identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03B92D24FFAC922CFF4627A701DFFE84.text	03B92D24FFAC922CFF4627A701DFFE84.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Atya gabonensis Giebel 1875	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Atya gabonensis</p>
            <p>In total, 42 individuals were sampled: 17 (40.5 %) males and 25 (59.5 %) females. The carapace length of males ranged from 19.54 to 58.49 mm,with an average of 41.26 ± 11.01 mm, while that of females ranged from 25.74 to 46.40 mm, with an average of 39.18 ± 5.28 mm. The overall average was 40.02 ± 7.92 mm.</p>
            <p>The weight of males ranged from 3 to 85 g (mean = 35.6 ± 26.1 g), while that of females ranged from 8 to 44 g (mean = 26.7 ± 18.7 g); the overall average was 30.3 ± 18.7 g. The relationship between carapace length and individual weight was described by the potential equation y = 0.0002CL 3.1895, where y is the weight and CL is the carapace length in mm, with a determination coefficient (R 2) of 97 %. There was no statistically significant difference between sexes for the CL × weight relationship (p &lt;0.05) (Fig. 3).</p>
            <p>The total length of males ranged from 51.4 to 137.6 mm, with an average of 103.0 ± 24.1 mm; females ranged from 75.6 mm to 124.1 mm,with an average of 102.5 ± 12.0 mm. The overall average was 102.7 ± 17.7 mm. The CL × CW relationship was the only one that showed no statistically significant difference between sexes (Tab. 1). The equations that describe each of these relationships, as well as each R², are shown in Figure 4. Both sexes presented negative allometry for the CL × TL relationships and CL × CW and isometry for CL × AL.In other relationships, there were different growth patterns between males and females. Males presented positive allometry for most of relationships with third pereopod articles (CL × MerL, CL × CarL, CL × DacL), while females showed isometry. On the other hand, females presented isometry for CL × PL and CL × PH, and positive allometry for CL × AW, while male presented negative allometry for all these relationships. Males presented isometry for the CL × AmL and CL × AmW relationships and decreasing ratio Am L/W. (Tab. 2, Fig. 4).</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B92D24FFAC922CFF4627A701DFFE84	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Oliveira Guilherme Souza Fabrício Lopes Carvalho Fernando Luis Mantelatto, Abner Carvalho-Batista Caio M. C. A.	Oliveira Guilherme Souza Fabrício Lopes Carvalho Fernando Luis Mantelatto, Abner Carvalho-Batista Caio M. C. A. (2021): Morphometric aspects of two coexisting amphidromous shrimps, Atya gabonensis Giebel, 1875 and Atya scabra (Leach, 1816), in the Paraíba do Sul River, Brazil. Nauplius (e 2021018) 29: 1-14, DOI: 10.1590/2358-2936e2021018, URL: https://doi.org/10.1590/2358-2936e2021018
03B92D24FFAE922EFF4623EA07F2FA06.text	03B92D24FFAE922EFF4623EA07F2FA06.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Atya scabra (Leach 1816)	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Atya scabra</p>
            <p>In total, 16 individuals were sampled: 8 (50 %) males and 8 (50 %) females. Carapace length of males ranging from 29.23 to 43.75 mm, with an average of 38.34 ± 10.61 mm, while that of females ranged from 8.37 to 30.09 mm, with an average of 22.06 ± 10.04 mm. The overall average was 29.19 ± 10.27 mm.</p>
            <p>Male weight ranged from 11 to 39 g (mean = 26 ± 10.27 g), while female weight ranged from 1 to 11 g (average = 6.62 ± 3.92 g); the overall average was 16.31 ± 12.5 g. The relationships between carapace length and weight of males and females were described by the potential equations y = 0.0123CL 2.0247 and y = 0.005CL 2.29748, respectively, where y is the weight and CL is the carapace length in mm (Fig. 5).</p>
            <p>The total length of males ranged from 78.62 to 112.64 mm, with an average of 100.40 ± 24.26 mm. Female length ranged from 31.13 to 81.12 mm, with an average of 64.95 ± 23.15 mm. The overall average was 80.46 ± 23.44 mm. The CL × TL, CL × CW, and CL × DacL relationships showed no statistically significant differences between sexes (Tab. 3). The equations that describe each of these relationships, as well as each R², are shown in Figure 6. Both sexes presented negative allometry for the CL × TL and CL × CW relationships and isometry for CL × ProL, CL × AL and CL × DacL. In other relationships, there were different growth patterns between males and females. Males presented positive allometry for CL × MerL and CL × CarL, while females presented negative allometry for the former and isometry for the second relationship. Females presented isometry for CL × PL, while males presented negative allometry for this relationship. Males presented negative allometry for the CL × AmL and CL × AmW relationships, and constant ratio Am L/W (Tab. 4, Fig. 6).</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B92D24FFAE922EFF4623EA07F2FA06	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Oliveira Guilherme Souza Fabrício Lopes Carvalho Fernando Luis Mantelatto, Abner Carvalho-Batista Caio M. C. A.	Oliveira Guilherme Souza Fabrício Lopes Carvalho Fernando Luis Mantelatto, Abner Carvalho-Batista Caio M. C. A. (2021): Morphometric aspects of two coexisting amphidromous shrimps, Atya gabonensis Giebel, 1875 and Atya scabra (Leach, 1816), in the Paraíba do Sul River, Brazil. Nauplius (e 2021018) 29: 1-14, DOI: 10.1590/2358-2936e2021018, URL: https://doi.org/10.1590/2358-2936e2021018
