taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03A41A66FFAAFFECFE73FB2DFD0C8D0A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670392/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670392	Figure 1 Duoparus hyeresensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. gen. n. sp., dorsum (left) and venter (right) of holotype female.	Figure 1 Duoparus hyeresensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. gen. n. sp., dorsum (left) and venter (right) of holotype female.	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
03A41A66FFAAFFECFE73FB2DFD0C8D0A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670394/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670394	Figure 2 Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermann n. gen. n. sp. Female. A – dorsal view of gnathosoma, B – ventral view of gnathosoma, C – palptarsus.	Figure 2 Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermann n. gen. n. sp. Female. A – dorsal view of gnathosoma, B – ventral view of gnathosoma, C – palptarsus.	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
03A41A66FFAAFFECFE73FB2DFD0C8D0A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670398/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670398	Figure 3 Duoparus hyeresensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. gen. n. sp., legs of holotype female (s = seta homologous to s).	Figure 3 Duoparus hyeresensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. gen. n. sp., legs of holotype female (s = seta homologous to s).	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
03A41A66FFAAFFECFE73FB2DFD0C8D0A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670400/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670400	Figure 4 a–d Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermann n. gen. n. sp. holotype: a – aspidosoma, b – posterior region of dorsum, c – area anterior to ag1with transversal spindle-shaped striae (within ellipse), d – genital area with two agsetae; e–g Pseudopronematulus duffelensis De Vis & Ueckermann n. sp.: e – aspidosoma, f – posterior region of dorsum (caption = lateral view of dome-shaped excrescence), g – genital	Figure 4 a–d Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermann n. gen. n. sp. holotype: a – aspidosoma, b – posterior region of dorsum, c – area anterior to ag1with transversal spindle-shaped striae (within ellipse), d – genital area with two agsetae; e–g Pseudopronematulus duffelensis De Vis & Ueckermann n. sp.: e – aspidosoma, f – posterior region of dorsum (caption = lateral view of dome-shaped excrescence), g – genital	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
03A41A66FFAAFFECFE73FB2DFD0C8D0A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670404/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670404	Figure 5 Comparison of setae of different species: a–d tc″ζ of respectively Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermannn. gen. n. sp., Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp., Pseudopronematulus tocantinsensisDe Vis, Castilho & Ueckermann n. sp. and Pseudopronematulus tenuisetosus(Meyer & Rodrigues, 1966) n. comb.; e–g bo, h–j f1 and k–m f2 of respectively Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermann n. gen. n. sp., Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp. and Pseudopronematulus tocantinsensisDe Vis, Castilho & Ueckermann n. sp.	Figure 5 Comparison of setae of different species: a–d tc″ζ of respectively Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermannn. gen. n. sp., Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp., Pseudopronematulus tocantinsensisDe Vis, Castilho & Ueckermann n. sp. and Pseudopronematulus tenuisetosus(Meyer & Rodrigues, 1966) n. comb.; e–g bo, h–j f1 and k–m f2 of respectively Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermann n. gen. n. sp., Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp. and Pseudopronematulus tocantinsensisDe Vis, Castilho & Ueckermann n. sp.	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
03A41A66FFAEFFE8FE73FB8FFD378CA5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670400/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670400	Figure 4 a–d Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermann n. gen. n. sp. holotype: a – aspidosoma, b – posterior region of dorsum, c – area anterior to ag1with transversal spindle-shaped striae (within ellipse), d – genital area with two agsetae; e–g Pseudopronematulus duffelensis De Vis & Ueckermann n. sp.: e – aspidosoma, f – posterior region of dorsum (caption = lateral view of dome-shaped excrescence), g – genital	Figure 4 a–d Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermann n. gen. n. sp. holotype: a – aspidosoma, b – posterior region of dorsum, c – area anterior to ag1with transversal spindle-shaped striae (within ellipse), d – genital area with two agsetae; e–g Pseudopronematulus duffelensis De Vis & Ueckermann n. sp.: e – aspidosoma, f – posterior region of dorsum (caption = lateral view of dome-shaped excrescence), g – genital	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
03A41A66FFAEFFE8FE73FB8FFD378CA5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670404/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670404	Figure 5 Comparison of setae of different species: a–d tc″ζ of respectively Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermannn. gen. n. sp., Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp., Pseudopronematulus tocantinsensisDe Vis, Castilho & Ueckermann n. sp. and Pseudopronematulus tenuisetosus(Meyer & Rodrigues, 1966) n. comb.; e–g bo, h–j f1 and k–m f2 of respectively Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermann n. gen. n. sp., Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp. and Pseudopronematulus tocantinsensisDe Vis, Castilho & Ueckermann n. sp.	Figure 5 Comparison of setae of different species: a–d tc″ζ of respectively Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermannn. gen. n. sp., Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp., Pseudopronematulus tocantinsensisDe Vis, Castilho & Ueckermann n. sp. and Pseudopronematulus tenuisetosus(Meyer & Rodrigues, 1966) n. comb.; e–g bo, h–j f1 and k–m f2 of respectively Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermann n. gen. n. sp., Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp. and Pseudopronematulus tocantinsensisDe Vis, Castilho & Ueckermann n. sp.	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
03A41A66FFAEFFE8FE73FB8FFD378CA5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670406/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670406	Figure 6 Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp., dorsum (left) and venter (right) of holotype female.	Figure 6 Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp., dorsum (left) and venter (right) of holotype female.	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
03A41A66FFAEFFE8FE73FB8FFD378CA5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670408/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670408	Figure 7 Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp. Female. A – dorsal view of gnathosoma, B – ventral view of gnathosoma, C – palptarsus. Setae or1 indistinguishable;	Figure 7 Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp. Female. A – dorsal view of gnathosoma, B – ventral view of gnathosoma, C – palptarsus. Setae or1 indistinguishable;	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
03A41A66FFAEFFE8FE73FB8FFD378CA5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670410/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670410	Figure 8 Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp. legs of holotype female.	Figure 8 Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp. legs of holotype female.	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
03A41A66FFAEFFE8FE73FB8FFD378CA5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670412/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670412	Figure 9 Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp. deutonymph dorsum with dehiscence line on aspidosoma (left) and tritonymph venter (right)	Figure 9 Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp. deutonymph dorsum with dehiscence line on aspidosoma (left) and tritonymph venter (right)	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
03A41A66FFAEFFE8FE73FB8FFD378CA5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670414/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670414	Figure 10 Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp. deutonymph venter (left) and protonymph venter (right).	Figure 10 Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp. deutonymph venter (left) and protonymph venter (right).	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
03A41A66FFA6FFE0FE73F973FAC48F54.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670404/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670404	Figure 5 Comparison of setae of different species: a–d tc″ζ of respectively Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermannn. gen. n. sp., Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp., Pseudopronematulus tocantinsensisDe Vis, Castilho & Ueckermann n. sp. and Pseudopronematulus tenuisetosus(Meyer & Rodrigues, 1966) n. comb.; e–g bo, h–j f1 and k–m f2 of respectively Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermann n. gen. n. sp., Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp. and Pseudopronematulus tocantinsensisDe Vis, Castilho & Ueckermann n. sp.	Figure 5 Comparison of setae of different species: a–d tc″ζ of respectively Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermannn. gen. n. sp., Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp., Pseudopronematulus tocantinsensisDe Vis, Castilho & Ueckermann n. sp. and Pseudopronematulus tenuisetosus(Meyer & Rodrigues, 1966) n. comb.; e–g bo, h–j f1 and k–m f2 of respectively Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermann n. gen. n. sp., Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp. and Pseudopronematulus tocantinsensisDe Vis, Castilho & Ueckermann n. sp.	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
03A41A66FFA6FFE0FE73F973FAC48F54.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670418/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670418	Figure 11 Pseudopronematulus tocantinsensisDe Vis, Castilho & Ueckermann n. sp. Dorsum of holotype (left) and venter (right) of paratype female.	Figure 11 Pseudopronematulus tocantinsensisDe Vis, Castilho & Ueckermann n. sp. Dorsum of holotype (left) and venter (right) of paratype female.	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
03A41A66FFA6FFE0FE73F973FAC48F54.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670420/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670420	Figure 12 Pseudopronematulus tocantinsensisDe Vis, Castilho & Ueckermann n. sp. A – dorsal view of gnathosoma, B – ventral view of gnathosoma, C – palptarsus.	Figure 12 Pseudopronematulus tocantinsensisDe Vis, Castilho & Ueckermann n. sp. A – dorsal view of gnathosoma, B – ventral view of gnathosoma, C – palptarsus.	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
03A41A66FFA6FFE0FE73F973FAC48F54.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670424/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670424	Figure 13 Pseudopronematulus tocantinsensisDe Vis, Castilho & Ueckermann n. sp. legs of paratype female.	Figure 13 Pseudopronematulus tocantinsensisDe Vis, Castilho & Ueckermann n. sp. legs of paratype female.	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
03A41A66FFBAFFFCFE73FDB4FB768BED.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670404/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670404	Figure 5 Comparison of setae of different species: a–d tc″ζ of respectively Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermannn. gen. n. sp., Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp., Pseudopronematulus tocantinsensisDe Vis, Castilho & Ueckermann n. sp. and Pseudopronematulus tenuisetosus(Meyer & Rodrigues, 1966) n. comb.; e–g bo, h–j f1 and k–m f2 of respectively Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermann n. gen. n. sp., Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp. and Pseudopronematulus tocantinsensisDe Vis, Castilho & Ueckermann n. sp.	Figure 5 Comparison of setae of different species: a–d tc″ζ of respectively Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermannn. gen. n. sp., Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp., Pseudopronematulus tocantinsensisDe Vis, Castilho & Ueckermann n. sp. and Pseudopronematulus tenuisetosus(Meyer & Rodrigues, 1966) n. comb.; e–g bo, h–j f1 and k–m f2 of respectively Duoparus hyeresensis De Vis & Ueckermann n. gen. n. sp., Pseudopronematulus duffelensisDe Vis & Ueckermann n. sp. and Pseudopronematulus tocantinsensisDe Vis, Castilho & Ueckermann n. sp.	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
03A41A66FFBAFFFCFE73FDB4FB768BED.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670429/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670429	Figure 14 Pseudopronematulus tenuisetosus(Meyer & Rodrigues, 1966) n. comb. Dorsum (left) and venter (right) of holotype female.	Figure 14 Pseudopronematulus tenuisetosus(Meyer & Rodrigues, 1966) n. comb. Dorsum (left) and venter (right) of holotype female.	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
03A41A66FFBAFFFCFE73FDB4FB768BED.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670431/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670431	Figure 15 Pseudopronematulus tenuisetosus(Meyer & Rodrigues, 1966) n. comb. Holotype female. A – chelicerae, B – ventral view of gnathosoma with palps.	Figure 15 Pseudopronematulus tenuisetosus(Meyer & Rodrigues, 1966) n. comb. Holotype female. A – chelicerae, B – ventral view of gnathosoma with palps.	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
03A41A66FFBAFFFCFE73FDB4FB768BED.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670433/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670433	Figure 16 Pseudopronematulus tenuisetosus(Meyer & Rodrigues, 1966) n. comb. Legs of holotype female.	Figure 16 Pseudopronematulus tenuisetosus(Meyer & Rodrigues, 1966) n. comb. Legs of holotype female.	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
03A41A66FFBFFFF8FE73FAE8FBE38CA4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670435/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670435	Figure 17 Dasilcoferla nadirae(Silva, Da-Costa & Ferla) n. comb. Dorsum (left) and venter (right) of female.	Figure 17 Dasilcoferla nadirae(Silva, Da-Costa & Ferla) n. comb. Dorsum (left) and venter (right) of female.	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
03A41A66FFBEFFF8FE73FAF8FAA18D3C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670435/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670435	Figure 17 Dasilcoferla nadirae(Silva, Da-Costa & Ferla) n. comb. Dorsum (left) and venter (right) of female.	Figure 17 Dasilcoferla nadirae(Silva, Da-Costa & Ferla) n. comb. Dorsum (left) and venter (right) of female.	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
03A41A66FFBEFFF8FE73FAF8FAA18D3C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670437/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670437	Figure 18 Dasilcoferla nadirae(Silva, Da-Costa & Ferla) n. comb. Female. A – dorsal view of gnathosoma, B – ventral view of gnathosoma, C – palptarsus.	Figure 18 Dasilcoferla nadirae(Silva, Da-Costa & Ferla) n. comb. Female. A – dorsal view of gnathosoma, B – ventral view of gnathosoma, C – palptarsus.	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
03A41A66FFBEFFF8FE73FAF8FAA18D3C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670439/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670439	Figure 19 Dasilcoferla nadirae(Silva, Da-Costa & Ferla) n. comb. Legs of female.	Figure 19 Dasilcoferla nadirae(Silva, Da-Costa & Ferla) n. comb. Legs of female.	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
03A41A66FFBEFFF8FE73FAF8FAA18D3C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14670442/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14670442	Figure 20 Dasilcoferla nadirae(Silva, Da-Costa & Ferla) n. comb. a – aspidosoma, b – posterior region of dorsum, c – area anterior to ag1 with transversal spindle-shaped striae and genital area with four agsetae. d – tc″ζ, e – bo, f – f1 and g – f2.	Figure 20 Dasilcoferla nadirae(Silva, Da-Costa & Ferla) n. comb. a – aspidosoma, b – posterior region of dorsum, c – area anterior to ag1 with transversal spindle-shaped striae and genital area with four agsetae. d – tc″ζ, e – bo, f – f1 and g – f2.	2024-10-16	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.		Zenodo	biologists	De VisK, Raf M. J.;VervaetK, Lore;LeeuwenK, Thomas Van;K, Alice de Freitas Braga;K, Raphael de Campos Castilho;UeckermannK, Edward A.			
