identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
038AB54A0B63FFA2FDBDFA25FB82F83E.text	038AB54A0B63FFA2FDBDFA25FB82F83E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Miracinae Viereck 1918	<div><p>Subfamily Miracinae Viereck, 1918</p><p>Checklist of Miracinae from Brazil</p><p>Centistidea areolaris sp. nov. [Brazil (Santa Catarina)]</p><p>Centistidea brasiliensis (Brues, 1912) [Brazil (Rio Grande do Norte); French Guiana]</p><p>Centistidea breviantennalis sp. nov. [Brazil (Santa Catarina)]</p><p>Centistidea insularis (Muesebeck, 1937) [new to Brazil (Paraná) and Costa Rica; Dominica, Guadeloupe, Puerto Rico]</p><p>Centistidea latisulca sp. nov. [Brazil (Santa Catarina); Belize, Costa Rica, Mexico, Trinidad]</p><p>Centistidea radialis sp. nov. [Brazil (Santa Catarina); Belize]</p><p>Centistidea striata Penteado-Dias, 1999 [Brazil (São Paulo)]</p><p>Centistidea vertus (Papp, 2013) [new to Brazil (Santa Catarina); Colombia]</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038AB54A0B63FFA2FDBDFA25FB82F83E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Liu, Zhen;Polaszek, Andrew	Liu, Zhen, Polaszek, Andrew (2025): The species of Centistidea Rohwer, 1914 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Miracinae) from Brazil. European Journal of Taxonomy 1004: 190-210, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2025.1004.2967, URL: https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2967/13367
038AB54A0B60FFA1FF43FEF4FACEF9BC.text	038AB54A0B60FFA1FF43FEF4FACEF9BC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Centistidea Rohwer 1914	<div><p>Key to species of genus Centistidea Rohwer, 1914 from Brazil</p><p>1. Notauli extending to two-thirds of mesoscutum and meeting each other posteriorly; median line of face almost carinate ............................................................................... C. brasiliensis (Brues, 1912)</p><p>– Notauli extending, at most, to half of mesoscutum and not meeting posteriorly (e.g., Fig. 3e); face not carinate medially (e.g., Fig. 3c)................................................................................................... 2</p><p>2. Scutellar sulcus distinctly crenulate (e.g., Fig. 3e) ............................................................................ 3</p><p>– Scutellar sulcus smooth (e.g., Fig. 5e)............................................................................................... 5</p><p>3. Propodeum with carinulate-areolate elements (Fig. 6b); head less broad, 1.7 × as wide as long in dorsal view (Fig. 6e); mesosoma black at least dorso-laterally (Fig. 6b)........ C. vertus (Papp, 2013)</p><p>– Propodeum without carinulate-areolate elements (e.g., Fig. 4j); head broader, at least 1.8× as wide as long in dorsal view (e.g., Fig. 4b); mesosoma yellow to brown (e.g., Fig. 4e)............................. 4</p><p>4. Propodeum 1.8× as wide as its mid length (Fig. 4j); face transverse, 2.0× as wide as high (Fig. 4c); T3 weakly longitudinally striate (Fig. 4k) ........................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................. C. latisulca sp. nov.</p><p>– Propodeum 1.4 × as wide as its mid length (Fig. 3h); face 1.4 × as wide as high (Fig. 3c); T3 nearly polished (Fig. 3i)............................................................................... C. insularis (Muesebeck, 1937)</p><p>5. T1 strongly constricted anteriorly (e.g., Fig. 5k); T2 reduced to very narrow longitudinal strip basally while abruptly widened apically (e.g., Fig. 5l) .................................................................................. 6</p><p>– T1 indistinctly constricted anteriorly (e.g., Fig. 1i); T2 gradually widening from basal to apical part (e.g., Fig. 1l) ...................................................................................................................................... 7</p><p>6. Fore wing vein r almost completely absent; occiput striate; scutellar hind depressions nearly touching each other............................................................................................ C. striata Penteado-Dias, 1999</p><p>– Fore wing vein r distinctly present (Fig. 5g); occiput at most weakly rugulose (Fig. 5b); scutellar hind depressions distinctly separated, interspace at least half length of minor axis of a depression (Fig. 5h) ................................................................................................................. C. radialis sp. nov.</p><p>7. Propodeum with areola (Fig. 1e, h); 1-CU1 of fore wing slightly longer than 2-CU1 (1.1×) (Fig. 1g); ovipositor sheath short, about half length of hind basitarsus (Fig. 1g, k)............ C. areolaris sp. nov.</p><p>– Propodeum without areola (Fig. 2i); 1-CU1 of fore wing distinctly shorter than 2-CU1 (0.7×) (Fig. 2g); ovipositor sheath 1.5× as long as hind basitarsus (Fig. 2a, j) ............................................. .................................................................................................................. C. breviantennalis sp. nov.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038AB54A0B60FFA1FF43FEF4FACEF9BC	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Liu, Zhen;Polaszek, Andrew	Liu, Zhen, Polaszek, Andrew (2025): The species of Centistidea Rohwer, 1914 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Miracinae) from Brazil. European Journal of Taxonomy 1004: 190-210, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2025.1004.2967, URL: https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2967/13367
038AB54A0B60FFA6FD92F945FDE6FD32.text	038AB54A0B60FFA6FD92F945FDE6FD32.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Centistidea areolaris Liu & Polaszek 2025	<div><p>Centistidea areolaris sp. nov.</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 6D0C3411-3C3D-4639-9B8C-229F7779E394</p><p>Fig. 1</p><p>Diagnosis</p><p>Body length 1.7 mm, light red-brown, except apical part of propodeum and T1–T4 black-brown (Fig. 1a); head 2.0 × as wide as long dorsally; eyes 2.4 × as long as temple in dorsal view; POL:OD:OOL = 1.5:1.0:2.5 (Fig. 1b); antenna (Fig. 1d) 1.2× as long as body length, with penultimate flagellomere 2.8× as long as wide; notauli weakly depressed at anterior ⅓; scutellar sulcus not crenulate; scutellar hind depressions medium-sized and oblong, with interspace over half of its minor axis (Fig. 1e); propodeum (Fig. 1h) with median longitudinal carinae attached with a diamond-shaped areola (this can be very difficult to see, requiring particular lighting); fore wing with (Fig. 1g) vein 1-R1 triangular, 0.2 of pterostigma length; T1 (Fig. 1i) weakly sclerotized, 1.9 × as long as its subapical maximum width; T2 (Fig. 1l) 1.7× as wide as median length, longitudinally striate laterally; T3 0.8 × as long as T2, weakly longitudinally striate; ovipositor sheath (Fig. 1k) about half length of hind basitarsus.</p><p>Etymology</p><p>The specific name ‘ areolaris ’ derives from the Latin, referring to its propodeum with areola in addition to the median longitudinal carina.</p><p>Type material</p><p>Holotype BRAZIL • ♀; Nova Teutonia; 27.1833° S, 52.3833° W; 4 Oct. 1938; F. Plaumann leg.; B.M.1938-682; NHMUK010639567; NHMUK.</p><p>Description</p><p>Female</p><p>MEASUREMENTS. Body length 1.7 mm, fore wing length 2.1 mm (Fig. 1a).</p><p>HEAD. 2.0 × as wide as long dorsally, 1.2 × as wide as mesoscutum. Eyes 2.4 × as long as temple in dorsal view. Temple smooth, with dense setae, slightly and roundly constricted behind eyes in dorsal view (Fig. 1b). Ocelli small, distance between fore and hind ocellus 1.1× as long as minor axis of a hind ocellus, POL:OD:OOL = 1.5:1.0:2.5. Frons flat and polished. Vertex between eye and hind ocellus a little shiny and smooth with small, sparse setose punctures. Occiput shallowly longitudinally striate at bottom. Face (Fig. 1c) nearly smooth except small, dense setose punctures, slightly convex medially, rather transverse, 2.0× as wide as high. Clypeus 2.2× as wide as median length, nearly polished except few setae laterally. Length of malar space 0.7× as long as basal width of mandible. Antenna (Fig. 1d) 1.2× as long as body length, with scape, pedicel and 1 st, 2 nd, penultimate and ultimate flagellomeres 2.0, 1.9, 4.4, 3.3, 2.8 and 3.3 × as long as wide, 1 st 1.3× as long as 2 nd, flagellomeres gradually shortening to penultimate one.</p><p>MESOSOMA. Length:width:height = 1.6:1.0:1.0. Mesoscutum (Fig. 1e) a little shiny with sparser small punctures on anterior half, shallowly punctate on apical half, notauli weakly depressed at anterior ⅓. Scutellar sulcus slightly curved, narrow and shallowly concave, not crenulate. Scutellum shiny, polished, hind depressions medium-sized and oblong, with interspace over half of its minor axis. Propodeum (Fig. 1h) shiny, median longitudinal carinae split to transverse carinae near apical extremity, attached to diamond-shaped areola, elsewhere polished. Mesopleuron (Fig. 1f) highly polished, smooth.</p><p>LEGS. Hind femur 3.1 × as long as its widest part. Length of hind femur:tibia:basitarsus = 1.6:2.4:1.0. Hind basitarsus 0.8 as long as tarsomeres 2–5 combined (Fig. 1j).</p><p>WINGS. Fore wing (Fig. 1g): pterostigma large, 2.3 as long as its widest part, vein 1-R1 triangular, 0.2 of pterostigma length; vein r distinct, r:2-SR:2-M = 1.0:7.7:2.7, 1-SR:1-M = 1.0:3.8, 1-CU1 indistinctly longer than 2-CU1; first discal cell of fore wing indistinctly wider than high. Hind wing (Fig. 1g): vein M+CU:1-M:r-m = 3.2:2.8:1.0.</p><p>METASOMA. 0.8× as long as mesosoma. T1 (Fig. 1i) smooth and polished, weakly sclerotized, 1.9 × as long as its subapical maximum width, slightly narrowed anterio-medially. T2 (Fig. 1l) 1.7× as wide as median length, longitudinally striate laterally. T3 0.8× as long as T2, weakly longitudinally striate. Hypopygium not reaching apex of metasoma. Ovipositor sheath (Fig. 1k) short, about half length of hind basitarsus, with setae of same length and denser apically.</p><p>COLOR. Light red-brown, except apical part of propodeum and T1–T4 black-brown (Fig. 1a). Eyes with green metallic reflection. Palpi and spurs pale yellow. Antenna black-brown except scape and pedicel yellow-brown. Legs all yellow except tarsi yellow-brown. Wing membrane hyaline, pterostigma pale brown, veins C+SC+R, r, 2-SR, 1-SR, 1-M, M+CU, 1-CU1 and 2-CU2 brown, other veins pale brown.</p><p>Male</p><p>Unknown.</p><p>Host</p><p>Unknown.</p><p>Distribution</p><p>Brazil.</p><p>Remarks</p><p>This species is similar to C. linguaris (Papp, 2013) but differs in the following characters: antenna 1.2× as long as body length (somewhat shorter than body length in C. linguaris); ovipositor sheath about half length of basitarsomere (longer, as long as tarsomeres 1–3 of hind tarsus in C. linguaris); and propodeum with areola (absent in C. linguaris).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038AB54A0B60FFA6FD92F945FDE6FD32	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Liu, Zhen;Polaszek, Andrew	Liu, Zhen, Polaszek, Andrew (2025): The species of Centistidea Rohwer, 1914 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Miracinae) from Brazil. European Journal of Taxonomy 1004: 190-210, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2025.1004.2967, URL: https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2967/13367
038AB54A0B67FFA6FDC4FD08FD62F8A5.text	038AB54A0B67FFA6FDC4FD08FD62F8A5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Centistidea brasiliensis (Brues 1912)	<div><p>Centistidea brasiliensis (Brues, 1912)</p><p>Mirax brasiliensis Brues, 1912: 205;</p><p>holotype in Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA (not examined) .</p><p>Mirax brasiliensis – Shenefelt 1973: 677. — Braet 2006: 167.</p><p>Mirax (Centistidea) brasiliensis – Papp 2013: 124, figs 14–21.</p><p>Centistidea brasiliensis – Yu et al. 2016.</p><p>Diagnosis</p><p>Female</p><p>Body length 2.2 mm; head and mesosoma pale honey-yellow, metasoma somewhat lighter; head twice as wide as long dorsally; median line of face almost carinate; antenna as long as body length, with flagellar joints beyond first not less than 2.5 × as long as wide; malar space very short, with furrow; notauli evenly deep, distinctly crenulate and extending to two-thirds of mesoscutum; scutellar sulcus curved, deep, crenulate; propodeum irregularly areolate with a median carina that bifurcates behind, a straight transverse carina behind, and a curved carina on each side at the base which marks off a large square space at each lateral angle; wing with broad pterostigma, marginal cell entirely wanting; submedian cell longer than median by the length of the transverse median vein; T2 twice as broad as long, longitudinally striate; ovipositor as long as head height, its sheath broad, pilose, piceous with pale yellow base (following Brues 1912 and Papp 2013).</p><p>Host</p><p>Unknown.</p><p>Distribution</p><p>Brazil, French Guiana.</p><p>Remarks</p><p>Based on Brues (1912) and Papp (2013), this species is peculiar among its congeners for its distinctly longer and deeper notauli on the mesoscutum.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038AB54A0B67FFA6FDC4FD08FD62F8A5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Liu, Zhen;Polaszek, Andrew	Liu, Zhen, Polaszek, Andrew (2025): The species of Centistidea Rohwer, 1914 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Miracinae) from Brazil. European Journal of Taxonomy 1004: 190-210, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2025.1004.2967, URL: https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2967/13367
038AB54A0B64FFABFDBAFEC1FAB0FBBD.text	038AB54A0B64FFABFDBAFEC1FAB0FBBD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Centistidea breviantennalis Liu & Polaszek 2025	<div><p>Centistidea breviantennalis sp. nov.</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: BD65A330-E372-46E1-A4FD-97DD2E7B7364</p><p>Fig. 2</p><p>Diagnosis</p><p>Body length 2.2 mm, red-brown (Fig. 2a); eyes 1.8 × as long as temple dorsally (Fig. 2b); POL:OD:OOL = 1.5:1.0:3.0; penultimate flagellomeres 2.0 × as long as wide; 1 st flagellomere 1.4 × as long as 2 nd (Fig. 2d); mesoscutum (Fig. 2e) nearly polished on apical half, notauli weakly depressed at anterior ⅓; scutellar sulcus smooth; scutellar hind depressions large and oval, nearly touching each other; propodeum (Fig. 2i) with median longitudinal carinae reaching apical margin, several transverse carinae regularly branching from median carinae; fore wing (Fig. 2g) with vein 1-R1 triangular, 0.3× as long as pterostigma; T1 (Fig. 2k) indistinctly narrowed antero-medially; T2 hardly separate from lateral area, 0.9× as wide as median length, weakly striate laterally; T3 0.9 × as long as T2, hardly longitudinally striate; ovipositor sheath (Fig. 2a, j) 1.5× as long as hind basitarsus.</p><p>Etymology</p><p>The specific name ‘ breviantennalis ’ refers to its distinctly short antenna.</p><p>Type material</p><p>Holotype BRAZIL • ♀; Nova Teutonia; 27.1833° S, 52.3833° W; 8 Aug. 1938; F. Plaumann leg.; B.M.1938-682; NHMUK010639581; NHMUK.</p><p>Paratype</p><p>BRAZIL • 1 ♂; same data as for holotype; 15 Sep. 1938; B.M.1938-682; NHMUK010639562; NHMUK .</p><p>Description</p><p>Female</p><p>MEASUREMENTS. Body length 2.2 mm, fore wing length 2.4 mm (Fig. 2a).</p><p>HEAD. 2.0 × as wide as long dorsally, 1.3 × as wide as mesoscutum. Eyes 1.8 × as long as temple in dorsal view. Temple smooth, with dense setae, slightly and roundly constricted behind eyes in dorsal view (Fig. 2b). Ocelli small, distance between fore and hind ocellus 1.3× as long as minor axis of a hind ocellus, POL:OD:OOL = 1.5:1.0:3.0. Frons flat and polished. Vertex between eye and hind ocellus a little shiny and smooth with small, sparse setose punctures. Face (Fig. 2c) nearly smooth except small, dense setose punctures, slightly convex medially, 1.6× as wide as high. Clypeus 2.0 × as wide as median length, nearly polished except few setae laterally. Length of malar space 0.8 × as long as basal width of mandible. Antenna (Fig. 2d) 0.7× as long as body length, with scape, pedicel and 1 st, 2 nd, penultimate and ultimate flagellomeres 1.9, 1.5, 5.1, 3.7, 2.0 and 2.5 × as long as wide, 1 st 1.4 × as long as 2 nd, flagellomeres gradually shortening to penultimate one.</p><p>MESOSOMA. Length:width:height = 1.4:1.0:1.2. Mesoscutum (Fig. 2e) less shiny with sparser small punctures on anterior half, nearly polished on apical half, notauli weakly depressed at anterior ⅓. Scutellar sulcus curved, narrow and concave, not crenulate. Scutellum a little shiny, polished, hind depressions large and oval, nearly touching each other. Propodeum (Fig. 2i) not shiny, with median longitudinal carinae reaching apical margin, several transverse carinae regularly emitted from median carinae, elsewhere polished. Mesopleuron (Fig. 2f) highly polished, smooth.</p><p>LEGS. Hind femur 3.0 × as long as its widest part. Length of hind femur:tibia:basitarsus = 1.9:3.0:1.0. Hind basitarsus 0.7× as long as tarsomeres 2–5 combined (Fig. 2h).</p><p>WINGS. Fore wing (Fig. 2g): pterostigma relatively large, 2.9 × as long as its widest part, vein 1-R1 triangular, 0.3 of pterostigma length; vein r indistinct, r:2-SR:2-M = 1.0:8.7:2.2, 1-SR:1-M = 1.0:3.1, 1-CU1:2-CU1 =1.0:1.5; first discal cell of fore wing 1.3 × as wide as high. Hind wing (Fig. 2h): vein M+CU:1-M:r-m = 2.0:2.1:1.0.</p><p>METASOMA. Indistinctly (1.1 ×) longer than mesosoma. T1 (Fig. 2k) smooth, weakly sclerotized, indistinctly narrowed antero-medially, spoon-shaped (strongly attenuated to apex at apical third) apically, 2.3× as long as its subapical maximum width. T2 weakly sclerotized, 0.9 × as wide as median length, weakly striate laterally. T3 0.9× as long as T2, hardly longitudinally striate. Hypopygium not reaching apex of metasoma. Ovipositor sheath (Fig. 2a, j) relatively long, 1.5× as long as hind basitarsus, with setae denser apically.</p><p>COLOR. Red-brown (Fig. 2a), except lateral parts of mesoscutum and scutellum and T3–T6 darker to black-brown. Eyes with green metallic reflection. Palpi and spurs yellow-brown. Antenna dark to black-brown. Legs all orange except tarsi yellow-brown. Wing membrane hyaline, pterostigma dark brown with pale opaque apex, veins C+SC+R, 2-SR, 1-SR, 1-M, M+CU, 1-CU1 and 2-CU2 darker brown, other veins yellow-brown.</p><p>Male</p><p>Similar to female except body slimmer with longer antenna, penultimate flagellomere nearly 3 × as long as wide and T3 weakly longitudinally striate.</p><p>Host</p><p>Unknown.</p><p>Distribution</p><p>Brazil.</p><p>Remarks</p><p>This species is similar to C. carinatus (Papp, 2013) having the propodeum finely rugulose with some transverse carinae along median longitudinal carina but differs in the following characters: antenna distinctly shorter (0.7×) than body length (somewhat longer than body length in C. carinatus); ovipositor sheath 1.5 × as long as hind basitarsus (somewhat shorter than hind basitarsus in C. carinatus); and T2 weakly sclerotized (T2 strongly sclerotized, obvious linear-shaped anteriorly in C. carinatus).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038AB54A0B64FFABFDBAFEC1FAB0FBBD	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Liu, Zhen;Polaszek, Andrew	Liu, Zhen, Polaszek, Andrew (2025): The species of Centistidea Rohwer, 1914 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Miracinae) from Brazil. European Journal of Taxonomy 1004: 190-210, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2025.1004.2967, URL: https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2967/13367
038AB54A0B6AFFA9FDD7FB9BFCF0FD33.text	038AB54A0B6AFFA9FDD7FB9BFCF0FD33.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Centistidea insularis (Muesebeck 1937)	<div><p>Centistidea insularis (Muesebeck, 1937)</p><p>Fig. 3</p><p>Mirax insularis Muesebeck, 1937: 139;</p><p>holotype in U.S. National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institute, USA (USNM) (holotype images examined on the website of USNM; paratypes examined) .</p><p>Mirax insularis – Shenefelt 1973: 677. — Papp 2013: 108, figs 45–54.</p><p>Centistidea insularis – Yu et al. 2016.</p><p>Diagnosis</p><p>Body length 1.5 mm; yellow or yellow-brown with dark brown or piceous area (Fig. 3a); temple rounded (Fig. 3b); OOL about as long as one side of ocellar triangle; antenna (Fig. 3d) about the length of body, 1 st flagellomere conspicuously longer than 2 nd; mesosoma slightly wider than high, mesoscutum, scutellum, and pleura smooth (Fig. 3e–f); notauli distinctly impressed on more than anterior third of mesoscutum; scutellar sulcus deep, minutely foveolate (Fig. 3e); propodeum (Fig. 3h) with a complete median longitudinal carina and a few irregular transverse on either side of this; sclerotized plate of T1 very narrow (Fig. 3l); plate of T2 reduced to a very narrow longitudinal strip on basal half, strongly widened apically (Fig. 3i); ovipositor sheath shorter than hind basitarsus(following Muesebeck 1937).</p><p>Type material</p><p>Paratypes</p><p>GUADELOUPE • 1 ♀; “ Mirax insularis ♀ Mues. Det. Muesebeck // W.I. July 36 / F. Sein Jr. // Paratype No 52019, U.S.N.M // lot No. 36-26032 // Pres by Imp.Inst.Ent.Brit.Mus.1937.455 // reared from coffee leaf miner”; Jul. 1936; NHMUK010639526; NHMUK • 3 ♂♂; same data as for preceding; NHMUK010639492, NHMUK010639494, NHMUK010639497; NHMUK .</p><p>Other material examined</p><p>BRAZIL • 1 ♂; Londrina; Feb. 1992; A. Menezes Jr. leg.; ex Leucoptera coffeella pupa; NHMUK010639535; NHMUK .</p><p>COSTA RICA • 1 ♀; “ Guanacaste Pv Sta. Rose NP Hacienda-1-O”; Janzen and Gauld leg.; 1 Jun.–22 Jul. 1985; NHMUK010639517; NHMUK .</p><p>DOMINICA • 1 ♀; “Ridgefield // Nov. 1968 // FD Bennett leg. // No. 644 (C I E Coll., No.19575) // Pres by Com.Inst.Ent.Brit.Mus.1964-2 // det. Muesebeck, 1937 ”; NHMUK010639493; NHMUK • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; No. 645; NHMUK010639512; NHMUK .</p><p>Host</p><p>Leucoptera coffeella (Guérin-Méneville &amp; Perrottet, 1842) ( Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae) [on Coffea arabica L.] (according to original literature and labels under the Brazil material). Also “coffee leaf miner” on the Guadeloupe paratype labels is likely to denote L. coffeella .</p><p>Distribution</p><p>New to Brazil and Costa Rica; Dominica, Guadeloupe, Puerto Rico.</p><p>Remarks</p><p>The hypopygium does not reach the apex of the metasoma in specimens we have examined, and specimens from Costa Rica are slightly darker (brown).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038AB54A0B6AFFA9FDD7FB9BFCF0FD33	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Liu, Zhen;Polaszek, Andrew	Liu, Zhen, Polaszek, Andrew (2025): The species of Centistidea Rohwer, 1914 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Miracinae) from Brazil. European Journal of Taxonomy 1004: 190-210, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2025.1004.2967, URL: https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2967/13367
038AB54A0B68FFAEFD90FD11FE42FB16.text	038AB54A0B68FFAEFD90FD11FE42FB16.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Centistidea latisulca Liu & Polaszek 2025	<div><p>Centistidea latisulca sp. nov.</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: ED439462-9FFB-43D6-A4EF-D4DDA2071104</p><p>Fig. 4</p><p>Diagnosis</p><p>Body length 1.9 mm, color varies from yellow-brown to black-brown (Fig. 4a); head 1.8 × as wide as long dorsally; eyes 1.8× as long as temple in dorsal view; POL:OD:OOL = 1.3:1.0:2.4 (Fig. 4b); antenna (Fig. 4d) 1.1× as long as body length, with penultimate flagellomeres abruptly narrowed, 3.6 × as long as wide; mesoscutum (Fig. 4e) largely polished posteriorly, notauli more strongly depressed at anterior ⅓; scutellar sulcus broadly furrowed with sparse crenulation; scutellum nearly polished, hind depressions large, ovoid, and touching each other; median longitudinal carina on propodeum split to transverse carinae near apical extremity, along with regularly transverse rugae, arched ridged anterolaterally, irregular rugae elsewhere; fore wing with vein 1-R1 0.2 of pterostigma length; T1 (Fig. 4k) 3.9 × as long as its subapical maximum width; T2 weakly sclerotized, medio-longitudinal plate petiolate basally, transverse part extremely narrow to indistinct; T3 0.8 × as long as T2, weakly longitudinally striate, polished at apical margin; ovipositor sheath nearly half length of hind basitarsus.</p><p>Etymology</p><p>The specific name ‘ latisulca ’ derives from the Latin, referring to the broad scutellar sulcus.</p><p>Type material</p><p>Holotype BRAZIL • ♀; Nova Teutonia; 27.1833° S, 52.3833° W; F. Plaumann leg.; 8 Sep. 1937; B.M.1937-656; NHMUK010639670; NHMUK.</p><p>Paratypes</p><p>BELIZE • 1 ♀; Cayo District <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-88.8522&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=17.1542" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -88.8522/lat 17.1542)">Pook’s Hill Lodge</a>; 17.1542° N, 88.8522° W; 1 Oct. 2008; V. and R. Snaddon leg.; Malaise trap; NHMUK010639530; NHMUK • 1 ♀; Toledo, Punta Gorda; 12–26 May 1982; Kelly and George leg.; NHMUK010639514; NHMUK .</p><p>BRAZIL • 1 ♀; same data as for holotype; 11 Jul. 1937; B.M.1938-656; NHMUK010639656; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; 12 Jun. 1937; NHMUK010639664; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; 14 Jun. 1937; NHMUK010639649; NHMUK • 2 ♂♂; same data as for preceding; 28 Jul. 1937; NHMUK010639631, NHMUK010639665; NHMUK • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; 11 Oct. 1937; 010639672; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for holotype; 12 Apr. 1938; NHMUK010639662; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for holotype; 13 Apr. 1938; NHMUK010639639; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for holotype; 27 Apr. 1938; NHMUK010639667; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for holotype; 30 Apr. 1938; NHMUK010639673; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for holotype; 3 May 1938; NHMUK010639648; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for holotype; 13 May 1938; NHMUK010639632; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for holotype; 18 May 1938; NHMUK010639646; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for holotype; 27 Jul. 1938; NHMUK010639647; NHMUK • 2 ♂♂; same data as for preceding; 9 Aug. 1938; NHMUK010639653, NHMUK010639642; NHMUK • 1 ♂; same data as for holotype; 18 Mar. 1937; B.M.1937-424; NHMUK010639669; NHMUK • 1 ♂; same data as for holotype; 17 Feb. 1945; B.M.1957-341; NHMUK010639657; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for holotype; 28 Aug. 1938; B.M.1938-458; NHMUK010639643; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for holotype; 11 Feb. 1937; NHMUK010639641; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for holotype; 8 Feb. 1937; NHMUK010639495; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for holotype; Aug. 1935; NHMUK010639637; NHMUK • 1 ♂; same data as for holotype; 25 Sep. 1935; NHMUK010639634; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for holotype; 28 Aug. 1944; B.M.1957-341; NHMUK010639513; NHMUK .</p><p>COSTA RICA • 1 ♀; “ P.N. de Guanacaste Santa Rosa Sector ”; 9 Sep. 1989; J Memmott leg.; NHMUK010639503; NHMUK .</p><p>MEXICO • 1 ♀; Teapa, Tabasco; Jan. 1904; “ Godman-Salvin expedition ”; NHMUK010639523; NHMUK • 1 ♀; Chilpancingo, Guerrero; 1402 m a.s.l.; “June // H.H.S. // March, H.H.S.”; Jan. 1904; Godman-Salvin expedition; NHMUK010639491; NHMUK .</p><p>TRINIDAD • 2 ♀♀; St. Augustine; Aug. 1976; 010639496; NHMUK010639522; NHMUK • 2 ♀♀; “W.I., St. Augustine, Bennett ”; Aug. 1976; NHMUK010639504, NHMUK010639536; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; Feb. 1978; NHMUK010639499; NHMUK .</p><p>Description</p><p>Female</p><p>MEASUREMENTS. Body length 1.9 mm, fore wing length 2.2 mm (Fig. 4a).</p><p>HEAD. 1.8 × as wide as long dorsally, 1.3 × as wide as mesoscutum. Eyes 1.8 × as long as temple in dorsal view. Temple less shiny, somewhat rough with dense setae, slightly and roundly constricted behind eye. Ocelli small, distance between fore and hind ocellus 1.1× as long as minor axis of a hind ocellus, POL:OD:OOL = 1.3:1.0:2.4 (Fig. 4b). Frons flat and polished. Vertex between eye and hind ocellus a little shiny and smooth with small, sparse setose punctures. Face (Fig. 4c) nearly smooth, densely pubescent, subparallel-sided, rather transverse, 2.0× as wide as high. Clypeus 2.0 × as wide as median length, nearly polished. Length of malar space 0.4× as long as basal width of mandible. Antenna (Fig. 4d) 1.1 × as long as body length, with scape, pedicel and 1 st, 2 nd, penultimate and ultimate flagellomeres 2.3, 1.8, 4.7, 4.6, 3.6 and 4.0× as long as wide, 1 st 1.1× as long as 2 nd, flagellomeres gradually shortened to penultimate one, the latter abruptly narrowed.</p><p>MESOSOMA. Length:width:height = 1.4:1.0:1.0. Mesoscutum (Fig. 4e) less shiny with evenly distributed small setose punctures, largely polished posteriorly, notauli more strongly depressed at anterior ⅓. Scutellar sulcus nearly straight, broadly furrowed with sparse crenulation. Scutellum not shiny, nearly polished, hind depressions large, ovoid, and touching each other. Propodeum slightly shiny, 2.6× as long as metanotum in median length, median longitudinal carina split to transverse carinae closing to apical extremity, along with regularly transverse rugae, arched ridged antero-laterally, irregularly rugose elsewhere. Mesopleuron (Fig. 4f) highly polished, smooth.</p><p>LEGS. Hind femur 3.1 × as long as its widest part. Length of hind femur:tibia:basitarsus = 1.6:2.4:1.0. Hind basitarsus 0.8× as long as tarsomeres 2–5 combined (Fig. 4i).</p><p>WINGS. Fore wing (Fig. 4g): pterostigma 3.2 × as long as its widest part, vein 1-R1 triangular, 0.2 of pterostigma length; vein r distinct, r:2-SR:2-M = 1.0:6.1:2.3, 1-SR:1-M = 1.0:5.0, 2-CU1 1.6× as long as 1-CU1; first discal cell of fore wing nearly 1.5× as wide as high. Hind wing (Fig. 4h): vein M+CU:1- M:r-m = 1.5:1.7:1.0.</p><p>METASOMA. Indistinctly longer than mesosoma. T1 (Fig. 4k) smooth and polished, distinctly narrowed antero-medially, spatula-shaped, 3.9× as long as its subapical maximum width. T2 weakly sclerotized, petiolate basally, transverse part extremely narrow to indistinct, not longitudinally striate laterally. T3 0.8× as long as T2, weakly longitudinally striate, polished at apical margin. Hypopygium not reaching apex of metasoma. Ovipositor sheath (Fig. 4k) short, nearly half length of hind basitarsus, with setae dense apically.</p><p>COLOR. Dark brown, except head yellow-brown and T1 yellow (Fig. 4a). Eyes with green metallic reflection. Palpi and spurs pale yellow. Antenna dark brown except scape, pedicel and basal of 1 st flagellomere paler. Legs all pale yellow to yellow except hind basitarsus with apical tarsomere dark brown and other hind tarsomeres yellow-brown. Wing membrane hyaline, pterostigma brown with pale opaque apex, veins C+SC+R and up border of pterostigma dark brown, vein r, 2-SR, 1-SR, 1-M and 1-CU1 brown, other veins pale brown.</p><p>VARIATION. Body color varying from yellow-brown to black-brown. Vertex some with weak striation at bottom.</p><p>Male</p><p>Similar to female except body smaller with longer antenna, penultimate flagellomere nearly 4 × as long as wide.</p><p>Host</p><p>Unknown.</p><p>Distribution</p><p>Belize, Brazil, Costa Rica, Mexico, Trinidad.</p><p>Remarks</p><p>This species is quite similar to C. insularis (Muesebeck, 1937) but differs in the following characters: propodeum distinctly more transverse, 1.8× as wide as median length (less transverse, 1.4 × in C. insularis); face more transverse, 2.0 × as wide as high (1.4 × in C. insularis); and T3 weakly longitudinally striate except polished apical margin (not longitudinally striate in C. insularis). Besides, the body is distinctly darker and longer in C. latisulca (dark brown, 1.9 mm) than in C. insularis (yellow or yellow-brown, 1.5 mm).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038AB54A0B68FFAEFD90FD11FE42FB16	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Liu, Zhen;Polaszek, Andrew	Liu, Zhen, Polaszek, Andrew (2025): The species of Centistidea Rohwer, 1914 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Miracinae) from Brazil. European Journal of Taxonomy 1004: 190-210, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2025.1004.2967, URL: https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2967/13367
038AB54A0B6FFFB3FD8AFB34FAF9FD32.text	038AB54A0B6FFFB3FD8AFB34FAF9FD32.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Centistidea radialis Liu & Polaszek 2025	<div><p>Centistidea radialis sp. nov.</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: C390F090-392A-454F-812F-5EF447941CC8</p><p>Fig. 5</p><p>Diagnosis</p><p>Body length 1.5 mm, dark brown, except T1 yellow-brown, T1–T2 white laterally and tergites posterior to T2 pale brown (Fig. 5a, l); head 1.8 × as wide as long dorsally; eyes 1.5× as long as temple dorsally; POL:OD:OOL = 1.2:1.0:2.7 (Fig. 5b); face (Fig. 5c) strongly convergent ventrally; antenna (Fig. 5d) with penultimate flagellomere 2.2 × as long as wide; mesoscutum (Fig. 5e) minutely finely wrinkled between punctures, notauli more strongly depressed reaching to anterior ⅓; scutellar sulcus smooth; hind depressions medium-sized and oblong, interspace at least half length of minor axis of a depression (Fig. 5h); propodeum (Fig. 5k) with median longitudinal carina split to transverse carinae near apical extremity; fore wing with vein 1-R1 0.3 of pterostigma length; T1 (Fig. 5l) 2.7× as long as its subapical maximum width; T2 inverted ‘T’ shape, 3.0× as wide as median length; T3 1.1 × as long as T2, weakly longitudinally striate; ovipositor sheath (Fig. 5j) 0.8× as long as hind basitarsus.</p><p>Etymology</p><p>The specific name ‘ radialis ’ derives from the Latin, referring to the radial microsculpture between punctures on the dorsal mesosoma.</p><p>Type material</p><p>Holotype BELIZE • ♀; Toledo, Punta Gorda; 12–26 May 1982; Kelly and George leg.; NHMUK010639540; NHMUK.</p><p>Paratypes</p><p>BELIZE • 1 ♀; Toledo, Punta Gorda, foot of Saddleback Hill; 17–21 Aug. 1978; NHMUK010639576; NHMUK .</p><p>BRAZIL • 1 ♀; Nova Teutonia; 27.1833° S, 52.3833° W; 12 Apr. 1938; F. Plaumann leg.; B.M.1938-682; NHMUK010639603; NHMUK .</p><p>Description</p><p>Female</p><p>MEASUREMENTS. Body length 1.5 mm, fore wing length 1.7 mm (Fig. 5a).</p><p>HEAD. 1.8 × as wide as long dorsally, 1.4 × as wide as mesoscutum. Eyes 1.5 × as long as temple in dorsal view. Temple less shiny with dense setae, slightly and roundly constricted behind eyes in dorsal view (Fig. 5b). Ocelli small, distance between fore and hind ocellus 1.1× as long as minor axis of a hind ocellus, POL:OD:OOL = 1.2:1.0:2.7. Frons flat and polished. Vertex between eye and hind ocellus a little shiny and smooth with small, sparse setose punctures. Face (Fig. 5c) nearly smooth, less pubescent, strongly converged towards apex, 1.3× as wide as high. Clypeus 2.7 × as wide as median length, nearly polished except few setae. Length of malar space 1.9 × as long as basal width of mandible. Antenna (Fig. 5d) slightly longer than body length, with scape, pedicel and 1 st, 2 nd, penultimate and ultimate flagellomeres 1.6, 1.3, 5.0, 4.2, 2.2 and 2.1 × as long as wide, 1 st 1.2 × as long as 2 nd, flagellomeres gradually shortened to penultimate one.</p><p>MESOSOMA. Length:width:height = 2.0:1.0:1.3. Mesoscutum (Fig. 5e) a little shiny with evenly distributed small punctures, minutely finely wrinkled between punctures, notauli more strongly depressed reaching to anterior ⅓. Scutellar sulcus straight, narrow and shallowly concave, not crenulate. Scutellum a little shiny, nearly polished except several sparse setal punctures, minutely finely wrinkled at intervals, hind depressions medium-sized and oblong, interspace at least half length of minor axis of a depression. Propodeum less shiny, shorter, 1.8× as long as metanotum in median length, median longitudinal carina split to transverse carinae near apical extremity, weakly rugulose anteriorly, elsewhere polished. Mesopleuron (Fig. 5f) highly polished, smooth.</p><p>LEGS. Hind femur 3.5 × as long as its widest part. Length of hind femur:tibia:basitarsus = 1.6:2.3:1.0. Hind basitarsus 0.6 as long as tarsomeres 2–5 combined (Fig. 5j).</p><p>WINGS. Fore wing (Fig. 5g): pterostigma 2.5 × as long as its widest part, vein 1-R1 triangular, 0.3 of pterostigma length; vein r distinct, r:2-SR:2-M = 1.0:6.7:2.0, 1-SR:1-M = 1.0:2.2, 2-CU1 1.5× as long as 1-CU1; first discal cell of fore wing nearly 1.5× as wide as high. Hind wing: vein M+CU:1-M:r-m = 1.6:1.9:1.0.</p><p>METASOMA. 0.8× as long as mesosoma. T1 (Fig. 5l) smooth and polished, distinctly narrowed antero-medially, spatula-shaped 2.7 × as long as its subapical maximum width. T2 inverted ‘T’ shape, 3.0 × as wide as median length, not longitudinally striate laterally. T3 1.1× as long as T2, weakly longitudinally striate. Hypopygium outreaching apex of metasoma. Ovipositor sheath (Fig. 5j) short, 0.8 × as long as hind basitarsus, with setae dense apically.</p><p>COLOR. Dark brown, except T1 yellow-brown, T1–T2 white laterally and tergites posterior to T2 pale brown (Fig. 5a, l). Palpi and spurs pale yellow. Antenna dark brown. Legs all yellow except apical tarsomeres somewhat yellow-brown. Wing membrane hyaline, pterostigma brown, veins C+SC+R, r, 2-SR, 1-SR, 1-M, M+CU, 1-CU1 and 2-CU2 brown, other veins pale brown.</p><p>VARIATION. Scutellar sulcus slightly curved and T2 slightly triangular posteriorly on specimen from Saddleback Hill.</p><p>Male</p><p>Unknown.</p><p>Host</p><p>Unknown.</p><p>Distribution</p><p>Belize, Brazil.</p><p>Remarks</p><p>This species is similar to C. ubangus (Papp, 2013) but differs in the following characters: T1 spatula-shaped (indistinctly constricted towards apex) (spoon-shaped in C. ubangus); median longitudinal carina bifurcated before apex of propodeum (median longitudinal carina reaches apical margin in C. ubangus); and first discal cell of fore wing nearly 1.5× as wide as high (1.1 × as wide as high in C. ubangus).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038AB54A0B6FFFB3FD8AFB34FAF9FD32	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Liu, Zhen;Polaszek, Andrew	Liu, Zhen, Polaszek, Andrew (2025): The species of Centistidea Rohwer, 1914 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Miracinae) from Brazil. European Journal of Taxonomy 1004: 190-210, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2025.1004.2967, URL: https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2967/13367
038AB54A0B72FFB3FDD0FD08FEE9F8A5.text	038AB54A0B72FFB3FDD0FD08FEE9F8A5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Centistidea striata Penteado-Dias 1999	<div><p>Centistidea striata Penteado-Dias, 1999</p><p>Centistidea striata Penteado-Dias, 1999: 192;</p><p>holotype in Departamento de Ecologia e Biologia Evolutiva, Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos, Brazil (not examined) .</p><p>Mirax (Centistidea) striata – Papp 2013: 127.</p><p>Centistidea striata – Yu et al. 2016.</p><p>Diagnosis</p><p>Body length 1.6 mm; head and mesosoma honey yellow; head wider than mesosoma, mostly smooth and shining, occiput striate; antenna about as long as body, first flagellar segment distinctly longer than second segment; notauli impressed on less than anterior third of mesoscutum, largely absent on disc; scutellar sulcus deep, not foveolate, mesoscutum and scutellum weakly punctate; propodeum with a complete median longitudinal carina and a few irregular transverse rugae on either side of carina; vein r almost completely obliterated; sclerotized part of T2 reduced to a very narrow longitudinal strip which is widened apically; T1 and T2 laterotergites membranous and finely longitudinally striate; T3 finely longitudinally striate basally (following Penteado-Dias 1999).</p><p>Host</p><p>Leucoptera coffeella (Guérin-Menèville, 1842) ( Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae) (Penteado-Dias 1999).</p><p>Distribution</p><p>Brazil.</p><p>Remarks</p><p>Penteado-Dias (1999) mentioned that it was separated from C. insularis, both sharing the same host, Leucoptera coffeella, by the yellow mesosoma, the length of the side of ocellar triangle to OOL and the color of the third and following tergites. But the distinction does not seem that obvious based on our examination of the paratypes of C. insularis here. Based on our examination, C. insularis can be better distinguished by the less developed notauli on the mesoscutum, not foveolate scutellar sulcus and the shape of T2.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038AB54A0B72FFB3FDD0FD08FEE9F8A5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Liu, Zhen;Polaszek, Andrew	Liu, Zhen, Polaszek, Andrew (2025): The species of Centistidea Rohwer, 1914 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Miracinae) from Brazil. European Journal of Taxonomy 1004: 190-210, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2025.1004.2967, URL: https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2967/13367
038AB54A0B73FFB2FDA0FEC1FD0AF825.text	038AB54A0B73FFB2FDA0FEC1FD0AF825.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Centistidea vertus (Papp 2013)	<div><p>Centistidea vertus (Papp, 2013)</p><p>Fig. 6</p><p>Mirax (Centistidea) vertus Papp, 2013: 121;</p><p>holotype in Instituto Alexander von Humbolt, Villa de Leyva, Colombia (not examined) .</p><p>Centistidea vertus – Yu et al. 2016.</p><p>Diagnosis</p><p>Body length 2.8 mm; head brown-black, mesosoma and metasoma black (Fig. 6a); antenna (Fig. 6f) about 1.6 × as long as body, first flagellomere 7 × as long as broad preapically, penultimate flagellomere almost 4× as long as broad; head 1.7× as broad as long in dorsal view; eye slightly protruding and 1.5 × as long as temple, temple rounded (Fig. 6e); inner margin of eyes parallel, face 1.5 × as wide as high (Fig. 6g); mesoscutum and scutellum uneven and dull (Fig. 6b); propodeum (Fig. 6c, f) rugulose with carinulate-areolate elements; hind femur 4.1× as long as broad distally; pterostigma narrow, 3.3 × as long as wide and issuing r proximally from its midpoint; vein 2-SR 1.5 × as long as width of pterostigma; T1 (Fig. 6d) spoon-shaped, broadening and convex, T2 fairly wide and straight; ovipositor sheath as long as hind tarsomeres 2–3 (following Papp 2013).</p><p>Material examined</p><p>BRAZIL • 1 ♀; Nova Teutonia; 27.1833° S, 52.3833° W; F. Plaumann leg.; 18 May 1937; B.M.1937-656; NHMUK010639543; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; 21 Jun. 1937; NHMUK010639584; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as preceding; 10 Jul. 1937; NHMUK010639585; NHMUK • 1 ♂; same data as preceding; 26 Jul. 1937; NHMUK010639588; NHMUK • 1 ♂; same data as preceding; 30 Jul. 1937; NHMUK010639544; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; 19 Nov. 1937; B.M.1937-748; NHMUK010639619; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; 28 Dec. 1937; NHMUK010639627 • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; 17 Aug. 1937; NHMUK010639613 • 2 ♂♂; same data as for preceding; NHMUK010639572, NHMUK010639569; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; 14 Nov. 1938; B.M.1938-682; NHMUK010639623; NHMUK • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding 6 Apr. 1938; NHMUK010639575; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; 17 Nov. 1938; B.M.1938-312; NHMUK010639587; NHMUK • 2 ♂♂; same data as for preceding; 18 Oct. 1938; NHMUK010639609, NHMUK010639591; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; 7 Jan. 1945; B.M.1957-341; NHMUK010639598; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; 11 Jun. 1935; NHMUK010639570; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; 25 Sep. 1935; NHMUK010639601; NHMUK • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; 10 Sep. 1935; NHMUK010639614; NHMUK • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; 25 Sep. 1935; NHMUK010639606; NHMUK .</p><p>Host</p><p>Unknown.</p><p>Distribution</p><p>New to Brazil; Colombia.</p><p>Remarks</p><p>It is worth noting that the hypopygium is well developed, surpassing the apex of the metasoma in specimens we have seen (Fig. 6a) and specimens from Brazil are distinctly lighter (yellow-brown) on the middle part of the mesosoma (Fig. 6b).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038AB54A0B73FFB2FDA0FEC1FD0AF825	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Liu, Zhen;Polaszek, Andrew	Liu, Zhen, Polaszek, Andrew (2025): The species of Centistidea Rohwer, 1914 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Miracinae) from Brazil. European Journal of Taxonomy 1004: 190-210, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2025.1004.2967, URL: https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2967/13367
