taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
196687DDA208FFE757DEFB16FC0DFA8D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16783139/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16783139	Figs 1–16. Species of Vetigastropoda – Figs 1–6. Jumaramaria jumaraensis n. gen., n. sp. – 1–4. Apical, basal, abapertural, and apertural views, ×1.4. – 5. Details of the ramp at higher magnification, ×2.5. – 6. Details of the selenizone ornament, ×4.4. – Figs 7–11. Solarioconulus kachchhensis n. sp., holotype. – 7–10. Abapertural, apical, apertural, and basal views, ×2. – 11. Magnified view of a boring system from the last whorl, ×3. – Figs 12–16. Chartronella belaensis n. sp. holotype. – 12–15. Abapertural, apertural, apical, and basal views, ×3.4. – 16. Details of shell part with spiral ornament remnants, ×11	Figs 1–16. Species of Vetigastropoda – Figs 1–6. Jumaramaria jumaraensis n. gen., n. sp. – 1–4. Apical, basal, abapertural, and apertural views, ×1.4. – 5. Details of the ramp at higher magnification, ×2.5. – 6. Details of the selenizone ornament, ×4.4. – Figs 7–11. Solarioconulus kachchhensis n. sp., holotype. – 7–10. Abapertural, apical, apertural, and basal views, ×2. – 11. Magnified view of a boring system from the last whorl, ×3. – Figs 12–16. Chartronella belaensis n. sp. holotype. – 12–15. Abapertural, apertural, apical, and basal views, ×3.4. – 16. Details of shell part with spiral ornament remnants, ×11	2019-12-31	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar			
196687DDA209FFE057E2F987FCDCF997.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16783139/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16783139	Figs 1–16. Species of Vetigastropoda – Figs 1–6. Jumaramaria jumaraensis n. gen., n. sp. – 1–4. Apical, basal, abapertural, and apertural views, ×1.4. – 5. Details of the ramp at higher magnification, ×2.5. – 6. Details of the selenizone ornament, ×4.4. – Figs 7–11. Solarioconulus kachchhensis n. sp., holotype. – 7–10. Abapertural, apical, apertural, and basal views, ×2. – 11. Magnified view of a boring system from the last whorl, ×3. – Figs 12–16. Chartronella belaensis n. sp. holotype. – 12–15. Abapertural, apertural, apical, and basal views, ×3.4. – 16. Details of shell part with spiral ornament remnants, ×11	Figs 1–16. Species of Vetigastropoda – Figs 1–6. Jumaramaria jumaraensis n. gen., n. sp. – 1–4. Apical, basal, abapertural, and apertural views, ×1.4. – 5. Details of the ramp at higher magnification, ×2.5. – 6. Details of the selenizone ornament, ×4.4. – Figs 7–11. Solarioconulus kachchhensis n. sp., holotype. – 7–10. Abapertural, apical, apertural, and basal views, ×2. – 11. Magnified view of a boring system from the last whorl, ×3. – Figs 12–16. Chartronella belaensis n. sp. holotype. – 12–15. Abapertural, apertural, apical, and basal views, ×3.4. – 16. Details of shell part with spiral ornament remnants, ×11	2019-12-31	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar			
196687DDA20FFFE35402FE21FC3DFE78.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16783139/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16783139	Figs 1–16. Species of Vetigastropoda – Figs 1–6. Jumaramaria jumaraensis n. gen., n. sp. – 1–4. Apical, basal, abapertural, and apertural views, ×1.4. – 5. Details of the ramp at higher magnification, ×2.5. – 6. Details of the selenizone ornament, ×4.4. – Figs 7–11. Solarioconulus kachchhensis n. sp., holotype. – 7–10. Abapertural, apical, apertural, and basal views, ×2. – 11. Magnified view of a boring system from the last whorl, ×3. – Figs 12–16. Chartronella belaensis n. sp. holotype. – 12–15. Abapertural, apertural, apical, and basal views, ×3.4. – 16. Details of shell part with spiral ornament remnants, ×11	Figs 1–16. Species of Vetigastropoda – Figs 1–6. Jumaramaria jumaraensis n. gen., n. sp. – 1–4. Apical, basal, abapertural, and apertural views, ×1.4. – 5. Details of the ramp at higher magnification, ×2.5. – 6. Details of the selenizone ornament, ×4.4. – Figs 7–11. Solarioconulus kachchhensis n. sp., holotype. – 7–10. Abapertural, apical, apertural, and basal views, ×2. – 11. Magnified view of a boring system from the last whorl, ×3. – Figs 12–16. Chartronella belaensis n. sp. holotype. – 12–15. Abapertural, apertural, apical, and basal views, ×3.4. – 16. Details of shell part with spiral ornament remnants, ×11	2019-12-31	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar			
196687DDA20DFFEC5436FDD1FCFFFB5D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15627428/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15627428	Figs 17–30. Species of Vetigastropoda, and Neritimorpha.– Figs 17–23. Planiturbo lerensis n. sp., holotype. – 17–20. Apertural, apical, basal, and abapertural views, ×2.8. – 21. Details of the early shell, ×9. – 22. Details of the basal ornament, ×7.6. – 23. Details of the last whorl ornament, ×7. – Figs 24–28. Planiturbo lerensis n. sp., paratype. – 24–27. Abapertural, apertural, basal, and apical views, ×2.8. – 28. Details of the earliest whorls, ×10.3. – Figs 29–30. Colubrellopsis? sp., abaper- tural, and apical views, ×7.3	Figs 17–30. Species of Vetigastropoda, and Neritimorpha.– Figs 17–23. Planiturbo lerensis n. sp., holotype. – 17–20. Apertural, apical, basal, and abapertural views, ×2.8. – 21. Details of the early shell, ×9. – 22. Details of the basal ornament, ×7.6. – 23. Details of the last whorl ornament, ×7. – Figs 24–28. Planiturbo lerensis n. sp., paratype. – 24–27. Abapertural, apertural, basal, and apical views, ×2.8. – 28. Details of the earliest whorls, ×10.3. – Figs 29–30. Colubrellopsis? sp., abaper- tural, and apical views, ×7.3	2019-12-31	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar			
196687DDA202FFEE540EFA41FF4CFC57.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15627428/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15627428	Figs 17–30. Species of Vetigastropoda, and Neritimorpha.– Figs 17–23. Planiturbo lerensis n. sp., holotype. – 17–20. Apertural, apical, basal, and abapertural views, ×2.8. – 21. Details of the early shell, ×9. – 22. Details of the basal ornament, ×7.6. – 23. Details of the last whorl ornament, ×7. – Figs 24–28. Planiturbo lerensis n. sp., paratype. – 24–27. Abapertural, apertural, basal, and apical views, ×2.8. – 28. Details of the earliest whorls, ×10.3. – Figs 29–30. Colubrellopsis? sp., abaper- tural, and apical views, ×7.3	Figs 17–30. Species of Vetigastropoda, and Neritimorpha.– Figs 17–23. Planiturbo lerensis n. sp., holotype. – 17–20. Apertural, apical, basal, and abapertural views, ×2.8. – 21. Details of the early shell, ×9. – 22. Details of the basal ornament, ×7.6. – 23. Details of the last whorl ornament, ×7. – Figs 24–28. Planiturbo lerensis n. sp., paratype. – 24–27. Abapertural, apertural, basal, and apical views, ×2.8. – 28. Details of the earliest whorls, ×10.3. – Figs 29–30. Colubrellopsis? sp., abaper- tural, and apical views, ×7.3	2019-12-31	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar			
196687DDA200FFEF5439FB04FC26FE47.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16783143/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16783143	Figs 31–59. Caenogastropods 1. – Figs 31–33. Zygopleura sp. – 31. Both specimens, ×5.5. – 32. Details of the earliest preserved whorls, ×13.5.– 33. The last whorl specimen from upper left corner of Fig. 31, ×7. – Figs 34–35. Procerithium (Rhabdocolpus)? aff. lorierei (Hebert et Deslongchamps, 1860). – 34. Full view, ×3.3. – 35. Magnified details, ×7. – Fig. 36. Magnified “best” view of Diatrypesis sp. 1, ×3.8. – Figs 37–40. Diatrypesis sp. 2. – 37–38. BHU2020I 10 specimen. – 37. Side view of full remnant, ×3.7. – 38. Details of pattern on the same specimen, ×7. – 39–40. BHU2020I 11 specimen. – 39. Side view of full remnant, ×4.2. – 40. Riblets on the earliest whorl of the same specimen, ×7.2.– Figs 41–42.Diatrypesis? sp.– 41.“Apertural” view of the available, flattened specimen,×1.7. – 42. Side view,×1.7. – Figs 43–59. Exelissa indiana n. sp.– 43–45. Holotype.– 43–44. Apertural, and abapertural view, ×4. – 45. Ornament details of the holotype in ×7.8 magnification. The holotype in Figs 43–44 and six paratypes (BHU2020I 14–19) in Figs 46–59 are equally magnified (×4) to demonstrate the high size variability among the full-grown shells. The same shells well show also the high shape, and ornament variability. The photo in Fig. 58 (BHU2020I 19) is taken parallel to the most frequent final peristome plane, ×6. – Fig. 59. Perpendicular view to the plane of the trumpet like peristome, ×6.2. Detailed data between the figures, the measurements, and the inventory numbers of the types are supplied above, in the species description	Figs 31–59. Caenogastropods 1. – Figs 31–33. Zygopleura sp. – 31. Both specimens, ×5.5. – 32. Details of the earliest preserved whorls, ×13.5.– 33. The last whorl specimen from upper left corner of Fig. 31, ×7. – Figs 34–35. Procerithium (Rhabdocolpus)? aff. lorierei (Hebert et Deslongchamps, 1860). – 34. Full view, ×3.3. – 35. Magnified details, ×7. – Fig. 36. Magnified “best” view of Diatrypesis sp. 1, ×3.8. – Figs 37–40. Diatrypesis sp. 2. – 37–38. BHU2020I 10 specimen. – 37. Side view of full remnant, ×3.7. – 38. Details of pattern on the same specimen, ×7. – 39–40. BHU2020I 11 specimen. – 39. Side view of full remnant, ×4.2. – 40. Riblets on the earliest whorl of the same specimen, ×7.2.– Figs 41–42.Diatrypesis? sp.– 41.“Apertural” view of the available, flattened specimen,×1.7. – 42. Side view,×1.7. – Figs 43–59. Exelissa indiana n. sp.– 43–45. Holotype.– 43–44. Apertural, and abapertural view, ×4. – 45. Ornament details of the holotype in ×7.8 magnification. The holotype in Figs 43–44 and six paratypes (BHU2020I 14–19) in Figs 46–59 are equally magnified (×4) to demonstrate the high size variability among the full-grown shells. The same shells well show also the high shape, and ornament variability. The photo in Fig. 58 (BHU2020I 19) is taken parallel to the most frequent final peristome plane, ×6. – Fig. 59. Perpendicular view to the plane of the trumpet like peristome, ×6.2. Detailed data between the figures, the measurements, and the inventory numbers of the types are supplied above, in the species description	2019-12-31	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar			
196687DDA201FFE856ECFDF4FCB2FEA2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16783143/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16783143	Figs 31–59. Caenogastropods 1. – Figs 31–33. Zygopleura sp. – 31. Both specimens, ×5.5. – 32. Details of the earliest preserved whorls, ×13.5.– 33. The last whorl specimen from upper left corner of Fig. 31, ×7. – Figs 34–35. Procerithium (Rhabdocolpus)? aff. lorierei (Hebert et Deslongchamps, 1860). – 34. Full view, ×3.3. – 35. Magnified details, ×7. – Fig. 36. Magnified “best” view of Diatrypesis sp. 1, ×3.8. – Figs 37–40. Diatrypesis sp. 2. – 37–38. BHU2020I 10 specimen. – 37. Side view of full remnant, ×3.7. – 38. Details of pattern on the same specimen, ×7. – 39–40. BHU2020I 11 specimen. – 39. Side view of full remnant, ×4.2. – 40. Riblets on the earliest whorl of the same specimen, ×7.2.– Figs 41–42.Diatrypesis? sp.– 41.“Apertural” view of the available, flattened specimen,×1.7. – 42. Side view,×1.7. – Figs 43–59. Exelissa indiana n. sp.– 43–45. Holotype.– 43–44. Apertural, and abapertural view, ×4. – 45. Ornament details of the holotype in ×7.8 magnification. The holotype in Figs 43–44 and six paratypes (BHU2020I 14–19) in Figs 46–59 are equally magnified (×4) to demonstrate the high size variability among the full-grown shells. The same shells well show also the high shape, and ornament variability. The photo in Fig. 58 (BHU2020I 19) is taken parallel to the most frequent final peristome plane, ×6. – Fig. 59. Perpendicular view to the plane of the trumpet like peristome, ×6.2. Detailed data between the figures, the measurements, and the inventory numbers of the types are supplied above, in the species description	Figs 31–59. Caenogastropods 1. – Figs 31–33. Zygopleura sp. – 31. Both specimens, ×5.5. – 32. Details of the earliest preserved whorls, ×13.5.– 33. The last whorl specimen from upper left corner of Fig. 31, ×7. – Figs 34–35. Procerithium (Rhabdocolpus)? aff. lorierei (Hebert et Deslongchamps, 1860). – 34. Full view, ×3.3. – 35. Magnified details, ×7. – Fig. 36. Magnified “best” view of Diatrypesis sp. 1, ×3.8. – Figs 37–40. Diatrypesis sp. 2. – 37–38. BHU2020I 10 specimen. – 37. Side view of full remnant, ×3.7. – 38. Details of pattern on the same specimen, ×7. – 39–40. BHU2020I 11 specimen. – 39. Side view of full remnant, ×4.2. – 40. Riblets on the earliest whorl of the same specimen, ×7.2.– Figs 41–42.Diatrypesis? sp.– 41.“Apertural” view of the available, flattened specimen,×1.7. – 42. Side view,×1.7. – Figs 43–59. Exelissa indiana n. sp.– 43–45. Holotype.– 43–44. Apertural, and abapertural view, ×4. – 45. Ornament details of the holotype in ×7.8 magnification. The holotype in Figs 43–44 and six paratypes (BHU2020I 14–19) in Figs 46–59 are equally magnified (×4) to demonstrate the high size variability among the full-grown shells. The same shells well show also the high shape, and ornament variability. The photo in Fig. 58 (BHU2020I 19) is taken parallel to the most frequent final peristome plane, ×6. – Fig. 59. Perpendicular view to the plane of the trumpet like peristome, ×6.2. Detailed data between the figures, the measurements, and the inventory numbers of the types are supplied above, in the species description	2019-12-31	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar			
196687DDA201FFE856ECFDF4FCB2FEA2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16783139/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16783139	Figs 1–16. Species of Vetigastropoda – Figs 1–6. Jumaramaria jumaraensis n. gen., n. sp. – 1–4. Apical, basal, abapertural, and apertural views, ×1.4. – 5. Details of the ramp at higher magnification, ×2.5. – 6. Details of the selenizone ornament, ×4.4. – Figs 7–11. Solarioconulus kachchhensis n. sp., holotype. – 7–10. Abapertural, apical, apertural, and basal views, ×2. – 11. Magnified view of a boring system from the last whorl, ×3. – Figs 12–16. Chartronella belaensis n. sp. holotype. – 12–15. Abapertural, apertural, apical, and basal views, ×3.4. – 16. Details of shell part with spiral ornament remnants, ×11	Figs 1–16. Species of Vetigastropoda – Figs 1–6. Jumaramaria jumaraensis n. gen., n. sp. – 1–4. Apical, basal, abapertural, and apertural views, ×1.4. – 5. Details of the ramp at higher magnification, ×2.5. – 6. Details of the selenizone ornament, ×4.4. – Figs 7–11. Solarioconulus kachchhensis n. sp., holotype. – 7–10. Abapertural, apical, apertural, and basal views, ×2. – 11. Magnified view of a boring system from the last whorl, ×3. – Figs 12–16. Chartronella belaensis n. sp. holotype. – 12–15. Abapertural, apertural, apical, and basal views, ×3.4. – 16. Details of shell part with spiral ornament remnants, ×11	2019-12-31	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar			
196687DDA206FFE85437FE78FC1DFA67.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16783143/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16783143	Figs 31–59. Caenogastropods 1. – Figs 31–33. Zygopleura sp. – 31. Both specimens, ×5.5. – 32. Details of the earliest preserved whorls, ×13.5.– 33. The last whorl specimen from upper left corner of Fig. 31, ×7. – Figs 34–35. Procerithium (Rhabdocolpus)? aff. lorierei (Hebert et Deslongchamps, 1860). – 34. Full view, ×3.3. – 35. Magnified details, ×7. – Fig. 36. Magnified “best” view of Diatrypesis sp. 1, ×3.8. – Figs 37–40. Diatrypesis sp. 2. – 37–38. BHU2020I 10 specimen. – 37. Side view of full remnant, ×3.7. – 38. Details of pattern on the same specimen, ×7. – 39–40. BHU2020I 11 specimen. – 39. Side view of full remnant, ×4.2. – 40. Riblets on the earliest whorl of the same specimen, ×7.2.– Figs 41–42.Diatrypesis? sp.– 41.“Apertural” view of the available, flattened specimen,×1.7. – 42. Side view,×1.7. – Figs 43–59. Exelissa indiana n. sp.– 43–45. Holotype.– 43–44. Apertural, and abapertural view, ×4. – 45. Ornament details of the holotype in ×7.8 magnification. The holotype in Figs 43–44 and six paratypes (BHU2020I 14–19) in Figs 46–59 are equally magnified (×4) to demonstrate the high size variability among the full-grown shells. The same shells well show also the high shape, and ornament variability. The photo in Fig. 58 (BHU2020I 19) is taken parallel to the most frequent final peristome plane, ×6. – Fig. 59. Perpendicular view to the plane of the trumpet like peristome, ×6.2. Detailed data between the figures, the measurements, and the inventory numbers of the types are supplied above, in the species description	Figs 31–59. Caenogastropods 1. – Figs 31–33. Zygopleura sp. – 31. Both specimens, ×5.5. – 32. Details of the earliest preserved whorls, ×13.5.– 33. The last whorl specimen from upper left corner of Fig. 31, ×7. – Figs 34–35. Procerithium (Rhabdocolpus)? aff. lorierei (Hebert et Deslongchamps, 1860). – 34. Full view, ×3.3. – 35. Magnified details, ×7. – Fig. 36. Magnified “best” view of Diatrypesis sp. 1, ×3.8. – Figs 37–40. Diatrypesis sp. 2. – 37–38. BHU2020I 10 specimen. – 37. Side view of full remnant, ×3.7. – 38. Details of pattern on the same specimen, ×7. – 39–40. BHU2020I 11 specimen. – 39. Side view of full remnant, ×4.2. – 40. Riblets on the earliest whorl of the same specimen, ×7.2.– Figs 41–42.Diatrypesis? sp.– 41.“Apertural” view of the available, flattened specimen,×1.7. – 42. Side view,×1.7. – Figs 43–59. Exelissa indiana n. sp.– 43–45. Holotype.– 43–44. Apertural, and abapertural view, ×4. – 45. Ornament details of the holotype in ×7.8 magnification. The holotype in Figs 43–44 and six paratypes (BHU2020I 14–19) in Figs 46–59 are equally magnified (×4) to demonstrate the high size variability among the full-grown shells. The same shells well show also the high shape, and ornament variability. The photo in Fig. 58 (BHU2020I 19) is taken parallel to the most frequent final peristome plane, ×6. – Fig. 59. Perpendicular view to the plane of the trumpet like peristome, ×6.2. Detailed data between the figures, the measurements, and the inventory numbers of the types are supplied above, in the species description	2019-12-31	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar			
196687DDA206FFE95437FA53FC2CFBE2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16783143/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16783143	Figs 31–59. Caenogastropods 1. – Figs 31–33. Zygopleura sp. – 31. Both specimens, ×5.5. – 32. Details of the earliest preserved whorls, ×13.5.– 33. The last whorl specimen from upper left corner of Fig. 31, ×7. – Figs 34–35. Procerithium (Rhabdocolpus)? aff. lorierei (Hebert et Deslongchamps, 1860). – 34. Full view, ×3.3. – 35. Magnified details, ×7. – Fig. 36. Magnified “best” view of Diatrypesis sp. 1, ×3.8. – Figs 37–40. Diatrypesis sp. 2. – 37–38. BHU2020I 10 specimen. – 37. Side view of full remnant, ×3.7. – 38. Details of pattern on the same specimen, ×7. – 39–40. BHU2020I 11 specimen. – 39. Side view of full remnant, ×4.2. – 40. Riblets on the earliest whorl of the same specimen, ×7.2.– Figs 41–42.Diatrypesis? sp.– 41.“Apertural” view of the available, flattened specimen,×1.7. – 42. Side view,×1.7. – Figs 43–59. Exelissa indiana n. sp.– 43–45. Holotype.– 43–44. Apertural, and abapertural view, ×4. – 45. Ornament details of the holotype in ×7.8 magnification. The holotype in Figs 43–44 and six paratypes (BHU2020I 14–19) in Figs 46–59 are equally magnified (×4) to demonstrate the high size variability among the full-grown shells. The same shells well show also the high shape, and ornament variability. The photo in Fig. 58 (BHU2020I 19) is taken parallel to the most frequent final peristome plane, ×6. – Fig. 59. Perpendicular view to the plane of the trumpet like peristome, ×6.2. Detailed data between the figures, the measurements, and the inventory numbers of the types are supplied above, in the species description	Figs 31–59. Caenogastropods 1. – Figs 31–33. Zygopleura sp. – 31. Both specimens, ×5.5. – 32. Details of the earliest preserved whorls, ×13.5.– 33. The last whorl specimen from upper left corner of Fig. 31, ×7. – Figs 34–35. Procerithium (Rhabdocolpus)? aff. lorierei (Hebert et Deslongchamps, 1860). – 34. Full view, ×3.3. – 35. Magnified details, ×7. – Fig. 36. Magnified “best” view of Diatrypesis sp. 1, ×3.8. – Figs 37–40. Diatrypesis sp. 2. – 37–38. BHU2020I 10 specimen. – 37. Side view of full remnant, ×3.7. – 38. Details of pattern on the same specimen, ×7. – 39–40. BHU2020I 11 specimen. – 39. Side view of full remnant, ×4.2. – 40. Riblets on the earliest whorl of the same specimen, ×7.2.– Figs 41–42.Diatrypesis? sp.– 41.“Apertural” view of the available, flattened specimen,×1.7. – 42. Side view,×1.7. – Figs 43–59. Exelissa indiana n. sp.– 43–45. Holotype.– 43–44. Apertural, and abapertural view, ×4. – 45. Ornament details of the holotype in ×7.8 magnification. The holotype in Figs 43–44 and six paratypes (BHU2020I 14–19) in Figs 46–59 are equally magnified (×4) to demonstrate the high size variability among the full-grown shells. The same shells well show also the high shape, and ornament variability. The photo in Fig. 58 (BHU2020I 19) is taken parallel to the most frequent final peristome plane, ×6. – Fig. 59. Perpendicular view to the plane of the trumpet like peristome, ×6.2. Detailed data between the figures, the measurements, and the inventory numbers of the types are supplied above, in the species description	2019-12-31	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar			
196687DDA207FFE95445FBD0FC0DF9B9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16783143/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16783143	Figs 31–59. Caenogastropods 1. – Figs 31–33. Zygopleura sp. – 31. Both specimens, ×5.5. – 32. Details of the earliest preserved whorls, ×13.5.– 33. The last whorl specimen from upper left corner of Fig. 31, ×7. – Figs 34–35. Procerithium (Rhabdocolpus)? aff. lorierei (Hebert et Deslongchamps, 1860). – 34. Full view, ×3.3. – 35. Magnified details, ×7. – Fig. 36. Magnified “best” view of Diatrypesis sp. 1, ×3.8. – Figs 37–40. Diatrypesis sp. 2. – 37–38. BHU2020I 10 specimen. – 37. Side view of full remnant, ×3.7. – 38. Details of pattern on the same specimen, ×7. – 39–40. BHU2020I 11 specimen. – 39. Side view of full remnant, ×4.2. – 40. Riblets on the earliest whorl of the same specimen, ×7.2.– Figs 41–42.Diatrypesis? sp.– 41.“Apertural” view of the available, flattened specimen,×1.7. – 42. Side view,×1.7. – Figs 43–59. Exelissa indiana n. sp.– 43–45. Holotype.– 43–44. Apertural, and abapertural view, ×4. – 45. Ornament details of the holotype in ×7.8 magnification. The holotype in Figs 43–44 and six paratypes (BHU2020I 14–19) in Figs 46–59 are equally magnified (×4) to demonstrate the high size variability among the full-grown shells. The same shells well show also the high shape, and ornament variability. The photo in Fig. 58 (BHU2020I 19) is taken parallel to the most frequent final peristome plane, ×6. – Fig. 59. Perpendicular view to the plane of the trumpet like peristome, ×6.2. Detailed data between the figures, the measurements, and the inventory numbers of the types are supplied above, in the species description	Figs 31–59. Caenogastropods 1. – Figs 31–33. Zygopleura sp. – 31. Both specimens, ×5.5. – 32. Details of the earliest preserved whorls, ×13.5.– 33. The last whorl specimen from upper left corner of Fig. 31, ×7. – Figs 34–35. Procerithium (Rhabdocolpus)? aff. lorierei (Hebert et Deslongchamps, 1860). – 34. Full view, ×3.3. – 35. Magnified details, ×7. – Fig. 36. Magnified “best” view of Diatrypesis sp. 1, ×3.8. – Figs 37–40. Diatrypesis sp. 2. – 37–38. BHU2020I 10 specimen. – 37. Side view of full remnant, ×3.7. – 38. Details of pattern on the same specimen, ×7. – 39–40. BHU2020I 11 specimen. – 39. Side view of full remnant, ×4.2. – 40. Riblets on the earliest whorl of the same specimen, ×7.2.– Figs 41–42.Diatrypesis? sp.– 41.“Apertural” view of the available, flattened specimen,×1.7. – 42. Side view,×1.7. – Figs 43–59. Exelissa indiana n. sp.– 43–45. Holotype.– 43–44. Apertural, and abapertural view, ×4. – 45. Ornament details of the holotype in ×7.8 magnification. The holotype in Figs 43–44 and six paratypes (BHU2020I 14–19) in Figs 46–59 are equally magnified (×4) to demonstrate the high size variability among the full-grown shells. The same shells well show also the high shape, and ornament variability. The photo in Fig. 58 (BHU2020I 19) is taken parallel to the most frequent final peristome plane, ×6. – Fig. 59. Perpendicular view to the plane of the trumpet like peristome, ×6.2. Detailed data between the figures, the measurements, and the inventory numbers of the types are supplied above, in the species description	2019-12-31	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar			
196687DDA204FFF55416FE21FB99FCD8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16783143/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16783143	Figs 31–59. Caenogastropods 1. – Figs 31–33. Zygopleura sp. – 31. Both specimens, ×5.5. – 32. Details of the earliest preserved whorls, ×13.5.– 33. The last whorl specimen from upper left corner of Fig. 31, ×7. – Figs 34–35. Procerithium (Rhabdocolpus)? aff. lorierei (Hebert et Deslongchamps, 1860). – 34. Full view, ×3.3. – 35. Magnified details, ×7. – Fig. 36. Magnified “best” view of Diatrypesis sp. 1, ×3.8. – Figs 37–40. Diatrypesis sp. 2. – 37–38. BHU2020I 10 specimen. – 37. Side view of full remnant, ×3.7. – 38. Details of pattern on the same specimen, ×7. – 39–40. BHU2020I 11 specimen. – 39. Side view of full remnant, ×4.2. – 40. Riblets on the earliest whorl of the same specimen, ×7.2.– Figs 41–42.Diatrypesis? sp.– 41.“Apertural” view of the available, flattened specimen,×1.7. – 42. Side view,×1.7. – Figs 43–59. Exelissa indiana n. sp.– 43–45. Holotype.– 43–44. Apertural, and abapertural view, ×4. – 45. Ornament details of the holotype in ×7.8 magnification. The holotype in Figs 43–44 and six paratypes (BHU2020I 14–19) in Figs 46–59 are equally magnified (×4) to demonstrate the high size variability among the full-grown shells. The same shells well show also the high shape, and ornament variability. The photo in Fig. 58 (BHU2020I 19) is taken parallel to the most frequent final peristome plane, ×6. – Fig. 59. Perpendicular view to the plane of the trumpet like peristome, ×6.2. Detailed data between the figures, the measurements, and the inventory numbers of the types are supplied above, in the species description	Figs 31–59. Caenogastropods 1. – Figs 31–33. Zygopleura sp. – 31. Both specimens, ×5.5. – 32. Details of the earliest preserved whorls, ×13.5.– 33. The last whorl specimen from upper left corner of Fig. 31, ×7. – Figs 34–35. Procerithium (Rhabdocolpus)? aff. lorierei (Hebert et Deslongchamps, 1860). – 34. Full view, ×3.3. – 35. Magnified details, ×7. – Fig. 36. Magnified “best” view of Diatrypesis sp. 1, ×3.8. – Figs 37–40. Diatrypesis sp. 2. – 37–38. BHU2020I 10 specimen. – 37. Side view of full remnant, ×3.7. – 38. Details of pattern on the same specimen, ×7. – 39–40. BHU2020I 11 specimen. – 39. Side view of full remnant, ×4.2. – 40. Riblets on the earliest whorl of the same specimen, ×7.2.– Figs 41–42.Diatrypesis? sp.– 41.“Apertural” view of the available, flattened specimen,×1.7. – 42. Side view,×1.7. – Figs 43–59. Exelissa indiana n. sp.– 43–45. Holotype.– 43–44. Apertural, and abapertural view, ×4. – 45. Ornament details of the holotype in ×7.8 magnification. The holotype in Figs 43–44 and six paratypes (BHU2020I 14–19) in Figs 46–59 are equally magnified (×4) to demonstrate the high size variability among the full-grown shells. The same shells well show also the high shape, and ornament variability. The photo in Fig. 58 (BHU2020I 19) is taken parallel to the most frequent final peristome plane, ×6. – Fig. 59. Perpendicular view to the plane of the trumpet like peristome, ×6.2. Detailed data between the figures, the measurements, and the inventory numbers of the types are supplied above, in the species description	2019-12-31	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar			
196687DDA204FFF55416FE21FB99FCD8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16783139/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16783139	Figs 1–16. Species of Vetigastropoda – Figs 1–6. Jumaramaria jumaraensis n. gen., n. sp. – 1–4. Apical, basal, abapertural, and apertural views, ×1.4. – 5. Details of the ramp at higher magnification, ×2.5. – 6. Details of the selenizone ornament, ×4.4. – Figs 7–11. Solarioconulus kachchhensis n. sp., holotype. – 7–10. Abapertural, apical, apertural, and basal views, ×2. – 11. Magnified view of a boring system from the last whorl, ×3. – Figs 12–16. Chartronella belaensis n. sp. holotype. – 12–15. Abapertural, apertural, apical, and basal views, ×3.4. – 16. Details of shell part with spiral ornament remnants, ×11	Figs 1–16. Species of Vetigastropoda – Figs 1–6. Jumaramaria jumaraensis n. gen., n. sp. – 1–4. Apical, basal, abapertural, and apertural views, ×1.4. – 5. Details of the ramp at higher magnification, ×2.5. – 6. Details of the selenizone ornament, ×4.4. – Figs 7–11. Solarioconulus kachchhensis n. sp., holotype. – 7–10. Abapertural, apical, apertural, and basal views, ×2. – 11. Magnified view of a boring system from the last whorl, ×3. – Figs 12–16. Chartronella belaensis n. sp. holotype. – 12–15. Abapertural, apertural, apical, and basal views, ×3.4. – 16. Details of shell part with spiral ornament remnants, ×11	2019-12-31	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar			
196687DDA21BFFF557D3FCB5FBAEF995.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15627430/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15627430	Figs 60–66. Caenogastropods 2. – Fig. 60. A piece of naturally prepared bed plane with a fossil assemblage, containing also new species for the Kachchh Callovian fauna; letters indicate position of the gastropod specimens. – Figs 61–63. Exelissa aff. strangulata (d’Archiac, 1840). – 61. Apertural view, ×4.4. – 62. Abapertural view, ×5. – 63. Apertural view, ×3.5. – Figs 64–65. Exelissa? sp, ×8.8. – 64. The original view on another broken rock surface. – 65. A variety of Fig. 64, to make it more digestible through reflection, and inversion of colour. – Fig. 66. Cerithioidea? sp., a poorly preserved specimen, indicating a siphonostomatous species,also new for the Callovian fauna of Kachchh, ×3.4	Figs 60–66. Caenogastropods 2. – Fig. 60. A piece of naturally prepared bed plane with a fossil assemblage, containing also new species for the Kachchh Callovian fauna; letters indicate position of the gastropod specimens. – Figs 61–63. Exelissa aff. strangulata (d’Archiac, 1840). – 61. Apertural view, ×4.4. – 62. Abapertural view, ×5. – 63. Apertural view, ×3.5. – Figs 64–65. Exelissa? sp, ×8.8. – 64. The original view on another broken rock surface. – 65. A variety of Fig. 64, to make it more digestible through reflection, and inversion of colour. – Fig. 66. Cerithioidea? sp., a poorly preserved specimen, indicating a siphonostomatous species,also new for the Callovian fauna of Kachchh, ×3.4	2019-12-31	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar			
196687DDA21BFFF557D3FCB5FBAEF995.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16783139/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16783139	Figs 1–16. Species of Vetigastropoda – Figs 1–6. Jumaramaria jumaraensis n. gen., n. sp. – 1–4. Apical, basal, abapertural, and apertural views, ×1.4. – 5. Details of the ramp at higher magnification, ×2.5. – 6. Details of the selenizone ornament, ×4.4. – Figs 7–11. Solarioconulus kachchhensis n. sp., holotype. – 7–10. Abapertural, apical, apertural, and basal views, ×2. – 11. Magnified view of a boring system from the last whorl, ×3. – Figs 12–16. Chartronella belaensis n. sp. holotype. – 12–15. Abapertural, apertural, apical, and basal views, ×3.4. – 16. Details of shell part with spiral ornament remnants, ×11	Figs 1–16. Species of Vetigastropoda – Figs 1–6. Jumaramaria jumaraensis n. gen., n. sp. – 1–4. Apical, basal, abapertural, and apertural views, ×1.4. – 5. Details of the ramp at higher magnification, ×2.5. – 6. Details of the selenizone ornament, ×4.4. – Figs 7–11. Solarioconulus kachchhensis n. sp., holotype. – 7–10. Abapertural, apical, apertural, and basal views, ×2. – 11. Magnified view of a boring system from the last whorl, ×3. – Figs 12–16. Chartronella belaensis n. sp. holotype. – 12–15. Abapertural, apertural, apical, and basal views, ×3.4. – 16. Details of shell part with spiral ornament remnants, ×11	2019-12-31	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar			
196687DDA21BFFF557D3FCB5FBAEF995.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16783143/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16783143	Figs 31–59. Caenogastropods 1. – Figs 31–33. Zygopleura sp. – 31. Both specimens, ×5.5. – 32. Details of the earliest preserved whorls, ×13.5.– 33. The last whorl specimen from upper left corner of Fig. 31, ×7. – Figs 34–35. Procerithium (Rhabdocolpus)? aff. lorierei (Hebert et Deslongchamps, 1860). – 34. Full view, ×3.3. – 35. Magnified details, ×7. – Fig. 36. Magnified “best” view of Diatrypesis sp. 1, ×3.8. – Figs 37–40. Diatrypesis sp. 2. – 37–38. BHU2020I 10 specimen. – 37. Side view of full remnant, ×3.7. – 38. Details of pattern on the same specimen, ×7. – 39–40. BHU2020I 11 specimen. – 39. Side view of full remnant, ×4.2. – 40. Riblets on the earliest whorl of the same specimen, ×7.2.– Figs 41–42.Diatrypesis? sp.– 41.“Apertural” view of the available, flattened specimen,×1.7. – 42. Side view,×1.7. – Figs 43–59. Exelissa indiana n. sp.– 43–45. Holotype.– 43–44. Apertural, and abapertural view, ×4. – 45. Ornament details of the holotype in ×7.8 magnification. The holotype in Figs 43–44 and six paratypes (BHU2020I 14–19) in Figs 46–59 are equally magnified (×4) to demonstrate the high size variability among the full-grown shells. The same shells well show also the high shape, and ornament variability. The photo in Fig. 58 (BHU2020I 19) is taken parallel to the most frequent final peristome plane, ×6. – Fig. 59. Perpendicular view to the plane of the trumpet like peristome, ×6.2. Detailed data between the figures, the measurements, and the inventory numbers of the types are supplied above, in the species description	Figs 31–59. Caenogastropods 1. – Figs 31–33. Zygopleura sp. – 31. Both specimens, ×5.5. – 32. Details of the earliest preserved whorls, ×13.5.– 33. The last whorl specimen from upper left corner of Fig. 31, ×7. – Figs 34–35. Procerithium (Rhabdocolpus)? aff. lorierei (Hebert et Deslongchamps, 1860). – 34. Full view, ×3.3. – 35. Magnified details, ×7. – Fig. 36. Magnified “best” view of Diatrypesis sp. 1, ×3.8. – Figs 37–40. Diatrypesis sp. 2. – 37–38. BHU2020I 10 specimen. – 37. Side view of full remnant, ×3.7. – 38. Details of pattern on the same specimen, ×7. – 39–40. BHU2020I 11 specimen. – 39. Side view of full remnant, ×4.2. – 40. Riblets on the earliest whorl of the same specimen, ×7.2.– Figs 41–42.Diatrypesis? sp.– 41.“Apertural” view of the available, flattened specimen,×1.7. – 42. Side view,×1.7. – Figs 43–59. Exelissa indiana n. sp.– 43–45. Holotype.– 43–44. Apertural, and abapertural view, ×4. – 45. Ornament details of the holotype in ×7.8 magnification. The holotype in Figs 43–44 and six paratypes (BHU2020I 14–19) in Figs 46–59 are equally magnified (×4) to demonstrate the high size variability among the full-grown shells. The same shells well show also the high shape, and ornament variability. The photo in Fig. 58 (BHU2020I 19) is taken parallel to the most frequent final peristome plane, ×6. – Fig. 59. Perpendicular view to the plane of the trumpet like peristome, ×6.2. Detailed data between the figures, the measurements, and the inventory numbers of the types are supplied above, in the species description	2019-12-31	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar			
196687DDA218FFF6542FFE82FCB2FB4A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15627430/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15627430	Figs 60–66. Caenogastropods 2. – Fig. 60. A piece of naturally prepared bed plane with a fossil assemblage, containing also new species for the Kachchh Callovian fauna; letters indicate position of the gastropod specimens. – Figs 61–63. Exelissa aff. strangulata (d’Archiac, 1840). – 61. Apertural view, ×4.4. – 62. Abapertural view, ×5. – 63. Apertural view, ×3.5. – Figs 64–65. Exelissa? sp, ×8.8. – 64. The original view on another broken rock surface. – 65. A variety of Fig. 64, to make it more digestible through reflection, and inversion of colour. – Fig. 66. Cerithioidea? sp., a poorly preserved specimen, indicating a siphonostomatous species,also new for the Callovian fauna of Kachchh, ×3.4	Figs 60–66. Caenogastropods 2. – Fig. 60. A piece of naturally prepared bed plane with a fossil assemblage, containing also new species for the Kachchh Callovian fauna; letters indicate position of the gastropod specimens. – Figs 61–63. Exelissa aff. strangulata (d’Archiac, 1840). – 61. Apertural view, ×4.4. – 62. Abapertural view, ×5. – 63. Apertural view, ×3.5. – Figs 64–65. Exelissa? sp, ×8.8. – 64. The original view on another broken rock surface. – 65. A variety of Fig. 64, to make it more digestible through reflection, and inversion of colour. – Fig. 66. Cerithioidea? sp., a poorly preserved specimen, indicating a siphonostomatous species,also new for the Callovian fauna of Kachchh, ×3.4	2019-12-31	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar			
196687DDA218FFF75780FB27FB96FEA2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15627430/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15627430	Figs 60–66. Caenogastropods 2. – Fig. 60. A piece of naturally prepared bed plane with a fossil assemblage, containing also new species for the Kachchh Callovian fauna; letters indicate position of the gastropod specimens. – Figs 61–63. Exelissa aff. strangulata (d’Archiac, 1840). – 61. Apertural view, ×4.4. – 62. Abapertural view, ×5. – 63. Apertural view, ×3.5. – Figs 64–65. Exelissa? sp, ×8.8. – 64. The original view on another broken rock surface. – 65. A variety of Fig. 64, to make it more digestible through reflection, and inversion of colour. – Fig. 66. Cerithioidea? sp., a poorly preserved specimen, indicating a siphonostomatous species,also new for the Callovian fauna of Kachchh, ×3.4	Figs 60–66. Caenogastropods 2. – Fig. 60. A piece of naturally prepared bed plane with a fossil assemblage, containing also new species for the Kachchh Callovian fauna; letters indicate position of the gastropod specimens. – Figs 61–63. Exelissa aff. strangulata (d’Archiac, 1840). – 61. Apertural view, ×4.4. – 62. Abapertural view, ×5. – 63. Apertural view, ×3.5. – Figs 64–65. Exelissa? sp, ×8.8. – 64. The original view on another broken rock surface. – 65. A variety of Fig. 64, to make it more digestible through reflection, and inversion of colour. – Fig. 66. Cerithioidea? sp., a poorly preserved specimen, indicating a siphonostomatous species,also new for the Callovian fauna of Kachchh, ×3.4	2019-12-31	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar			
196687DDA21EFFF05421FE22FCDBFCFD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16783147/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16783147	Figs 67–83. Further caenogastropods and some acteonoideans. – Figs 67–74. Two deformed specimens of Diarthema sp. – 67–70. BHU2020I 306 specimen in apical, flattened apertural, abapertural views, and an image parallel to the compressed aperture, ×3.9. – 71–74. BHU2029I 307 specimen in apical,“apertural”, “abapertural”, and in peristome planeviews,×4.2.– Fig. 75. Cuphotifer? sp., the only informative view, ×10. – Figs 76–77. Purpurina sp. in apertural and abapertural positions, ×2.8. – Fig. 78. Parvulactaeon? sp., the most informative view, ×7. – Fig. 79. Mathilda? sp. on loose matrix surface, ×8.7. – Figs 80–83. Sulcoacteon haboensis n. sp., holotype. – 80–82. Apertural, abapertural and apical views; oblique apertural view, ×7.3. – 83. Inner face of columellar lip, bearing also vertical fissure of umbilicus, ×7.3; Fig. 80 shows outline of the entire, very thin outer lip and the shape of the aperture. This outer lip suffered subsequently damages (Fig. 83) dur- ing the cleaning of the inner lip region, bearing diagnostic characters	Figs 67–83. Further caenogastropods and some acteonoideans. – Figs 67–74. Two deformed specimens of Diarthema sp. – 67–70. BHU2020I 306 specimen in apical, flattened apertural, abapertural views, and an image parallel to the compressed aperture, ×3.9. – 71–74. BHU2029I 307 specimen in apical,“apertural”, “abapertural”, and in peristome planeviews,×4.2.– Fig. 75. Cuphotifer? sp., the only informative view, ×10. – Figs 76–77. Purpurina sp. in apertural and abapertural positions, ×2.8. – Fig. 78. Parvulactaeon? sp., the most informative view, ×7. – Fig. 79. Mathilda? sp. on loose matrix surface, ×8.7. – Figs 80–83. Sulcoacteon haboensis n. sp., holotype. – 80–82. Apertural, abapertural and apical views; oblique apertural view, ×7.3. – 83. Inner face of columellar lip, bearing also vertical fissure of umbilicus, ×7.3; Fig. 80 shows outline of the entire, very thin outer lip and the shape of the aperture. This outer lip suffered subsequently damages (Fig. 83) dur- ing the cleaning of the inner lip region, bearing diagnostic characters	2019-12-31	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar			
196687DDA21FFFF25449FBAAFC20FE1D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16783147/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16783147	Figs 67–83. Further caenogastropods and some acteonoideans. – Figs 67–74. Two deformed specimens of Diarthema sp. – 67–70. BHU2020I 306 specimen in apical, flattened apertural, abapertural views, and an image parallel to the compressed aperture, ×3.9. – 71–74. BHU2029I 307 specimen in apical,“apertural”, “abapertural”, and in peristome planeviews,×4.2.– Fig. 75. Cuphotifer? sp., the only informative view, ×10. – Figs 76–77. Purpurina sp. in apertural and abapertural positions, ×2.8. – Fig. 78. Parvulactaeon? sp., the most informative view, ×7. – Fig. 79. Mathilda? sp. on loose matrix surface, ×8.7. – Figs 80–83. Sulcoacteon haboensis n. sp., holotype. – 80–82. Apertural, abapertural and apical views; oblique apertural view, ×7.3. – 83. Inner face of columellar lip, bearing also vertical fissure of umbilicus, ×7.3; Fig. 80 shows outline of the entire, very thin outer lip and the shape of the aperture. This outer lip suffered subsequently damages (Fig. 83) dur- ing the cleaning of the inner lip region, bearing diagnostic characters	Figs 67–83. Further caenogastropods and some acteonoideans. – Figs 67–74. Two deformed specimens of Diarthema sp. – 67–70. BHU2020I 306 specimen in apical, flattened apertural, abapertural views, and an image parallel to the compressed aperture, ×3.9. – 71–74. BHU2029I 307 specimen in apical,“apertural”, “abapertural”, and in peristome planeviews,×4.2.– Fig. 75. Cuphotifer? sp., the only informative view, ×10. – Figs 76–77. Purpurina sp. in apertural and abapertural positions, ×2.8. – Fig. 78. Parvulactaeon? sp., the most informative view, ×7. – Fig. 79. Mathilda? sp. on loose matrix surface, ×8.7. – Figs 80–83. Sulcoacteon haboensis n. sp., holotype. – 80–82. Apertural, abapertural and apical views; oblique apertural view, ×7.3. – 83. Inner face of columellar lip, bearing also vertical fissure of umbilicus, ×7.3; Fig. 80 shows outline of the entire, very thin outer lip and the shape of the aperture. This outer lip suffered subsequently damages (Fig. 83) dur- ing the cleaning of the inner lip region, bearing diagnostic characters	2019-12-31	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar			
196687DDA21CFFF2540BFD4AFCFCFAA1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16783147/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16783147	Figs 67–83. Further caenogastropods and some acteonoideans. – Figs 67–74. Two deformed specimens of Diarthema sp. – 67–70. BHU2020I 306 specimen in apical, flattened apertural, abapertural views, and an image parallel to the compressed aperture, ×3.9. – 71–74. BHU2029I 307 specimen in apical,“apertural”, “abapertural”, and in peristome planeviews,×4.2.– Fig. 75. Cuphotifer? sp., the only informative view, ×10. – Figs 76–77. Purpurina sp. in apertural and abapertural positions, ×2.8. – Fig. 78. Parvulactaeon? sp., the most informative view, ×7. – Fig. 79. Mathilda? sp. on loose matrix surface, ×8.7. – Figs 80–83. Sulcoacteon haboensis n. sp., holotype. – 80–82. Apertural, abapertural and apical views; oblique apertural view, ×7.3. – 83. Inner face of columellar lip, bearing also vertical fissure of umbilicus, ×7.3; Fig. 80 shows outline of the entire, very thin outer lip and the shape of the aperture. This outer lip suffered subsequently damages (Fig. 83) dur- ing the cleaning of the inner lip region, bearing diagnostic characters	Figs 67–83. Further caenogastropods and some acteonoideans. – Figs 67–74. Two deformed specimens of Diarthema sp. – 67–70. BHU2020I 306 specimen in apical, flattened apertural, abapertural views, and an image parallel to the compressed aperture, ×3.9. – 71–74. BHU2029I 307 specimen in apical,“apertural”, “abapertural”, and in peristome planeviews,×4.2.– Fig. 75. Cuphotifer? sp., the only informative view, ×10. – Figs 76–77. Purpurina sp. in apertural and abapertural positions, ×2.8. – Fig. 78. Parvulactaeon? sp., the most informative view, ×7. – Fig. 79. Mathilda? sp. on loose matrix surface, ×8.7. – Figs 80–83. Sulcoacteon haboensis n. sp., holotype. – 80–82. Apertural, abapertural and apical views; oblique apertural view, ×7.3. – 83. Inner face of columellar lip, bearing also vertical fissure of umbilicus, ×7.3; Fig. 80 shows outline of the entire, very thin outer lip and the shape of the aperture. This outer lip suffered subsequently damages (Fig. 83) dur- ing the cleaning of the inner lip region, bearing diagnostic characters	2019-12-31	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar			
196687DDA21CFFFD57C8FA64FC76FCD8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16783147/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16783147	Figs 67–83. Further caenogastropods and some acteonoideans. – Figs 67–74. Two deformed specimens of Diarthema sp. – 67–70. BHU2020I 306 specimen in apical, flattened apertural, abapertural views, and an image parallel to the compressed aperture, ×3.9. – 71–74. BHU2029I 307 specimen in apical,“apertural”, “abapertural”, and in peristome planeviews,×4.2.– Fig. 75. Cuphotifer? sp., the only informative view, ×10. – Figs 76–77. Purpurina sp. in apertural and abapertural positions, ×2.8. – Fig. 78. Parvulactaeon? sp., the most informative view, ×7. – Fig. 79. Mathilda? sp. on loose matrix surface, ×8.7. – Figs 80–83. Sulcoacteon haboensis n. sp., holotype. – 80–82. Apertural, abapertural and apical views; oblique apertural view, ×7.3. – 83. Inner face of columellar lip, bearing also vertical fissure of umbilicus, ×7.3; Fig. 80 shows outline of the entire, very thin outer lip and the shape of the aperture. This outer lip suffered subsequently damages (Fig. 83) dur- ing the cleaning of the inner lip region, bearing diagnostic characters	Figs 67–83. Further caenogastropods and some acteonoideans. – Figs 67–74. Two deformed specimens of Diarthema sp. – 67–70. BHU2020I 306 specimen in apical, flattened apertural, abapertural views, and an image parallel to the compressed aperture, ×3.9. – 71–74. BHU2029I 307 specimen in apical,“apertural”, “abapertural”, and in peristome planeviews,×4.2.– Fig. 75. Cuphotifer? sp., the only informative view, ×10. – Figs 76–77. Purpurina sp. in apertural and abapertural positions, ×2.8. – Fig. 78. Parvulactaeon? sp., the most informative view, ×7. – Fig. 79. Mathilda? sp. on loose matrix surface, ×8.7. – Figs 80–83. Sulcoacteon haboensis n. sp., holotype. – 80–82. Apertural, abapertural and apical views; oblique apertural view, ×7.3. – 83. Inner face of columellar lip, bearing also vertical fissure of umbilicus, ×7.3; Fig. 80 shows outline of the entire, very thin outer lip and the shape of the aperture. This outer lip suffered subsequently damages (Fig. 83) dur- ing the cleaning of the inner lip region, bearing diagnostic characters	2019-12-31	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar			
196687DDA213FFFD5473FC54FCCAFA18.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/16783147/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16783147	Figs 67–83. Further caenogastropods and some acteonoideans. – Figs 67–74. Two deformed specimens of Diarthema sp. – 67–70. BHU2020I 306 specimen in apical, flattened apertural, abapertural views, and an image parallel to the compressed aperture, ×3.9. – 71–74. BHU2029I 307 specimen in apical,“apertural”, “abapertural”, and in peristome planeviews,×4.2.– Fig. 75. Cuphotifer? sp., the only informative view, ×10. – Figs 76–77. Purpurina sp. in apertural and abapertural positions, ×2.8. – Fig. 78. Parvulactaeon? sp., the most informative view, ×7. – Fig. 79. Mathilda? sp. on loose matrix surface, ×8.7. – Figs 80–83. Sulcoacteon haboensis n. sp., holotype. – 80–82. Apertural, abapertural and apical views; oblique apertural view, ×7.3. – 83. Inner face of columellar lip, bearing also vertical fissure of umbilicus, ×7.3; Fig. 80 shows outline of the entire, very thin outer lip and the shape of the aperture. This outer lip suffered subsequently damages (Fig. 83) dur- ing the cleaning of the inner lip region, bearing diagnostic characters	Figs 67–83. Further caenogastropods and some acteonoideans. – Figs 67–74. Two deformed specimens of Diarthema sp. – 67–70. BHU2020I 306 specimen in apical, flattened apertural, abapertural views, and an image parallel to the compressed aperture, ×3.9. – 71–74. BHU2029I 307 specimen in apical,“apertural”, “abapertural”, and in peristome planeviews,×4.2.– Fig. 75. Cuphotifer? sp., the only informative view, ×10. – Figs 76–77. Purpurina sp. in apertural and abapertural positions, ×2.8. – Fig. 78. Parvulactaeon? sp., the most informative view, ×7. – Fig. 79. Mathilda? sp. on loose matrix surface, ×8.7. – Figs 80–83. Sulcoacteon haboensis n. sp., holotype. – 80–82. Apertural, abapertural and apical views; oblique apertural view, ×7.3. – 83. Inner face of columellar lip, bearing also vertical fissure of umbilicus, ×7.3; Fig. 80 shows outline of the entire, very thin outer lip and the shape of the aperture. This outer lip suffered subsequently damages (Fig. 83) dur- ing the cleaning of the inner lip region, bearing diagnostic characters	2019-12-31	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar		Zenodo	biologists	Szabó, János;Jaitly, Anand Kumar			
