taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03B5E94FFC47C83842F5F91BFD59F8AA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15609010/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15609010	Figs. 1 & 2: Sphagnum heinrichsii (holotype): (1) general view with number indicating parts of plants shown by closeups in subsequent pictures; (2) slightly enlarged view of holotype at a slightly different angle.SL: stem leaf, B1–B7: branches numbered for ease of discussion. The putative remains of one of pendent branches are denoted as?B5 (its interpretation as a branch is not certain). Branch B3 (shown in Fig. 35) is situated at angle of ca. 70° to the polished surface of amber piece with the main part of specimen. SL (cf. Fig. 3). Branch B6a may represent apical part of B6 or otherwise the separate branch (similar to B7), fallen off and lying near the end of B6.	Figs. 1 & 2: Sphagnum heinrichsii (holotype): (1) general view with number indicating parts of plants shown by closeups in subsequent pictures; (2) slightly enlarged view of holotype at a slightly different angle.SL: stem leaf, B1–B7: branches numbered for ease of discussion. The putative remains of one of pendent branches are denoted as?B5 (its interpretation as a branch is not certain). Branch B3 (shown in Fig. 35) is situated at angle of ca. 70° to the polished surface of amber piece with the main part of specimen. SL (cf. Fig. 3). Branch B6a may represent apical part of B6 or otherwise the separate branch (similar to B7), fallen off and lying near the end of B6.	2019-06-30	Ignatov, M. S.;Lamkowski, P.;Ignatova, E. A.;Perkovsky, E. E.		Zenodo	biologists	Ignatov, M. S.;Lamkowski, P.;Ignatova, E. A.;Perkovsky, E. E.			
03B5E94FFC47C83842F5F91BFD59F8AA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15427021/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15427021	Fig. 3: Scheme of Sphagnum heinrichsii position in two amber pieces, with numbering of branches (B1, B2, etc.) for ease of discussion, and showing position of stem leaf (SL).	Fig. 3: Scheme of Sphagnum heinrichsii position in two amber pieces, with numbering of branches (B1, B2, etc.) for ease of discussion, and showing position of stem leaf (SL).	2019-06-30	Ignatov, M. S.;Lamkowski, P.;Ignatova, E. A.;Perkovsky, E. E.		Zenodo	biologists	Ignatov, M. S.;Lamkowski, P.;Ignatova, E. A.;Perkovsky, E. E.			
03B5E94FFC47C83842F5F91BFD59F8AA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15427023/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15427023	Figs. 4–7: Sphagnum heinrichsii (holotype): branch (3) and lower parts of branch leaves (4–6), showing pores mostly in distal ends of hyalocysts, however at places (especially in the middle of convex surface near leaf bases, vf. 6 and 7) scattered along whole cells. Marginal and submarginal cells (6, below, right) narrower and eporose.	Figs. 4–7: Sphagnum heinrichsii (holotype): branch (3) and lower parts of branch leaves (4–6), showing pores mostly in distal ends of hyalocysts, however at places (especially in the middle of convex surface near leaf bases, vf. 6 and 7) scattered along whole cells. Marginal and submarginal cells (6, below, right) narrower and eporose.	2019-06-30	Ignatov, M. S.;Lamkowski, P.;Ignatova, E. A.;Perkovsky, E. E.		Zenodo	biologists	Ignatov, M. S.;Lamkowski, P.;Ignatova, E. A.;Perkovsky, E. E.			
03B5E94FFC47C83842F5F91BFD59F8AA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15427025/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15427025	Figs. 8–11: Sphagnum heinrichsii (holotype): dorsal surface of branch leaves showing pores mostly in distal ends of hyalocysts.	Figs. 8–11: Sphagnum heinrichsii (holotype): dorsal surface of branch leaves showing pores mostly in distal ends of hyalocysts.	2019-06-30	Ignatov, M. S.;Lamkowski, P.;Ignatova, E. A.;Perkovsky, E. E.		Zenodo	biologists	Ignatov, M. S.;Lamkowski, P.;Ignatova, E. A.;Perkovsky, E. E.			
03B5E94FFC47C83842F5F91BFD59F8AA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15427027/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15427027	Figs. 12–20: Sphagnum heinrichsii (holotype): dorsal surface of branch leaves showing pores in ends of hyalocysts. Three series (11–13, 14–16, 17–19) show tree photos each with different focus to better understanding of pore position.	Figs. 12–20: Sphagnum heinrichsii (holotype): dorsal surface of branch leaves showing pores in ends of hyalocysts. Three series (11–13, 14–16, 17–19) show tree photos each with different focus to better understanding of pore position.	2019-06-30	Ignatov, M. S.;Lamkowski, P.;Ignatova, E. A.;Perkovsky, E. E.		Zenodo	biologists	Ignatov, M. S.;Lamkowski, P.;Ignatova, E. A.;Perkovsky, E. E.			
03B5E94FFC47C83842F5F91BFD59F8AA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15427029/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15427029	Figs. 21-24: Pendent branch leaves of Sphagnum heinrichsii (holotype) and their areolation. (21–22): upper part of branch leaves with longly attenuate and narrowed acuminae, which are flexuose and irregulary crumples. 21 taken from back, “raw” face of specimen; 22 from polished side, as all other photos; 23: median cells of long leaf closer to distal part of pendent branch; they are only slightly porose, with many inperfect pores (seen as rings covered by cell walls); (24) cells closer to leaf apex: pores are totally or almost totaly absent.	Figs. 21-24: Pendent branch leaves of Sphagnum heinrichsii (holotype) and their areolation. (21–22): upper part of branch leaves with longly attenuate and narrowed acuminae, which are flexuose and irregulary crumples. 21 taken from back, “raw” face of specimen; 22 from polished side, as all other photos; 23: median cells of long leaf closer to distal part of pendent branch; they are only slightly porose, with many inperfect pores (seen as rings covered by cell walls); (24) cells closer to leaf apex: pores are totally or almost totaly absent.	2019-06-30	Ignatov, M. S.;Lamkowski, P.;Ignatova, E. A.;Perkovsky, E. E.		Zenodo	biologists	Ignatov, M. S.;Lamkowski, P.;Ignatova, E. A.;Perkovsky, E. E.			
03B5E94FFC47C83842F5F91BFD59F8AA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15427031/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15427031	Figs. 25-29: Sphagnum heinrichsii (holotype): 25: spreading branch B1, with leaves quite strongly covered by mud and detritus (26, 27), and diatoms (28). 29 is a small leaved branch B6a (unclear if it is a continuation of B6 or a separated bench), where leaves also covered by mud and quite damaged. Note a very few pores, mostly confined to upper hyalocyst corners in B6a.	Figs. 25-29: Sphagnum heinrichsii (holotype): 25: spreading branch B1, with leaves quite strongly covered by mud and detritus (26, 27), and diatoms (28). 29 is a small leaved branch B6a (unclear if it is a continuation of B6 or a separated bench), where leaves also covered by mud and quite damaged. Note a very few pores, mostly confined to upper hyalocyst corners in B6a.	2019-06-30	Ignatov, M. S.;Lamkowski, P.;Ignatova, E. A.;Perkovsky, E. E.		Zenodo	biologists	Ignatov, M. S.;Lamkowski, P.;Ignatova, E. A.;Perkovsky, E. E.			
03B5E94FFC47C83842F5F91BFD59F8AA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15427033/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15427033	Figs. 30-35: Sphagnum heinrichsii (holotype): 31: branch with small leaves (B7), with a stem leaf near its base; the lower leaf from this branch have pores very variable in size on cell dorsal surface near leaf apex (33). Stem leaf by its overall habit (30 and 32) looks having not slightly porose cells, as pores are mostly imperfect, without perfo- ration; however under higher magnification and additional transmitted light abundant pores are apparent (34, 35).	Figs. 30-35: Sphagnum heinrichsii (holotype): 31: branch with small leaves (B7), with a stem leaf near its base; the lower leaf from this branch have pores very variable in size on cell dorsal surface near leaf apex (33). Stem leaf by its overall habit (30 and 32) looks having not slightly porose cells, as pores are mostly imperfect, without perfo- ration; however under higher magnification and additional transmitted light abundant pores are apparent (34, 35).	2019-06-30	Ignatov, M. S.;Lamkowski, P.;Ignatova, E. A.;Perkovsky, E. E.		Zenodo	biologists	Ignatov, M. S.;Lamkowski, P.;Ignatova, E. A.;Perkovsky, E. E.			
03B5E94FFC47C83842F5F91BFD59F8AA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15427035/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15427035	Figs. 36–42: Sphagnum heinrichsii (holotype, cut off second part). 30: General view: upper part of branch with large leaves (close up in Fig. 31) and attached (seemingly close to its base) small-leaves branch, partly cut longitudinally. Details of the latter branch are showin in Figs. 32–36: it bears one leaf ca. 1 mm long close to its base (Figs. 32-33), while leaves closer to its tip are only 200 µm long (Fig. 34). Fig 35 shows part of this tiny branch, only 50 µm thick. Fig 36 comprise longitudinal section of small leaf close to branch tip showing fibrils.	Figs. 36–42: Sphagnum heinrichsii (holotype, cut off second part). 30: General view: upper part of branch with large leaves (close up in Fig. 31) and attached (seemingly close to its base) small-leaves branch, partly cut longitudinally. Details of the latter branch are showin in Figs. 32–36: it bears one leaf ca. 1 mm long close to its base (Figs. 32-33), while leaves closer to its tip are only 200 µm long (Fig. 34). Fig 35 shows part of this tiny branch, only 50 µm thick. Fig 36 comprise longitudinal section of small leaf close to branch tip showing fibrils.	2019-06-30	Ignatov, M. S.;Lamkowski, P.;Ignatova, E. A.;Perkovsky, E. E.		Zenodo	biologists	Ignatov, M. S.;Lamkowski, P.;Ignatova, E. A.;Perkovsky, E. E.			
