taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03B59E41FFCF3905E54F76E2FB2DFE7A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14700017/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14700017	Fig. 3. Comparison of male prosternum of Chirozetes, Mesochirozetes and Pempheres spp. Males of Chirozetes exhibit distinct prosternal spines, where Mesochirozetes and Pempheres do not. A, Chirozetes arotes Heller, 1915; B, Mesochirozetes formosanus (Heller, 1931); C, Pempheres habena Pascoe, 1871; D, Pempheres trilineata Pascoe, 1871. Photo credits: D, Keita Matsumoto (NHMUK).	Fig. 3. Comparison of male prosternum of Chirozetes, Mesochirozetes and Pempheres spp. Males of Chirozetes exhibit distinct prosternal spines, where Mesochirozetes and Pempheres do not. A, Chirozetes arotes Heller, 1915; B, Mesochirozetes formosanus (Heller, 1931); C, Pempheres habena Pascoe, 1871; D, Pempheres trilineata Pascoe, 1871. Photo credits: D, Keita Matsumoto (NHMUK).	2024-12-27	Tseng, Wei-Zhe;Hsiao, Yun;Cabras, Analyn;Cheng, Ren-Chung		Zenodo	biologists	Tseng, Wei-Zhe;Hsiao, Yun;Cabras, Analyn;Cheng, Ren-Chung			
03B59E41FFCF3905E54F76E2FB2DFE7A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14700021/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14700021	Fig. 4. Comparison of male abdomens of Chirozetes, Mesochirozetes and Pempheres spp. Males of Mesochirozetes and Pempheres exhibit distinct canaliculate structures, where Pempheres occurs on ventrite I, while Mesochirozetes on ventrite I and V. A, Chirozetes arotes Heller, 1915; B, Mesochirozetes formosanus (Heller, 1931); C, Pempheres habena Pascoe, 1871; D, Pempheres trilineata Pascoe, 1871. Photo credits: D, Keita Matsumoto (NHMUK).	Fig. 4. Comparison of male abdomens of Chirozetes, Mesochirozetes and Pempheres spp. Males of Mesochirozetes and Pempheres exhibit distinct canaliculate structures, where Pempheres occurs on ventrite I, while Mesochirozetes on ventrite I and V. A, Chirozetes arotes Heller, 1915; B, Mesochirozetes formosanus (Heller, 1931); C, Pempheres habena Pascoe, 1871; D, Pempheres trilineata Pascoe, 1871. Photo credits: D, Keita Matsumoto (NHMUK).	2024-12-27	Tseng, Wei-Zhe;Hsiao, Yun;Cabras, Analyn;Cheng, Ren-Chung		Zenodo	biologists	Tseng, Wei-Zhe;Hsiao, Yun;Cabras, Analyn;Cheng, Ren-Chung			
03B59E41FFC33908E4FE7762FEC0F899.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14700017/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14700017	Fig. 3. Comparison of male prosternum of Chirozetes, Mesochirozetes and Pempheres spp. Males of Chirozetes exhibit distinct prosternal spines, where Mesochirozetes and Pempheres do not. A, Chirozetes arotes Heller, 1915; B, Mesochirozetes formosanus (Heller, 1931); C, Pempheres habena Pascoe, 1871; D, Pempheres trilineata Pascoe, 1871. Photo credits: D, Keita Matsumoto (NHMUK).	Fig. 3. Comparison of male prosternum of Chirozetes, Mesochirozetes and Pempheres spp. Males of Chirozetes exhibit distinct prosternal spines, where Mesochirozetes and Pempheres do not. A, Chirozetes arotes Heller, 1915; B, Mesochirozetes formosanus (Heller, 1931); C, Pempheres habena Pascoe, 1871; D, Pempheres trilineata Pascoe, 1871. Photo credits: D, Keita Matsumoto (NHMUK).	2024-12-27	Tseng, Wei-Zhe;Hsiao, Yun;Cabras, Analyn;Cheng, Ren-Chung		Zenodo	biologists	Tseng, Wei-Zhe;Hsiao, Yun;Cabras, Analyn;Cheng, Ren-Chung			
03B59E41FFC33908E4FE7762FEC0F899.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14700021/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14700021	Fig. 4. Comparison of male abdomens of Chirozetes, Mesochirozetes and Pempheres spp. Males of Mesochirozetes and Pempheres exhibit distinct canaliculate structures, where Pempheres occurs on ventrite I, while Mesochirozetes on ventrite I and V. A, Chirozetes arotes Heller, 1915; B, Mesochirozetes formosanus (Heller, 1931); C, Pempheres habena Pascoe, 1871; D, Pempheres trilineata Pascoe, 1871. Photo credits: D, Keita Matsumoto (NHMUK).	Fig. 4. Comparison of male abdomens of Chirozetes, Mesochirozetes and Pempheres spp. Males of Mesochirozetes and Pempheres exhibit distinct canaliculate structures, where Pempheres occurs on ventrite I, while Mesochirozetes on ventrite I and V. A, Chirozetes arotes Heller, 1915; B, Mesochirozetes formosanus (Heller, 1931); C, Pempheres habena Pascoe, 1871; D, Pempheres trilineata Pascoe, 1871. Photo credits: D, Keita Matsumoto (NHMUK).	2024-12-27	Tseng, Wei-Zhe;Hsiao, Yun;Cabras, Analyn;Cheng, Ren-Chung		Zenodo	biologists	Tseng, Wei-Zhe;Hsiao, Yun;Cabras, Analyn;Cheng, Ren-Chung			
03B59E41FFC33908E4FE7762FEC0F899.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14700013/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14700013	Fig. 2. Type specimens of Pempheres and Mesochirozetes in dorsal view. A, lectotype of Pempheres trilineata Pascoe, 1871; B, lectotype of Pempheres habena Pascoe, 1871; C, holotype of Pempheres picta Heller, 1894; D, lectotype of Chirozetes (Mesochirozetes) formosanus Heller, 1931. Photo credits: A–B, Keita Matsumoto (NHMUK); C, Roberto Poggi (MSNG).	Fig. 2. Type specimens of Pempheres and Mesochirozetes in dorsal view. A, lectotype of Pempheres trilineata Pascoe, 1871; B, lectotype of Pempheres habena Pascoe, 1871; C, holotype of Pempheres picta Heller, 1894; D, lectotype of Chirozetes (Mesochirozetes) formosanus Heller, 1931. Photo credits: A–B, Keita Matsumoto (NHMUK); C, Roberto Poggi (MSNG).	2024-12-27	Tseng, Wei-Zhe;Hsiao, Yun;Cabras, Analyn;Cheng, Ren-Chung		Zenodo	biologists	Tseng, Wei-Zhe;Hsiao, Yun;Cabras, Analyn;Cheng, Ren-Chung			
03B59E41FFC23908E76C70C3FBC9F979.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14700011/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14700011	Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree based on four molecular markers. The node support is presented with bootstrap values (left) and posterior probability (right) under each branch. Mecopine species are highlighted, and the head morphologies of three species are illustrated on the right.	Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree based on four molecular markers. The node support is presented with bootstrap values (left) and posterior probability (right) under each branch. Mecopine species are highlighted, and the head morphologies of three species are illustrated on the right.	2024-12-27	Tseng, Wei-Zhe;Hsiao, Yun;Cabras, Analyn;Cheng, Ren-Chung		Zenodo	biologists	Tseng, Wei-Zhe;Hsiao, Yun;Cabras, Analyn;Cheng, Ren-Chung			
03B59E41FFC2390BE76C74A2FC06FCD9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14700011/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14700011	Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree based on four molecular markers. The node support is presented with bootstrap values (left) and posterior probability (right) under each branch. Mecopine species are highlighted, and the head morphologies of three species are illustrated on the right.	Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree based on four molecular markers. The node support is presented with bootstrap values (left) and posterior probability (right) under each branch. Mecopine species are highlighted, and the head morphologies of three species are illustrated on the right.	2024-12-27	Tseng, Wei-Zhe;Hsiao, Yun;Cabras, Analyn;Cheng, Ren-Chung		Zenodo	biologists	Tseng, Wei-Zhe;Hsiao, Yun;Cabras, Analyn;Cheng, Ren-Chung			
03B59E41FFC2390BE76C74A2FC06FCD9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14700017/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14700017	Fig. 3. Comparison of male prosternum of Chirozetes, Mesochirozetes and Pempheres spp. Males of Chirozetes exhibit distinct prosternal spines, where Mesochirozetes and Pempheres do not. A, Chirozetes arotes Heller, 1915; B, Mesochirozetes formosanus (Heller, 1931); C, Pempheres habena Pascoe, 1871; D, Pempheres trilineata Pascoe, 1871. Photo credits: D, Keita Matsumoto (NHMUK).	Fig. 3. Comparison of male prosternum of Chirozetes, Mesochirozetes and Pempheres spp. Males of Chirozetes exhibit distinct prosternal spines, where Mesochirozetes and Pempheres do not. A, Chirozetes arotes Heller, 1915; B, Mesochirozetes formosanus (Heller, 1931); C, Pempheres habena Pascoe, 1871; D, Pempheres trilineata Pascoe, 1871. Photo credits: D, Keita Matsumoto (NHMUK).	2024-12-27	Tseng, Wei-Zhe;Hsiao, Yun;Cabras, Analyn;Cheng, Ren-Chung		Zenodo	biologists	Tseng, Wei-Zhe;Hsiao, Yun;Cabras, Analyn;Cheng, Ren-Chung			
03B59E41FFC2390BE76C74A2FC06FCD9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14700021/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14700021	Fig. 4. Comparison of male abdomens of Chirozetes, Mesochirozetes and Pempheres spp. Males of Mesochirozetes and Pempheres exhibit distinct canaliculate structures, where Pempheres occurs on ventrite I, while Mesochirozetes on ventrite I and V. A, Chirozetes arotes Heller, 1915; B, Mesochirozetes formosanus (Heller, 1931); C, Pempheres habena Pascoe, 1871; D, Pempheres trilineata Pascoe, 1871. Photo credits: D, Keita Matsumoto (NHMUK).	Fig. 4. Comparison of male abdomens of Chirozetes, Mesochirozetes and Pempheres spp. Males of Mesochirozetes and Pempheres exhibit distinct canaliculate structures, where Pempheres occurs on ventrite I, while Mesochirozetes on ventrite I and V. A, Chirozetes arotes Heller, 1915; B, Mesochirozetes formosanus (Heller, 1931); C, Pempheres habena Pascoe, 1871; D, Pempheres trilineata Pascoe, 1871. Photo credits: D, Keita Matsumoto (NHMUK).	2024-12-27	Tseng, Wei-Zhe;Hsiao, Yun;Cabras, Analyn;Cheng, Ren-Chung		Zenodo	biologists	Tseng, Wei-Zhe;Hsiao, Yun;Cabras, Analyn;Cheng, Ren-Chung			
03B59E41FFC2390BE76C74A2FC06FCD9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14700013/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14700013	Fig. 2. Type specimens of Pempheres and Mesochirozetes in dorsal view. A, lectotype of Pempheres trilineata Pascoe, 1871; B, lectotype of Pempheres habena Pascoe, 1871; C, holotype of Pempheres picta Heller, 1894; D, lectotype of Chirozetes (Mesochirozetes) formosanus Heller, 1931. Photo credits: A–B, Keita Matsumoto (NHMUK); C, Roberto Poggi (MSNG).	Fig. 2. Type specimens of Pempheres and Mesochirozetes in dorsal view. A, lectotype of Pempheres trilineata Pascoe, 1871; B, lectotype of Pempheres habena Pascoe, 1871; C, holotype of Pempheres picta Heller, 1894; D, lectotype of Chirozetes (Mesochirozetes) formosanus Heller, 1931. Photo credits: A–B, Keita Matsumoto (NHMUK); C, Roberto Poggi (MSNG).	2024-12-27	Tseng, Wei-Zhe;Hsiao, Yun;Cabras, Analyn;Cheng, Ren-Chung		Zenodo	biologists	Tseng, Wei-Zhe;Hsiao, Yun;Cabras, Analyn;Cheng, Ren-Chung			
