall), with dorsal margin convex. Forewings generously maculated with irregularly arranged bluish spots (with similar spotting on both sides of nodal line). Abdominal terga broadly red. Legs with two pale bands on both femora and tibiae of front and middle legs. Rostrum far exceeding hind coxae. Amended description. Color. Overall coloration near blackish (Fig. 14), irregularly mottled paler. Forewings opaque, generously maculated with irregularly arranged pale blue spots (including distad of nodus, irregular reticulate lines obscure in cells). Hindwings smokey in apical third and most of claval lobe, deep gray proximally. Legs black with irregular white markings (hind legs with more extensive pale markings), front and middle femora and tibiae with two white bands. Abdomen (Figs 14 A, B) with apparent tergites 3 – 4 reddish with a pair of black spots each side of midline. Structure. Body size (excluding wings — type with wings spread) male 7.5 mm, forewing 8.3 mm, estimated body length with wings 10.5 mm. Head in dorsal view (Fig. 15 A) broad and transverse (but midline distinctly more elongate than P. fuliginosa or P. thanatophana), narrower than prothorax, anteriorly convex and posteriorly concave. Vertex much wider than long (about 4 × wider than midlength), carinate on all margins, disc depressed bearing median longitudinal carina and a distinct pit near center of disc each side of midline, surface roughened; anterior margin of head (dorsal view) appearing to have second anterior carina. Head in lateral view (Fig. 15 A) with face receding ventrad, inflection between vertex and frons abrupt. Frons (frontal view, Fig. 15 C) broad, quadrate, about 1.1 × broader than high, dorsal margin convex, lateral margins sinuate, laterally foliate, laterally flared into a low lobe near ventral margins; face surface bearing irregular groves, with weak median carina (appearing to come to a “ T ” with a transverse carina before dorsal margin), and diagonally oriented lateral carinae (approximated at base, giving a V-shaped appearance). Frontoclypeal suture nearly transverse (downwardly inflected laterally), clypeus triangular median portion longitudinally carinate. Antennae short, scape hidden behind lateral foliations of frons in frontal view, pedicel bulbous, bearing numerous sensory plaques, flagellum bristle-like with bulbous base. Eyes bulbous, laterally projecting, subcircular (in lateral view). Lateral ocelli conspicuous at anterior ventral margin of eye. Rostrum (Fig. 14 C) exceeding hind coxae by full segment. In lateral view, mesonotum and pronotum nearly flat and on same plane (Fig. 14 B). In dorsal view (Fig. 15 A), pronotum nearly 2 × length of vertex at midline, (length at midline about 1 / 3 width), anterior margin arched and carinate, posterior margin weakly concave, surface bearing longitudinal striae. Mesonotum triangular, just longer than pronotum + head at midline. Tegulae conspicuous. Front and middle legs (Fig. 14 E) with femora and tibiae expanded and flattened, hind tibia with 5 lateral spines, apical spinulation appearing 7 (2 + 5) - 9 - 6. Forewings broad (Fig. 14 A), opaque and relatively short, costal and trailing margin subparallel, apex (at apical branches of RP and MP) broadly rounding, claval apex distad of midlength. Hindwings broad, maximum breadth near base, anal lobe well-developed.	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11068A67018961C2B99DFDAE.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Among species of Poblicia, P. misella is most readily recognized by the more elongate vertex from dorsal view (with distinct pits in each lateral compartment), and from frontal view the frons being only a little wider than tall, with the dorsal margin of the face convex, rather than truncate as in P. fuliginosa and P. thanatophana. Also, the speckling patterns of the forewings are different with P. misella being more densely supplied with bluish maculations and lacking the many fine, irregular pale reticulate lines in cells before the nodal line and the white dashes between veins distad of the nodal line. Also, in the type specimen of P. misella, the apex of the hindwing is transparent (usually smoky in other Poblicia) and the hindwing base lacks the large bluish markings. We have not yet found any additional records of this species (either specimens or iNaturalist), although iNaturalist observation 94771776 from Nayarit State, Mexico, may represent this species. Plant associations. None reported.	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11068A67018961C2B99DFDAE.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Mexico (Oaxaca).	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11068A67018961C2B99DFDAE.taxon	materials_examined	Material examined. Type material (NHRS, holotype, male) “ Oaxaca // Sallé // Typus [red paper] // 458 / 63 // Poblicia / misella Stal / V. Lallemand det., 1953 // NHRS-GULI / 00009853 ”.	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11048A600189630FBEACF85F.taxon	description	(Figure 13)	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11048A600189630FBEACF85F.taxon	diagnosis	Amended diagnosis. Vertex not elongate (vertex shorter than P. misella, similar to P. fuliginosa and P. thanatophana), lateral compartments without distinct pits. Forewings maculated with irregularly arranged bluish spots (with similar spotting on both sides of nodal line), forewings lacking fine, irregular pale reticulate lines in cells proximad to the nodal line, distal white dashes between veins distal to nodal line also absent. Hindwings broad, apex and proximal portion washed with fuscous, basal portion with two large, irregular, bluish spots (similar to P. fuliginosa). Abdominal terga broadly red.	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11048A600189630FBEACF85F.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Poiocera cribrata was proposed as a replacement name for Poiocera venosa Walker (nec Germar) in Gerstaecker, 1860. Walker’s type specimen (Fig. 13) in the BPBM collection does not have locality information and was reported as being from an uncertain locality (Walker 1851: 298 – 299). As noted under remarks of P. fuliginosa, Nast (1951: 270) synonymized Poiocera venosa under ‘ Crepusia’ fuliginosa (Olivier, 1791). Based on the type of Poiocera venosa, this synonymy is in error. The pattern of spotting in the forewing differs in that the many fine, irregular pale reticulate lines in cells proximad to the nodal line and distal white dashes between veins present in both P. fuliginosa and P. thanatophana are absent. The maculations on the forewings of P. cribrata may be comparable to those on the forewing of P. misella (although fewer), but P. misella has a conspicuously more elongate vertex, and so we conclude that P. cribrata is not a synonym of any of these three Poblicia species. Unfortunately, we only have a dorsal view of the type and were unable to locate any additional specimens of P. cribrata, nor definitive observations of this species on iNaturalist. Since the intended scope of this work was to reconsider the US species of Poblicia, we considered further diagnostic reevaluation of P. cribrata to be outside of our scope, but we here restore Poblicia cribrata as a new combination and a valid species of Poblicia. Gerstaecker’s reference specimen (Figs 16 – 17, erroneously labeled as a type specimen) at the MFNB is reported as being from Brazil, based on the specimen labels). Unfortunately, this specimen does not appear to represent the same species of Poblicia as Walker’s type specimen of Poiocera venosa. While the Gerstaecker specimen is labeled as being from Brazil, the specimen appears quite similar to P. fuliginosa in that it has a red abdomen and forewing markings similar to P. fuliginosa. While it appears reasonable that P. fuliginosa may be present in Mexico, we have no records (specimens or iNaturalist records) of Poblicia south of Mexico, and so we are unclear whether Gerstaecker’s specimen is a mislabeled P. fuliginosa, or that otherwise undetected Poblicia species are present in southern Mesoamerica into South America. Plant associations. None reported.	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11048A600189630FBEACF85F.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Not reported, probably Central America.	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11048A600189630FBEACF85F.taxon	materials_examined	Material examined. Type material (BMNH, holotype, female) “ Type [circular label, green border] / Poiocera / venosa Walk / ≠ Poblicia fuliginosa [handwritten, possibly by Lois O’Brien] ” Other material examined (MFNB, female) “ 4681 // cribrata / gerst. * / venosa Walker / Brasil N. Olfers [green paper] // Typus [red paper] // MfN URI / http: // coll. mfn-berlin. de / u / de 65 d 0 [2 D barcode label] ”.	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11018A63018961C2B9A6FD3C.taxon	type_taxon	Type species. Poblicia texana Oman, 1936.	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11018A63018961C2B9A6FD3C.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. General color mottled grey, with a dark median vitta from head apex to apex of mesonotum. Face bearing strongly developed carinae in dorsal part and a transverse carina just above frontoclypeal suture. Vertex much broader than long. Face broad, dorsal margin convex. Forewings elongated and opaque. Hindwing broadly washed with fuscous except irregular transparent patches proximally.	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11018A63018961C2B9A6FD3C.taxon	description	Description. Color. Overall coloration (Fig. 19) mottled brown-grey, with a dark vitta from head to apex of mesonotum (intensity and extent varying), with the median carina of nota pale. Forewing opaque, mainly grey marked variously with irregular patches of charcoal, pale spotting and sometimes with reddish wash. Hindwing greyish to blackish, usually with 1 – 2 irregular hyaline windows near base. Fore and middle legs often with two pale bands on the tibiae. Dorsum of abdomen near black proximally paler or reddish distally. Structure. Body length (including wings) ~ 18 – 22 mm. Body in dorsal view broad and parallel-sided, in lateral view dorsoventrally compressed, head and thorax in similar plane (mesonotum weakly raised relative to inclined pronotum). Head in dorsal view (Fig. 19 A) broad and strongly transverse (head projection lacking), anteriorly broadly convex, posterior margin concave. Vertex much wider than long, carinate on all margins, median carina present, disc depressed often bearing one or more pits near middle, surface irregular; anterior margin of head (dorsal view) appearing to have second anterior carina (i. e., with “ double carina between forehead and crown ”, viz. Metcalf 1938). Head in lateral view with face distinctly receding ventrally, inflection between vertex and frons (i. e., fastigium) sharp. Frons (frontal view, Fig. 19 C) broad, roughly quadrate, broader than high, dorsal margin convex, laterally foliate; median carina present (may be incomplete), dorsal portion bearing strongly developed carina partially enclosing dorsal portion of face; a sinuate transverse carina just above frontoclypeal suture. Frontoclypeal suture arched, clypeus bearing median and sublateral carinae. Antennae short, scape short (hidden behind lateral foliations of frons from frontal view), pedicel bulbous, longer than wide, bearing sensory plaques, flagellum bristle-like with bulbous base. Eyes bulbous, laterally projecting, subcircular (in lateral view), with weakly expanded callus behind ventrocaudal margin (not an expanded flange), lacking a vertical carina or spine in front of eye. Lateral ocelli conspicuous at anterior ventral margin of eye. Rostrum exceeds hind coxae. In dorsal view, pronotum broader than vertex along midline, anterior margin truncate and carinate with lateral potions diagonally sloped; posterior margin weakly angulate, median carina distinct. Mesonotum triangular, subequal in length at midline to pronotum + head combined, median carina distinct, lateral carinae obscure. Tegulae conspicuous. Front and middle legs with femora and tibiae not expanded. Forewings elongated and opaque, costal and trailing margin subparallel, apex narrowing to rounded apex (near apical branches of RP and MP), claval apex distad of midlength. Hindwings broad, maximum width near base, anal lobe well-developed. Male terminalia. Pygofer in lateral view (Fig. 20 A), broadest near ventral margin, narrowed dorsad; in ventral view, ventral pygofer margin (Fig. 20 B) concave (medioventral margin weakly convex). Gonostyli broad and spatulate, proximal lateral portion bearing a conspicuous laterally projected hook; apex rounded. Phallus stout, bilaterally symmetrical; horizontally bisected into dorsal and ventral lobes; dorsal lobe with a bifurcated inflatable process. Anal tube (lateral view, Fig. 20 A) thick, broadened distally; from ventral or dorsal view (Fig. 21 E), apex deeply concave, lateral margins projected; epiproct visible from above, paraproct conical, exceeding posterior margin.	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11018A63018961C2B9A6FD3C.taxon	etymology	Etymology. Formed from the Greek words “ angula ” (corner, bent) combined with “ pteryx ” (wing), a reference to the narrowed apex of the forewing. The genus is feminine in gender.	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11018A63018961C2B9A6FD3C.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Superficially, Angulapteryx gen. nov. is easily separated from other US Poiocerini by the mottled grey color bearing a dark median vitta. Angulapteryx gen. nov. has a broader vertex than all Poblicia species except P. misella. Poblicia, as defined here, is uniformly near black. Angulapteryx gen. nov. is similar in general proportions to Scaralina Yanega, 2024, but differs most conspicuously in having opaque instead of partially transparent forewings. Two other genera in the Poiocerini that reach the United States in extreme southern Texas are Alaruasa Distant, 1906 (e. g., Bartlett et al. 2014, fig. 83 A, D) and Itzalana Distant, 1905 (e. g., Bartlett et al. 2014, fig. 83 B, E). Both are Central American genera. Itzalana is highly distinctive — species are short and broad with a head wider than the thorax. Alaruasa as a genus is probably heterogeneous, but Alaruasa lepida (Spinola, 1839), the type species, is similar to Angulapteryx gen. nov. from dorsal perspective of the head and thorax, but does not have the strongly developed carinae of the face, and the transverse carina above the frontoclypeus of Angulapteryx gen. nov. is absent in Alaruasa lepida. The more dorsal carinae enclosing the triangular area is not fully developed. Alaruasa also appears to be less dorsoventrally compressed and the hindwings are of variable color but usually not uniformly fuscous (possibly excepting A. anceps (Stål, 1869), A. pallidoconspersa (Distant, 1905 )). Angulapteryx gen. nov. also lacks the copious wax production found in some members of Alaruasa (viz. A. aerata (Distant, 1887), A. anceps, and A. violacea (Distant, 1887 )).	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11018A63018961C2B9A6FD3C.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Southern USA (especially East) and Mexico. Species composition Angulapteryx texana (Oman, 1936), comb. nov. — The striated lanternfly	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11008A6801896383BB40FB8C.taxon	description	(Figures 19 – 22 A)	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11008A6801896383BB40FB8C.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Color mottled grey with a median vitta from head apex to apex of mesonotum (median carina pale). Face bearing strongly developed carinae dorsally enclosing a nearly triangular region and a transverse carina just above frontoclypeal suture. Vertex broad, width about 2.8 × midlength. Face broad (width at eyes about 1.4 × midlength), dorsal margin convex. Forewings elongate (length about 2.7 × width), opaque, irregularly washed with charcoal bearing irregularly placed rounded pale spots. Hindwing fuscous except irregular transparent patches proximally.	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11008A6801896383BB40FB8C.taxon	description	Description. Color. Overall coloration (Fig. 19) mottled olive-grey, with darker and paler markings on forewings and body. A dark vitta extends from apex of head to apex of mesonotum (intensity and extent varying), with the median carina of pro- and mesonotum pale. Forewing mainly grey with broad, irregular patches of charcoal (in claval area and irregular wash along the middle of remigium) and bearing many pale, rounded maculations of varying intensity; some specimens also with pale reddish wash. Hindwing greyish to blackish, with 1 – 2 irregular pale windows near base (sometimes also in claval region). Fore and middle legs olive-grey washed with blackish with extensive pale markings; fore- and middle legs with three dark bands; hind legs paler. Dorsum of abdomen near black proximally, apically reddish. Structure. Body length (including wings) usually less than 21 mm (males n = 1, 18.4 mm; females n = 6, 20.3 – 21.6 mm, average 20.8 mm). Body in dorsal view (Fig. 19 A) broad and parallel-sided (weakly laterally convex). Head in dorsal view (Fig. 19 A) broad and strongly transverse, anteriorly broadly (but weakly) convex, posterior margin concave. Vertex width about 2.8 × midlength, carinate on all margins, median carina weaker, disc bearing a conspicuous elongate-oval pit near middle (and a smaller, inconspicuous round pit just anterior and mesad of oval pit). Head in lateral view with face distinctly receding ventrally, inflection at fastigium sharp. Frons (frontal view, Fig. 19 C) broad, roughly quadrate with width at eyes about 1.4 × midlength, dorsal margin convex, lateral margins sinuate; face surface bearing fine spots and diagonal striations; median carina on frons upper half, dorsally terminating in transverse carina, all enclosed within strongly developed carina enclosing a nearly triangular area (triangle apex, directed ventrad, not quite closed); a sinuate transverse carina in median third of face above frontoclypeal suture. Clypeus subtriangular, with median carina and arched lateral carinae. In dorsal view (Fig. 19 A), pronotum about 2.25 × broader than vertex along midline, anterior margin truncate and carinate with lateral potions diagonally sloped (giving anterior margin a broadly trapezoidal appearance); posterior margin weakly angulate, surface weakly striate bearing distinct median carina. Mesonotum triangular, length at midline about equal to combined pronotum + head length, median carina distinct, lateral carinae obscure (laterally curved). Front and middle legs not expanded, hind tibiae with 5 lateral spines, spinulation 7 (2 + 5) - (8 – 9) - (7 – 9), with teeth at the apex of tibia large and those on the basitarsus and 2 nd tarsomere in uniform row with lateral teeth largest. Forewing length about 2.7 × width, opaque, costal and trailing margin subparallel (costal margin weakly convex, trailing margin weakly concave inflected near apex of clavus), apex narrowing to rounded apex. Hindwings broad, maximum breadth near base, anal lobe well-developed. Male terminalia. Pygofer in lateral view (Fig. 20 A) irregular in shape, broadest ventrally, irregularly narrowed dorsad, leading anterior margin concave, caudal margin sinuate, nearly linear for ¾ length (narrowed dorsad); in ventral view, ventral pygofer margin (Fig. 20 B) concave (medioventral margin weakly convex). Gonostyli very broad and spatulate, proximal lateral portion bearing a conspicuous laterally projected hook before midlength (Fig. 21 B); apex broadly and sinuately rounded. Phallus stout, bilaterally symmetrical; in lateral view (Fig. 21 A) horizontally bisected into dorsal and ventral lobes, each subtended by a sclerotized element; dorsal lobe with pair of stout elongate sclerotized rods, each subtending a bifurcated inflatable process; ventral lobe with pair of shorter and slenderer sclerotized rods subtending a membranous element. Anal tube (lateral view, Fig. 20 A) thick, broadened distally, dorsal margin nearly linear, ventral margin sinuate, apical margin smoothly rounded (distal-most point below midline); from ventral or dorsal view (Fig. 21 E), apex deeply concave, lateral margin projected. Plant associations. Reported collected from the trunk of Juniperus virginiana L., and on ‘ Cedar’ (label data given below). In this study, nymphs were collected from Juniperus deppeana Steud. by fogging.	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11008A6801896383BB40FB8C.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Angulapteryx texana comb. nov. is easily separated from other US Poiocerini by general color pattern including the broad median dark vitta. Angulapteryx texana comb. nov. is similar in general proportions to Scaralina marmorata (Spinola), but has opaque (not partially transparent forewings) which are held partially overlapping in repose (Scaralina marmorata wings are held weakly diverging). Angulapteryx texana comb. nov. appears to have undergone a recent eastern expansion in distribution. In Bartlett et al. (2014), the species was known only from Arkansas and Texas, but now iNaturalist records it throughout the eastern United States (Fig. 26). This species seems poorly represented in institutional collections. There are several disjunct records (Fig. 26) attributed to Angulapteryx texana comb. nov. from Central Mexico (Fig. 22 B, e. g., states of Jalisco, iNaturalist observation 64748274, Guanajuato, observations 61228128, 35147587, Querétaro, observation 31627477, and Michoacán, observation 32386639). We believe these will likely prove to be undescribed species allied to Angulapteryx texana comb. nov., but we do not have specimens to make this determination. Also, we note that the Arizona population appears to be disjunct relative to the eastern population. It is possible that the eastern and western US populations of Angulapteryx gen. nov. may represent different species, but we lacked the needed data and specimens to adequately address this question, although we hope to return to the problem in the future. Plant Associations. Juniperus virginiana L. and ‘ Cedar’ (from label data). A specimen from Arizona (at UCRC) is from an area with abundant Juniperus deppeana, and nymphs tentatively associated with this taxon were found on this host plant (pers. obs., DY).	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11008A6801896383BB40FB8C.taxon	distribution	Distribution. USA: AR, AZ, DC, IL, MD, MO, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX, VA; also reported Mexico (Guanajuato, Michoacán, Querétaro, Jalisco) (Fig. 26, see Remarks).	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
0382817F11008A6801896383BB40FB8C.taxon	materials_examined	Material examined. Type material (USNM, holotype, male) “ Dallas / IX. 21 Tex // GeoMGreene / Collection // Poblicia / Texana / Oman // Type No. / 51616 / U. S. N. M. [red paper] ”, Paratype “ ParisTx / 10.8 1904 // on cedar // CRJones / Collector // Paratype No. 51616 / U. S. N. M. [red paper] // Poblicia / texana / Oman / Det. PWOman // UDCC _ TCN 00102586 [2 d barcode label] ”. Other material examined. USA: TEXAS: Brazos Co., 12. X. 1955 (1 female, TAMU); same, 12. X. 1936, H. C. Johnston Collector (1 female, TAMU); College Station, H. J. Reinhard collector (1 female, TAMU); College Station, University Campus, Student collection, 28. X. 2008, Thomas Hutto (1 female, TAMU); Montgomery Co., Montgomery City Park [understood as Cedar Brake Park], 25. X. 2007, B. M. Drees, on trunk of Juniperus virginiana (2 females, TAMU). iNaturalist State Records: USA: ARIZONA: Yavapai Co. (244701702, 244701537). ARKANSAS: Benton Co. (961517504), Craighead Co. (200134382), Madison Co. (8713829), Washington Co. (189796259). DISTRICT OF COLOMBIA (250917457). ILLINOIS: Saline Co. (134628978). KENTUCKY: Warren Co. (249827214). MARYLAND: Frederick Co. (100811485), Prince George’s Co. (98730473). MISSISSIPPI: Montgomery Co. (58804582). MISSOURI: Greene Co. (135123900, 246707994). NORTH CAROLINA: Durham Co. (16997853), Lee Co. (17313973), Randolph Co. (246249220), Wake Co. (248112245). OKLAHOMA: Tulsa Co. (185502284). SOUTH CAROLINA: Abbeville Co. (95028199), Greenville Co. (35073002), Richland Co. (140315009). TENNESSEE: Clay Co. (185838447), Shelby Co. (138403100), Williamson Co. (95290833), Wilson Co. (148971077). VIRGINIA: Chesapeake Co. (245654726), Loudoun Co. (191225500). Angulapteryx sp. iNaturalist Records: MEXICO: Aguascalientes (250695724), Querétaro, (31627477), Distrito Federal (252306883), Durango (240838706), Guanajuato (61228128, 35147587), Jalisco (64748274), Michoacán (32386639).	en	Bartlett, Charles R., Hagerty, Tyler, Yanega, Douglas, Hoddle, Mark S., Gebiola, Marco, Gómez-Marco, Francesc (2025): A taxonomic review of Poblicia Stål, 1866 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), with special reference to species north of Mexico. Zootaxa 5689 (1): 81-113, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5689.1.3
